[1. Call to Order / Roll Call. ]
          [00:00:07]
          WELCOME TO THE APRIL 21ST, 2026 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING. THE MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER AT 6:33 P.M. PLEASE NOTE FOR THE RECORD THAT ALL COMMISSIONERS ARE PRESENT THIS EVENING, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF COMMISSIONER CARSON ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION, CITIZENS, CITIZENS AND VISITORS ATTENDING PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION MEETING SHALL OBSERVE THE SAME RULES OF PROPRIETY, DECORUM AND GOOD CONDUCT APPLICABLE TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. ANY PERSON MAKING PERSONAL AND PERTINENT, PROFANE AND SLANDEROUS REMARKS, OR BECOMES BOISTEROUS WHILE ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION OR WHILE ATTENDING THE MEETING SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ROOM. IF SO DIRECTED BY THE COMMISSION OR PRESIDING OFFICER, AND THE PERSON SHALL BE BARRED FROM FURTHER AUDIENCE BEFORE THE COMMISSION DURING THAT SESSION OF THE MEETING. DISRUPTION OF A PUBLIC MEETING COULD CONDUCT A VIOLATION OF SECTION 42.05 OF THE TEXAS PENAL CODE. THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. EVERYONE, PLEASE RISE AND JOIN ME WITH THE PLEDGE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS 
          [3. America 250. ]
ITEM THREE, AMERICA 250. TO HONOR THE 250TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE FOUNDING OF AMERICA. TOWN STAFF WILL BRIEFLY DISCUSS A TOPIC RELATING TO AMERICAN HISTORY AND EACH PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. FROM NOW UNTIL JULY 4TH, WE WILL HAVE THIS ITEM ON THE. ON OUR AGENDA. STAFF WILL READ THE FOLLOWING. SO THIS EVENING WE'RE GOING TO HAVE SOME FUN FACTS ABOUT WOMEN AT WAR. OFTENTIMES, WOMEN WERE IN THE BATTLEFIELDS HELPING. BRINGING WATER. THE SOLDIERS. ONE OF THE WELL KNOWN EXAMPLE IN ONE BATTLE. MOLLY PITCHER TOOK OVER HER HUSBAND'S CANNON WHEN SHE. HE WAS INJURED, SO THEY HELPED OUT IN THOSE WAYS. ALSO, ONE OF THE MOST SUCCESSFUL SPIES FOR THE AMERICAS AMERICANS WAS A FEMALE OPERATIVE KNOWN AS AGENT 355, AND HER IDENTITY IS STILL NOT KNOWN. AND THEN DEBORAH SAMPSON'S WORTH MENTIONING. 
          SHE'S FROM MASSACHUSETTS, AND SHE DISGUISED HERSELF AS A MAN TO FIGHT FOR 18 MONTHS IN THE CONTINENTAL ARMY. AT ONE POINT, AFTER BEING WOUNDED, SHE KEPT HER IDENTITY SECRET BY USING A PENKNIFE AND A SEWING NEEDLE TO EXTRACT A BULLET FROM HER LEG, AND THEN SHE CONTINUED ON WITH HER SERVICE. THANK YOU. THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM NUMBER FOUR, OUR CONSENT AGENDA. 
          [CONSENT AGENDA]
ITEMS PLACED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE IN NATURE AND NON-CONTROVERSIAL. 
          THE CONSENT AGENDA CAN BE ACTED UPON IN ONE MOTION. ITEMS MAY BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM AT THE REQUEST OF A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF STAFF ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. 
