18. Consider and act upon a resolution directing the publication of Notice of Intention to issue Certificates of Obligation for the purpose of funding costs associated with the construction of wastewater improvements. (CL)

[18. Consider and act upon a resolution directing the publication of Notice of Intention to issue Certificates of Obligation for the purpose of funding costs associated with the construction of wastewater improvements. (CL)]

PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE RECOGNIZED WHEN THE PUBLIC HEARING IS OPEN. OUR NEXT AGENDA ITEM IS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 18 TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FUNDING COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS. CHRIS. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND PROSPER TOWN COUNCIL. I GUESS I WAS JUST A LITTLE EAGER TO PRESENT THIS TO YOU, SO TONIGHT WE'RE ASKING FOR COUNCIL'S CONSIDERATION, TO PUBLISH THE NOTICE OF INTENT FOR CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, YEAH. OBLIGATION, SO THE ON THE CALENDAR IN FRONT OF YOU, YOU SEE THAT THERE'S TWO PUBLICATIONS THAT ARE REQUIRED, THE FIRST PUBLICATION WILL BE ON JUNE 3RD, AND THEN THE SECOND PUBLICATION WOULD BE ON JUNE 10TH, WE WOULD COME BACK BEFORE COUNCIL TO ASK PERMISSION ON A PARAMETERS ORDINANCE THAT ESSENTIALLY JUST SETS THE PARAMETERS WITH WHICH IT WOULD BE OKAY TO ISSUE THE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, AND THEN ON OR AROUND AUGUST 6TH IS WHEN THE PRICING WOULD TAKE PLACE AND WE WOULD RECEIVE FUNDING, ON SEPTEMBER 4TH, THIS PROJECT WAS APPROVED BY COUNCIL AT THE APRIL 16TH MEETING, AND

[00:45:04]

YOU CAN SEE ON YOUR SCREEN, WHAT THE INITIAL ISSUANCE WOULD BE FOR. I WILL REMIND YOU, THERE'S A SECOND ISSUANCE IN NEXT YEAR'S , FOR THE SAME AMOUNT. AND WITH THAT, IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS, I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THAT. QUESTIONS FOR STAFF, I THINK. I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY, TOO, AS A MEMBER OF THE FINANCE SUBCOMMITTEE THAT, THIS IS MENTIONING THE CEOS OR THE REVENUE BONDS AND THAT IS BECAUSE IN GENERAL, I THINK, WE'RE NOT IN FAVOR OF TAKING ABUNDANT CO AMOUNTS FOR THINGS THAT ARE NOT DIRECTLY TARGETED OR RELATED TO PROJECTS. IF IT WAS A LARGE PROJECT, WE WOULD GO OUT FOR A GEO BOND. THIS IS DIFFERENT BECAUSE IT'S WASTEWATER AND THERE IS REVENUE TO BACK IT, SO WE'RE ON THAT CUSP OF BEING ABLE TO GO OUT FOR THESE. I JUST, I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT WAS ON PUBLIC RECORD, BUT ALSO JUST FOR THE OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS TO UNDERSTAND THAT, THAT I THINK OUR GENERAL INTENT IS NOT TO DO VERY MANY OF THESE CEOS AND THIS IN THIS CASE, IT'S TECHNICALLY BECAUSE WE AREN'T READY FOR REVENUE. OR WE MAY BE, BUT WE DON'T KNOW. RIGHT? RIGHT. ON THE CALENDAR, YOU SAW THE, JULY 16TH DATE, THAT'S WHEN WE'RE ACTUALLY HAVING RATING AGENCIES OUT HERE TO DETERMINE IF OUR RATING FOR OUR WATER AND WASTEWATER FUND IS ADEQUATE ENOUGH TO ISSUE DEBT. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR THAT. MR. MAYOR. I MOVE TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FUNDING COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS. GOT A MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM, SECOND BY DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM. ALL IN FAVOR? MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THE NEXT ITEM IS

[19. Consider and act upon authorizing the Town Manager to execute a Construction Agreement awarding CSP No. 2024-20-B to Mountain Cascade of Texas, LLC, related to the Lower Pressure Plane Phase 2 Water Pipeline project, for $7,101,331. (PA)]

AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 19 TO CONSIDER AN ACT UPON AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT AWARDING CSP NUMBER 2024, DASH 20, DASH B TO MOUNTAIN CASCADE OF TEXAS RELATED TO THE LOWER PRESSURE PLAN. PHASE TWO WATER PIPELINE PROJECT FOR 7,101,003 31 PETE ANAYA THANK YOU, MAYOR. WE HAVE HERE IS OUR LAST PIECE OF THE LOWER PRESSURE PLANE, SYSTEM.

