[7. Consider and act upon an ordinance to rezone for a Specific Use Permit (SUP) for Temporary Buildings on 8.2± acres, located north of US-380, west of South Teel Parkway. (ZONE-23-0009) (DH)]

UM, I WAS NOT HERE WHEN WE PASSED THIS, UM SO I JUST HAD A POINT OF CLARITY IN THE CONTRACT . IT STATES THAT IS A TWO YEAR UM, AGREEMENT TO HAVE THE PORTABLE BUILDINGS IN PLACE WITH A ONE YEAR POTENTIAL EXTENSION. CAN YOU TELL ME WHAT THE PROCESS IS FOR THE EXTENSION? IS IT AN AUTOMATIC EXTENSION JUST UPON AN APPLICATION, OR DOES IT HAVE TO GO THROUGH PETE? WHAT'S THE PROCESS FOR THE APPLICANT? IT WOULD HAVE TO GO, JUST LIKE IT WAS STARTING FROM SCRATCH. IT WOULD GO THROUGH BOTH PANES, E. AND GO THROUGH THE COUNCIL AND THERE'S KIND OF AN ADDED KICKER TO IT, SO TO SPEAK, THAT ARE FOR SUMMARIES, AND THEY DON'T START THE PROCESS. THE CITY CAN, UM THAT'S WHAT THE SECTION. HE SAYS THE TOWN RESERVES THE RIGHT TO INITIATE A REZONING REQUEST IN THE EVENT THAT THE APPLICANT HAS NOT SUBMITTED IT. SO IT GIVES US THE AUTHORITY TO OPEN IT UP. AND IF FOR SOME REASON THEY HAVEN'T DONE WHAT THEY SAID THEY WERE GOING TO DO TO DENY IT AND MAKE A MOVE THE BUILDINGS, SO IT'S PRETTY PROTECTIVE OF THE CITY'S WRITES THAT THAT WAS IT FOR ME.

I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFICATION OF THE PROCESS. THANK YOU. OKAY. THANK YOU. WE DO HAVE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS, UH, FORMS FOR THIS. SO IF MR TOM ROSS I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SEVEN. AND YOU WANT OKAY? AUSTIN CAR EITHER ONE. AUSTIN CAR MANHART CONSULTING HERE ON 505 PECAN STREET. FORT WORTH, TEXAS. JUST FEELING THAT OUT IN ANTICIPATION OF NUMBER SEVEN BEING PULLED FROM CONSENT, AND WE'RE JUST HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAD SO NOT NECESSARILY NEED TO SPEAK UP. YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE ITEM. CORRECT CORRECT. I'M SORRY. YES TO HELP CLARIFY FOR YOU. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANY ANY OTHER COMMENTS FOR TOM? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SO YOU HAVE WE HAVE TO PUBLIC COMMENT FORMS THAT ARE IN FAVOR OF THIS PARTICULAR ITEM. WITH THEIR COUNCILMAN. COUNCILWOMAN BARTLEY. WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SEVEN? SECOND WE'LL GET A CAB COUNSELING BARTLEY COUNCILMAN COTTON ALL IN FAVOR. THE MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY ALSO, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO CITIZENS COMMENTS THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ADDRESS THE

[CITIZEN COMMENTS]

COUNCIL. ON ANY TOPIC. HOWEVER THE COUNCIL IS UNABLE TO DISCUSS OR TAKE ACTION ON ANY TOPIC NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA. IF YOUR COMMENTS PERTAIN TO A SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE HOLD YOUR COMMENTS UNTIL THAT PARTICULAR ITEM. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES OR MULTIPLE INDIVIDUALS WHO WISH TO SPEAK ON THE TOPIC. THEY MAY YIELD THERE THREE MINUTES TO ONE INDIVIDUAL POINTED TO SPEAK ON THEIR BEHALF. ALL INDIVIDUALS YIELDING THEIR TIME MUST BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING AND THE APPOINTED INDIVIDUAL BE LIMITED TO A TOTAL OF 15 MINUTES. AND, UH, SECRETARY. I BELIEVE ALL OF THESE ARE FOR SPECIFIC AGENDA, AND SO OKAY? IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL ON CITIZENS COMMENTS? OKAY? IN THAT CASE, I WILL MOVE

