13. Conduct a Public Hearing and consider and act upon a request to rezone 61.7± acres from Agricultural and Planned Development-71 to a Planned Development allowing for Mixed-Use Development, located on the south side of First Street and 1,550± feet east of Legacy Drive. (ZONE-24-0025) (DH)

[13. Conduct a Public Hearing and consider and act upon a request to rezone 61.7± acres from Agricultural and Planned Development-71 to a Planned Development allowing for Mixed-Use Development, located on the south side of First Street and 1,550± feet east of Legacy Drive. (ZONE-24-0025) (DH)]

71 TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ALLOWING FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT.

LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FIRST STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 1450FT EAST OF LEGACY DRIVE.

MR. HOOVER. THANK YOU MAYOR. COUNCIL IS GOING TO GIVE A QUICK OVERVIEW OF WHERE THIS IS.

I KNOW YOU'VE ALL SEEN PARTS OF IT IN IN A WORKSHOP AND IT'S IT'S BEEN THROUGH OUR PROCESS FOR QUITE A WHILE NOW.

THE APPLICANTS ARE HERE AND THEY HAVE A MORE IN-DEPTH PRESENTATION THAT I THINK BE BETTER USE OF YOUR TIME THAN YOU LISTENING TO ME TELL YOU THINGS YOU ALREADY KNOW ALREADY. BUT AGAIN, I JUST WANTED TO KIND OF TOUCH BASE.

[00:20:03]

THE THE PROPOSAL IS FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WITH ASSISTED LIVING COMMERCIAL USES, HOTEL RESTAURANT RETAIL DOES HAVE MULTIFAMILY AS WELL AS TOWNHOMES.

THE BACKGROUND IS STARTED BACK IN EARLY OF 2020 FOR APPLICANTS CAME MET WITH STAFF NUMEROUS TIMES BEFORE IT ACTUALLY BECAME AN OFFICIAL APPLICATION, WHICH DIDN'T OCCUR UNTIL DECEMBER OF 24.

THERE WERE MANY ROUNDS OF OF BACK AND FORTHS COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS THAT THAT STAFF HAD THAT, THAT WERE ACCOMMODATED BY THE APPLICANT. THEN WENT TO PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A WORK SESSION AND THEN ALSO WENT TO THE TOWN COUNCIL FOR A WORK SESSION. AGAIN, THERE WERE A LOT OF COMMENTS THAT THAT WERE GIVEN BY BOTH PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE COUNCIL THAT THE APPLICANTS TOOK. AND I BELIEVE EACH TIME IT CONTINUED TO TO GET BETTER.

AND IT FINALLY WENT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON SEPTEMBER THE 15TH, WHERE THE PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED UNANIMOUSLY, FIVE ZERO. THERE WERE TWO TWO MEMBERS ABSENT TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

THE LOCATION IS IS HERE AT WEST FIRST. AND MAHADE WOULD, WOULD RUN THROUGH THIS SITE.

IT'S NOT QUITE TO LEGACY. THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN.

EXCUSE ME. RECOMMENDS IT'S PART OF THE DOWNTOWN.

EXCUSE ME. DOWNTOWN. THE TOLLWAY DISTRICT. AND THIS THE USES THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED ARE ARE RECOMMENDED AS FAR AS THE LAND USE PLAN IS CONCERNED. THIS IS JUST THIS SURROUNDING ZONING TO GIVE YOU KIND OF AN IDEA OF WHAT ALL IS THERE.

IT'S PRIMARILY THE TOLLWAY DISTRICT. THIS IS MORE OF WHAT I THINK THE APPLICANT WILL GET INTO AS FAR AS THE TRACKS AND THE SUBDISTRICTS WITHIN THE TRACT. AND I'M NOT GOING TO GO THROUGH THESE.

WE CAN TALK ABOUT THEM LATER AFTER THEY DO THEIR PRESENTATION, IF YOU HAVE SPECIFIC QUESTIONS, BUT I THINK THEY WILL GIVE YOU A REALLY GOOD JOB AS FAR AS WHAT THOSE ARE AS FAR AS NOTICES.

FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER THE 26TH, WHEN THEY WENT OUT, WE'VE NOT HAD ANY RESPONSES THAT THAT HAVE BEEN RESUBMITTED.

EXCUSE ME. SUBMITTED TO US. AND AGAIN, PA'S RECOMMENDED APPROVAL.

FIVE ZERO TOWN STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL.

AND IF IT'S ALL RIGHT, I WILL TURN THIS OVER TO ALEXA KNIGHT TO.

YES, SIR. THANK YOU. YEP. OKAY. GOOD EVENING.

MAYOR. COUNCIL MEMBERS. MY NAME IS ALEXA KNIGHT, AND WITH LAW 322 WEST WALNUT STREET, SALINA.

WE'RE HERE THIS EVENING. WE HAVE THE ENTIRE TEAM HERE WITH US.

ROB RADKE, WE HAVE GF DESIGN WHO DID THE LAND PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE THAT YOU'LL SEE BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING.

AND THEN WE HAVE KIMLEY-HORN THE CIVIL ENGINEERS AND THEN ALSO PERMIT ENGINEERS WHO'S A TRAFFIC IN CASE IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS RELATED TO ANY OF THOSE ITEMS, ONE OF US SHOULD BE ABLE TO RESPOND. HOPEFULLY.

IT'S BEEN SEVERAL MONTHS SINCE WE'VE SEEN YOU LAST.

END OF MAY WE HAD THE WORK SESSION WITH YOU. IT WAS VERY FRUITFUL.

WE CAME AWAY WITH SOME GOOD QUESTIONS THAT YOU ALL HAD SOME GOOD COMMENTS.

GF SPENT A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME WITH STAFF, SEVERAL MEETINGS, SEVERAL ITERATIONS, AND THEN WE'LL SHOW YOU THE CHANGES AND WE'LL GO THROUGH THOSE CHANGES. THIS EVENING, ONE OF WHICH IS ON THIS VERY SLIDE, WHICH INCLUDES NOW THE LAKE SYSTEM IS NOW IN THE CENTER OF THE PROJECT, IN ADDITION TO WHERE IT WAS WHEN YOU LAST SAW IT IN MAY.

THIS IS YOUR THIS IS YOUR TOWN MAP. AND THEN THE YELLOW STAR IS THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY WEST OF THE TOLLWAY.

THIS IS ZOOMED IN WITH OUR NEIGHBOR RIGHT NEXT DOOR, THE CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND, WHICH IS, AS YOU WELL KNOW, AN 86,000 SQUARE FOOT DISTRIBUTION FACILITY THAT SHOULD BE OPEN NEXT YEAR.

WE'RE LOCATED BETWEEN LEGACY DRIVE AND THE TOLLWAY, AND WE'RE RIGHT ON FIRST STREET.

LOVER'S LANE WILL BE COMING UP TO THE SOUTH SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY.

ONE OF THE THINGS, OF COURSE, WE LOOKED AT WHEN WE FIRST STARTED PLANNING A COUPLE YEARS AGO WAS YOUR THOROUGHFARE PLAN, WHICH WAS ADOPTED IN 2022? AS YOU CAN SEE, MEASURED IS NOT SHOWN TO GO THROUGH THE PROPERTY.

IT TAKES A HARD RIGHT AND BECOMES THE EXTENSION OF LOVER'S LANE.

ONCE GF DID THEIR PLANNING OF THE PROJECT AND WE UNDERSTOOD THE DESIRE TO ALSO HAVE THE COMMUNITY COME TO THE CENTER OF THE PROPERTY. I MEAN, IT IS A 60 ACRE SITE.

SO IT'S PRETTY DEEP. WE FEEL THAT IT MAKES MOST SENSE TO HAVE MEASURED, GO ALL THE WAY TO THE NORTH AND INTERSECT WITH FIRST STREET.

THIS SHOWS THE PROPOSED STREET SECTION THAT KIMLEY-HORN WORKED WITH THE STAFF ON, AND THAT'S A 60 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY.

[00:25:03]

WHAT I REALLY WANT TO SHOW YOU ON HERE IS THE ADDITIONAL 40 FOOT OF LANDSCAPE AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT ON THE EAST SIDE OF OMAHA AS IT COMES THROUGH THE PROJECT. THE WEST SIDE HAS A FIVE FOOT STANDARD SIDEWALK, BUT THE EAST SIDE HAS A TEN FOOT PEDESTRIAN PATH.

IT WILL BE A SHARED USE PATHWAY, AND ONE OF THE QUESTIONS THAT CAME OUT OF PNC WAS, WELL, HOW DOES THAT INTEGRATE INTO OUR TRAIL SYSTEM? SO I'LL ALSO SHOW THAT HERE IN A MOMENT. THE REASON WHY WE HAVE THE THE 40FT OF AREA ALLOWS THAT TEN FEET TO MEANDER THROUGH THAT 40FT THERE ARE NO TREES LOCATED WITHIN THAT ON THE SITE ON THE EAST SIDE OF OMAHA.

SO THOSE WILL ALL BE PLANNED TREES. SO THE LANDSCAPING AS EACH PHASE COMES IN THE SIDEWALK WOULD THEN BE BUILT WITH THAT PARTICULAR PHASE.

THE MINOR THOROUGHFARE ON THE LOWER PORTION OF YOUR SCREEN THERE SHOWS WHAT THE LOVERS LANE EXTENSION WOULD BE.

THIS IS THE EXISTING ZONING. AS WAS ALREADY STATED, WE HAVE AG AND PART OF THE SOUTHERN PART IS PART OF A PD, AND WE HAVE THE COMMERCIAL TO OUR WEST AND ANOTHER PD TO OUR EAST.

ALSO, AS SHOWN WITHIN YOUR COMP PLAN, WHICH WAS RECENTLY ADOPTED FAIRLY RECENTLY WITHIN 2023, WE ARE VERY APPRECIATIVE OF THE FACT THAT YOU DO HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT IS UP TO DATE.