WE'RE ACTIVELY, FINISHING UP THE LOWER PRESSURE PLANE PUMP STATION. SO WE NEED THIS LITTLE PIECE OF 42 INCH PIPELINE IN THE GROUND TO COMPLETE THE SYSTEM FOR SUMMER OF 2025, WE WENT OUT FOR BIDS. WE RECEIVED EIGHT BIDS, WHICH WERE. THAT'S THAT'S A GOOD AMOUNT OF BIDS, WE USED OUR CURRENCY, CSP, TO BETTER SEAL PROPOSAL PERCENTAGES. AND THEN, OUR ENGINEERS ESTIMATE WAS $10.2 MILLION. WE HAD BUDGETED 11.1. SO, WE'RE VERY PLEASED WITH THE BIDS. THEY CAME IN, WE THE WAY WE BID, THIS WAS A BASE BID, WHICH WAS EVERYTHING BUT THE PIPE MATERIAL. THEN OPTION ONE WAS THE BAR RAP CONCRETE CENTER PIPE. AND OPTION TWO WAS A POLY WRAPPED STEEL PIPE. AND WE DID THAT JUST TO MAKE SURE SUPPLIERS KEPT EVERYTHING ABOVE BOARD AND COMPETED AGAINST EACH OTHER, THE PROPOSALS WERE ARRANGED WITH 273 DAYS TO 385 DAYS, AND WITH THAT, WE'RE GOING TO RECOMMEND THAT WE GO WITH MOUNTAIN CASCADE OF TEXAS WITH WITH BASE BID AND OPTION. ONE FOR 7,101,000 $331,000. ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. YES I DO, PETE. AND I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN ANSWER OR NOT, BUT, IN VIEWING WHERE THE PIPELINE WILL GO, YOU'LL NOTICE THAT OUT BY COIT ROAD, IT'S RIGHT BY ROGER MIDDLE SCHOOL. AND I DON'T KNOW THE SEQUENCE OF HOW THESE THINGS HAVE TO BE BUILT, BUT IF THERE COULD BE ANY ATTENTION PAID TO TRYING TO GET THAT PORTION DONE DURING THE SUMMER BEFORE SCHOOL STARTS JUST TO AVOID ANY TYPE OF TRAFFIC INFLUENCE, I WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. YEAH, THAT THERE'S A LONG LEAD TIME FOR THE PIPE MANUFACTURER TO MANUFACTURE THE PIPE, WE'LL MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO TRY TO AND WE DO START DOWNSTREAM AND WORK UPSTREAM TOWARDS THE CONVERSATION. SO I KNOW IT'S 360 DAYS. RIGHT. SO IF YOU CAN'T GET IT IN THE FIRST THREE MONTHS, MAYBE THE LAST THREE MONTHS OR SOMETHING, I DON'T KNOW. I'M JUST SAYING IF WE COULD TRY TO PAY ATTENTION TO THE SCHOOL CALENDAR, MAYBE DURING A HOLIDAY, CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, WE CAN GO IN THERE AND GET IT DONE. OKAY. THANKS, SIR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? IS THERE ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? I MOVE TO AUTHORIZE THE TOWN MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT AWARDING

[00:50:06]

CSP NUMBER 2024, DASH 20, DASH B TO MOUNTAIN CASCADE OF TEXAS, LLC RELATED TO THE LOWER PRESSURE PLAIN PHASE TWO WATER PIPELINE PROJECT FOR $7,101,331. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION SECOND BY AMY BARTLEY. ALL IN FAVOR? THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY ALSO, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU.

[20. Consider and act upon authorizing the Town Manager to execute a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Contract #2 between the Town of Prosper and Dean Construction related to Site Development for Raymond Community Park in the amount of $9,363,174. (DB)]

THANKS, PETE. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 20 IS TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO EXECUTE A GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE CONTRACT. NUMBER TWO, BETWEEN THE TOWN OF PROSPER AND DEAN CONSTRUCTION RELATED TO THE SITE DEVELOPMENT FOR RAYMOND COMMUNITY PARK IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,363,174. MR. DAN BAKER, MAYOR, COUNCIL, THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO PRESENT THIS TO YOU THIS EVENING. HERE OBVIOUSLY TO ASK YOU TO AWARD THE SECOND, BID OF THIS PROJECT, THE SECOND PAGE OF THIS PROJECT, JUST TO GIVE YOU SOME JUST TO CATCH UP SOME BACKGROUND, WE CURRENTLY HAVE A TOTAL COST OF 19.8 MILLION FOR THE PROJECT. THAT INCLUDES DESIGN TESTING, CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION, EVERYTHING, RIGHT NOW, WE ARE STILL ON TRACK TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT IN SUMMER OF 25. SO ABOUT A YEAR FROM NOW, JUST SOME DETAIL, RIGHT NOW, IF YOU WERE TO AWARD THIS THIS EVENING, THE BIDS PLUS OUR CONSTRUCTION COSTS OR OUR GENERAL CONTRACTOR COSTS, WOULD TOTAL RIGHT AT 16.7 MILLION. THIS PROJECT ALSO CARRIES A CONTINGENCY OF 1.2 MILLION, FOR A TOTAL OF A CONSTRUCTION TOTAL OF 17.9 MILLION, JUST WANT TO, RECOGNIZE THE FACT THAT AFTER WE DID THE DESIGN, ON THIS AND WE WENT THROUGH THE REVIEW, WE DID HAVE THOSE THREE BULLET POINTS THAT WE NEEDED TO ADD TO THIS PROJECT , AND THOSE ARE ALL CONTAINED WITHIN THAT NUMBER, THAT 17.9. SO WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR ANYTHING ADDITIONAL ON THAT, BEFORE WE GET GOING ON THIS, I WANT TO ALSO LET YOU KNOW WHAT IS INCLUDED IN THIS BASE BID THAT YOU'RE, THAT WE'RE ASKING YOU TO AWARD TONIGHT, IT DOES INCLUDE FOUR LIGHTED BASEBALL FIELDS, A COMPLEX WITH A RESTROOM, CONCESSION BUILDING, THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM, SANITARY SEWER AND LIFT STATION, ON SITE DETENTION PONDS. MULTI-PURPOSE FIELDS THAT WOULD BE IRRIGATED, BUT NOT LIGHTED, PICKLEBALL COURTS, EIGHT OF THEM WITH LIGHTING. AND THEN A VERY NICE PLAYGROUND WITH SHADE, RESTROOM AT THE PLAYGROUND AND A LARGE PARKING LOT. SO THAT'S WHAT THAT 9.3 MILLION IS GOING TO GET US, AS I NOTED BEFORE, THIS PROJECT DOES CARRY A FAIRLY LARGE CONTINGENCY NUMBER, AND AS YOU KNOW, CONTINGENCIES THAT'S BASICALLY AN INSURANCE POLICY. WE ARE IN A 5% CONTINGENCY ON THESE ITEMS. IT'S POSSIBLE THAT WE MIGHT NEED TO USE SOME OF THAT ON THE BASE BID. IF WE RUN INTO THINGS THAT ARE UNFORESEEN. BUT IT'S ALSO VERY LIKELY THAT WE COULD CARRY THAT ALL THE WAY THROUGH. AND WHAT WE'D LIKE TO DO, WE DID HAVE A MEETING WITH THE CIP SUBCOMMITTEE, ALONG WITH THE PROJECT. TEAM, AND WE SAT DOWN AND WE DISCUSSED WHAT ITEMS ARE OUT THERE THAT WE COULD, POTENTIALLY AWARD AT A LATER DATE. THESE ITEMS HAVE ALREADY BEEN BID. THEY WERE BID ALTERNATES. SO, WE WERE ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE BID WITHOUT AWARDING THESE UP FRONT. BUT AS THE PROJECT TEAM IN CIP SUBCOMMITTEE MET, WE CAME UP WITH THIS LIST AND PRIORITY ORDER, THAT WOULD BE PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING FOR A LITTLE OVER $200,000, ADDITIONAL RESTROOM AT THE TENNIS SLASH PICKLEBALL FACILITY, ADDING TWO TENNIS COURTS. SHADE STRUCTURE AT THE TENNIS AND PICKLEBALL FACILITY, AND THEN OTHER SITE FURNISHINGS, WHICH WOULD BE BENCHES, PICNIC TABLES, ITEMS THAT WOULD BE YOU'D FIND TYPICALLY IN A PARK, SO ALL THOSE NUMBERS COME UP TO THAT $1.2 MILLION, WHAT WE ALSO IDENTIFIED. NOW WE CAN BUILD A PARK WITH THAT, WE CAN IRRIGATE IT. BUT WE DID SOME STUDIES AND WE LOOKED AT IT. AND USING JUST MUNICIPAL WATER WOULD RUN US ABOUT 250 TO $300,000 A YEAR. SO WE LOOKED INTO THE, COST OF INSTALLING A WELL SYSTEM TO BE USED FOR IRRIGATION. THAT NUMBER COMES OUT TO JUST OVER 1.2 MILLION, BUT WE FELT IT WAS IS IMPORTANT TO BRING THAT TO YOU BECAUSE WE KNOW OVER THE COURSE OF 4 OR 5 YEARS WE WOULD HAVE PAID FOR THAT. WELL, IF WE CHOSE NOT TO INSTALL IT AT THIS POINT.