          WE HAVE ITEMS FOR A THROUGH FOUR F. ARE THERE ANY COMMISSIONERS THAT WOULD LIKE TO PULL AN ITEM FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA THIS EVENING? I LIKE TO PULL AGENDA ITEM FOUR E SO WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER HAMILTON TO PULL CONSENT. AGENDA ITEM FOUR E DO WE HAVE A SECOND. OH WE DON'T SORRY. MY BAD. I WAS ON VACATION. DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 4A24D AND FOUR F. SO MOVED. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HAMILTON. WE HAVE A SECOND I SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER DANIELS. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. THANK YOU. I FORGOT. OKAY. ITEM FOUR. E IS AN AMENITY AREA FOR 
          [4e. Consider and act upon a request for a Site Plan for an Amenity Area on Creekside,  Block A, Lot 58X, on 1.5± acres, located on the southeast corner of Cloister Lane and  Huntleigh Lane. (DEVAPP-25-0145) ]
CREEKSIDE. SO THE PURPOSE OF THIS IS TO CONSTRUCT A AMENITY AREA FOR OUR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PER PLAN DEVELOPMENT 129 FOUR OF THE FOLLOWING SEVEN AMENITIES ARE PROVIDED IN THIS AREA. THE ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BOLDED ARE THE ITEM AMENITIES THAT THEY PROVIDED. SO THEY PROVIDED SIX AND THEN THE TWO WITH ASTERISKS. ONE OF THOSE HAD TO BE PROVIDED AS PART OF THE AMENITIES. THEY PROVIDED BOTH. AND JUST SOME BACKGROUND ON THIS. THE FINAL PLAT FOR THIS SUBDIVISION WAS APPROVED ON THE 25TH OF MARCH, AND TOWN STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS SITE PLAN. AND THERE'S A LOCATOR MAP IN ALL THE PLANS. I WILL NOW TAKE ANY QUESTIONS THAT THE COMMISSION HAS FOR ME. THANK YOU. I HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS. HOW IS LIGHTING HANDLED ON THIS SITE? I DIDN'T SEE LIGHTING LISTED ON HERE, BUT THERE WILL BE LIGHTS IN THIS FACILITY, CORRECT? THAT IS CORRECT. AND SO ONCE THEY COME IN FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS AREA, THEY WILL SUBMIT A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN THAT SHOWS THE LIGHTING. AND WE WILL ENSURE THAT THERE IS ZERO BLEED OVER ONTO ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. AND I NOTICED THAT ON THIS WHERE THE BLUE LINE IS LOCATED ON THAT SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE AMENITY CENTER 
          [00:05:03]
IS A WROUGHT IRON FENCE. AND I'D LIKE TO REQUEST THAT THE APPLICANT CHANGE IT FROM A WROUGHT IRON FENCE, BECAUSE THERE'S HOUSES THAT ARE CITING THAT RIGHT IRON FENCE AND THE PLAYGROUND, THE PLAYGROUND AREAS THAT THEY INSTALL A WALL VERSUS A ORNAMENTAL FENCE. OKAY, SO THAT'S JUST A COMMENT I HAD ABOUT THAT PARTICULAR SECTION. AND THEN MY LAST HAD TO DO WITH PARKING. HOW IS PARKING HANDLED ON THIS FACILITY? SO FOR THIS SITE KIND OF VEERED AWAY FROM TYPICALLY HAVING WE TYPICALLY HAVE PARKING THAT IS ON SITE FOR THIS SITE. WANTED TO ENCOURAGE RESIDENTS TO WALK THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY TO COME TO THIS SITE. AND THERE WILL BE PARKING ADJACENT ON ONE OF THE LANES ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY, WHETHER