THIS IS YOUR FUTURE LAND USE PLAN. WE USED IT IN LOOKING AT THE DESIGN GUIDELINES WE TOOK TO HEART THE DISTRICT IN DESIGNING THE OVERALL PROJECT. THIS IS THE HIKE, YOUR HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL PLAN.

AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE IS A HOLE IN THE IN THE SYSTEM RIGHT THERE.

SO WE WILL BE ADDING A FOUR ACRE PARK RIGHT IN THE CENTER OF OUR PROJECT.

AND THEN WE HAVE THAT TEN FOOT WIDE TRAIL SYSTEM THAT WILL TAKE THAT WILL CONNECT TO THE SOUTH THERE, ALL THE WAY UP TO THE NORTHERN TRAIL SYSTEM ALONG FIRST STREET.

THIS IS RIGHT OUT OF YOUR COMP PLAN, AND I THINK IT WARRANTS SOME TIME JUST TO REALLY DIGEST THE WORDS HERE.

THE QUALITY OF LIFE AND FOCUS TO ON QUALITY OF LIFE, AMENITIES FOR EXISTING AND FUTURE PROSPER FAMILIES, TO FOSTER A DESIRABLE AND UNIQUE COMMUNITY WHICH WE FEEL THAT WE HAVE COME UP WITH IN THE 60 ACRE PROJECT.

THE GOAL IS TO PROVIDE A VARIETY OF DESIRABLE LAND USES THAT DIVERSIFY THE TAX BASE AND ENABLE ALL TYPES OF PEOPLE TO LIVE, WORK, SHOP, EAT AND RELAX IN PROSPER. THAT THAT IMAGE RIGHT THERE IS IMAGERY THAT WE TOOK TO HEART, AND THAT'S THE REASON WHY WE PLANNED THE PART OF OUR PROJECT TO LOOK SIMILAR TO THAT.

IT IT WOULD BEHOOVE US TO HAVE RESIDENTS WHO COULD POTENTIALLY WORK IN THAT OFFICE COMPLEX AND JUST WALK TO THEIR UNIT, YOU KNOW, FOR WHERE THEY RESIDE. AND THEN ALSO POPULATE THE RESTAURANTS AND THE RETAIL THAT'S IN THE CENTER OF THE PROJECT, TOO. AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, WE ARE PART OF THE DALLAS NORTH TOLLWAY DISTRICT, AND THAT IS THE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT SHOULD ENCOURAGE AND SHOULD CONTAIN A MIXTURE OF OFFICE, RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL USES. CHECK CHECK CHECK.

WE HAVE ALL OF THOSE ITEMS WITHIN THE PLAN. MIXED USE LOFT APARTMENTS WOULD BE THE MOST APPROPRIATE RESIDENTIAL USE WITHIN THE DISTRICT.

SO A MORE URBAN FEEL, NOT A SUBURBAN THREE STORY WALK UP PRODUCT.

AND THAT'S NOT WHAT WE HAVE. WE HAVE AIR CONDITIONED CORRIDORS. IT'S A WRAP PRODUCT.

SO THAT CHECKS THAT BOX. AND THEN THE MIXED USE REFERS TO DEVELOPMENT STYLE THAT COMBINES A MIX OF LAND USES WITHIN ONE DEFINED ZONING DISTRICT.

THIS PD FOR EXAMPLE, RESIDENTIAL, RETAIL, RESTAURANTS, OFFICE AND PUBLIC USES.

AGAIN, ALL OF THOSE ARE INCORPORATED IN THE PROJECT ON THE SAME TRACT, BLOCK OR ZONING DISTRICT WHICH IS IN THIS PD, THIS PROPOSED PD. OKAY. SO HERE IS OUR PROPOSED PD CONCEPT PLAN.

LOTS ON HERE. SO THIS IS THE NEW AND UPDATED ONE.

AND WHAT SETS BELLA PROSPER APART FROM OTHERS? WELL CONSERVATIVELY IT'S A $314 MILLION MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT.

IT'S NOT SMALL CHUMP CHANGE. IT'S A IT'S A GRAND PROJECT.

IT'S A WALKABLE COMMUNITY WHERE RESIDENTS CAN ACTIVATE THE CORE RETAIL AND PARK SPACE.

I CAN'T STRESS ENOUGH HOW IMPORTANT THAT IS. I USED TO RIGHT OUT OF COLLEGE.

I LIVED IN THE CITY OF AUSTIN, AND IN THE IN THE 90S, IT WAS DEAD.

DOWNTOWN WAS JUST DEAD. THEY HAD NO ONE LIVING THERE UNTIL OUR MAYOR PROCLAIMED THAT THEY WANTED 20,000 UNITS.

EVERYBODY THOUGHT HE WAS CRAZY. WELL, AS SOON AS THOSE UNITS, THEY INCENTIVIZED THEM.

AS SOON AS THOSE UNITS CAME INTO DOWNTOWN, IT'S, YOU KNOW, IT'S THRIVING.

IF YOU LOOK AT IT TODAY, THERE'S THERE'S UNITS EVERYWHERE.

BUT YOU NEED TO HAVE THOSE RESIDENTS THERE TO HELP ACTIVATE THAT RETAIL, THOSE RESTAURANTS.

AND SO IT JUST DOESN'T JUST DIE IN THE EVENING.

IT'S A PEDESTRIAN. THIS IS A PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY CENTRAL LIGHT WITH A CENTRALIZED AMENITY.

[00:30:04]

AS YOU CAN SEE, WE'VE TAKEN THE PARK THE WATER FEATURE THAT WAS ORIGINALLY JUST DOWN ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THERE.

WE'VE NOW EXTENDED IT WITH A STREAM AND UP TO ANOTHER SECONDARY LAKE RIGHT IN THE CORE OF THE COMMUNITY.

ALL OF THAT IS A 4.1 ACRE PARK FOR EVERYONE TO ENJOY.

SO THIS WILL BE A PUBLIC PARK FOR ALL TO ENJOY FOR THE TOWN OF PROSPER.

THE LAKE FEATURE THAT'S SHOWN THERE IS ACTUALLY ONE ACRE OF LAKE FEATURE.

WE HAVE THE AMPHITHEATER THERE IN THE CENTER AND THEN TRAILS THROUGHOUT.

AND OF COURSE, AS DISCUSSED EARLIER, WE HAVE COMMERCIAL WHICH RETAIL, BANK, RESTAURANTS, A HOTEL AND TWO OFFICE BUILDINGS.

WE HAVE 428 MULTIFAMILY UNITS CAPPED. WE HAVE 88 TOWNHOME UNITS AND 249 ASSISTED LIVING UNITS.

SO THE CHANGES THAT WE MADE SINCE WE LAST SAW YOU IN MAY, OR A LOT OF YOUR COMMENTS AND SOME OF PAZ'S COMMENTS.

ALSO, WE'VE INCREASED THE OPEN SPACE. I'LL GO THROUGH THAT IN A SEPARATE SLIDE.

WE BROUGHT THAT LAKE FEATURE AGAIN FROM THE SOUTHERN SOUTHEAST CORNER, ALL THE WAY INTO THE CENTER OF THE PROJECT.

AGAIN, WE'VE GOT ONE ACRE OF WATER SURFACE AREA.

WE'VE REDUCED THE HOTEL TO ONLY PROVIDE ONE FULL SERVICE ONE, AND THAT'S THE PURPLE AND THE SOUTHEAST PIECE OF THE PROPERTY.

WE'VE ADDED AN ADDITIONAL OFFICE BUILDING FLANKING THAT THAT LAKE SYSTEM.

WE'VE ADDED MORE SMALL BOUTIQUE RETAIL AROUND THE CENTRALIZED PARK SPACE WITH WHICH BRIAN WILL TAKE YOU THROUGH IN HIS ARCHITECTURAL DISCUSSIONS.

WE'VE CREATED AN EAST WEST CONNECTIVITY FROM THE TOWNHOME TO THE CENTRALIZED PARK SPACE.

THAT WAS ONE OF THE COMMENTS THAT IT WAS KIND OF ISOLATED, SO WE'VE OPENED THAT UP, ALLOWING PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR ACCESS BOTH EAST AND WEST, AND THEN WE'VE ADDED THE CURVATURE IN THE TOWNHOME STREETS.

THAT WAS IT. WHAT WAS ONE OF THE COMMENTS THAT IT WAS KIND OF RACEWAY LIKE.

AND SO IF WE COULD ACCOMMODATE SOME OF THE CURVILINEAR BIT INTO THE STREETS, THAT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE.

THAT ALSO CAUSED A DECREASE IN TOWNHOME UNITS.

SO WHEN WE INITIALLY STARTED THIS OVER A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, WE WERE OVER 1000 MULTIFAMILY UNITS.

WE HAD 140 TOWNHOME UNITS. WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY CENTRALIZED AMENITIES.

SO WE FEEL REALLY PROUD OF THE WORK THAT OUR TEAM HAS DONE.

WORKING WITH STAFF, WORKING, COMING FROM THE WORKSHOPS THAT YOU ALL, YOU AND THE PNC MEMBERS HAVE GIVEN US THE FEEDBACK FROM THERE.

ONE OF THE FEEDBACK, ONE OF THE ITEMS THAT CAME OUT OF PNC WAS WHETHER OR NOT WE WERE WILLING TO PUT A UNIT MIX ON THE MULTIFAMILY, AND WE HAD SAID, YOU KNOW, AT THAT POINT IN TIME, NO, IT REALLY STRAPS A MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPER.

SINCE THEN, IF COUNCIL WOULD LIKE US TO DO THAT, WE COULD WRITE THAT INTO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WE COULD LIMIT.