JUST OUR WATER COSTS FOR IRRIGATION. SO WE'RE ASKING COUNCIL TO, IF THERE'S ADDITIONAL FUNDS, ALTERNATIVE FUNDS WE COULD USE, WE'D LIKE TO . ADD 1.2 MILLION TO THE PROJECT TO INSTALL A WELL, WE HAVE OTHER ITEMS. SO. SO WHAT? WE'VE YOU'VE SEEN WHAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING.

[00:55:05]

THE PROJECT TEAM AND THE CIP SUBCOMMITTEE. THERE ARE OTHER ITEMS THAT WERE BID AND THAT WE FELT WERE LESS IMPORTANT. BUT YOU COULD CERTAINLY, IF YOU CHOSE TO ADD THESE OR REPLACE A PRIOR ITEM WITH ANY OF THESE, WE WANTED TO GIVE YOU THE, THE OPTIONS HERE, THE TOP FOUR BULLET POINTS. THEY HAVE BEEN BID. THEY WERE PART OF THE BID ALTERNATE SYSTEM. THAT'S A PLAYGROUND PAVILION, BATTING CAGES, MONUMENT SIGN OF FIRST STREET AND THEN SOME ADDITIONAL TREES AND LANDSCAPE. WHAT WE DO NOT HAVE IN OUR BID, BUT WE WERE ASKED BY THE CIP SUBCOMMITTEE TO COME UP WITH SOME COSTS, SO WE HAVE SOME ESTIMATES. THESE ARE NOT BID ITEMS, BUT THAT WOULD BE TO ADD ARTIFICIAL TURF TO THE BASEBALL FIELD, ARTIFICIAL TURF TO THE MULTI-PURPOSE FIELDS, AND THEN A TRAIL THAT ESSENTIALLY RUNS FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARK TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARK. SO YOU'LL SEE THOSE NUMBERS THERE. NOW BY DOING THE ARTIFICIAL TURF, WE WOULD SET THIS PROJECT BACK ABOUT 6 TO 8 MONTHS IN TIME, AND THOSE ARE JUST THE MATERIAL COSTS. THAT DOESN'T INCLUDE DESIGN AND SOME OTHER ITEMS THAT WE WOULD PROBABLY HAVE TO COME UP WITH. SO VERY EXPENSIVE. BUT WE WANT TO GIVE THOSE UP WITH THOSE OPTIONS OUT HERE. WE DON'T WE CAN'T AFFORD THAT IN OUR CURRENT BUDGET, I DO WANT TO NOTE THAT LAST ONE, THE TRAIL WITH THE BRIDGE WE ARE CURRENTLY CURRENTLY APPLYING THROUGH COLLIN COUNTY, THROUGH THEIR GRANT PROCESS, GRANT PROGRAM. WE'VE GOT THAT IN THERE. SO WE THINK IT'S IMPORTANT, BUT WE KNOW THIS PROJECT CAN'T CURRENTLY HANDLE THAT. AND THAT'S WHAT I HAVE FOR YOU TONIGHT. IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS? QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL. YEAH I DO, LOOKING AT THE PRICE TAGS OF THE ARTIFICIAL TURF ONCE THAT'S BUILT. RIGHT, IS IT HOW MUCH? I GUESS MORE EXPENSIVE WOULD IT BE TO AT SOME LATER DATE, GO BACK IN AND THEN PUT TURF DOWN TO RENOVATE THEM? YEAH. WITH ARTIFICIAL TURF. I MEAN, RIGHT NOW THAT'S THAT'S THE MATERIAL COST. NOW DEPENDING ON HOW LONG, YOU KNOW, WITH THE INFLATION ANYTHING ALONG THOSE LINES. PLUS THERE'S YOU HAVE THE ENGINEER IT DESIGN IT. WE'D HAVE TO DO SOME REMOVAL. THERE'S A DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THERE'S ACTUALLY, ADDITIONAL DETENTION IS REQUIRED FOR THOSE TWO. THAT'S WHY SOME OF THOSE COSTS ARE SO LARGE.