[9. Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon a request to rezone 34.7± acres from Commercial District (C) to a new Planned Development for Mixed Use, located northside of Prosper Trail and west of Dallas Parkway. (Z22-0019)]

ON TO OUR REGULAR AGENDA. OUR REGULAR AGENDA PURSUANT TO SECTION 551.007 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE. INDIVIDUALS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL FOR LISTED AS SPECIFIC PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE RECOGNIZED WHEN THE PUBLIC HEARING IS OPENED. OUR NEXT AGENDA ITEM IS AGENDA NUMBER ITEM NUMBER NINE, WHICH IS TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER AN ACT UPON REQUEST TO REZONE 34.7 ACRES FROM COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. THE NEW PLAN DEVELOPMENT FOR MIXED USE, LOCATED NORTH SIDE OF PROSPER OY , MISTER DAVID HOOVER FOR THE STAFF PRESENTATION. THANK YOU.

[00:10:08]

MAYOR COUNCIL. IT'S ALL DAILY. YOU'VE SEEN MOST OF THIS SEVERAL TIMES NOW. A. SUBJECT PROPERTY IS REFERRED TO AS PRADERA IS ABOUT 35 ACRES PROPOSED AS A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. ON THE DALLAS NORTH TOLLWAY. AMERICAN THROUGH SOME OF THESE FAIRLY FAST AND YOU'VE SEEN MOST OF THEM AND THEY'RE THEY'RE PRETTY OBVIOUS WHAT THEY ARE. THERE'S TWO SUB DISTRICTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT. ONE IS THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT. ONE IS THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT. MADE UP OF TOWN HOMES, CONDOMINIUMS, MULTI FAMILY APARTMENTS, OFFICE BUILDINGS HOTEL PERHAPS A COUPLE OF RESTAURANTS. THIS IS WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE, OBVIOUSLY A LOT BUSIER WHEN IT'S GOT BUILDINGS AND LOCATIONS OF THE UM, WALKWAYS AND ROAD LAYS THAT RUN THROUGH THE SITE TRAILS, LANDSCAPING SO FORTH, AND SO ON THE PROPOSAL ACTUALLY, SLOPES IF YOU WILL. FROM THE NORTH TOLLWAY. BACK TOWARDS THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY WITH THE BUILDINGS AS YOU GET TOWARDS THE BACK BEING LOWER AS FAR AS THE HEIGHT IS CONCERNED, SO AS TO BE LESS OF A TRUCE. YVONNE RESIDENTIAL AREAS THAT ARE BEHIND. THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE ARE DESIGNED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE DEVELOPMENT PROCEEDS AND IN ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT AND THAT THAT ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT IS SOMETHING THAT IS BENEFICIAL TO THE CITY AND SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS AS WELL AS THAT DEVELOPER AND GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS AND THINGS LIKE TRIGGERS, WHICH ARE REALLY JUST A TOOL THAT WE REFER TO THAT. REQUIRES CERTAIN THINGS TO HAPPEN BEFORE OTHER THINGS CAN PROCEED, FOR INSTANCE, JUST SIMPLY STATED, YOU CAN'T GO OUT IN A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AND BUILD ALL THE APARTMENTS AND THEN GO AWAY AND COME BACK AND FIVE YEARS AND BUILD SOMETHING ELSE THERE WILL TRIGGERS THAT WILL CAUSE CERTAIN THINGS TO HAVE TO BE BUILT IN A CERTAIN ORDER TO WHERE IT'S CONSTANTLY MIXED USE ENVIRONMENT AND IT DOESN'T JUST TURN INTO SOMETHING THAT WAS NOT ORIGINALLY WANTED. IN THE FIRST PLACE. THE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATIONS PRETTY STANDARD. IN THESE TYPES OF DEVELOPMENTS TAKES CARE OF ALL THE DAY TO DAY INCIDENTALS SIMILAR TO WHAT AN H O A HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION DOES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. IT WAS A MINIMUM HEIGHTS. UM, SETBACKS OBVIOUSLY MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM DENSITIES AND THE TOWN HOMES. UM AGAIN, SAYS JUST ANOTHER VIEW OF HOW THIS WORLD LOOK AS IT GET SOME TO BE DEVELOPED. THIS IS A CHART THAT IS TYPICALLY SHOWN WHEN SOME TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT COMES THROUGH THE PROCESS FOR THE COUNCIL TO KIND OF KEEP A TAB IF YOU WILL ON THE MULTIFAMILY ZONING WHAT'S ALREADY BEEN APPROVED. WHAT'S ON THE GROUND? WHAT'S IN IN DIFFERENT STAGES OF CONVERSATION AS FAR AS AS COMING ON BOARD AS FAR AS THAT THE CITY IS CONCERNED. ZONING REQUEST HAS 730 UNITS THAT WILL BE ADDED TO THE TOTAL NUMBER THAT ARE OUT THERE THAT HAVE SOME TYPE OF ENTITLEMENT YOU CAN SEE FROM FROM THIS CHART AGAIN. SUMMARY EXISTING. SOME ARE ENTITLED SOME ORENDER CONSTRUCTION. UM ALAN AND SEVERAL ARE JUST KIND OF IN THE THOUGHT PROCESS. IT BRINGS THE TOTAL UP TO 6990, WHICH IS JUST UNDER THE 7000, WHICH IS DID THE CEILING FOR A WHILE NOW , AS FAR AS HOW MANY OF THE TOWN WOULD LIKE TO SEE. THESE ARE SOME OF THE TRIGGERS JUST TO GIVE AN EXAMPLE THE COUNT HUMS ALL HAVE TO BE IN PLACE WITH CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY BEFORE