WE UNDERSTAND THAT THREE BEDROOMS MIGHT BE AN ISSUE, AND SO WE COULD LIMIT THE THREE BEDROOMS TO 5%, AND THEN WE COULD PUT THESE TWO BEDROOMS AT 30% AND 65% ON THE ONE BEDROOMS. SO OR WE COULD JUST CAP IT AT 21 UNITS, SAY, FOR THE THREE BEDROOMS. THIS IS THE OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT. I WANTED TO BRING YOUR ATTENTION TO.

WHAT WE DID HERE ON THE TOWNHOME PARCEL IS WE'VE ACTUALLY SINCE THE WORKSHOP, WE'VE ACTUALLY INCREASED THIS BY A HALF AN ACRE, AND THEN WE'VE INCREASED THE OVERALL PARK SPACE OUTSIDE OF THE TOWNHOME PRODUCT BY 1.75 ACRES.

SO AGAIN, THAT CENTRAL AMENITY IS 4.1 ACRES. WHICH ONE ACRE OF IT IS THE WATER FEATURE? THIS IS THE PHASING PLAN. I KNOW THAT THIS WAS DIFFICULT TO READ LAST TIME, SO KIMLEY-HORN REJIGGERED IT AND PUT SOME COLOR TO IT SO IT'S EASIER TO READ.

CLEARLY PHASE ONE IS ALL THE RETAIL ALONG THE FRONTAGE AND THEN THE TOWNHOMES AND MAHADE THE NEW ADDITIONS SINCE OUR WORKSHOP WAS EXTENDING THAT WATERWAY UP TO THE CENTER PORTION OF IT, AND ALSO ADDING THE CENTRAL PARK INTO AN EARLIER PHASE.

SO NOW IT WILL BE BUILT WITH PHASE THREE. OUR CLIENT IS VERY ANXIOUS TO GET READY AND GET GOING ON THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT. SO MUCH SO THEY'VE WORKED.

THEY'RE WORKING WITH ANOTHER DEVELOPER TO HELP BRING THIS PROJECT FORWARD AFTER ZONING, OF COURSE.

AND THE OTHER ISSUE IS THEY THEY ALSO FOUND IT VERY IMPORTANT TO COMMISSION THIS IMPACT DATA SOURCE OUT OF AUSTIN.

THEY DO A LOT OF WORK WITH EDCS AND MUNICIPALITIES.

AND THESE ARE SOME OF THE HIGHLIGHTS THAT THEY CAME UP WITH WITH REGARD TO THE IMPACT OF BELLA PROSPER ON THE TOWN OF PROSPER IN BLUE, THERE ARE THE GIVENS, RIGHT? 516 UNITS AND THEN AND WE HAVE OVER HUNDRED AND 36,000FT² OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.

SO WHAT DOES WHAT KIND OF IMPACT DOES THAT HAVE ON ON THE TOWN OF PROSPER? WELL, LET'S START WITH THE DEVELOPMENT COSTS CONSERVATIVELY. AGAIN, THIS IS THE GRAND TOTAL IS $314 MILLION.

[00:35:01]

122 OF THAT IS IN THE RESIDENTIAL 100 AND 62.5 IS IN COMMERCIAL AND 29 MILLION IN IN SITE IMPROVEMENTS.

AGAIN, I THINK THAT THAT'S PROBABLY A CONSERVATIVE NUMBER. THE CONSTRUCTION IMPACT THESE ARE OVER THE IMPACT DATA SOURCE LOOKED AT THIS OVER A TEN YEAR INPUT.

WHAT THEY FELT WAS A TWO YEAR CONSTRUCTION ALONG WITH EACH ONE OF THESE PHASES.

SO YOU'RE LOOKING AT TOTAL SPENDING THERE OVER 543 MILLION FOR THE TOTAL JOBS FOR EMPLOYMENT IS THAT 3700. SO 369 PER YEAR ON AVERAGE, AND THEN THE TOTAL WAGES $244 MILLION.

THIS ONE I'M SURE YOU WILL FIND VERY INTERESTING. THE TOTAL JOBS RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS 60 ACRE PROSPER PROJECT IS ALMOST 1200 JOBS. THE TAXABLE SALES 46.7. THESE ARE ANNUAL NUMBERS.

THE LODGING SALES WOULD BE 9 MILLION IN REVENUE.

AND THEN THE NEW RESIDENTIAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME WOULD EQUATE TO ALMOST 55 MILLION.

SO THE FISCAL IMPACT TO THE TOWN. THIS IS I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT YOU REALIZE THAT THIS IS A FISCAL NET BENEFIT, WHICH MEANS IT'S MINUS THE ESTIMATED LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICE COSTS.

SO NET TO THE TOWN OF PROSPER IS ALMOST $103 MILLION.

WITH THAT, I'M GOING TO ALLOW BRIAN TO COME UP HERE AND TALK ABOUT THE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES.

THANK YOU ALEXA. THANK YOU, DAVID, FOR THE PRESENTATIONS THAT THAT HAVE GONE ON.

I'M BRIAN MOORE WITH GF DESIGN. 3030 NOWICKI WAY IN DALLAS.

WE'RE REALLY PLEASED TO BE PRESENTING THIS PROJECT TO YOU THIS EVENING.

AS WAS MENTIONED BY DAVID THIS IS A LONG TIME COMING.

ALMOST TWO AND A HALF YEARS IN THE IN THE MAKING.

I WANT TO COMPLIMENT YOUR PLANNING STAFF IN PARTICULAR.

DAVID, DAKARI AND THEIR PLANNING STAFF HAVE BEEN AN ABSOLUTE JOY TO WORK WITH.

WE DON'T SAY THAT VERY OFTEN. THEY KNOW THEIR STUFF.

BUT THEY ALSO WERE VERY CONSTRUCTIVE IN THE, IN THE, IN THE DESIGN PROCESS.

AND AS DAVID MENTIONED, THE PROJECT ACTUALLY REALLY HAS GOTTEN BETTER OVER TIME.

YOU DON'T REALLY SEE THAT ALL THE TIME. SOMETIMES THINGS GET A LITTLE DILUTED OVER TIME.

BUT THIS PROJECT IN PARTICULAR HAS ABSOLUTELY GOTTEN BETTER OVER TIME.

DURING THE WORK SESSION WITH TOWN COUNCIL A LOT OF COMMENTS WERE MADE.

A LOT OF WE DID A LOT OF LISTENING. AND WE ALSO RESPONDED.

ROUGHLY 70% OF THIS PLAN HAS CHANGED OVER THE LAST SIX MONTHS OR SO SINCE WE HAD OUR WORK SESSION LAST.

AND AS ALEXA MENTIONED, A LOT OF ASPECTS OF THE PLAN ARE DIFFERENT AND HAVE IMPROVED OVER TIME AS YOU'RE SEEING UP HERE ON THE SCREEN.

A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS HAVE, IN FACT CHANGED THE NAMELY THINKING ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP OF MULTIFAMILY IN THE SOUTH TO THE TO THE WAY THAT BUILDINGS ARE RELATING TO EACH OTHER, HOW THEY SCALE WITH EACH OTHER.

THE PREVIOUS PLAN HAD TWO BUILDINGS THAT WERE EQUAL IN, IN HEIGHT AND SIZE AND MORE RECTILINEAR IN NATURE IN NOW WHAT WE HAVE INSTEAD OF TWO BUILDINGS, WE HAVE FOUR BUILDINGS AND A LOWER MULTIFAMILY UNIT COUNT, BUT ALSO MORE STRATEGICALLY THINKING ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP OF COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY, GROUND FLOOR ACTIVE USES WITH THAT.

IN ADDITION TO THAT, WE HAVE A SAMPLING OF DIFFERENT HEIGHTS, DIFFERENT BUILDING HEIGHTS FOR THE MULTIFAMILY.

INSTEAD OF ALL FIVE STORY, WE HAVE A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT HEIGHTS OF FIVE AND FOUR STORY TO HELP BREAK THOSE THOSE BUILDING BLOCKS DOWN INTO MORE MANAGEABLE SIZES.

RIGHT. ALEXA MENTIONED ROUGHLY A FOUR ACRE PARK.

THE RELATIONSHIP OF THINKING ABOUT WHERE THE WATER IS THAT WE HAD TO WE HAD TO GO BACK AND THINK ABOUT HOW THAT WOULD IMPACT FROM BE IMPACTED FROM A COST STANDPOINT.

AND WE FELT COMFORTABLE OF BEING ABLE TO TIE THOSE TWO BODIES OF WATER TOGETHER SO THAT SMARTLY, YOUR ONE OF YOUR COMMENTS IN PARTICULAR WAS THINKING ABOUT THAT WHERE WHERE THE WATER WAS ON THAT SOUTHEAST PORTION WHEN WE SPLIT THOSE UP INTO TWO PIECES.

SO NOW YOU HAVE A GREATER SENSE OF BUFFER BETWEEN THE, THE ASSISTED LIVING AND THE AND THE REST OF THE PARK SPACE.

THAT WAS ONE OF THE COMMENTS THAT WAS MENTIONED. ALSO THINKING ABOUT THE SIZE OF THE OF THE AMPHITHEATER THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE DRIVE AISLES THAT ARE GOING THROUGH THE SITE, REALLY STARTING TO REALLY FOCUS ON THAT A LITTLE BIT MORE.

SOME OF THE SITE SECTIONS WERE, WERE SPEAKING TO THAT AS WELL.

ON THE TOWNHOME PORTION, REALLY STARTING TO THINK A LITTLE BIT MORE AGAIN, FROM A DESIGN STANDPOINT AS WE'RE GOING THROUGH THIS OVER THE PAST TWO, TWO AND A HALF YEARS OR SO, THINKING A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT DESIGN, ABOUT DETAIL.

