[00:00:03] OKAY. ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING. THIS IS THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE TUESDAY, AUGUST 19TH, 2025. [1. Call to Order/Roll Call.] PROSPER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. THE MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER AT 6:09 P.M. PLEASE NOTE FOR THE RECORD THAT ALL COMMISSIONERS ARE PRESENT AND IN ATTENDANCE THIS EVENING. FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION. CITIZENS AND OTHER VISITORS ATTENDING PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETINGS SHALL OBSERVE THE SAME RULES OF PROPRIETY, DECORUM AND GOOD CONDUCT APPLICABLE TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION. ANY PERSON MAKING PERSONAL, IMPERTINENT, PROFANE OR SLANDEROUS REMARKS, OR WHO BECOMES BOISTEROUS WHILE ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION OR WHILE ATTENDING THE MEETING, SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ROOM. IF SO, DIRECTED BY THE COMMISSION OR PRESIDING OFFICER, AND THE PERSON SHALL BE BARRED FROM FURTHER AUDIENCE BEFORE THE COMMISSION DURING THAT SESSION OF THE MEETING. DISRUPTION OF A PUBLIC MEETING COULD CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF SECTION 42.05 OF THE TEXAS PENAL CODE. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION, THOSE WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION MUST COMPLETE THE PUBLIC COMMENT REQUEST FORM LOCATED ON THE TOWN WEBSITE OR IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. IF YOU'RE ATTENDING IN PERSON, PLEASE SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD CHAIR OR A STAFF MEMBER PRIOR TO THE MEETING. WHEN CALLED UPON, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. ITEM TWO THIS EVENING IS THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. IF EVERYONE WILL PLEASE RISE, I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. ALRIGHT. ITEM THREE IS OUR [CONSENT AGENDA] CONSENT AGENDA. THIS EVENING. WE HAVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS THREE THROUGH THREE F ON RECORD THIS EVENING. DO ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS WISH TO PULL ANY ITEMS OFF THE CONSENT AGENDA THIS EVENING? AND I KNOW I WILL MAKE A NOTE. WE'RE GOING TO PULL ITEM THREE F. SO I'M GOING TO PUT THAT OUT THERE RIGHT NOW. ITEM THREE F. WE NEED TO PULL OFF THE CONSENT AGENDA. ARE THERE ANY OTHERS. ALSO WANTED TO PULL OFF THREE C AND THREE D. NO. 333 AND THREE D OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO WE'VE GOT 3C3D AND THREE F THAT ARE PULLED. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON THE REMAINING ITEMS WHICH WOULD BE THREE A, THREE B AND THREE E. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM THREE A, THREE B AND THREE E. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HAMILTON. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND? I HAVE MULTIPLE SECONDS. COMMISSIONER JACKSON, I HEARD FIRST ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF APPROVING CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS THREE A, THREE B AND THREE SUBJECT TO TOWN STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS. PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. AND THAT MOTION [Items 3c. & 3d.] CARRIES 7 TO 0. SO LET'S GO BACK TO CONSENT AGENDA ITEM THREE C. AND. LET STAFF TAKE IT AWAY FOR REVIEW OF THREE C AND THREE D, WHICH ARE KIND OF TOGETHER THERE. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. GOOD EVENING. AGENDA ITEM THREE C IS A SITE PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A ONE STORY INDOOR COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT BUILDING WITH A MEZZANINE TOTAL OF 40,738FT■!S WITH THE ASSOCIAD PARKING. WE WANT TO GO TO THE WANT TO INTRODUCE 3D AS WELL, SINCE THERE IS THE SITE PLAN AND THE FINAL PLAT. YES, SIR. LET'S DO THAT. OKAY. SO WE ALL KNOW THIS IS THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LEXINGTON AND RICHMOND. YOU SEE A CLOSE UP VIEW OF THE SITE PLAN. THIS IS YOUR OPEN SPACE PLAN. THE DARK SHADED AREAS. THAT'S THE CONSIDERED OPEN SPACE. AND ITEM THREE D IS THE FINAL PLAT, WHICH IS A FINAL PLAT TO CREATE THE FINAL PLAT LOT AND DEDICATE THE EASEMENTS NECESSARY FOR DEVELOPMENT. SAME LOCATION CLOSE UP ON THE FINAL PLAT. SORRY. NO. SO THAT IS THE HUNTER GATEWAY PROPERTY. WHICH WAS WHICH WOULD YOU KNOW, IT WOULD LIKE TO BE A GROUND CONTROL, WHICH IS AN AMUSEMENT PARK. AND I'M READY FOR YOUR QUESTIONS. AND WE ALSO HAVE REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE APPLICANT HERE AS WELL. ALRIGHT. LET'S OPEN IT UP TO THE COMMISSION FOR ANY QUESTIONS ON THREE C OR THREE D. I HAD A QUESTION ON OUR COMMENT REGARDING TRAFFIC. SO ON THE ON A PRIOR SUBMISSION IN THAT LASEMA ON THE WEST NORTHWEST CORNER, I THINK LASEMA AND RICHLAND, WITH THAT DEVELOPMENT, WE HAD REQUESTED A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. AND BECAUSE RICHLAND DOESN'T GO THROUGH ON THE WEST OR EAST SIDE ALL THE WAY CURRENTLY, I BELIEVE THAT WE NEED TO REQUEST A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THIS LAND AS WELL, [00:05:10] JUST BECAUSE THIS WILL DEFINITELY CHANGE THE TRAFFIC FLOW. YES, AND IT IS UNDER REVIEW AS WE SPEAK. OKAY, GREAT. THAT'S THE ONLY QUESTIONS I HAD. BUT I KNOW THE APPLICANT WAS HERE TO SPEAK. I THINK YOU SAID. ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS HAVE COMMENTS? COMMISSIONER BLANCHARD, I JUST HAVE A QUESTION, A CLARIFICATION, BECAUSE I THOUGHT YOU SAID WHEN YOU WERE GOING THROUGH THIS, THIS WAS A ONE STORY BUILDING, BUT THE PLAT SAYS IT'S A TWO STORY. SO ONE STOREY WITH A MEZZANINE WITH A MEZZANINE? YES. AND WHERE'S THE MEZZANINE AT? I CAN'T ZOOM IN ON THIS. IF. YOU CAN'T REALLY SEE IT ON THE. ON THE ACTUAL SITE PLAN. IT'S JUST AN INTERIOR MEZZANINE. CORRECT. YES. SO THAT'S WHY THAT'S THE VOLUME. THAT'S WHAT'S DRIVING THE VOLUME HEIGHT. CORRECT. OKAY. AND I DO KNOW WE HAVE THE APPLICANT HERE IN ATTENDANCE TOO. AND IF THE APPLICANT, SINCE WE PULLED THIS OFF, THE CONSENT AGENDA WANTS TO COME FORWARD. SURE. HAVE THAT OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT ANYTHING ELSE. MAYBE TALK ABOUT THAT MEZZANINE. IF WE HAVE ANY FURTHER CLARIFICATION NEEDED ON THAT. WOULD WELCOME THAT THAT FEEDBACK. JUST ASK THE APPLICANT AS YOU STEP FORWARD TO STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. ERIC PAULINO I'M ONE OF THE OWNERS OF GROUND CONTROL PARK AT 2000 MARKETPLACE BOULEVARD, IRVING, TEXAS. WE DO HAVE I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WE IF YOU WANTED TO SEE IT, BUT PHIL, OUR ARCHITECT, HE HAS A DRAWING OF THE INSIDE AS WELL. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S NECESSARY OR NOT, BUT IT IS A MEZZANINE AND INTERIOR MEZZANINE UP ON TOP. SO THAT'S NOT NECESSARY. I JUST I JUST SAW THAT, HEARD THE DIFFERENCE OF THE FACTS ON THERE. I WAS JUST TRYING TO CLARIFY. NO PROBLEM. ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT OR. I DIDN'T KNOW IF YOU HAD ANYTHING THAT YOU WANTED TO BRING UP TO US. AND IF YOU DON'T, THAT'S FINE TOO. SO NO, I DON'T MEAN TO PUT YOU ON THE SPOT, SO. NO, NOT NOT A PROBLEM AT ALL. I JUST WANT TO BE HERE. WE'RE EXCITED TO BE PART OF THE PROSPER AND JUST WANT TO BE HERE. AND JUST IN CASE ANYBODY ELSE HAD QUESTIONS AND I CAN BE OF ANY HELP. ONLY COMMENT MIGHT BE PROBABLY MORE OF A LOOK. THINKING ABOUT THIS FROM THE RESIDENTS PERSPECTIVE. YOU KNOW, THIS IS A BIT OF AN AWKWARD PIECE OF LAND AS IT RELATES TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, RIGHT? AND I THINK PROBABLY THE DEVELOPMENT'S GOING TO BE GREAT. I'M SURE YOU GUYS HOPEFULLY THERE'S A LOT OF KIDS AND I THINK YOU'LL PROBABLY MAKE SOME GOOD MONEY, I'M SURE. BUT I WOULD TELL YOU AS IT PROGRESSES AND THERE'S ONLY CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS THAT WE WOULD SAY YOU HAVE TO DO, BUT AS A GOOD NEIGHBOR AND KIND OF IN GOOD FAITH TO THAT NEIGHBORHOOD, I WOULD ASK THINK ABOUT THE RESIDENTS THAT BACK