[00:15:03]

THE RETAIL COMPONENTS CAN START. THAT AND AGAIN, THE MAIN REASON TO DO THAT IS ENSURED THAT IT'S AN ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT AND NOT JUST. SOME OF THE PIECES PICKED OUT AND THE OTHER PIECE IS NOT DONE AND TIMELY PROCESS. BUILDING HEIGHTS. OFFICE HERE IS FOURTH STORY DEPARTMENTS ARE FOUR STORY. I AM THE HOTELS. FOUR STORY RETAILS ONE STORY. AND THIS IS IN THE AREA. UM TOWARDS THE BACK. THIS IS AGAIN. UM YOU CAN SEE. YOU CAN SEE THERE. THE AREA TOWARDS THE FRONT HAS THE TOLERANCE BUILDINGS AND THAT'S GOOD. I'M BETTER PERSPECTIVE OF HOW THAT SLOPE ACTUALLY TAKES PLACE. THE APPLICANTS PROPOSING MATERIALS SUCH AS BRICK AND STUFF. GLAZING GLAZING FROM WINDOWS AND GLASS. AND WHAT THE EXTERIOR OF THE STRUCTURES WILL LOOK LIKE.

FATHER SAYS JUST OF RECAP OF THE BUILDING SETBACKS AND HELD THEIR DIFFERENT DEPENDENT ON WHICH ONE OF THE SUB DISTRICTS THAT ARE IN PLACE THIS ONE PRIMARILY AS TALKING ABOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUB DISTRICTS. APARTMENT BUILDINGS HAVE TO BE BACK. 250 FT. FROM THEM. THE TOLLWAY.