THE MORE WE GET INTO IT, THE MORE DETAIL WE ADD, RIGHT? AND PARTICULARLY FOR THE TOWNHOMES IN PARTICULAR, WE START FOCUSING ON THE RELATIONSHIP FROM THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY STANDPOINT, FROM THE TOWNHOMES TO THE THE HEART OR THE CORE OF THE PROJECT, WHICH IS THE THE, THE PARK SPACE ITSELF.

[00:40:03]

SO INSTEAD OF ORIGINALLY WE HAD ONE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TYING FROM TOWNHOMES TO TO THE EAST TOWARDS THE THE HEART OF THE PARK.

NOW WE HAVE THREE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS TYING IN.

WE ALSO HAVE A SAMPLING OF DIFFERENT ADDITIONAL MODERN FARMHOUSE TYPE ACTIVITY THAT I'LL SHARE TO YOU IN JUST A SECOND.

BUT HERE'S A SAMPLING OF SOME OF THE THE IMAGES THAT WE THINK ARE SERVING AS NICE INSPIRATION FOR THE FOR THE PROJECT.

AGAIN, A SAMPLING OF MULTIFAMILY ASSISTED LIVING, COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY, TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT, HOTEL ALL IN THE HORIZONTAL MIX OF USES. THIS IS LOOKING FROM THE NORTHWEST, LOOKING SOUTH, LOOKING SOUTHEAST WITH A RETAIL RESTAURANT ACTIVITY IN THE THE IMMEDIATE LOWER LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER AND THEN THE REST OF THE PROJECT FURTHER TO THE ON THE UPPER PORTION OF THE PAGE. ONE OF THE OTHER COMMENTS THAT WAS THAT WAS MENTIONED BY MISS BARTLETT WAS THE THINKING ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE TOWNHOMES AND THE THE LET'S CALL IT THE THE SOMEWHAT RELENTLESSNESS OF THOSE FACADES.

SO WE HAVE A LOT OF STAGGER TO THOSE TO THOSE BUILDINGS.

NOW WE HAVE A LOT OF, YOU MIGHT SAY, JIGS AND JOGS BETWEEN OR SAWTOOTH KIND OF EFFECT BETWEEN THOSE.

SO YOU DON'T HAVE A SINGLE MONOLITHIC FACADE.

YOU HAVE A GREATER VARIETY OF DIFFERENT FACADES, AND YOU'LL SEE THAT IN A SECOND AS WELL.

IT ALL KIND OF COMES DOWN TO THE TO THE PARK SPACE IN THE MIDDLE, THOUGH. THAT'S, THAT'S, THAT'S THAT FOUR ACRE PARK IS A TRUE GENUINE AMENITY WEAR, A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT USES ARE ALL FLANKING IT.

THAT WAS THAT WAS ALWAYS MY INTENTION FROM THE VERY BEGINNING.

A COMBINATION OF HOTEL OFFICE SPACE, BOTH TWO STORY AND FOUR STORY ASSISTED LIVING.

COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY. HERE'S ANOTHER SAMPLING OF THE TOWNHOMES THAT ARE DIRECTLY ALONG MY HARD DRIVE, WITH THE GREATER LEVEL OF ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL AND STAGGERS ALONG THAT ALONG THAT DRIVE.

THE COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY FOR RETAIL RESTAURANT ACTIVITY.

WE FOCUSED A LOT ON THE DESIGN AS IT RELATES TO THINKING ABOUT THE MODERN FARMHOUSE KIND OF CONCEPT.

AND IT'S IT'S A CONCEPT THAT WE'VE DONE A FEW TIMES ON OTHER, OTHER PROJECTS ALREADY, AND IT'S GOTTEN A LOT OF GOOD AIRPLAY SO FAR.

AND WE'RE ALSO DOING MORE OF THAT OF THAT PARTICULAR LOOK ON THIS, ON THIS PROJECT.

NOW, THIS IS ANOTHER LOOK AT THE NOW WHAT YOU HAVE IN THE CENTRAL PARK WITH WATER.

A WATER FEATURE EMBEDDED WITHIN THAT, IN ADDITION TO THE GREEN SPACE AND AMPHITHEATER.

ALWAYS THINKING ABOUT THE QUALITY OF THE OPEN SPACE.

THAT'S WHERE THE DESIGN REALLY KIND OF COMES INTO PLAY HERE.

THINKING ABOUT A COMBINATION OF A NATURAL PLANT PALETTE ARTWORK, PERHAPS, AND THEN THE SPILLOVER EFFECT OF GROUND FLOOR ACTIVATED USES SPILLING OUT TOWARDS THE THE OPEN SPACE. HERE'S THE FOUR STORY MULTIFAMILY AT THE HEART CORNER WITH GROUND FLOOR ACTIVATED USES THERE ON THE HARD CORNER AS WELL.

AND ONE OF THE WATER FEATURES WITH TWO STORY OFFICE ON THE RIGHT AND FOUR STORY OFFICE ON THE LEFT.

AS ALEXA MENTIONED, OUR ENTIRE TEAM IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. WE REALLY APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION.

THANK YOU. WOULD ANYONE HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT AT THIS TIME? NO. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE APPRECIATE IT.

THIS ITEM IS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO THEREFORE, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS PARTICULAR ITEM? MICHELLE, DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENT CARDS OR ANYTHING? NOPE. OKAY, THEN IN THAT CASE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND COUNCIL ANY DISCUSSION.

I'LL START WITH COUNCIL MEMBER HODGES. YEAH. SO I DO APPRECIATE ALL THE TIME THAT YOU ALL HAVE TAKEN TO PRESENT THIS.

AND THERE ARE DEFINITELY SOME IMPROVEMENTS MADE.

YOU CAN SEE THAT JUST FROM THE PRESENTATION. BUT AGAIN, APARTMENTS ARE SOMETHING THAT I KNOW THAT OUR CITIZENS ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF. AND SO WHEN WE LOOK TO ISSUE APARTMENTS, WE HAVE TO SIT BACK AND SAY, WHAT ARE WE GETTING? AND SO IN LOOKING AT THIS PRESENTATION, I DON'T I DON'T SEE THE UNIQUENESS OR THE AGAIN, I THINK I USE THIS PRIOR, BUT THE WOW FACTOR. OKAY. I THE AMPHITHEATER, I DON'T KNOW HOW THAT WOULD WORK WITH, WITH THAT SETTING, I DON'T KNOW. I DON'T SEE PEOPLE COMING FROM OUTSIDE THE DEVELOPMENT TO THE AMPHITHEATER FOR A CONCERT OR. WHATEVER. IT WOULD BE THERE. I WOULD JUST FEAR IT WOULD BE KIND OF WASTED SPACE.

[00:45:09]

I DO APPRECIATE THE EXTENSION OF MY HEART. I BELIEVE THAT IS NECESSARY.

AND I DO LIKE THE THE WATER CONCEPT. I MEAN, I THINK THAT THE ADDING MORE OF A WATER FEATURE LIKE YOU DID IS IS IS A IS A GREAT ADDITIVE. I WOULD ALMOST THINK THAT. USING THAT, MAYBE PUTTING A RESTAURANT WITH HAVING LIKE ALMOST LIKE A PIER TYPE DEAL WHERE PEOPLE ARE SITTING ON THE WATER MIGHT BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE INTERESTING.

BUT AGAIN, WE ONLY HAVE A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF, OF APARTMENTS THAT WE CAN ISSUE OR THAT WE WANT TO ISSUE.

AND I THINK THAT IT WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT WHAT WE'RE GETTING IS SOMETHING THAT THE CITIZENS ARE, ARE GOING TO APPRECIATE AND AS A DESTINATION.

AND WITH THIS, I'M SORRY, I JUST DON'T SEE IT.

AGAIN, I'M ON ONE VOTE. I WOULD ASK THAT IF THE REST OF THE COUNCIL DOES THINK THAT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT THEY DO WANT, I WOULD REQUEST THAT IN THE SUBDISTRICT THAT TALKS ABOUT THE AGE RESTRICTED BUILDING, THERE IS A USE BY RIGHT THAT MENTIONS THE BEVERAGE SALE, ALCOHOL BEVERAGE SALES ON THE LIST.

AND I WOULD ASK THAT YOU EITHER MAKE THAT BUY SOUP OR ELIMINATE ALTOGETHER.

I JUST DON'T THINK WE NEED ANY MORE LIQUOR STORES IN TOWN OR OR BEER STORES FOR THAT MATTER.

SO RESPECTFULLY, I, I'M NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THE, THE AGAIN, THE LIMITED NUMBER OF APARTMENTS THAT WE ARE ABLE TO TO GIVE. AND I JUST DON'T THINK THAT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT.

THAT WE WOULD WANT TO LEND THOSE TO, I GUESS WOULD BE THE BEST WAY TO PUT IT.

THANK THANK YOU. JEFF. COUNCIL MEMBER REEVES.

I DO THINK THAT THAT Y'ALL HAVE Y'ALL HAVE COME A LONG WAY FROM FROM WHEN WE FIRST SAW THIS.

I I, I THINK THE EXTENSION OF MOLATE IS, IS DEFINITELY A PLUS.

I THINK THE TRAIL SYSTEM CONNECTION IS A PLUS.

BRINGING THE THE WATER FEATURE IN THE MIDDLE I THINK IS, IS A IS A GREAT PLUS THE WHERE, WHERE MY HANG UP IS, IS JUST THE TOTAL NUMBER OF OVERALL UNITS WHICH WE'RE, WE'RE AT ABOUT 772 UNITS TOTAL. AND THAT'S A LOT OF UNITS. THE, THE TOWNHOMES ALL OF THE, THE MAJORITY OF THE OPEN SPACE IS ON THE FAR WEST SIDE IS WHERE ALL OF THE OPEN SPACE IS.

AND SO IT CRAMS EVERYTHING. AND I'M NOT A BIG FAN OF THAT.