UP. YOU HAVE A VERY SMALL LANDSCAPE SETBACK THAT'S REQUIRED, WHICH IS ONLY 15FT AT THE BACK. SO MAYBE IF YOU CAN. I KNOW YOU'RE BUILDING A WALL AND HAVE SOME COSTS THERE AND SOME OTHER THINGS, BUT ANYTHING YOU CAN DO TO ADDRESS THAT UP TO HELP PROTECT THE THOSE NEIGHBORS, THEY'VE BEEN THEY BOUGHT THOSE HOMES AND HAVE BEEN LOOKING AT COWS AND PASTURES AND THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE A TRAMPOLINE PARK. SO JUST A FRIENDLY REQUEST ON THE RECORD ALREADY IN THE WORKS. SO DEFINITELY. AND THEN SAME THING ALONG WITH SEMA. YOU KNOW, THAT'S THE MAIN GATEWAY INTO THE SEMA AND WILLOW RIDGE AND JUST ANYTHING THAT WE CAN DO. YOU KNOW YOU DON'T WE DON'T HAVE A LOT OF WE HAVE A NICE AREA OF LANDSCAPING AND THERE'S ONLY CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS. BUT I WOULD JUST ASK ON BEHALF OF THOSE RESIDENTS, IF YOU CAN JUST KIND OF THINK THROUGH WHAT WE DO AND JUST DO YOUR DO YOUR BEST TO BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR TO THOSE RESIDENTS, AS THIS IS KIND OF A STRANGE, HEAVY COMMERCIAL LITTLE ZONE LEADING INTO ALL THEIR HOMES. SO THAT'S THAT'S MY ONLY REAL COMMENT. TOTALLY UNDERSTAND. THIS IS OUR LIKE I SAID, THIS IS WE'RE NOT NEW TO THIS. THIS IS OUR FOURTH PROJECT. AND AGAIN, WE'RE EXCITED ABOUT IT. IT'S GOING TO BE PROBABLY OUR BIGGEST PARK. WE'RE BUILDING IT FROM THE GROUND UP. IT'S GOING TO BE BEAUTIFUL. ACCORDING TO THE LANDSCAPING THAT WE HAVE PREPARED ALREADY. SO SOUNDS GOOD. I HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS. MORE FOR STAFF. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. APPRECIATE YOU STEPPING UP. THANKS FOR BEING A PROSPER AND LOOK FORWARD TO IT. WE ARE TOO. THANK YOU. YES, SIR. THANK YOU. KIND OF AS IT RELATES TO TRAFFIC, YOU KNOW, THE ENTRY IS A LITTLE BIT STRANGE. I THINK WE TALKED A LITTLE BIT IN THE WORK SESSION. JUST TO CLARIFY THE MAIN, THE MAIN POINT OF ENTRY IS REALLY COMING OFF OF LASEMA. I DO THINK THAT THERE'S A CURB CUT SO THE FOLKS LEAVING CAN GO LEFT OR SOUTH ON THE, ON THE I'M GOING TO CALL IT PLAN SOUTH SIDE WHERE THAT IS. THERE IS NO WAY [00:10:04] TO GET INTO THAT IS THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OR SOMEBODY WITH THE TOWN STUDYING. HOW DO VEHICLES ACTUALLY GET INTO THE PROPERTY, PARTICULARLY ALONG RICHLAND, WHEN THERE'S NO THERE'S NO MEDIAN CUT THROUGH THERE? IT LOOKS LIKE IT CLOSELY ALIGNS TO THE ROAD THAT LEADS TO THE CONVENIENCE STORE, BUT THERE DOESN'T LOOK LIKE THEY'RE DOING ANYTHING AS FAR AS A CURB CUT OR ANYTHING GOES. IS THAT IS THAT CORRECT? RIGHT. WELL, WITH THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, WE JUST GOT WORD OF TODAY THAT IT'S BEEN UNDER REVIEW. AND THAT'S THE ENGINEERS. THEY'RE CURRENTLY REVIEWING THAT AT THE MOMENT. OKAY. SO I CAN I CAN CIRCLE BACK AND GET WHAT YOU PERSONALLY GET THAT ANSWER FOR YOU. OKAY. THANK YOU. I THINK THOSE ARE MY TWO CONCERNS I SHARE. SORRY I CAN GIVE YOU A LITTLE CLARIFICATION ON THAT. MY NAME IS DOUG WEAVER. I'M THE CIVIL ENGINEER FOR THIS PROJECT, SIR. COULD COULD YOU ALSO STATE YOUR ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD? OH 3907 FRISCO, TEXAS HARVEST LANE. 3930 907 HARVEST LANE, FRISCO, TEXAS. EXCUSE ME, I APPRECIATE IT. YEAH. I'M SORRY. OH NO WORRIES. PART OF THE CIVIL PACKAGE THAT WE'RE PUTTING TOGETHER. IT WASN'T NECESSARILY PART OF THE SITE PLAN, BUT PART OF THE CIVIL PACKAGE. WE'VE BEEN ASKED TO OPEN UP RICHLAND ROAD TO. IT DID END JUST BEYOND THIS PROPERTY, A LITTLE WAYS DOWN. AND THEN THERE'S A MEDIAN CUT AT THAT POINT. SO WE'RE WE'RE PLANNING ON GOING DOWN THERE INSTEAD OF I BELIEVE IT'S THE 711. THEY'RE THEY'RE COMING OUT AND TURNING LEFT. THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO DO THAT ANY LONGER. THEY'LL HAVE TO TURN RIGHT, GO DOWN AND TURN AROUND AND COME BACK. SO IT'LL GIVE US ACCESS TO RICHLAND TO WHERE WE CAN COME OUT AND MAKE A LEFT ONTO, I MEAN, RIGHT ONTO RICHLAND. YOU KNOW, THE YOU'RE RIGHT. THERE'S NO MEDIAN CUT IN THERE. WHICH BUT THAT'S WE'RE NOT PROPOSING ONE EITHER. SO. AND THERE'S ALSO NO DETENTION ON SITE IS THAT WELL THERE'S REGIONAL DETENTION RIGHT ACROSS THE MATTER OF FACT I THINK OUR CLIENT WHEN THEY BOUGHT THE PROPERTY, THEY HAD TO BUY THE DETENTION AREA. SO THEY OWNED THE DETENTION AREA FOR THIS PROPERTY. THE RICHLAND AVENUE. AND I THINK MAYBE SOME OTHER PEOPLE TO THE SOUTH. OKAY, OKAY. SO I'M GOOD. THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE THAT EXPLANATION. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COMMISSIONERS AT THIS POINT? I GUESS I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE. SO THERE A TRAFFIC STUDY IS ONGOING. IT'S UNDERWAY RIGHT NOW. CORRECT? YES. ALL RIGHT THEN, I'LL TAKE I'LL TAKE IT BACK TO THE COMMISSION FOR ANY ACTION ON ITEMS THREE C AND THREE D. DO YOU WANT THEM SEPARATE OR TOGETHER? I THINK SEPARATE PLEASE. OKAY. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM THREE C SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. OKAY. SO WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HAMILTON TO APPROVE THREE C. DO WE HAVE A SECOND SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER HARRIS, THE SUBJECT OF THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. SO ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF APPROVING CONSENT AGENDA ITEM THREE C SUBJECT TO THE MOTION, COMMISSIONER HAMILTON, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. AND THAT MOTION CARRIES 7 TO 0 IN APPROVAL. AND ITEM 3DA COMPANION TO THREE C I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON THAT SAME MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM THREE D SUBJECT TO THE IMPLEMENTATION AND APPROVAL OF THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER HAMILTON. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND, SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER HARRIS? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF APPROVING CONSENT? AGENDA ITEM THREE D PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. AND THAT MOTION CARRIES 7 TO 0. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE THE EXPLANATION. WE WILL MOVE ON OUR [3f. Consider and act upon a request for a Preliminary Site Plan for a Free-Standing Emergency Room, Hospital, and Medical Office Buildings on HCA Medical City Addition, Block A, Lot 1, on 42.3± acres, located on the southeast corner of Mayor Clary Road and Frontier Parkway. (DEVAPP- 25-0024)] NEXT CONSENT AGENDA ITEM IN OUR FINAL CONSENT AGENDA ITEM THIS EVENING IS ITEM THREE F. PLEASE NOTE FOR THE RECORD THAT COMMISSIONER FUREY WILL RECUSE HIMSELF FROM THIS ONE, CITING A CONFLICT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO ITEM THREE F IS THE PURPOSE OF IT TO CONSTRUCT TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS, ONE FREESTANDING EMERGENCY ROOM AND ONE HOSPITAL TOTALING 573,000FT■!S. AND SO YOU CAN SEE THE DIFFERENT SQUARE FOOTAGES FOR EACH OF THE BUILDINGS THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED. THIS PROPERTY WILL BE PHASED. THE FIRST PHASE WILL BE THE FREESTANDING EMERGENCY ROOM, AND THEN PHASE TWO WILL BE THE HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL OFFICES. [00:15:01] HERE'S THE LOCATION OF WHERE HCA IS PROPOSING TO GO. HERE IS THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AND I WILL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS THE COMMISSION HAS FOR ME. ALL RIGHT. ANY ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE COUNTY OR TOWN STAFF ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEM THREE F QUESTION. YES, SIR. COMMISSIONER BLANFORD, CAN YOU TELL ME WHERE THE ROAD THAT GOES ALONG THE BOTTOM, THE OF THIS PLAT. WHERE WHERE DOES THAT CONNECT TO? ON TO THE ON THE RIGHT SIDE. THERE WOULD W I GUESS THAT'S THE EAST. LET'S SEE. SO I BELIEVE THAT THERE WILL BE AN EXTENSION OF A ROAD THAT COMES DOWN ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. OKAY. AND IT SHOULD CONNECT THERE. AND THEN