THAT BE HUNTLEY OR. STANFORD, AND I'M NOT SURE WHICH SIDE THAT WILL BE ON, BUT THERE WILL BE PARKING LOT ON ONE SIDE AND THEN NO PARKING ON THE OTHER TO ALLOW PEOPLE TO STILL CONTINUE OUT THROUGH THE SUBDIVISION. IS THAT THAT'S LIKE SIGNED OR IS THAT JUST RED MARKED IN RED? NO PARKING? OR HOW IS THAT MANAGED SIDE SIGNED? AND WE DON'T HAVE CONCERNS WITH NOT HAVING ANY AT ALL ON SITE PARKING FOR THIS LOCATION. THERE ARE NO CONCERNS FOR TOWN STAFF FOR THIS SPECIFIC PLAN NOT HAVING ON SITE PARKING. OKAY. OKAY. THOSE ARE THOSE ARE THE QUESTIONS THAT I HAVE. ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? IN TERMS OF THE WALL THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, EXPLAIN HOW WOULD THAT WORK WITH CITY ORDINANCES AND THEN THE TOWN ORDINANCE REQUIRE. A THE KIND OF FENCING THAT THEY ALREADY PROPOSED. YEAH. SO ADJACENT TO OPEN SPACE AREAS, THE REQUIREMENT IS THAT THE DEVELOPER PROVIDE AN ORNAMENTAL FENCE ADJACENT TO OPEN SPACE AREAS. SO IS, IS AND THIS PLAN IS PROVIDING THAT. AND SO IS CAN CAN THE COMMISSION RECOMMEND SOMETHING DIFFERENT FROM WHAT THE ORDINANCE SAYS IS THAT I MEAN, THE COMMISSION IS WITHIN THEIR PURVIEW TO DO THAT. OKAY. ISN'T THE IDEA BEHIND THE ORNAMENTAL WALL TO MAKE IT FEEL MORE OPEN ALONG THE OPEN SPACE? THAT'S CORRECT. I THINK IT'S A LITTLE DIFFERENT IN THIS SITUATION BECAUSE YOU HAVE HOUSES ROUGHLY ABOUT EIGHT, TEN FEET AWAY FROM THE SIDES OF THOSE HOUSES ARE RIGHT UP NEXT TO THE PLAYGROUND AREA. THERE'S A LOT OF ACTIVITY GOING ON, RIGHT? RIGHT THERE. BUT THOSE HOUSES DON'T EXIST. NONE OF THIS EXISTS YET. THIS IS THIS IS STILL TO BE DEVELOPED. SO HOUSES THAT BY THIS WOULD ALREADY SEE WHAT THEY'RE GETTING ARE PEOPLE WHO WOULD BE BUYING THESE HOUSES, WOULD SEE WHAT THEY'RE GETTING. RIGHT? NOT NOT NECESSARILY. THE AMENITY CENTER IS NOT ALWAYS THE FIRST ITEM THAT GOES INTO A NEIGHBORHOOD. A LOT OF TIMES IT'S BASED OFF OF THE NUMBER OF HOMES THAT ARE BUILT BEFORE THEY BRING ON TO THE AMENITIES. ARE YOU PROPOSING A A STONE WALL OR A OR A FENCE? I'D LIKE IT TO BE A STONE WALL JUST FOR THAT AREA. SO I, I HAVE A QUESTION. YES, SIR. ON FIRST STREET BY THE FIRE STATION. ON THE EAST SIDE. PRESTON, DO YOU HAVE THAT PROSPER OWN TRAIL? IT'S A SEPARATES LAKES OSHIMA AND WILLOW. WILLOW RIDGE, I THINK IT IS THE REQUIREMENT ON THAT ON THAT GREEN. I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU CALL IT, BUT IT'S A, A TRAIL WITH GREEN WITH GRASS ON BOTH SIDES. THE REQUIREMENT FOR THAT IS WROUGHT IRON FENCE. THAT'S CORRECT. IS THAT NOT THE SAME FOR THIS YEAR. YEAH. I MEAN THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE PROVIDING. THEY'RE PROVIDING RIGHT AWAY. OKAY. NOT BUT THIS WROUGHT IRON WITH WITH TREES OR SOMETHING. I MEAN THERE IS LANDSCAPING. I DON'T KNOW THE SPECIFICS OF THE LANDSCAPING THERE. AND IF YOU GUYS WANT TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING, THAT ALSO CAN BE PART OF THE PROPOSAL AS WELL THAT WE CAN CATCH THROUGHOUT THE CIVIL REVIEW. MR. CHAIR, IF I COULD ADD SOMETHING, ANSWER A COUPLE OF THE QUESTIONS. AND IT'S JUST BECAUSE I'VE BEEN IN DIFFERENT MEETINGS THAN THAN ALL OF US DON'T SIT IN EVERY MEETING, OBVIOUSLY, OR WE'D NEVER GET ANYTHING DONE. EXCUSE ME, BUT THERE IS PLANS OR OUR PLANS EXCUSE ME FOR ALONG WHERE THIS THE THE FENCES THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOW IS GOING TO BE PRETTY HEAVILY LANDSCAPED 