I WOULD I JUST IT'S, IT'S ALL CRAMMED IN TO ONE AREA.

I'D LIKE TO SEE MORE OPEN SPACE IN THERE. I APPRECIATE FROM THE FROM THE MULTIFAMILY STANDPOINT.

I'M APPRECIATIVE THAT Y'ALL Y'ALL ARE ADHERING TO OUR STANDARDS.

SO THANK YOU FOR THAT. AND SO RIGHT NOW, AS FAR AS WHERE MY THOUGHTS ARE FROM, A FROM A YES NO STANDPOINT, I'M NOT 100% SURE. I'M BUT I. I LIKE I LIKE WHERE YOU ARE HEADING.

BUT I'M NOT 100% SURE AND, AND I WOULD LIKE TO, TO HEAR WHERE, WHERE SOME OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS STAND ON THIS.

BUT I DO THANK YOU FOR, FOR THE HARD WORK THAT Y'ALL HAVE DONE.

SO THANK YOU. OKAY, SO I'VE GOT A FEW COMMENTS.

AND AND FIRST, I'D LIKE TO THANK YOU GUYS FOR THE EFFORT YOU PUT IN.

I THINK YOU'VE LISTENED TO THE FEEDBACK FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING AND FROM COUNCIL, AND YOU REFERENCED COUNCILWOMAN BARTLEBAUGH COMMENTS COMMENT SEVERAL DIFFERENT TIMES.

AND SO I, I TEND TO ECHO THOSE COMMENTS. JUST A FEW OBSERVATIONS AND YEAH, IF YOU GUYS FOLLOW MY TRACK RECORD WITH WITH MULTIFAMILY, I'M NOT HISTORICALLY FOR IT.

I DO THINK THAT YOU'VE MADE SOME GOOD STRIDES WITH THE DIVERSIFICATION OF WHERE THE WATER AND THE GREEN AREAS AND COLLECTION SPACES.

I REALLY STRUGGLE WITH WHERE FUTURE LOVERS LANE IS GOING TO BE HAVING MULTIFAMILY UNITS RIGHT THERE ON THAT EDGE.

IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT, IF YOU'RE DRIVING DOWN, I DON'T WANT IT TO LOOK LIKE FRISCO, WHERE YOU'VE GOT SO MANY DIFFERENT, YOU KNOW, FOUR STORIES. I THINK THE PRODUCT IS THE RIGHT PRODUCT.

[00:50:03]

YOU KNOW, FOR A LOCATION LIKE THIS. I THINK THE PROXIMITY IN THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT IS GUT.

AND IF I WAS DRIVING BY, I WOULD COMPLETELY MISS THE AMPHITHEATER, THE WATER FEATURES.

YOU WOULDN'T SEE THEM. ALL I WOULD SEE IS IF I'M DRIVING ALONG.

LOVERS IS APARTMENTS. I WOULD SEE ROWS OF TOWNHOMES.

I LIKE THE TOWNHOME OPTIONS. I THINK THE, THE WORK THAT'S BEEN DONE ON TOWNHOMES TO CREATE SOME CURVATURE HELPS SOFTEN THAT HARD LINE OF JUST ROWS AND ROWS OF TOWNHOMES. I STRUGGLE A BIT WITH THE THE PHASING, WITH THE FIRST PHASING BEING ALL TOWNHOMES, SECOND PHASING BEING ALL MULTIFAMILY. I DO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THERE WILL BE SOME RETAIL THAT COMES IN WITH PHASE ONE.

AND OBVIOUSLY YOU'VE GOT A HOTEL THAT WILL GO IN WITH PHASE TWO OF THESE ITERATIONS, BUT I DON'T KNOW.

I REALLY WANT TO HEAR WHAT MY COLLEAGUES HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THIS.

I UNIT COUNT, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY APARTMENTS ARE A PREMIUM HERE IN PROSPER, AND WE'VE GOT A LOT OF THEM COMING IN AROUND US.

THERE'S ALSO A LOT THAT ARE AVAILABLE. AND MY CONCERN WITH THE WAY THIS IS LAID OUT AT CURRENT STATE AND THE QUANTITY.

I NEED TO HEAR WHERE THE REST OF THE COUNCIL SET BEFORE I CAN VOTE ACCORDINGLY.

BUT I DO WANT TO COMMEND YOU GUYS FOR THE EFFORT YOU'VE TAKEN THUS FAR. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU CRAIG. I WON'T SPEND A LOT OF TIME ON.

I THINK MY COUNCIL, MY PEERS, HAVE DONE A GREAT JOB OF OF CHARACTERIZING, AND I APPRECIATE THE WORK THAT'S BEEN DONE TO GET TO THIS POINT.

I KNOW IT'S A LOT OF WORK AND THERE DEFINITELY HAVE BEEN STRIDES MADE.

I'M NOT YOU KNOW WHAT? I'M I'M NOT AGAINST THE MULTIFAMILY NECESSARILY, BUT I AM REALLY FOR IS THAT WHATEVER WE PUT IN THERE HAS TO BE SUPER HIGH QUALITY. AND ONE OF THE THINGS I WANT TO MAKE SURE HAPPENS HERE IS I'M NOT.

WELL, LET ME KIND OF ADDRESS THE MAIN BULLETS HERE.

NUMBER ONE AND I MAY BE IN THERE IN THE PACKET SOMEWHERE.

BUT I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT WE REALLY, REALLY ADHERE TO THE MULTIFAMILY STANDARDS AND IN PARTICULAR STRUCTURE PARKING.

I THINK THAT IS REALLY GOING TO BE ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL.

NOW THAT MAY PUSH YOU FURTHER DOWN THE ROAD BECAUSE OF PRICE POINTS AND PER SQUARE FOOT DEMAND IN THIS AREA.

WE ALL KNOW THAT DEMAND YOU KNOW, THE DEMAND CURVE AND KIND OF WHERE THE PRICE POINTS GO YOU KNOW, WE'RE KIND OF GRADUALLY WORKING OUR WAY UP TO THAT TYPE OF PRODUCT.

AND THAT MAY NOT BE TOMORROW, BUT I THINK IT'S CRITICAL THAT THE STRUCTURE PARKING REQUIREMENT IS ADHERED TO.

I THINK IT'S ALSO REALLY IMPORTANT THAT THAT FIRST FLOOR I SAW THAT WE MEET THE, I BELIEVE, 12 OR 14 FOOT FLOOR PLATE ON THE GROUND FLOOR, BUT THAT REALLY A CONCENTRATION OF HIGHER END MATERIALS ARE ON THAT SO THAT THAT STREETSCAPE LOOKS LOOKS GOOD. AND NOT JUST THAT I'M GOING TO KIND OF GO INTO, I THINK, SOME OF MY PEERS REALLY CRITICAL POINTS. ONE BEING THAT THE LANDSCAPING IS EXCEPTIONAL, PARTICULARLY AROUND THOSE KIND OF ENTRY POINTS TO THE DRIVE ISLES. I THINK THAT'S GOING TO BE SUPER CRITICAL.

WE HAVE TO HAVE SUPER HIGH STANDARDS THERE, AND THIS HAS TO BE A HIGH END PRODUCT.

SO KIND OF ADDRESSING THE MULTIFAMILY CONCERNS THERE.

THAT IS NOT SOMETHING WE JUST GIVE AWAY. IT IS SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE TO SET THE TONE IN THAT AREA.

AND WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME, EFFORT BROUGHT IN A LOT OF PEOPLE TO HELP US KIND OF HELP UNDERSTAND WHAT THE VISION IS FOR THAT, FOR THAT AREA. AND SO I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE CRITICAL.

ONE OTHER THING BEFORE I GET TO MY FINAL POINT IS, I THINK AT THE END OF THE DAY, I THINK, YOU KNOW, MEDICAL OFFICE IS GOING TO BE HIGH DEMAND OVER THERE AND THAT WE'RE SEEING IT RIGHT NOW.

MEDICAL OFFICE PENETRATION IS IS VERY STRONG RIGHT NOW.

AND YOU'RE SEEING THE FOLKS THAT ARE DOING THOSE TYPE OF PROJECTS ARE REALLY ABLE TO, TO THE MARKET'S REALLY ABSORBING THAT RIGHT NOW.

SO I THINK THAT'S GOING TO BE CRITICAL. WHAT I, WHAT I REALLY STRUGGLE WITH ON THIS, THIS PROJECT IS THE PHASING.

I THINK COUNCILMAN RAY MAY HAVE SAID IT, AND IF I'VE MISSED ANYBODY ELSE, THAT KIND OF I THINK PHASE TWO AND I GUESS WHAT IS THE MIDDLE THE MIDDLE OF THE PROJECT IS FOUR AND FIVE. I FEEL LIKE THOSE NEED TO BE FLIPPED.

I THINK YOU KNOW WHAT, WHAT NEEDS TO BE SEEN AT THE STREETSCAPE.

IF YOU LOOK AT THE KIND OF THINGS WE'RE THINKING ABOUT ALONG THE TOLL ROAD IS, YOU KNOW, WE'RE REALLY THINKING ABOUT THINGS THAT PULL PEOPLE IN TO A PROJECT.

AND THAT IS THE IS THE MORE INTRICATE AND BEAUTIFUL STREETSCAPES.

MULTIFAMILY DOESN'T DO THAT. I'M SORRY. IT'S GOT TO BE ONE OF THOSE THINGS WHERE WE MOVE THE MULTIFAMILY INSIDE OF THE PROJECT IF WE'RE GOING TO DO

[00:55:10]

IT AT ALL. AND AND THEN USE THOSE OTHER ELEMENTS TO BRING PEOPLE IN.

AND THE PARK IS A GREAT IDEA, BUT I DON'T THINK ANYBODY'S EVER GOING TO SEE IT.