DESIGN GUIDELINES, PARKING STANDARDS. LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS, OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS. OKAY, UM. DENSITY IS FAR AS HAVE TO LOOK AT THIS FOR A SECOND. I'M SORRY. IN THAT MULTI FAMILY IS ALLOWED IN THE TOWN OF PROSPER. THE 370 UNITS BASED ON THAT MAXIMUM NUMBER THAT THAT I MENTIONED EARLIER 15 UNITS PER ACRE THE TOWN HOMES OR 10 UNITS PER ACRE. IN THE AREA AS FAR AS THE TOWN OF PROSPEROUS , CONCERNED. AND THEN THIS NEW P D. YOU CAN SEE WHAT THE DENSITIES ARE THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED. THE DALLAS NORTH. TOTALLY DISTRICT IS SOMETHING THAT IS RELATIVELY NEWS, FAR AS THE TOWN IS, IS CONCERNED. WHEN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WAS DONE BACK 11 12 YEARS AGO ONE OF THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES AT THAT TIME WAS TO COME UP WITH A DISTRICT ALONG THE NORTH TOLLWAY THAT WAS ACTUALLY DONE, AND IT HAS CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS. UM MULTI FAMILY. IS SLATED TO ONLY BE ALONG THE TOLLWAY, UM, KIND OF A CAMPUS FEEL. SOMETHING SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU SEE ON THE HALLWAY IS YOU'RE HEADING SOUTH OF HERE IN PLANO AND FRISCO GIVES YOU THAT THE SAME CONCEPT AS FAR AS LANDSCAPING AND HEIGHTS AND ARCHITECTURE AND SO FORTH. FOR HIS OBVIOUSLY, GENERAL GUIDELINES. VERTICAL MIXED USE WHAT THAT MEANS, UM, YOU KNOW, YOU HEAR PEOPLE TALK ABOUT MIXED JUICE, AND THAT CAN BE EITHER HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL. HORIZONTAL REALLY JUST MEANS THAT YOU HAVE A BUNCH OF STUFF THAT'S THE NEXT TO EACH OTHER AND MY OPINION, VERTICAL MEANS THAT IT'S ACTUALLY INTEGRATED TOGETHER WITH RIGHT RETAIL RESTAURANTS ON FIRST FLOOR AND PERHAPS OFFICE, AND THEN THEN, PERHAPS, UM, RESIDENTIAL, UM, NOT NECESSARILY WITH THE RESIDENTIAL AND THE OFFICE AND THAT ORDER YOU'LL SOMETIMES SEE IT IN OTHER WAYS, BUT THE TRUE MIXED USE ENVIRONMENT IS AGAIN TYPICALLY WHAT YOU'LL SEE ON THE TOLLWAY. THERE ARE THE TOTAL IS BROKEN UP INTO SEVERAL DISTRICTS SUB SUB DISTRICTS AGAIN AND THERE IS SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT GUIDELINES FOR THE THREE AREAS. ONE IS THE , UH 3 80. GATEWAY ONE IS NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES AND RETAIL AND THE THIRD IS THE FRONTIER PARKWAY. THESE ARE. THERE ARE GOING TO GO THROUGH HER AND READ HIM BECAUSE YOU ALL HAVE SEEN HIM OVER AND OVER. THEY'RE ONLINE. THEY'RE IN A LOT OF OUR LITERATURE THAT THAT FOLKS THAT ARE WATCHING CAN CAN PULL UP AND READ THROUGH THEM IF THEY'RE INTERESTED TO SEE HOW THESE GUIDELINES APPLY THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE LENGTH OF THE TOLL AID WHERE WE HAVE IT JUST THREE MILES BY THE WAY, SO SIX MILES TOTAL FROM THREE MILES ON EITHER SIDE. YEAH. THAT'S IT AS FAR AS

[00:20:06]

MY PART OF THIS, THE APPLICANT IS HERE, UM FROM CORNER STAND DEVELOPMENT. THERE WAS A PIECE OF WHO WAS PUTTING THIS DEAL TOGETHER, AND HE'S GOT SMALL PRESENTATION. IF YOU LIKE WE CAN GO THROUGH THAT, AND HE'LL FILL IN A LOT OF THE DETAILS THAT I DIDN'T AS FAR AS THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS IS CONCERNED, IF THAT'S ALRIGHT, CERTAINLY THANK YOU. OKAY CAN I ASK DAVID JUST TO CLARIFY A COUPLE OF THINGS IN HIS PRESENTATION FIRST? OR WOULD YOU RATHER GO TO THE APPLICANT FIRST? LET'S DO THAT CAN AND THEN QUESTIONS, OKAY? YES. GOOD EVENING, AND IT'S NOLAN BRADSHAW CORNERSTONE PROJECTS GROUP. HAVE FOOT WORTH, TEXAS ADDRESS 4770 BRINER IN COURT SUITE 200. SO THANK YOU, DAVID FOR THE OVERVIEW. UM I'LL RUN THROUGH OUR PRESENTATION FAIRLY QUICKLY.