          [00:10:04]
WITH EVERGREEN TREES. AND, AND I DON'T WANT TO SAY BUSHES MORE LIKE SHRUBS. SO IT'S A MIX OF, OF TALL AND THIN TO FILL IN THAT AREA. AND THAT WAS PRETTY EXTENSIVE CONVERSATIONS THAT WENT ON WHEN WE WERE FIRST TALKING ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CREEKSIDE PARK WITH MR. SHADDOCK, WHO IS THE ONE WHO IS BUILDING CREEKSIDE. AND THEN THE SECOND PIECE IS THERE IS AN AGREEMENT. IT'S A REQUIREMENT THAT IS IN THE PD COMMISSION MAY REMEMBER THAT THERE IS PARK PLACE, WHICH IS ON THE EASTERN SIDE OF THIS. AND THEN THERE'S CREEKSIDE, WHICH ORIGINALLY WAS GOING TO BE THE SECOND PHASE OF PARK PLACE, BUT IT WAS SOLD TO MR. SHADDOCK AND HE CHANGED THE NAME TO TO CREEKSIDE. BUT PART OF THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT WAS THAT THE AMENITY CENTER HAD TO BE BUILT BY THE TIME 50% OF THE HOMES IN BOTH SECTIONS WERE. OR EXCUSE ME, THE LOTS IN BOTH SECTIONS WERE SOLD FOR DEVELOPMENT FOR. FOR HOMES. THERE'S ONLY BEEN TWO, I BELIEVE, ON THE, THE PARK PLACE SIDE AND THAT THAT HAVE HAVE BEEN SOLD AND ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND ON THE CREEK SIDE, CREEKSIDE SIDE. I THINK MR. SHADDOCK HAS ABOUT 40% OF THE LOTS ALREADY COMMITTED. SO THIS BUILDING PLAN IS EITHER ALREADY IN THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT TO THIS APPROVAL, OR IT IS GOING TO BE IN AS SOON AS IT DOES GET APPROVED, ASSUMING IT GETS APPROVED. SO. SO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE AMENITY CENTER IS GOING TO COME A LITTLE BIT FASTER THAN THAN WHAT COMMISSIONER HAMILTON SAID. 
          IT GENERALLY ISN'T AS DONE AS AS CLOSE TO THE BEGINNING. BUT BECAUSE THESE TWO SIDES ARE ARE REALLY JOINED AT THE HIP, THEN IT'S GOING TO HAVE TO GO IN FASTER THAN IT MIGHT OTHERWISE GO. IF IT WAS JUST CREEKSIDE, IT MAY TAKE A WHILE, BUT SINCE IT'S BOTH, THEY GOT TO GET THEM GOING OR THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO TO SLOW DOWN AND NOBODY WANTS TO SLOW DOWN. AND WHEN YOU START DEVELOPING THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO THERE WILL BE TREES AND AND THE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT IS FOR TRAILS, FOR OPEN SPACE AND FOR THOROUGHFARES. YOU HAVE TO, TO, TO DO THE WROUGHT IRON. AND I DON'T HONESTLY KNOW, MR. ATTORNEY, IF I CAN PUT YOU ON THE SPOT, IF IT IS A TOWN ORDINANCE, BUT COMMISSION HAS THE ABILITY TO MAKE, YOU KNOW, TWEAKS, I'LL CALL IT TO SITE PLANS. DO THEY HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO TO CHANGE THAT? WELL, I THINK THE YEAH, I'M SORRY, I GOT MY MIC ON THE STAND. IT WOULD RELATE TO THE STANDARDS OF APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN. AND ONE OF THOSE STANDARDS OF APPROVAL IS USE OF. 
          I'M LOOKING AT THE ORDINANCE FOR THE STANDARDS APPROVAL FOR SITE PLAN UNDER SECTION FOUR H. 