I THINK IF YOU LOOK AT SOME OF THE SUCCESSFUL MIXED USE PROJECTS, ADDISON CIRCLE, THINGS LIKE THAT, THEY HAVE SOME REALLY GREAT STREETSCAPE ACTIVITIES THAT ARE GOING ON.

SOME ART, SOME THINGS THAT ARE AT THE AT THE MAIN THOROUGHFARE LEVEL THAT BRING PEOPLE INTO THAT DEVELOPMENT.

AND I THINK THERE'S THINGS IN HERE, THERE'S REALLY GOOD PIECES, BUT IT'S IT'S KIND OF IN THE WRONG.

IT'S IN THE WRONG SPOT, I THINK. AND SO I'D REALLY LIKE TO SEE SOME, SOME ALTERNATIVES ON THAT FRONT.

THE, THE MULTIFAMILY, THE ONLY WAY THAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN IS IF THAT IS, IS ADHERED TO, THE STANDARDS ARE ADHERED TO AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL.

IT'S GOT TO THE BAR HAS GOT TO BE SUPER HIGH BECAUSE EVERYTHING ELSE THAT COMES ALONG THE TOLLWAY, THERE'S GOING TO BE OTHER PEOPLE THAT ARE GOING TO FOLLOW. AND IF WE IF WE DON'T HOLD THOSE STANDARDS UP ON THE NORTH DALLAS TOLL ROAD, THEN WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A LONG, LONG BATTLE AHEAD OF US AND OUR, OUR, OUR CITIZENS, OUR NEIGHBORS REALLY EXPECT THIS AREA TO BE REALLY BE THE THE FUTURE OF PROSPER AND REALLY DRIVE OUR TAX BASE GOING FORWARD.

SO I THINK REALLY WHEN IT BOILS DOWN TO IT, THE MULTIFAMILY HAS TO ADHERE TO THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF STANDARDS FOR OUR TOWN, STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY, FOR FOR MULTIFAMILY.

GOING FORWARD, WE NEED TO FLIP THE, THE REALLY THE OUTSIDE AND PUT IT INSIDE.

AND REALLY THE THIRD THING WOULD BE TO WHEN WE REPLACE THAT, REALLY HAVE SOME THINGS ON THE THE MAIN THOROUGHFARE STREETSCAPE THAT REALLY BRING PEOPLE IN RATHER THAN THEM GOING, OKAY, THERE'S THERE'S MULTIFAMILY THERE AND YEAH, IT LOOKS REALLY NICE.

MAYBE. BUT THAT'S NOT GOING TO BRING ME. THAT'S NOT GOING TO BRING ME INTO THE INTO THE AREA FOR THE RETAIL AND ALL THE OTHER THINGS.

AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE. THANK YOU. OKAY. YOU KNOW, I DON'T WANT TO REPEAT, JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE SAID, REPEAT A LOT OF THE SAME COMMENTS. I THINK THAT WE DEFINITELY APPRECIATE THE ATTENTION TO DETAIL HERE, AND WE'RE SOMETIMES TALKING OUT OF BOTH SIDES OF OUR MOUTH SAYING WE WANT BIG PICTURE VERSUS DETAILS AND THE DEVIL'S IN THE DETAILS.

AND YOU GUYS ARE RESPONDING TO A LOT OF INDIVIDUAL DETAILS, WHICH IS GOOD.

AND WE APPRECIATE THAT MAKING THOSE ADJUSTMENTS AND THINKING.

BUT I THINK WHAT HAPPENED HERE, IN MY OPINION, IS WE'RE STILL MISSING THE BIGGER PICTURE.

WHICH IS IT FEELS THE DEVELOPMENT ITSELF FEELS LIKE MULTIFAMILY MIXED MORE SUPPORTED BY MIXED USE AS OPPOSED TO MORE OF LIKE A DESTINATION SPOT THAT'S BEING ENABLED BY THE THE MULTIFAMILY.

AND SO I THINK THAT'S WHERE I'M HAVING THE BIGGEST DIFFICULTY.

I'M STILL SEARCHING FOR THAT SPECIAL UNIQUE TRADE OFF THAT WE WOULD GET AS, AS RESIDENTS AND AS A TOWN.

AND I THINK THAT WHAT OUR RESIDENTS ARE ASKING FOR AS A BALANCE TO THE NEED TO HAVE THE MULTIFAMILY, MAYBE TO HELP MAKE IT WORK, BUT ALSO TO JUST MAKE THE DEAL WORK.

AND I'M DEFINITELY APPRECIATIVE OF THAT COMPONENT OF IT.

I JUST THINK EVEN FROM THE VERY BEGINNING, THAT WAS MY INITIAL FEEDBACK PERSONALLY, WAS THAT IT JUST I'M LOOKING FOR THAT UNIQUE OR SOMETHING THAT I GO I REALLY THINK THAT'S AWESOME. AND WE WANT THAT. AND YOU'RE SAYING THE DEVELOPER OR YOU GUYS ARE SAYING, BUT WE NEED SOME OF THESE OTHER COMPONENTS TO HELP MAKE IT WORK.

THAT'S WHERE I'M A LITTLE BIT MORE OPEN TO IT.

IT'S FAIRLY FAR AWAY FROM THE ACTUAL TOLLWAY.

SO IT'S NOT GOING TO ACTUAL IT'S IN OUR TOLLWAY DISTRICT, WHICH IS ALLOWABLE USES, BUT IT'S NOT.

YOU KNOW, THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT WE JUST ALLOW ALL OF THE THINGS THAT ARE ALLOWABLE IN THAT DISTRICT. AND SO, LIKE IF IT WAS ACTIVATING THE CORNER OR IF IT WAS IF THERE WAS A MAJOR COMMERCIAL PIECE OF IT THEN I WOULD BE A LITTLE BIT IT'D BE EASIER FOR ME TO, TO AGREE.

AND AGAIN, I KNOW THAT YOU GUYS HAVE PUT A LOT OF WORK INTO IT. SO I THINK, YOU KNOW, THAT'S JUST MY OVERALL THOUGHT PROCESS THERE TOO.

I'M JUST MISSING THAT, YOU KNOW, WHAT'S WHAT'S THE BIG GET THAT PROSPER'S GETTING IN ORDER FOR YOU GUYS TO BE ABLE TO GET SOME OF, YOU KNOW, PRECIOUS MULTIFAMILY ENTITLEMENTS. WE'RE.

SPEAKING OF DEVIL'S IN THE DETAILS, THAT WOULD BE ME.

SO I WILL COMMENT A LITTLE BIT ON THE, THE THE ACTUAL DOCUMENT THAT ACCOMPANIED ALL OF THE THE PLANS HERE, THE THE PHOTOS HERE. I THINK THERE'S A LITTLE CLEANUP TO DO STILL IN THAT DOCUMENT THAT, FOR EXAMPLE,

[01:00:06]

THE HOTEL STANDARDS ARE NOT CLEAR. THERE'S SOME THERE'S THERE'S ALLOWABLE MULTIFAMILY IN WHAT IS CALLED THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT, WHICH SHOULD BE MOVED OVER TO THE RETAIL SUBDISTRICT.

THERE'S SOME ERRORS IN YOUR MAP LABELING VERSUS YOUR CHART.

SO THERE'S SOME CLEANUP TO BE DONE. AND THERE ARE SOME THERE ARE SOME DETAILS MISSING HERE.

AND THERE'S ALSO SOME USES THAT, YOU KNOW, YOU YOU YOU DON'T SHOW ANYTHING BIG LIKE A BIG BOX OF 50,000 SQUARE FOOT OR LARGER BUILDING ON THIS SITE PLAN, BUT IT'S ALLOWED IN, IN IN THE OTHER, IN THE RETAIL SUBDISTRICT.

SO THOSE KINDS OF THINGS I THINK NEED TO BE SORT OF REFINED AND CLEANED UP.

TO START WITH, THE SECOND COMMENT IS THE PHASING FOR ME IS A PROBLEM, BECAUSE REALLY, THE WAY IT READS WITH THE TRIGGERS IS YOU COULD DO THE THE TOWNHOMES IN, IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT, YOU COULD DO ONE BIG BOX 50,000 SQUARE FOOT STORE AND THEN YOU COULD BUILD THE APARTMENTS. AND I UNDERSTAND WHY PHASE FOUR AND FIVE ARE WHERE THEY ARE.

THAT'S PROBABLY THE HARDEST PART TO GET. IT'S A LOT OF RETAIL.

IT'S A LOT OF RESTAURANTS. IT'S IT'S A SIGNIFICANT CAPITAL OUTLAY FOR THE MIDDLE PART FOR FOR THE PARK AREA.

I UNDERSTAND THAT. BUT TO ME, YOU'RE LEAVING RESIDENTS IN THE TOWNHOMES AND THE APARTMENTS WITH NOTHING TO WALK TO.

THERE IS NO QUALITY OF LIFE. SO THAT'S YOUR SELLING POINT.

BUT IT THERE IS JUST NOT THERE. THE SIDEWALKS AREN'T EVEN THERE.

YOU'RE YOU'RE DOING THOSE SIDEWALKS IN PHASES AS THE RETAIL COMES.

SO TO ME THAT, YOU KNOW, THAT COULD SIT THERE FOR 5 OR 6 YEARS.

THOSE RESIDENTS DON'T HAVE A PLACE TO WALK TO. THERE'S NO RESTAURANTS. THERE'S NOTHING TO DO. SO I HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THAT.