OKAY BUT IS IT POSSIBLE? ABSOLUTELY. BUT IT'S EXPENSIVE. YEAH JUST FOR CONTEXT, WE DISCUSSED THAT IN THE CIP MEETING. AND REALLY ENCOURAGED STAFF TO LOOK AT ARTIFICIAL TURF FOR THE THIRD LARGE PARK, THE ONE AT WINDSONG RANCH THAT WOULD LIKELY BE ON THE NEXT BOND ELECTION, AND TO GO AHEAD AND INCLUDE THAT THERE SO THAT YOU'VE GOT FRONTIER, AND THEN YOU WOULD HAVE, YOU KNOW, WINDSONG POTENTIALLY WITH THE TURF, BECAUSE IT'S JUST SO COST PROHIBITIVE. I MEAN, WE HAVE TWO. OUR THOUGHT WAS WE HAD TOO MANY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS TO SPEND THAT THAT'S JUST A LOT OF MONEY, I WASN'T PART OF THE CIP COMMITTEE, BUT I WOULD ABSOLUTELY AGREE THAT, YOU KNOW, FOR THE TURF, WHILE YOU MIGHT GET LONGEVITY, KIND OF OFFSETS YOUR, WELL, NEED AND IT'S JUST A BIG DOLLAR SIGN FOR TURF. I WOULD MUCH RATHER INVEST IN. IF WE DON'T GET THE GRANT, MAKE SURE YOU HAVE THE TRAIL BRIDGE THERE, I LOVE LIGHTED FOUNTAINS.

AND MAYBE THAT'S JUST, YOU KNOW, IT'S A. YEAH, IT. I I LIKE THAT WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED. I JUST I'M NOT A FAN OF THE TURF COST FOR THIS PARTICULAR PACKAGE. NOW, I'LL, ECHO THAT, IN REGARDS TO THE TURF AND ALSO I FEEL LIKE, YOU KNOW, THE TRAIL BRIDGE, SIGNIFICANTLY ACTIVATES THE PARK TO A LARGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE, SIMILAR TO, I MEAN, I'M PARTIAL TO PECAN PARK IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH IS COMPLETELY, CHANGED THE WHOLE NEIGHBORHOOD, BASICALLY BY HAVING A PARK THAT YOU KNOW, CONNECTS UP LIKE THAT, I HAD A QUESTION ABOUT THE OVERALL BID.

AND SO THE 9.4, YOU THINGS HAD TO BE REMOVED IN ORDER TO KEEP IT THAT WAS THE BUDGET. THINGS HAD TO BE REMOVED. I WAS A LITTLE UNCLEAR ABOUT THAT OR I'M SORRY, I'M SO LIKE IT'S 9.4 AND YOU'RE SAYING YOU'RE WITHIN BUDGET, YOU'RE ON TRACK, OR DID YOU HAVE TO REMOVE THINGS TO STAY IN BUDGET? OH I'M SORRY. SO WE HAD, BID ALTERNATE. SO WE, THROUGH OUR PRIOR ESTIMATES, WE FELT COMFORTABLE WITH THAT NUMBER IN BIDDING OUT A LIST OF ITEMS, WE WERE PRETTY SURE WE WEREN'T GOING TO GET EVERYTHING. SO THAT'S WHY WE USED THE BID ALTERNATE SYSTEM. SO WE GOT EVERYTHING THAT WE FELT WE COULD GET WITH THAT WITH OUR BUDGET, BUT WE ALSO WANTED TO MAKE SURE WE HAD SOME, OTHER ITEMS FOR CONTINGENCY USE OR IF WE GOT LUCKY IN BIDS CAME IN, YOU KNOW,

[01:00:05]

ESPECIALLY GOOD WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO ADD THOSE ITEMS. SO. OKAY, I THINK AND MAYBE THIS IS FOR THE NEXT PART, TOO. BUT, I MEAN, I FEEL LIKE, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE A CERTAIN STANDARD THAT WE'VE ALREADY SET IN FRONTIER, YOU KNOW, AND, SOME OF THESE OTHER THINGS I FEEL LIKE MAYBE WE SHOULD BE A LITTLE BIT MORE, ESPECIALLY IF WE ARE GOING TO PUT IT INTO THE BOND PACKAGE. WE SHOULD BE A LITTLE BIT MORE CONCRETE ON SOME OF THESE STANDARD ITEMS AND GET WHAT THE ACTUAL COST IS, YOU KNOW, SO THAT WE CAN, ASSESS THAT UPFRONT AND, AND BE READY FOR THAT, BOND AMOUNT. AND, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE TO ME, THE, THE TURF PART, YOU KNOW, AND I AGREE WITH WHAT WHERE WE'RE GOING NOW, IT JUST FEELS LIKE, I'M SURPRISED WE DIDN'T HAVE THAT IN THE ORIGINAL , VIEW. SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE THINK ABOUT THAT VERY CLEARLY, ESPECIALLY IF WE'RE GOING TO GO TO THE VOTERS, I THINK PROBABLY WE'D BE SURPRISED ON PEOPLE BEING WILLING TO PAY THIS AMOUNT. WE JUST DON'T HAVE THAT IN OUR PURVIEW RIGHT NOW. SO I THINK IF WE PRESENT IT THEN PROPERLY, THEN THAT WILL LEAD TO THAT. SO YOU'VE GOT YOU'VE GOT TWO YOU'VE GOT TWO COSTS THAT ARE THAT ARE SUBSTANTIAL. ONE IS THE TURF COST, ARTIFICIAL TURF. BUT TWO IS THE WELL COST, BECAUSE WITH A WELL YOU'VE GOT, YOU'VE GOT A COUPLE OF THINGS TO THINK ABOUT.