IT'LL CONNECT TO MAYOR CLARY. THAT'S NEXT TO THE HEB TO THE WEST. SO THERE'S NOT A CONNECTION TO THAT, TO THAT RING ROAD OR AROUND FRONTIER PARK? NO. IT JUST IT'S A DIFFERENT ROAD. OKAY. THANK YOU. I FEEL LIKE ON OURS YOUR SCREEN HERE CUTS IT OFF. BUT ON THE PACKET IT SHOWS IT CONNECTING TO THE RING ROAD IN MY IN MY UNDERSTANDING. IT IS CONNECTING. YES, SIR. THAT'S THAT'S THE REASON IT WOUND UP BEING ON THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN. IT CONNECTS TO THE RING OVER ON THE STADIUM SIDE. AND IT'S SUPPOSED TO GO THROUGH AND CONNECT TO THE ROAD THAT RUNS IN BETWEEN THE NEW HEB AND WHERE THIS HOSPITAL WILL BE. IT'S TO GIVE AN EXTRA ACCESS FOR ACTIVITY THAT'S GOING ON IN THE STADIUM TO COME TO THE WEST AND GO UP TOWARDS FRONTIER, AS OPPOSED TO FUNNELING IT ALL UP TO THE SOUTH AT THE ONE ENTRANCE THAT'S THERE. THAT'S WHY IT'S A BIG DEAL AND WHY WE'RE MAKING THEM PUT IT THERE IS THE CONNECTION, BECAUSE IT REALLY ISN'T DOING MUCH FOR THE, THE HCA SITE, BUT IT IS HELPING FOR THE TWO ON EITHER SIDE. IS THAT ROAD GETTING BUILT WITH THE FIRST PHASE OR THE LATER? NOT WITH THE FIRST PHASE. IT WILL COME IN LATER AND THE, THE LOGISTICS AREN'T NECESSARILY WORKED OUT YET. HOW THAT'S GOING TO BE IS, YOU KNOW, DEPENDING ON WHEN IT'S ALL DONE, IS THE TOWN GOING TO DO IT? IS IT GOING TO BE PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND REIMBURSED OR WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN. SO WE'RE NOT SURE ABOUT THAT YET, BUT IT WILL NOT BE DURING THE FIRST PHASE. SO THAT ROAD WILL CUT THROUGH THE PRACTICE FIELDS OR THE FIELDS THERE. THE BALL FIELDS THAT ARE IN THE IN THE PARK SOMEWHERE. IT COMES FROM SOMEWHERE OVER THERE. YES. I THOUGHT THERE WAS A CUTOUT IN THERE SOMEPLACE, BUT. YEAH, THERE IT IS. IF YOU SEE. WHERE THERE DOESN'T CARRY, CAN YOU GO UP ONE SLIDE FORWARD, SEE IF IT SHOWS UP? YEAH, I KNOW IT DOESN'T MAKE IT OUT THERE. IT'S IF YOU GO BACK TO THE PICTURE I'M SORRY. IT'S RIGHT THERE. YOU'LL SEE THAT. DON'T KNOW WHAT TO CALL IT. THE LITTLE PARKING AREA LOOKS LIKE RIGHT IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST OF THE, THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE. THERE'S A CONNECTION POINT THAT COMES OUT OF THERE AND CONNECTS TO WHERE THE ROAD IS. AND ALL OF THAT'S CONNECTED TO THE RING ROAD THAT GOES AROUND. SO IT REALLY IS JUST A EXCESS KIND OF BAILOUT ROAD TO, TO HELP ASSIST WITH, WITH TRAFFIC WHEN, WHEN THE FACILITY IS, IS OCCUPIED AND FULL OF A BUNCH OF PEOPLE WATCHING A FOOTBALL GAME. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? ONLY IT LOOKS LIKE THE FUTURE MEDIAN OPENING ISN'T GOING TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH PHASE ONE. IT LOOKS FOR PHASE TWO. SO IF YOU'RE TRYING TO ACCESS THIS. ER, YOU'LL HAVE TO GO DOWN AND MAKE A U-TURN OR GO DOWN AND MAKE A LEFT INTO THE KIND OF THE HEAVY FEEDER ROAD. AND THEN SO ALL THE ROADS THAT ARE KIND OF IN RED, THAT ARE INCLUSIVE OF THE DARK BLACK LINE, THAT DOESN'T SHOW UP VERY GOOD ON THE SCREEN. ALL THOSE ROADS WILL GET BUILT AS PART OF PHASE ONE AND ALL THAT PARKING. THAT'S THAT WHOLE. RIGHT. THIS WHOLE CORNER HERE IS GOING TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN PHASE ONE. OKAY. SO YOU HAVE A COUPLE ACCESS POINTS, JUST NOT THE MEDIAN. CUT OUT THE FRONTIERS OFF OF FRONTIER. YEAH. BECAUSE THAT'S PHASE TWO RIGHT. YEAH. RIGHT. YEAH. THAT'S WHAT I UNDERSTAND. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? EASY QUESTION. DO WE KNOW THE TIMING OF WHEN PHASE TWO WOULD FOLLOW? I DO NOT KNOW THE TIMING ON WHEN THAT WOULD FOLLOW. HE WAS WAVING HIS HAND. YEAH. SO I [00:20:09] KNOW WE HAD SOMEBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WANTED TO COMMENT WHAT'S THE PROTOCOL ON THAT. BECAUSE THIS IS A CONSENT AGENDA ITEM. DO WE NEED TO HOLD THAT FOR OUR CITIZEN COMMENT SECTION AFTER THIS? IT'S ENTIRELY UP TO YOU, MR. CHAIR. YOU CAN CAN WHILE WE'RE ON IT. YOU PULLED IT OFF CONSENT. IT'S I THINK IT'S APPROPRIATE TO LET HIM SPEAK ON THE TOPIC AT HAND. SO THIS IS A CONSENT AGENDA ITEM THREE OF IT'S NOT A PUBLIC HEARING. BUT IF WE HAVE MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE THAT WANT TO STEP FORWARD, YOU NEED TO STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. AND THEN I'D NEED TO ALSO GET YOU TO FILL OUT A PUBLIC COMMENT REQUEST CARD, IF YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY. I'M ACTUALLY THE ENGINEER. OH. YES, SIR. YEAH. OH, YEAH. YEAH. SO JUST MY NAME IS ROSS LUCAS AND WITH FORMER LUCAS ENGINEERING AT 1738 KINGSBURY DRIVE. ACTUALLY, NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE. JUST WANTED TO BRIEFLY ANSWER A FEW OF THOSE QUESTIONS THAT CAME UP. I DIDN'T WANT TO SPEAK OUT OF ORDER. IT THE ROAD AS AS ALLUDED TO BY DAVID, IS THAT IT WAS PURELY BECAUSE IT'S ON THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN. SO NOT NOT THE DESIRE OF THE APPLICANT, BUT BUT CERTAINLY WANTED TO MEET THE DESIRES OF, OF THAT PLAN. BUT IT DOES CONNECT. THERE IS A LITTLE GRAVEL PARKING LOT OVER THERE. THERE'S A IT'S INTENDED TO ALIGN WITH THE DRIVEWAY INTO THAT LOT ON THE EAST AND THEN ON THE WEST. IT'S INTENDED TO ALIGN WITH THE ROAD THAT GOES BEHIND THE GROCERY STORE. AND BOTH THOSE WERE SORT OF DICTATED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. SO I'LL JUST ADD IN ADDITION THAT TO ANSWERING THOSE QUESTIONS. YOU KNOW, WE'RE EXCITED TO BE A PART OF THE COMMUNITY WITH THIS. THE INTENT IS TO BUILD THE FIRST THAT SORT OF THAT NORTHWEST CORNER, THE CUT THROUGH IT WOULD BE A FUTURE PHASE. THE IDEA THERE WAS THAT SIMPLY IT JUST DIDN'T ADD ENOUGH ACCESS TO BE WORTHWHILE WITH THIS FIRST PHASE. BUT CERTAINLY AS THERE ARE MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS THAT ARE TO THE EAST, THEN IT WOULD BE MORE ACCESSIBLE FOR THOSE. THE. THERE WAS ONE OTHER QUESTION THAT YOU ALL HAD THAT I WANTED TO BE SURE WAS ANSWERED. TOMMY, THERE ARE NO IMMEDIATE PLANS. AND THAT'S THAT'S KIND OF WHY WE MAKE CALLED IT FUTURE ON THE PLAN. THERE'S JUST NO IMMEDIATE PLANS. CERTAINLY THE INTENT IS TO BUILD THAT NORTHWEST CORNER NOW AND THEN. DECISION WOULD BE MADE DEPENDING ON JUST HOW BUSINESS IN SOME OF THOSE THINGS. SO BUT HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE. WELL APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. I APPRECIATE THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. AND YEAH THANK YOU. AND I BELIEVE WE HAVE ANOTHER MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE THAT WANTED TO MAKE A COMMENT. I DID NOT REALIZE THAT THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING, AS I HAD HEARD ON THE NEWS THIS MORNING, THAT IT WOULD BE. I KNOW I HEARD IT WAS ON THE NEWS, SO IT WAS ON THE NEWS, BUT YOU'RE HERE AND WE OPENED IT UP. SO APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE. AND MY NAME IS BRITTANY STEVENS. I LIVE AT 951 SAGEBRUSH DRIVE, ABOUT TWO BLOCKS SOUTH OF THE BOTTOM OF THAT PICTURE. THE REASON I'M HERE TODAY IS BECAUSE THERE'S SEVERAL THINGS THAT WE WERE TOLD IN PREVIOUS MEETINGS, NOT JUST MYSELF, BUT OTHER MEMBERS OF OUR COMMUNITY, THAT THIS PARTICULAR PLOT, ORIGINALLY IT WAS ZONED TO BE RESIDENTIAL. THAT'S WHAT IT WAS WHEN I MOVED HERE 11 YEARS AGO. NOW, WE WERE TOLD THAT IT WAS GOING TO BE ZONED COMMERCIAL AND THAT THERE WOULD BE NOTHING MORE THAN TWO STORIES BUILT IN THAT PARTICULAR PLOT. AND SO FOUR STORIES IS MUCH HIGHER THAN WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY STATED WOULD BE EVER BUILT IN THAT PARTICULAR AREA. A COUPLE OTHER THINGS. AS A CITIZEN, SOMEONE WHO DOES LIVE RIGHT THERE, I TAKE MY DAUGHTER TO GYMNASTICS RIGHT OFF THE LEFT OF THE SCREEN, PAST THE STADIUM. I AM ON MY GOLF CART. I GO THERE THROUGH THERE ALL THE TIME. THERE'S A BUS STOP AT THE VERY CORNER OF THAT LOT, RIGHT PAST THE BATTING CAGES, THAT PICKS UP MIDDLE SCHOOLERS AND HIGH SCHOOLERS EVERY SINGLE DAY. SO YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE 30 TO 40 KIDS RIGHT THERE AT THE EDGE OF THAT. WITH ALL THAT EXTRA TRAFFIC. I WORRY ABOUT THE TRAFFIC, EXTRA TRAFFIC. ON GAME NIGHTS, YOU CAN HARDLY GET AROUND THERE ON GAME NIGHTS, FOR FOOTBALL GAMES, FOR SOCCER GAMES, FOR THINGS OF THAT NATURE. AND THEN WHEN YOU ADD IN FLAG FOOTBALL, SOCCER, THINGS LIKE THAT, IT'S JUST IT'S ALREADY BECOMING EXTREMELY CONGESTED AROUND HEB. AND I'M REALLY CONCERNED HOW CONGESTED IT WOULD BECOME WITH A HOSPITAL THAT'S FOUR STORIES AND OVER 400,000FT■!S IN THAT PARTICULAR AREA. SO THAT'S THAT'S WHAT I WOULD HAVE TO SAY. I APPRECIATE Y'ALL'S TIME. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. I APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS. ABSOLUTELY. I GUESS ONE THING FOR TOWN STAFF, I'M GOING TO ASK, I KNOW WE'RE EARLY ON IN THE PROCESS HERE, BUT TRAFFIC STUDIES THAT THAT WILL BE COVERED AND IMPACT AND ALL THAT IF IT HASN'T ALREADY. OR HAS THAT HAPPENED I GUESS TO THEY HAVE NOT REQUESTED ENGINEERING STAFF, HAS NOT REQUESTED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THIS SITE. IF THEY [00:25:05] DEEM THAT NECESSARY, THEY CAN. NO. AND SPEAKING TO THE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS IN THE PD. SO IF IT'S ONE STORY, THE SETBACK IS 30FT. IF IT'S TWO STORIES, THE SETBACK IS 84FT. IF IT'S THREE OR MORE STORIES, THE SETBACK IS 150FT. AND THE HOSPITAL IS MEASURED TODAY IS ABOUT 485FT AWAY FROM THE RESIDENTIAL AREA TO THE SOUTH. BUT YEAH, THERE ARE STIPULATIONS AND SETBACKS IN THAT PD. AND IT'S WELL PAST IT'S PAST THOSE RIGHT AT THIS TIME. OKAY. APPRECIATE THAT. ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION. TWO QUESTIONS KIND OF IF YOU DON'T MIND. ONE, IS THERE ANY PLANS AS IT RELATES TO IT. LOOKS LIKE STRAIGHT LANE. THERE'S A LITTLE ROAD IN THE RESIDENTIAL THAT KIND OF DEAD ENDS TO THE FENCE LINE. IS THERE ANY PLAN TO CONNECT THAT TO THAT THOROUGHFARE OR TO THE WHATEVER THAT ROAD WOULD BE CALLED? I DON'T BELIEVE SO. BUT I GUESS IS THAT FENCING OR A BORDER RIGHT THERE? YEAH. I DON'T I CAN'T TELL BY THE AERIAL WHAT'S THERE, BUT IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE IT'S CONNECTING. AND BASED ON THE RESIDENTS CONCERNS, IT PROBABLY WOULDN'T BE. WOULDN'T MAYBE. AND THEY'LL HAVE TO INSTALL A MASONRY WALL AS WELL ADJACENT ON THE SOUTH SIDE. SO PROBABLY WON'T BE A CONNECTION THERE. OKAY. AND THEN I GUESS JUST TO CLARIFY, I DIDN'T I KNOW THIS IS NOT A ZONING, I'M JUST KIND OF CURIOUS, BUT WAS IT ZONED? DID IT CHANGE ZONING AT SOME POINT IN THE LAST 10 TO 10 YEARS OR SO? I DON'T KNOW WHEN THE PD 69 CAME THROUGH. IT COULD HAVE BEEN RESIDENTIAL PRIOR TO THAT, BUT OKAY, NOT SURE, BUT IT'S ZONED SOMETHING IN THE PD. I MEAN IT'S THE ZONING FOR THE PD RETAIL NOW BECAUSE IT'S THE SAME PD THAT HEB IS IN. IS THAT WHAT HOSPITALS FIT UNDER IS RETAIL. IT IS A PERMITTED USE WITHIN THE RETAIL DISTRICT. AND THE PD SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT I THINK HOSPITALS AND THERE'S TWO OTHER USES THAT CAN BE IN EXCESS OF TWO STORIES. IT ALLOWS THEM TO BE EIGHT STORIES MAXIMUM. NO, NO, NOT A ZONING CONVERSATION. BUT THANK YOU FOR THAT CLARIFICATION. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? IF NOT, I'LL TAKE IT BACK TO THE COMMISSION TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEM THREE F. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM THREE F. OH, ARE WE DEALING WITH THE TRAFFIC IMPACT LIKE THE LAST ONE THAT WE JUST. DID? ALL RIGHT. GO FOR IT. SO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR FROM COMMISSIONER CARSON TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM THREE F. DO I HAVE A SECOND TO THAT? HAVE A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER JACKSON. ALL THOSE COMMISSIONERS IN FAVOR OF APPROVING REGULAR AGENDA ITEM THREE F SUBJECT OF TOWN STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS. PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. AND THAT MOTION CARRIES 6 TO 0. IN FAVOR. NOTE THAT COMMISSIONER FIORE WAS RECUSED FROM THAT VOTE. I APPRECIATE EVERYONE'S WORK