I WANT, I WANT TO SEE MORE PHASING WHERE, YOU KNOW, IF YOU DID THE TOWNHOMES FOR FIRST, FOR EXAMPLE, WHERE ARE THOSE PEOPLE GOING TO GO? YOU KNOW, WITH PHASE ONE, WHAT ARE YOU BUILDING WITH THAT? ARE THERE TRAILS? IS THERE A PARK AREA THEY CAN WALK TO IN THE INTERIM WHILE ALL THESE OTHER THINGS COME ALONG? YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN IN THE MARKET RIGHT NOW. HOTELS ARE HARD TO FIND. I WOULD ASSUME THAT WOULD BE LAST. YOU KNOW, IF WE WERE GOING TO DO IT RIGHT NOW. SO I THINK THERE'S SOME CLEANUP THERE AS WELL TO DO. THE OTHER THING I WILL SAY IS THE THERE ARE SOME THERE ARE SOME THINGS IN YOUR PRESENTATION LIKE PUBLIC ART, FOR EXAMPLE, WHICH ARE IN OUR DESIGN GUIDELINES, BUT THERE'S THAT'S NOWHERE IN THE DOCUMENTATION THAT YOU WOULD PUT IN PUBLIC ART.

LANDSCAPING ENHANCEMENTS. THERE'S NOWHERE IN THE DOCUMENTATION. THERE WOULD BE LANDSCAPING ENHANCEMENTS. SO I THINK THERE ARE SOME THINGS LIKE THAT. I AGREE WITH WHAT MY COLLEAGUE SAID. I THINK FOR THE STANDARDS WE'RE WANTING FOR MULTIFAMILY, THAT ENERGY NEEDS TO BE MATCHED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT.

IT'S JUST NOT AN APARTMENT COMPLEX WITH WITH A PARKING GARAGE.

IT'S A HIGH END PROJECT, AND IT NEEDS TO BE A HIGH END PROJECT FROM START TO FINISH, AND I DON'T SEE THAT YET.

I THINK THERE'S STILL WORK TO DO. SO THE OTHER THING IS ONE MORE THING.

SORRY. MY BRAIN. SORRY. I DON'T GET THE ASSISTED LIVING.

I REALLY DON'T GET IT. I WILL TELL YOU WHY. WE HAD A DEVELOPER IN HERE A MONTH AGO WITH AN AGE RESTRICTED DEVELOPMENT, AND THEIR COMMENT WAS, NOBODY BUYS THE HOMES NEAR THE AMENITY CENTER BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT TO HEAR PEOPLE PICKLEBALL AND ALL THAT KIND OF STUFF.

THIS MAKES NO SENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF THAT, BECAUSE YOU HAVE ASSISTED LIVING RIGHT NEXT TO AN AMPHITHEATER WITH RESTAURANTS AND PATIOS AND LIVE MUSIC, AND THAT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO ME. I'D I'D RATHER SEE AN ENTERTAINMENT TYPE USE THERE OR SOMETHING ELSE THAT MAKES MORE SENSE WITH THE LIFESTYLE THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO CREATE HERE. I DON'T THINK ASSISTED LIVING FITS. THAT'S JUST MY OPINION. I'LL STOP NOW.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU TO EVERYONE WHO MADE THEIR COMMENTS.

I DO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT I ACKNOWLEDGE THE WORK OF OUR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, WHO WORKED ON THIS EXTENSIVELY, OUR STAFF WHO WORKED ON IT EXTENSIVELY, AS WELL AS DURING OUR WORK SESSIONS AND EVERYTHING.

I WANT TO THANK GOOD FULTON FARRELL FOR YOUR CLARITY ON MANY OF THE ITEMS HERE.

SO THAT WAS THAT WAS WELL DONE. I WANT TO THANK MISS KNIGHT FOR THE QUICK THROW AWAY ON THREE BEDROOMS. SO THAT WAS REALLY GOOD IN TERMS OF MADE A QUICK ADJUSTMENT ON THAT.

YEAH. I FROM OUR COMMUNITY THEY WOULD PROBABLY BE NOT MUCH ROOM FOR THREE BEDROOM APARTMENTS, ESPECIALLY IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA. SO THANK YOU FOR RECOGNIZING SOME PART OF THAT.

COUNCIL MEMBER HODGES CAUGHT THE THING ABOUT THE ALCOHOL BEING ALLOWED BY RIGHT IN THERE AND THAT.

ALL RIGHT. WELL BUT IT'S IN THE APPROVED USES.

SO YEAH. SO TO YOUR POINT, THERE'S, THERE'S QUITE A FEW THINGS IN HERE THAT I WOULD WANT TO HAVE CLEANED UP.

THE FINAL POINT I'M GOING TO MAKE AND IS MORE FOR ALL OF THE DEVELOPMENT IN THE TOLLWAY DISTRICT.

[01:05:02]

SO PART OF THIS PROPERTY IS IN THE TOLLWAY DISTRICT.

PART OF IT IS NOT JUST BECAUSE A PIECE OF PROPERTY IS IN THE TOLLWAY DISTRICT DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY GRANT IT MULTIFAMILY REITS. SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE THAT A VERY CLEAR THING SO THAT IT GETS OUT TO THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY.

WE HAVE, AS COUNCIL MEMBER HODGES MENTIONED, A NUMBER OF APARTMENTS THAT WE'RE TARGETING, AND THIS DOESN'T DO ANYTHING TO REMOVE SOME OF THEM OR MITIGATE OR WE DON'T HAVE ANY MITIGATION FOR THAT YET.

SO JUST FOR THE BROADER DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY, TOLLWAY DISTRICT DOES NOT MEAN AUTOMATIC GRANTING OF THOSE PARTICULAR RIGHTS.

SO WITH THAT, I WILL LET EVERYBODY ELSE'S COMMENTS STAND AS THEY ARE.

SO ARE THERE ANY MOTIONS THAT ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE ON THIS PARTICULAR ITEM? I THINK MAYOR AS IT STANDS RIGHT NOW. JUST I'VE GOT ONE OTHER ITEM I WANT TO MAKE SURE I GET ON THE RECORD.

IS THE MAXIMUM DENSITY FROM GOING FROM 45% TO 80% IS A CONCERN.

I THINK WITH THE WAY THIS IS BEING PROPOSED AT CURRENT STATE, IT'D BE DIFFICULT TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION FOR IT IN MY BEHALF WITHOUT MOVING SOME OF THE PHASES AND COMPONENTS AROUND. SO I THINK AS IT'S BEING PROPOSED AT CURRENT STATE, YOU KNOW, MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO NOT ALLOW OR DISAPPROVE WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED.

THAT'D BE MY MOTION. THREE. THAT'S MORE DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND EXACTLY.

SO I KNOW LET ME LET ME CLARIFY. SORRY. YEAH, I THINK THAT'D PROBABLY BE GOOD TO MAKE SURE THEY HAVE A COMMENT.

DO YOU WANT TO CLARIFY THE QUESTION? SO YEAH CLARIFYING QUESTION IS ON THE THE MAXIMUM.

WE'RE TALKING ABOUT LOT COVERAGE GOING FROM 45% TO 80%.

OKAY. CAN YOU ADDRESS THAT. THANK YOU. WELL, I WAS ACTUALLY GOING TO ADDRESS ALL THE COMMENTS.

THANK YOU FOR ALL THOSE COMMENTS. AND I'M WONDERING IF IT WOULD BE BEST TO ACTUALLY TABLE THIS ITEM TO ALLOW US TO GO BACK AND RELOOK AT THE PLAN, IF THAT MAKES SENSE. YEAH. PLEASE.

MY ONLY WORRY ABOUT THAT IS THAT IT POSSIBLY MISLEADING.

I'M NOT GOING TO SPEAK FOR EVERYBODY ELSE, BUT YOU'VE ALREADY PUT A LOT OF TIME AND WORK AND EFFORT INTO HOW IT IS.

MY FEAR IS THAT IT'S PROVIDING A FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY, I GUESS.

SO WHAT? I THINK I'M GOING TO HELP WITH THE WORDS TABLING IT TO BRING BACK MORE MULTIFAMILY.

THE MULTIFAMILY COMPONENT ISN'T GOING TO BE EFFECTIVE.

SO IF WE'RE IN A TABLE AND NEGOTIATE MULTIFAMILY, I DON'T.

MY GUT FEELING IS THAT'S NOT VERY HELPFUL. IF YOU WANT TO NEGOTIATE IT, COME TABLE IT, NEGOTIATE IT TO REMOVE THE MULTIFAMILY AND PUT SOME OTHER COMMENTS IN.

WE CAN GIVE YOU THAT DIRECTION. IT SO YEAH. AND THE PHASING AND SOME OF THE OTHER THE MISS GUIDANCE ON SUNDAYS.

YEAH. BUT I THINK COUNCIL MEMBER KERN IS RIGHT ON.

I WOULD NOT WANT TO GIVE YOU A FALSE HOPE THAT IF THAT REMAINS IN THERE, I DO NOT SEE IT BEING SUCCESSFUL.

OKAY. WE'D STILL LIKE TO REQUEST THE TABLING THEN, PLEASE.

OKAY. I MOTION TO TABLE. NO, NO, NO. I'M SORRY.

TOMORROW. I'M SORRY, I WAS POINTING. SO THERE'S A LOT OF COMMENTS MADE, A LOT OF CONSISTENT THEMES THROUGHOUT THE DIALOG WITH COUNCIL.

SO AGAIN, REGARDLESS OF WHATEVER ACTION THE COUNCIL TAKES, WHETHER IT'S A TABLING, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT, AGAIN, AS MENTIONED, I DON'T WANT TO GIVE FALSE HOPE TO THE APPLICANT AND COUNCIL AND I DON'T WANT TO WASTE ANYONE'S TIME.

AND SO SO IS THE ISSUE. I JUST WANT TO GET CLEAR DIRECTION FROM THE COUNCIL SO THEY, THE STAFF CAN WORK WITH THEY THE DEVELOPER IS THE INTENT TO A NUMBER ONE PHASING WAS VERY IMPORTANT. SO SO IF THERE IS SOME PHASING COMMENTS ABOUT THE ORDER, PLEASE SEND SOMETHING TO US SO WE CAN CONVEY IT BACK TO THIS, TO THE STAFF TO, TO TO THE APPLICANT. AND THEN ALSO THE ACTUAL USES OF OF HOUSING.