ONE IS, IS THE JUST THE, THE EXPENSE OF WATER IF WE, IF WE WERE ON MUNICIPAL WATER, BUT TWO YOU'VE GOT THE, THE, THE WATER REGULATION, DURING SUMMERTIME AND BUT THE WE'VE GOT TO BE CAREFUL WITH AS WITH CRACKING AND THAT TYPE OF THING BECAUSE IF, IF WE WERE ON MUNICIPAL AND WE HAD TO SHUT OFF WATER, NOW WE'VE GOT TO, WE'VE GOT TO STOP PLAY ON THERE BECAUSE OF THE CRACKING AND THAT'S WHERE THE WELLS ARE REALLY IMPORTANT, AND SO THOSE ARE DEFINITELY THINGS DOWN, DOWN THE LINE THAT WE REALLY HAVE TO KEEP AN KEEP IN MIND. CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE CONTINGENCY LIST? YES, MA'AM. PLEASE YEAH. SO CHRIS, TO YOUR POINT, JUST SO YOU KNOW, WHEN WE DISCUSSED THIS, YOU KNOW, WE LOOKED AT ALL THE ITEMS, STAFF MADE SOME RECOMMENDATIONS. THESE ARE THE LIST. THESE ARE THE PRIORITIES. SO, YOU KNOW, IF THE CONTINGENCY IS 800,000, THE FIRST TWO THINGS ARE GETTING DONE. YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? SO WE MADE THIS AS A LIST OF PRIORITIES. AND THE PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING WAS THE SAFETY ISSUE. AND THE RESTROOMS AT THE TENNIS COURT WAS KIND OF ONE OF THOSE THINGS. LIKE YOU SAID, WE HAVE A STANDARD WE WANT TO MAKE SURE PEOPLE CAN USE IT DAY ONE, NOT HAVE TO WALK TO THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PARK TO USE THE RESTROOM.

IT'S A CONVENIENCE THING. SO THESE ARE JUST THE ITEMS WE PICKED OUT AT, YOU KNOW, ONCE THE FINANCE COMMITTEE TELLS THE CIP COMMITTEE HOW MANY CENTS ARE BEING USED FOR CAPITAL DEDICATED, WE MAY COME BACK IN THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR AND ADD SOME MORE OF THESE ITEMS, BUT JUST, JUST THAT'S JUST OUR LINE OF DISCUSSION, JUST SO YOU KNOW, OKAY, SO TO KIND OF I'M GOING TO PIGGYBACK ON ALL THAT, I WOULD CONSIDER THIS LIST AND THE LIST ON THE OTHER, THE ONE WE JUST CAME OFF OF, NOT THIS ONE, BUT THAT ONE KIND OF TOWARDS WHERE I WOULD SAY THAT'S OUR STANDARD PARK. WE WANT ALL OF THESE THINGS. SO SO, AND I WOULD SAY I , I WASN'T ON THE CIP COMMITTEE EITHER, BUT HAVING A MONUMENT SIGN AT FIRST STREET FOR 17,000 SEEMS LIKE IT'S AN EASY THING TO PULL BACK INTO THAT. I MEAN, WE NEED TO HAVE SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO I WOULD HOPE THAT WOULD GET UPGRADED TO THE POTENTIAL LIST THERE. SO I REMEMBER YOU SAYING JULY ISH, YOU MIGHT HEAR ABOUT THE GRANT. YES IT'S FOR THE TRAIL WE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THAT TIME. SO WE SHOULD KNOW THAT ROLLING INTO THE NEXT BUDGET, IF WE'RE IF WE'RE GOING TO HAVE SOME HELP ON IT, WE'RE GOING TO PAY PARTIAL OR WE NEED TO COME UP WITH ALL OF THAT TO DO THE TRAIL. BECAUSE I AGREE WITH YOU, CHRIS. I THINK IT ACTIVATES THE PARK FOR A LOT MORE PEOPLE THAN JUST THE SPORTS PEOPLE. AND I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT. I THINK THE TEAM AND COMMITTEE WERE LOOKING AT PROGRAMMATIC SAFETY AND PROGRAM ITEMS, AND JUST TRYING TO GET AS MUCH AS WE COULD WITH THOSE DOLLARS, WE ALSO FEEL IT'S IMPORTANT TO HAVE SOME KIND OF SIGNAGE, BUT WE DIDN'T WANT TO GIVE UP SOMETHING ELSE IN LIEU OF THAT. YEAH. AND BRINGING THAT FORWARD AGAIN, YOU HAD A BUNCH OF KIDS OUT ON A PLAYGROUND. I GUARANTEE THOSE MOMS AND DADS WOULD LOVE A PAVILION FOR SHADE WHILE THE KIDS ARE PLAYING OUT THERE, THE NEXT QUESTION I HAVE IS A SIMPLE QUESTION. I RAN FOR MAYOR A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO. I PROMISE EVERYBODY A PICKLEBALL COURT. WHEN IS THE FIRST ONE GOING TO BE MADE? IS THIS THIS ONE'S 2025. IS LAKEWOOD GOING TO BE DONE BEFORE THEN? THEY'RE THEY'RE THEY'RE RUNNING NECK AND NECK. SO IT'LL BE CLOSED. YEAH. AS LONG AS IT'S MAY OF 2025. ALL RIGHT. NOT JUNE OKAY. GOLLY GOLLY. YEAH. THAT'S IT. YEAH YEAH I CAN'T I CAN'T GUARANTEE I