ON THAT. CITIZEN COMMENTS. THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON ANY TOPIC. HOWEVER, THE COMMISSION IS UNABLE TO DISCUSS OR TAKE ACTION ON ANY TOPIC NOT LISTED ON THIS AGENDA. PLEASE COMPLETE A PUBLIC COMMENT REQUEST FORM AND PRESENT IT TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. PRIOR TO THE MEETING, DID WE HAVE ANY OF THOSE SUBMITTED THIS EVENING? I DO NOT BELIEVE WE DID. SO LET'S MOVE ON TO OUR REGULAR AGENDA [5. Review actions taken by the Town Council and possibly direct Town Staff to schedule topic(s) for discussion at a future meeting. ] THIS EVENING. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FOUR REVIEW ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE TOWN COUNCIL AND POSSIBLY DIRECT TOWN STAFF TO SCHEDULE TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION AT A FUTURE MEETING. OKAY, SO AT THE PREVIOUS TOWN COUNCIL MEETING ON THE 12TH, ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, THERE WAS THE ORDINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR 357. THOSE ARE BOTH APPROVED. THE NOTICE OF APPEALS WAS JUST THE MARKET STREET ITEM THAT YOU GUYS SAW PREVIOUSLY. THAT WAS ALSO APPROVED. AND THEN THE PD FOR THE FIRST LEGACY SHOPPING CENTER ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FIRST AND LEGACY WAS TABLED. THE APPLICANT REQUESTED THAT ITEM TO BE TABLED FOR THE MEETING ON THE 26TH NEXT WEEK. THERE'S NOTHING ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, BUT THERE'S A DECENT AMOUNT ON THE REGULAR AGENDA SO THAT PD FOR THE FIRST LEGACY SHOPPING CENTER THAT WAS TABLED IS ON THE AGENDA. THE PD AND COMP PLAN AMENDMENT FOR PROSPER OAKS IS ON THE AGENDA. THE PD 67 AMENDMENT FOR THE GATES OF PROSPER THAT YOU GUYS SAW IS ON THE AGENDA. AND THEN AS WELL AS THAT PD FOR THE 607 EAST FIRST STREET IN THE DOWNTOWN, THAT IS ALSO ON THE AGENDA FOR TOWN COUNCIL. FOR YOUR AGENDA FOR THE SECOND, WE'RE STILL DETERMINING THE CONSENT AGENDA. I THINK LAST TIME I MENTIONED THAT HEB IS [00:30:07] UNDERGOING A PD AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOR STORAGE CONTAINERS ON THEIR SITE. WE HAVE NOT NOTICED THAT CASE YET, SO IT COULD BE ON YOUR AGENDA, BUT IT COULD. IT MAY NOT BE. AND THEN FOR FUTURE PRNS ITEMS. WE DISCUSSED THIS IN THE WORK SESSION, BUT GOING TO DISCUSS IT OUT HERE AS WELL. TOWN COUNCIL IS RESCHEDULING THEIR MEETING. THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ON THE NINTH TO THE 16TH, WHICH WAS ORIGINALLY OUR SECOND MEETING IN SEPTEMBER. SO WE WILL HAVE TO RESCHEDULE AND I WILL TURN IT OVER TO DAVID OR THE COMMISSION ABOUT HOW YOU GUYS KIND OF WANT TO GO ABOUT THAT. SO I THINK, WELL, WE NEED TO DETERMINE SO WE DON'T HAVE TO RENOTICE THINGS IS SEND OUT AN EMAIL TO ALL THE COMMISSIONERS INDICATING POTENTIAL DATES. LET'S TAKE A VOTE AND SEE. AND EVEN GOING THROUGH THAT THURSDAY THE 18TH, I GUESS, I DON'T KNOW IF WE WANT TO PUT FRIDAY ON THERE OR NOT, BUT I'D SAY THOSE THREE OPTIONS THAT SAME WEEK AND LET'S SEE IF WE CAN GET EVERYONE ENOUGH IN ATTENDANCE. SURE. GO FROM THERE. AND THEN IF THAT DOESN'T WORK, THEN WE'LL TRY PLAN B, WE'LL FIGURE SOMETHING ELSE OUT. THAT'LL DO FINE. GOOD. THAT IS ALL I GOT. THAT'S ALL YOU GOT? I GUESS I'LL TAKE IT. OPEN IT UP TO THE COMMISSION. IF THEY HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS ON ANYTHING BEFORE WE LOOK AT REGULAR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FIVE. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. REGULAR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FIVE IS ADJOURNED. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN. MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER JACKSON, DO I HAVE A SECOND? QUICK SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER HARRIS. ALL THOSE COMMISSIONERS IN FAVOR OF ADJOURNING, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. AND THAT MOTION CARRIES 7 TO 0, AND WE ARE ADJOURNED AT * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.