          USE OF LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING. SO, SO FAR AS IT GOES TO SCREENING, THAT THAT COULD BE A CONDITION ON A MOTION FOR APPROVAL. I WILL TELL YOU THAT THAT WROUGHT IRON IS NOT ALWAYS WELL RECEIVED. WHEN PEOPLE ARE TOLD THAT THAT'S WHAT THEY HAVE TO HAVE, WHETHER IT'S THE DEVELOPER OR THE HOMEOWNER OR ANYBODY ELSE. SOME PLACES IT IS SOME PLACES NOT SO MUCH. SO I DON'T BELIEVE THAT IF IT COMMISSION DECIDES TO TO REQUIRE AS A WALL, REALLY DON'T THINK IT'S GOING TO BE THAT BIG A DEAL IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU ALL FEEL IS, IS AN ENHANCEMENT. BUT I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE BEFORE WE SAID, OKAY, YOU CAN CAN DO THAT. 
          I WANTED TO MAKE SURE FROM A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE IT WAS OKAY BECAUSE IT JUST HASN'T COME UP BEFORE. SO I HAVE ONE QUESTION ABOUT THE WALL BECAUSE JUST WITH MY HOA PRESIDENT, I HAVE THAT ON. IF THE WALL IS BUILT, WHOSE RESPONSIBILITY IS THE WALL IS A SHARED RESPONSIBILITY WITH WITH THE THE AMENITIES AND OWNER AND THE HOMEOWNER, DOES IT FALL ON THE HOA IF THEY HAVE AN HOA, OR DOES IT FALL ON THE PERSON THAT OWNS THE HOUSE? IT WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER UP UNTIL SUCH POINT AS THE HOA TAKES OVER. AND THAT COULD BE 65%, COULD BE 70% OF THE THE HOME SOLD AND THEN THE BOARD TAKES OVER THAT. THAT'S PRETTY STANDARD. AND BECAUSE THE HOUSES ARE NOT THERE YET, I WOULD IMAGINE THAT THAT WALL WOULD BE SET ON THE 
          [00:15:03]
PROPERTY LINE, NOT LITERALLY ON THE PROPERTY LINE, BUT ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY LINE. AND THAT WOULD SERVE AS THE SIDE FENCE BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT IT IS. IT'S THE SIDES OF THESE TWO LOTS THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THAT WOULD SERVE AS THE SIDE FENCE FOR THAT LOT, BUT IT WOULD STILL ULTIMATELY BE THE RESPONSIBLE OF THE DEVELOPER SLASH HOA. WHENEVER THAT TIME COMES WHEN IT SWITCHES, IT WOULD NOT FALL ON THE, THE, THE, THE PROPERTY OWNERS. THANK YOU. 
          YES, SIR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO. NOPE. VERY GOOD. ALL RIGHT. AT THIS TIME. THANK YOU. TAKARI. 
          I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO TO APPROVE THE JUST DENY WHATEVER IT IS YOU GUYS WANT TO DO, M'LADY. SORRY. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM FOUR E, SUBJECT TO A CHANGE OF ADDING A WALL INSTEAD OF THE WROUGHT IRON FENCE ON THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THAT AMENITY CENTER. DO WE NEED TO SPECIFY WHAT TYPE OF WALL? A MASONRY WALL DO WE HAVE? A SECOND TO COMMISSIONER HAMILTON'S MOTION TO ADD A MASONRY WALL. I'LL SECOND. WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER DANIELS. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. GOOD. 