[01:05:02]

THINK I THINK LAKEWOOD WILL PROBABLY FINISH BEFORE, RAYMOND. SO. GOOD, SO WE'RE JUST AGAIN, YOU GET A STORM LIKE WE HAD, YOU KNOW, WHATEVER'S PROPOSED FOR US THIS WEEK, WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET A LOT OF CONSTRUCTION GOING. SURE, COMPLETED THIS THIS WEEK, BUT WE THINK THE WEATHER TRENDING. YOU'RE PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE LAKEWOOD MAYBE A COUPLE MONTHS AHEAD OF RAYMOND. OKAY BUT LAKEWOOD HAS PICKLEBALL AS WELL. THANK YOU. YES. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. IS THERE A MOTION THAT WE'D LIKE TO MAKE? YEAH, I MOVE TO AUTHORIZE THE TOWN MANAGER TO EXECUTE A GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE CONTRACT NUMBER TWO, BETWEEN THE TOWN OF PROSPER AND DOING CONSTRUCTION RELATED TO SITE DEVELOPMENT FOR RAYMOND COMMUNITY PARK IN THE AMOUNT OF 9,000,330 $363,174. WE HAVE A MOTION. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. ALL RIGHT. ALL IN FAVOR? THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY ALSO. THANK YOU VERY

[21. Consider and act upon authorizing the Town Manager to execute an amendment to the agreement between the Town of Prosper, Texas, and Brown, Reynolds, Watford, Architects, Inc., related to architectural and engineering design services for Fire Station No. 4 for $342,300. (SB)]

MUCH. THANKS, DAN. ALL RIGHT. NEXT AGENDA ITEM IS AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 21 TO CONSIDER AN ACT UPON AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF PROSPER AND BROWN REYNOLDS, WATFORD ARCHITECTS, INC, RELATED TO THE ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR FIRE STATION NUMBER FOUR FOR $342,300. CHIEF. ABOUT A YEAR AGO, YOU SAID YOU'D BE BACK WITH US, SO. YES, SIR. THANK YOU. I'M A MAN OF MY WORD. YES, SIR, GOOD EVENING, MAYOR. BRISTOL TOWN COUNCIL AND TOWN MANAGER, TONIGHT WE'RE PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO OUR ARCHITECTURAL AGREEMENT WITH BRW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION DESIGN OF FIRE STATION NUMBER FOUR. THIS STATION WILL BE, SITUATED ON PROSPER TRAIL WEST OF CUSTER ROAD, STRATEGICALLY POSITIONED TO SERVE THE EASTERN PART OF OUR TOWN, BEFORE DIVING INTO THE SPECIFICS OF. LET ME PROVIDE JUST A LITTLE BIT OF CONTEXT FOR US. THIS IS THE FIRE STATION RENDERING THAT WE BROUGHT TO YOU LAST YEAR, ACTUALLY, YEAR BEFORE LAST, THAT, IS THE END PRODUCT OF WHAT WE'VE GOT WITH BRW, FOLLOWING A THOROUGH SELECTION PROCESS, THIS BRW WAS ARCHITECTURE WAS CHOSEN TO DESIGN FIRE STATION FOUR IN THE AGREEMENT, RECEIVED TOWN COUNCIL APPROVAL ON NOVEMBER THE NINTH, 2021. SUBSEQUENTLY, POST CONSTRUCTION WAS APPOINTED AS THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK, APPROVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL ON JUNE 14TH, 2022.

DURING THIS PERIOD, WE WITNESSED UNPRECEDENTED CHALLENGES OF THE COVID ERA, INCLUDING A NOTABLE SURGE IN CONSTRUCTION. PRICES EMERGED ACROSS VIRTUALLY ALL AREAS OF THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. RECOGNIZING THIS TREND, WE PRESENTED A SCHEMATIC DESIGN AND COST ESTIMATES TO THE TOWN COUNCIL ON AUGUST THE 23RD OF 2022, SEEKING THEIR INPUT. ADDITIONALLY, WE INQUIRED WHETHER FURTHER VALUE ENGINEERING MEASURES OR A REDUCTION IN SQUARE FOOTAGE WOULD BE ADVISABLE TO REDUCE THE COST ESTIMATES. THE COUNCIL'S DIRECTIVE WAS TO RETAIN, THE EXISTING DESIGN AND ALSO INCLUDING THE SQUARE FOOTAGE, NOT TO REDUCE IT. BIDDING COMMENCED AT THE END OF NOVEMBER 2022, WITH A GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE PRESENTATION BROUGHT TO THE COUNCIL DURING THE JANUARY 10TH, 2023 MEETING. THE PROPOSED GMP FOR FACILITY CONSTRUCTION TOTALED $10,213,950, WITH THE TOTAL PROJECT COST OF 12,285,604. PENDING COUNCIL APPROVAL, THE PROJECT WOULD HAVE BEEN SCHEDULED FOR APPROVAL AT THE SUBSEQUENT JANUARY MEETING.