RIGHT. SO SO LESS MULTIFAMILY, NO MULTIFAMILY.

I MEAN, I GUESS I'LL BE CLEAR. NO MORE MULTIFAMILY, OKAY? THAT WOULD BE THE ONLY WAY I WOULD EVEN CONSIDER IT.

SO AGAIN, ONE VOTE. OKAY, SO. SO LET US KNOW.

NONE. I'M HERE. NO. I BELIEVE IF YOU WANT US TO TAKE A VOTE ON IT, THAT WOULD IT WOULD NOT PASS WITH THAT IN THERE.

OKAY. I BELIEVE I HEARD FAIRLY DEFINITIVELY FROM AT LEAST FOUR MEMBERS THAT WILL THE MULTIFAMILY WAS IN THERE.

[01:10:07]

IT WOULD NOT BE SUCCESSFUL. OKAY. SO. SO MULTIFAMILY IS A MAJOR ISSUE OBVIOUSLY THE PHASING.

ARE THERE ANY OTHER ELEMENTS THAT ARE CRITICAL TO TO THIS DEVELOPMENT FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT? CLEAN. WELL CLEAN UP THE JUST SOME OF THOSE THOSE MRS ORIENTATION COUNCIL MEMBER ANDRUS WAS CLEAR ON FLIPPING SOME OF THE THE ORIENTATION, THE ORIENTATION AND THE WAY.

I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO DESCRIBE IT BETTER, CRAIG. YEAH, I MEAN, I THINK IT'S, YOU KNOW, IT'S REALLY FLIPPING THE, THE MULTIFAMILY THAT'S THAT'S IN THE PLAN TO MOVING IT MORE TO THE MIDDLE OF THE PROJECT AND THEN BRINGING SOME, SOME OF THE ELEMENTS OUT. AND I'LL BE I'LL BE HONEST, I DIDN'T SAY THIS EARLIER.

I DON'T KNOW IF I'M ALLOWED TO TO JUMP ON TO THIS, BUT WHERE THIS IS POSITIONED IN THE TOLLWAY DISTRICT, YOU KNOW, REALLY, TO ME, IN MY MIND, I'M NOT TRYING TO PLAY DEVELOPER HERE, BUT IN MY MIND, THIS THIS AREA FUNCTIONS MORE LIKE THE HEALTH AND WELLNESS DISTRICT IN THE IN THE FRISCO STATION AREA, WHICH IS KIND OF A MID BLOCK TYPE THING. SO I JUST STRUGGLE.

I STRUGGLE WITH ALL THESE PIECES. AND THIS IS REALLY FOR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY AND PARTICULARLY THIS DEVELOPER TO TO ADDRESS.

BUT I THINK IF YOU'RE GOING TO DO ANYTHING LIKE THAT WITH MULTIFAMILY, I JUST DON'T I CAN'T SEE IT ON THE STREET.

EVEN EVEN THE HIGH QUALITY PROJECT PRODUCT CAN'T BE ON THE STREET THAT WELL, AGAIN, I GO BACK TO I'M HERE.

NO MULTIFAMILY HEARING SAW MULTIFAMILY JUST ORIENTATE IT DIFFERENT.

SO. I DON'T KNOW. I JUST WANT I'M JUST I UNDERSTAND I UNDERSTAND THERE MAY BE ENOUGH FOR ME.

IT DOESN'T MATTER. HOLD ON. LET ME GO TO JEFF REAL QUICK.

I WOULD SAY THAT IF MULTIFAMILY WAS TAKEN OUT OF IT, I WOULD BE A LOT MORE RECEPTIVE.

I DON'T EVEN DISLIKE THE TOWNHOMES. I THINK TOWNHOMES ARE A NICE ADDITIVE.

AND AS LONG AS PARKING ISN'T AN ISSUE I THINK THAT THEY COULD, YOU KNOW, THAT'S PRETTY BENEFICIAL.

BUT YOU HAVE THE RESTAURANTS, YOU HAVE WALKABILITY.

YOU HAVE THE TRAILS. IN THAT RESPECT, I LIKE IT.

I, YOU KNOW, I THINK IT'S A IT'S A FAIRLY GOOD DEVELOPMENT.

BUT AGAIN, THE MULTIFAMILY IS WHAT I, I JUST, I CAN'T SUPPORT.

FOR ME IT'S THE MULTIFAMILY IS OKAY. IT'S JUST IT'S THE NUMBER AND IT'S THE TOTAL NUMBER IN THE DEVELOPMENT 770.

IT'S TOO DENSE FOR ME. TOTALLY. SO WE HAD THEN MARCUS WAS WORKING ON A TABLING MOTION.

YEAH. I THINK WITH THE THE FEEDBACK THAT YOU'VE RECEIVED, THERE'S SOME WORK TO BE DONE.

SO WITH THAT, I WOULD MOVE TO TABLE THE REQUEST TO REZONE 61.7 ACRES.

SECOND, THAT IS THERE A DATE REQUIRED? YES. WE NEED TO HAVE A CERTAIN DATE FOR IT TO COME BACK.

OTHERWISE, THEY HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE NOTIFICATION PROCESS AGAIN IF WE DON'T HAVE A SPECIFIC DATE. SO WE HAVE AMPLE TIME. YEAH.

NOT ON THE 25TH. AND THEN WE HAVE ONE. WE ONLY HAVE ONE MEETING IN DECEMBER.

THEM. OR IS THERE SOMETHING THAT THEY CAN'T DO THAT.

WELL HOW MUCH TIME DO THEY NEED. JANUARY 15TH.

THE FIRST ONE. YEAH. SO TO THE APPLICANT, WOULD JANUARY 13TH BE TOO SOON? OKAY. WE COULD GO TO THE END OF JANUARY. JANUARY? JANUARY? IS THAT WORK FOR THEM? YEAH. THEY JUST THEY JUST SAID YEAH YEAH YEAH YEAH.

OKAY. 27TH. FEBRUARY.

OKAY. I THINK BY THEN YOUR COMMENTS WILL BE REGISTERED IF YOU WANT TO.

WATCH THAT SECOND, SECOND WEEK OF FEBRUARY TO THE SECOND MEETING FEBRUARY 24TH.

OH. HOLD ON. YEAH. THAT'S CRAZY. Y'ALL GOTTA GO BACKWARDS. MAYOR AND IF THERE IS A CONFLICT ON THE 20 ON THAT SECOND MEETING, WE COULD ALWAYS MOVE THE MEETING TO A DIFFERENT DATE.

WE NEED TO. SO THAT WOULD BE FEBRUARY 24TH. OKAY.

OKAY. MARCUS TO THE FEBRUARY 24TH MEETING. 2026 26.

ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION BY MARCUS RAY, SECONDED BY CRAIG.

ALL IN FAVOR? THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE APPRECIATE IT. ALL RIGHT.

OUR NEXT ITEM IS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 14. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE,

[14. Conduct a Public Hearing to consider the adoption of a Unified Development Code, which encompasses amendments to Building Regulations, Business Regulations, Fire Prevention and Protection codes, Health and Sanitation codes, the Subdivision Regulation, Utilities standards, the Zoning Ordinance, Engineering Design Standards, and Definitions. (ZONE-25-0014) (DH)]

[01:15:07]

WHICH ENCOMPASSES AMENDMENTS TO THE BUILDING REQUIREMENTS, BUILDING REGULATIONS, FIRE PREVENTION, PROTECTION CODES, HEALTH AND SANITATION CODES, THE SUBDIVISION REGULATION, UTILITY STANDARDS, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND THE ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS AND DEFINITIONS. MR. HOOVER. THANK YOU.

MAYOR. COUNCIL. HELLO AGAIN. TO AGAIN, KIND OF SOMETHING SIMILAR TO THE LAST TIME.

I'M GOING TO GIVE YOU A JUST A LITTLE BIT OF A RUN THROUGH OF WHAT WE'VE BEEN DOING, WHERE WE ARE, WHAT'S THE GOAL, HOW DO WE GET WHERE WE WERE, AND SO FORTH, AND THEN WE'LL LET THE CONSULTANTS DO A LIMITED PRESENTATION SMALLER THAN THAN WHAT WE'VE DONE BEFORE. AND THEN PERHAPS ME COME BACK AND ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS OR FINISH UP KIND OF WHAT OUR PROCESS IS, SO TO SPEAK. SOME OF THESE SLIDES ARE THE SAME.

I JUST I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE EXCEPT FOR THE COUNCIL THERE'S NOT BEEN DISCUSSION.

OKAY. WE WILL HAVE THIS PUBLIC HEARING. WE WILL NOT VOTE ON ANY OF THE CHANGES TONIGHT.

IS THAT THAT'S CORRECT. AND THAT'S GENERALLY CORRECT.

WHAT I WOULD ASK YOU TO DO IS, AS A COUNCIL WOULD BE TO TO VOTE, TO RECOMMEND GOING FORWARD WITH A UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, BUT NOT THE SPECIFICS, BECAUSE THOSE WILL HAVE TO BE ABLE TO GO THROUGH AT A LATER DATE.

SO THANK YOU. RIGHT. YES, SIR. AND THAT'S GOOD.

I WAS GOING TO GET TO THAT IN A SECOND, BUT THAT'S FINE THAT YOU ALL KNOW THAT RIGHT UP FRONT.

I'M GOING TO SKIP THROUGH THESE BECAUSE THESE ARE THINGS THAT THE THE CONSULTANTS ARE GOING TO GO THROUGH.

WELL GOOD. THEY'RE ALL OUT OF THERE. YEAH. THAT WAS QUICK WASN'T IT.