          YOU LOCKED OUT. THEY LOCKED YOU OUT? YEAH, THEY KEEP LOCKING ME OUT. SO JUST IN TERMS OF THE DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION. I GUESS LET ME JUST SAY MY. I WILL VOTE IN FAVOR OF THIS, NOT BECAUSE I'M IN FAVOR OF THE WALL VERSUS THE THE I'M NOT OPPOSED TO A WALL. I MEAN, IT'S IT'S NOT THAT BIG OF A DEAL TO ME. I DON'T THINK IT'S NECESSARY OR ANYTHING, BUT JUST, JUST SO IT'S CLEAR THAT MY MOTION, MY VOTE IN FAVOR OF THIS IS JUST TO SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN AND THE WALL. I'M NOT SO OPPOSED TO THE WALL. I WOULD VOTE AGAINST THE MOTION. SO AND SUPPORT COMMISSIONER, MY BIGGEST PIECE IS WILL THEY FALL BACK ON THE HOMEOWNER? THAT'S WHY I ASKED THE QUESTION, BECAUSE I DO KNOW FROM BEING PRESIDENT FOR SEVEN YEARS, WHEN THOSE WALLS FALL DOWN, THEY'RE VERY EXPENSIVE TO PUT BACK UP. SO THAT'S WHY I WAS MAKING SURE IT'S NOT GOING TO BE SOMETHING THAT THE HOMEOWNER HAS TO, HAS TO FOOT THE BILL ON IN THE FUTURE, BECAUSE IT ONLY LASTS FOR ABOUT TEN, 15 YEARS. SO. YOU HAVE TO VOTE ON IT. I HAVE ONE COMMENT AS WELL. I'M WITH COMMISSIONER BLANCHARD ON THIS. IF YOU LOOK AT THE GREEN SPACE PLAN, THERE'S A LOT OF GREEN SPACE BETWEEN THE TWO LOTS AND THE THE PLAYGROUND OR THE OR THE WALL IS GOING TO GO OR WITH, I GUESS, THE ORNAMENTAL OR STONE WALL IS GOING TO GO. I, YOU KNOW, JUST LOOKING AROUND PROSPER AND OTHER LITTLE COMMUNITIES THAT HAVE COMMUNITY PARKS AND AMENITY CENTERS, I DON'T KNOW THAT I HAVE SEEN ANY THAT HAVE A WALL SEPARATING A HOUSE AND A. AND THE CENTER, EVEN THOUGH THIS IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT BECAUSE IT'S ON, THERE'S NO STREET THAT'S SEPARATING IT. I UNDERSTAND WHY COMMISSIONER HAMILTON IS SAYING THERE'S A NEED TO THINK ABOUT THIS MORE, BUT I'M I'M I'M I GUESS I'M WITH COMMISSIONER BLANCHARD, AND THEN I'M IN FAVOR OF THE DEVELOPMENT. I WANT TO KEEP IT MOVING FORWARD, BUT DON'T NECESSARILY WANT TO SAY THAT I'M IN FAVOR OF PUTTING A WALL THERE. SO I'LL JUMP ON THE TRAIN OF PRE EXPLAINING OUR VOTES. I'M IN FAVOR OF THE WROUGHT IRON FENCE, SO I'LL VOTE NO ON THIS SOLELY FOR THAT REASON. I THINK THE OPENNESS OF THE WROUGHT IRON FENCE IS WHY OUR ORDINANCES SAY WHAT THEY SAY, AND I THINK THE COMMUNITIES FEEL MUCH MORE HIGH END WHEN YOU HAVE THAT INSTEAD OF A WALL JUST RIGHT IN YOUR FACE THERE NEXT TO A PARK. SO I'M TOTALLY IN FAVOR OF THE DEVELOPMENT AS PRESENTED, BUT I'LL VOTE NO ON THE MOTION BECAUSE OF THE WALL. IT IS VERY CLOSE PROXIMITY FROM WHERE THAT WALL IS TO WHERE THOSE PICNIC TABLES. AND THAT IS IT'S, IT'S NOT LIKE IT'S 50FT AWAY. WE'RE TALKING IT'S PROBABLY LESS THAN TEN FEET RIGHT THERE. FROM SOMEBODY'S BACKYARD TO A AREA WHERE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GATHER. AND I TOTALLY GET IT IN MY COMMUNITY, FOLKS COMPLAINED ABOUT THAT TRAIL BECAUSE THEY HAD WROUGHT IRON FENCE, AND PEOPLE WERE LOOKING IN THEIR POOLS WHILE THEY'RE SWIMMING AND STUFF, AND EVERYBODY WAS UPSET AND ASKED US TO PUT TREES. 