HOWEVER, THE COUNCIL OPTED TO POSTPONE THE CONSTRUCTION UNTIL OCTOBER OF 2023. IN JUNE OF 2023, THE CIP SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDED A FURTHER DELAY TO PRIORITIZE THE CONSTRUCTION OF LEGACY ROAD FROM FIRST STREET TO 380. UNDERSTANDING THE RATIONALE, THE NEED, AND CONSIDERING OUR ONGOING EFFORTS TO COMPLETE CENTRAL FIRE STATION, WE FULLY SUPPORTED THE ADDITIONAL DELAY. FOLLOWING THE PROJECT'S BIDDING PHASE, THE TOWN OF PROSPERS IMPLEMENTED THE 2021 EDITIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE AND FIRE CODES. CONSEQUENTLY, THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS THAT WE ORIGINALLY HAD FOR BIDDING MUST NOW UNDERGO A VERY COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW. THIS REVIEW IS NECESSARY TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE LATEST REQUIREMENTS OF THE FIRE AND BUILDING CODES, PARTICULARLY REGARDING MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING SYSTEMS. OUR INITIAL AGREEMENT WITH BRW OUTLINED A BID OF $608,300, WITH A PROJECTED CONSTRUCTION COST OF 4.6 MILLION. PER THE CONTRACT TERMS. ANY CONSTRUCTION COSTS EXCEEDING THIS INITIAL ESTIMATE WOULD INCUR AN ADDITIONAL FEE OF 8.85. BASED ON THE DIFFERENCE TO DATE, WE'VE SPENT $485,215 FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUDGET, WITH $123,165 REMAINING ON THE PURCHASE ORDER. HOWEVER, DUE TO THE NECESSITY OF REVIEWING FIRE AND BUILDING CODES, AS WELL AS UPDATING THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS BEFORE THE PROJECT RETURNS TO BIDDING, WE REQUIRE AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT REQUESTING AN ADDITIONAL $342,300, FOR A TOTAL COST OF $950,680. WITH THIS, I DID ALSO, NEGOTIATE AND MAKE AN AGREEMENT WITH BRW THAT THERE

[01:10:03]

WILL NOT BE AN ADDITIONAL 8.85% ADDED ON TO ANY FEES THAT COME IN WITH OUR GMP. THIS SLIDE OUTLINES THE COST ESTIMATES FROM OUR PREVIOUS BUDGETS, ALONGSIDE OUR PROJECTIONS FOR 2024.

FOLLOWING OUR RECENT DISCUSSION WITH POPE CONSTRUCTION, IT'S EVIDENT THAT MARKET INCREASES HAVE BEEN SIGNIFICANT SINCE OUR LAST BID, WITH AN APPROXIMATE 8% RISE IN THE FIRST YEAR ALONE.

WHILE CERTAIN COST ELEMENTS HAVE STABILIZED, WE'RE BEING TOLD THAT OTHERS ARE STILL EXPERIENCING UPWARD TRENDS. BASED ON THESE INSIGHTS, I FACTORED IN A CONSERVATIVE 10% INCREASE SINCE OUR LAST, GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE. HOWEVER, IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT OBTAINING AN ACCURATE FIGURE WILL REQUIRE REVISITING THE BIDDING PROCESS, THIS ENTAILS A TIMELINE OF ABOUT 3 TO 4 MONTHS OF BID DOCUMENT REVIEW, FOLLOWED BY AN ADDITIONAL 30 DAYS FOR THE BIDDING PERIOD. IT'LL TAKE A BRW AND, THEIR ENGINEER SOME TIME TO GO THROUGH ALL THE DOCUMENTS, BRING ALL OF THEM UP TO THE CODES AND THEN CHANGE OUT ALL THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, THAT WE CAN ACTUALLY GO OUT TO BID FOR. ALSO WANT TO EXTEND MY SINCERE GRATITUDE TO BRW, FOR THEIR FAIR NEGOTIATION REGARDING THE DIFFERENCE IN OUR AGREEMENT WITHOUT THEIR FLEXIBILITY, WE WOULD HAVE BEEN BOUND BY THE ORIGINAL TERMS. FACING A SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATION TOTALING OVER $737,000. ADDITIONAL. CONSIDER ADDING THE CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE AND THE ADDITIONAL EXPENSES FOR THE REVIEW OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. SPECIAL THANKS TO FRED CLIFFORD, PRINCIPAL AT MAYOR W, FOR HIS ROLE AND, ALLOWING ME TO NEGOTIATE THAT WITH HIM. AND WE SAVED ABOUT $400,000 BY AMENDING OUR CONTRACT, BASICALLY, IF WE WOULD HAVE DONE ANYTHING ELSE. SO I'M VERY GRATEFUL FOR HIM AND THEIR WILLINGNESS TO WORK WITH US ON THAT. SO WE WERE HOPING FOR A SMOOTH PROGRESSION OF THE PROJECT. THE FUNDING SOURCE FOR THIS PROJECT WOULD BE UNALLOCATED BOND FUNDS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY, AND I ALSO WANT TO NOTE THAT THIS INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO THE CIP SUBCOMMITTEE LAST WEEK, AND THEY'VE REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM AT THIS TIME. I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL. JUST SO THE REST OF THE COUNCIL IS AWARE, WE DISCUSSED THIS IN OUR CIP. THERE WAS YOU WERE UNDER BUDGET A LITTLE BIT ON CENTRAL, AND IT WENT INTO THE UNALLOCATED FUNDS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY. SOME, SOME DID AND SOME WAS UTILIZED FOR THE UPGRADE TO THE, WARNING SIREN SYSTEM. OKAY. SO WE THERE IS A LITTLE BIT OF MONEY IN THERE FROM THE SAVINGS. YES WE PUT THEM IN OVERALL APPROXIMATELY 700,000 UNDER BUDGET. I JUST WANT EVERYBODY TO KNOW THAT. ALSO, CAN YOU REMIND ME WHAT THE ESTIMATED ANNUAL, EMPLOYEE COST IS TO RUN? SO IT'S ROUGHLY I DON'T HAVE THE EXACT NUMBER WITH ME, BUT IT'S ROUGHLY 1.11.2. OKAY IT'S WE'VE WE'VE WE'VE GOT NINE PERSONNEL, THREE CAPTAINS, THREE DRIVERS AND THREE FIREFIGHTERS. OTHER QUESTIONS FOR CHIEF. I'LL ECHO YOUR OR EMPHASIZE YOUR APPRECIATION TO BRW FOR THEIR WILLINGNESS TO. I KNOW YOU STOOD STOOD BEFORE US A YEAR OR SO AGO AND SAID THESE THINGS. SO, AND WE MADE THE DECISION, SO. BUT THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO WORK WITH US. SO WITH THAT, ARE THERE ANY MOTIONS I MOVE APPROVAL OF ITEM 21. ALL RIGHT.

I'LL SECOND. ALL RIGHT. I GOT A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THE NEXT AGENDA ITEM IS NUMBER 22. TO CONSIDER

[22. Consider and act upon authorizing the Town Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with Quorum Architects in the amount of $1,780,000 for the design of the proposed Public Works/Parks Service Center. (CE)]

AN ACT UPON AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH QUORUM ARCHITECTS IN THE AMOUNT OF 1.78 MILLION FOR THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED PUBLIC WORKS PARK SERVICE CENTER. CHECK YOU WINGS. THANK YOU. MAYOR. COUNCIL, LAST YEAR, DURING YOUR BUDGET DELIBERATIONS, COUNCIL AUTHORIZED, AROUND 1.8 MILLION FOR THE DESIGN OF THE, PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS SERVICE CENTER. SO THE, BUDGET WOULD WAS SPLIT BETWEEN, CAPITAL DEDICATED OF 1.2 MILLION AND THEN 600,000 OF UTILITY FUNDS WERE SET ASIDE FOR THIS, AS STAFF RECEIVED 12 PROPOSALS IN FEBRUARY, AND WE DID INTERVIEW THREE FIRMS AND OUR RECOMMENDING, QUORUM ARCHITECTS, CURRENTLY WE'RE ESTIMATING APPROXIMATELY 15 MILLION WOULD BE AVAILABLE, THAT WOULD BE A MIX OF FUNDS OF CASH, CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION AND OTHER AND UTILITY FUNDS. ABOUT A THIRD, UTILITY FUNDS AND, TWO THIRDS, OTHER OTHER FUNDING FROM CIP SOURCES. THIS IS THE, MASTER PLAN THAT WAS ORIGINALLY DONE LAST YEAR, SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THIS, CONTRACT INCLUDES IS TO, MAKE SOME MODIFICATIONS TO THIS, AS YOU'LL, AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE NORTH SIDE, SAFETY WAY

[01:15:02]

WAS NOT CONSIDERED AS AN ACCESS. SO THAT MAY CHANGE THE ACCESS POINTS FOR, FOR THE BUILDING. WE WOULD PREFER SOME OF THE LARGER VEHICLES TO COME IN OFF SAFETY WAY VERSUS COMING IN OFF OF COOK, AND SO AS PART OF THIS THEY WILL GO AND RELOOK AT THIS, LAYOUT AND SEE IF THAT IS, IS THE IS THE MOST EFFICIENT WAY TO UTILIZE THE SPACE, SO AS I SAID, WE'LL UPDATE THE MASTER PLAN ALSO WILL DETERMINE PHASING, UNDERSTANDING THAT WE MAY NOT HAVE THE FULL COST AVAILABLE, AND SO PORTIONS OF THE SERVICE CENTER MAY HAVE TO BE DONE FIRST, AND THEN WE'LL BRING IN AND FUND OTHER PARTS LATER. WE DID INCLUDE THE DESIGN UP TO THE FUEL, CENTER THAT IS SHOWN, ON THE, FOR THE EASTERN PORTION OF THIS LAYOUT. DUE TO THE COST AND TO GET US UNDERNEATH THE 1.8, THAT PORTION WAS REMOVED FROM THE DESIGN. BUT THE DESIGN WILL CONSIDER ALL THE FUTURE PHASES.

SO TO ENSURE THAT WE HAVE ON SITE UTILITIES ANY CONDUIT, ANY POWER SOURCES THAT MAY NEED TO BE CONSIDERED, AND SO THAT WILL ALL BE DESIGNED THROUGH AND SO THAT IT'S AVAILABLE ONCE THOSE OTHER PHASES CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. SO WITH THAT, THE TOTAL PROPOSAL COST IS A LUMP SUM OF 1.78 MILLION. AND, AND I WOULD LIKE I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE, DAVID DOMAN WITH QUORUM ARCHITECTS IS HERE AS WELL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. QUESTIONS FOR CHUCK OR OTHER MEMBERS OF STAFF. OKAY. I ASSUME THE COST IS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL COST OF THE PROJECT. IS THAT A CORRECT, IT ACTUALLY, IT FELL IN PROBABLY AROUND 10% OF THE 19 MILLION.

BUT WE DID REDUCE THAT LEFT. SO IT'S PROBABLY LESS THAN 10% OF THE 19 MILLION MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION COSTS THAT, THAT WE ANTICIPATED BASED ON THE MASTER PLAN THAT WAS DONE BEFORE. SO.

OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION, PLEASE? I'M LOOKING AT CAMERA. I MOVE THE I MOVE TO APPROVE, AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH QUORUM ARCHITECTS IN THE AMOUNT OF 1.78 MILLION FOR THE DESIGN, AND PROPOSED PUBLIC WORKS PARK SERVICE CENTER. THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR? YOU RAISE YOUR KIDS? YEP THAT THAT IS, MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANKS FOR THE HELP, JEFF. YES, SIR. ALL RIGHT. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 23 IS TO

[23. Conduct a public hearing to consider and act upon a request for a rezoning of 47.0± acres from Planned Development-75 to a Planned Development for Multifamily and Mixed-Use, located at the northwest corner of Dallas Parkway and Prosper Trail. (ZONE-24-0001) (DH)]