          AND I TOLD THEM NO. WHEN IT COMES TO THE COST FOR THE HOA, SO I, I SEE BOTH SIDES. I SEE BOTH SIDES. SO ARE WE STILL, WE HAVE A WE HAVE A WE HAVE A MOTION. WE HAVE A SECOND A SECOND TO APPROVE WITH A MASONRY WALL. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. 
          ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE. WE GOT FIVE OUT OF SIX MOTION CARRIES AND APPROVAL FIVE OUT 
          [00:20:05]
OF SIX. THANK YOU EVERYONE FOR THEIR COMMENTS. NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS CITIZEN COMMENTS. 
          THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON ANY TOPIC. 
          HOWEVER, THE COMMISSION IS ON. IS UNABLE TO DISCUSS OR TAKE ACTION ON ANY TOPIC NOT LISTED ON THIS AGENDA. THOSE WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION MUST COMPLETE THE PUBLIC COMMENT REQUEST FORM LOCATED AT THE TOWN WEBSITE OR IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. IF YOU ATTEND IN PERSON, PLEASE SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD CHAIR STAFF MEMBER WHEN CALLED UPON, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO THREE MINUTES. IF MULTIPLE INDIVIDUALS WISH TO SPEAK ON A TOPIC, THEY MAY YIELD THREE MINUTES TO ONE INDIVIDUAL APPOINTED TO SPEAK ON THEIR BEHALF. ALL INDIVIDUALS YIELDING THEIR TIME MUST BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING, AND THE APPOINTED INDIVIDUAL WILL BE LIMITED TO A TOTAL OF 15 MINUTES. I DO NOT SEE ANYONE HERE, SO I'M GOING TO TAKE IT THAT WE DON'T HAVE ANYONE AND NO ONE SUBMITTED ANYTHING SO WE CAN MOVE ON. WE DO NOT HAVE ANY 
          [5. Review actions taken by the Town Council and possibly direct Town Staff to schedule topic(s) for discussion at a future meeting.]
PUBLIC HEARING ON OUR AGENDA THIS EVENING. SO ITEM NUMBER FIVE ON OUR REGULAR AGENDA IS REVIEW ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE TOWN COUNCIL AND POSSIBLY DIRECT TOWN STAFF TO SCHEDULE TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION AT A FUTURE MEETING. OKAY. THANK YOU CHAIRMAN. SO AT THE PREVIOUS TOWN COUNCIL MEETING, NOTHING HAS REALLY CHANGED SINCE WE MET LAST TIME. SINCE IT WAS LAST WEEK, NOTICE OF APPEALS WAS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. I GUESS THE ONE THING THAT DID CHANGE IS THAT CONCEPT PLAN THAT YOU GUYS SAW LAST MEETING IS GOING TO BE ON THE AGENDA FOR TOWN COUNCIL ON THE 28TH, AND THEN THE DETROIT OFFICE PARK ORDINANCE AND D. A THE ADOPTION OF THE UDC NOTICE OF APPEALS IN THE S U P FOR THE FULL SERVICE SLASH EXTENDED STAY HOTEL AND THE PD FOR THE INDOOR GOLF FACILITY, AND THEN FOR THE FUTURE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION ITEMS ON THE FIFTH. STILL WORKING THROUGH THE CONSENT AGENDA. DO NOT BELIEVE THERE WILL BE ANY PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE REGULAR AGENDA. AND THAT IS IT. YOU CAN PUSH IT, DAVID. THAT'D BE GREAT. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? THANK YOU ALL FOR WHAT YOU DO. ALRIGHT. ITEM NUMBER SIX IS ADJOURNED. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? MOTION TO ADJOURN. MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER HAMILTON. WE HAVE A SECOND. WE CAN ALL STAY HERE ALL NIGHT. SECOND, WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER BUTLER. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. MOTION CARRIES SIX ZERO AND APPROVAL AT
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.