I KNOW MANY OF YOU HAVE SEEN IT. IN FACT, MORE THAN ONCE. WE HAVE THE LOCATION. HERE'S THE INTENDED LAYOUT, OR EXHIBIT D. WE HAVE TOWN HOMES, ACTING AS BUFFER TO SHAWNEE TRAIL AND THEN MULTI FAMILY IN THE MIDDLE AND OFFICE AND RETAIL USES TOWARDS THE DALLAS NORTH TOLLWAY. SOME LIFESTYLE SHOTS OF THE RENDERED DEVELOPMENT HERE. THIS DEVELOPMENT IS REALLY ANCHORED AROUND THE TOWN CENTER. YOU CAN SEE THE GREEN. SPACE WITHIN MULTI FAMILY. THE YELLOW REPRESENTS RETAIL TRYING TO CREATE A DYNAMIC, WALKABLE URBAN SPACE. TWO. LIVE WORK PLAY.

HERE'S A SLIDE ON OUR MULTI FAMILY. ONE OF THE EXHIBIT THE LEVEL OF QUALITY WE ENDEAVOR TO BUILD. SOME DIFFERENT ITEMS HERE , SUCH AS CONDITIONED CORRIDORS, 10 FT CEILINGS. HOSPITALITY STYLE AMENITY CENTERS FOR SHORT STOUT POOLS. STRUCTURE PARKING AND STATE OF YOUR BUSINESS CENTERS. HERE'S OUR LOT DIAGRAM IDENTIFYING WHERE THE LOTS OCCUR . YOU CAN SEE THE TOWN 100 FT.

SIMPLE MEANING WILL BE FOR SALE. ALL GAINED RIGHT THERE AROUND THE ENTRANCE TO RETAIL BUILDINGS ARE AS WELL AND THEN THE BIGGER LOTS REPRESENT. IN THE MIDDLE OF MULTI FAMILY AND THEN OFFICE.

WHAT'S THE DALLAS WENT AWAY? HAVE SOME DIFFERENT SHOTS OF OUR STREET SCENE. THIS IS WHEN WE'RE PARTICULARLY EXCITED ABOUT ADAM D AT THE TOP IS OUR BOULEVARD BETWEEN THE OFFICE AND THE MULTI FAMILY WHERE WE'LL HAVE POP UP RETAIL USES, SUCH AS CAFES OR COFFEE SHOPS. WITH AMPLE SEATING. WITHIN THE BOULEVARD. UNDER SOME EXAMPLES OF MATERIALITY AND SCALE. PROJECTS ARE TEAM HAS WORKED ON IN THE PAST. THIS IS PROBABLY MORE EXCITING SLIDE FOR US. REALLY SHOWING HOW WE CAN ENHANCED LANDSCAPING AREAS AND PEDESTRIAN AREAS TO BE COMMUNAL IN NATURE.

ANCHORED BY RETAIL SHADE OF THE TREES AND PLACES FOR ENTERTAINMENT. OR RESPITE. I'LL GO THROUGH A FEW SLIDES HERE AT THE RENDERINGS OF THE DEVELOPMENT. HERE'S THE TOWN CENTER. HOTEL. SINGLE STORY RETAIL AT THE ENTRANCE OF SHAWNEE TRAIL. A LITTLE BIT ABOUT SCHEDULE SUBMITTED A MORE DETAILED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE, TOO. THE COUNCIL. THESE ARE JUST . THE HIGHLIGHTS DALLAS NORTH TOLLWAY FROM 3 80 TO FARM ROAD FOR 28 AND SELENA. SUPPOSED TO START IN 2024 COMPLETE IN 2027. UM AND THEN THERE'LL BE SOME WORK TO DO ON SHAWNEE TRAIL FOR EXTENSION OF CITY SERVICES, INCLUDING SANITARY SUPER OUR WATER IS COMING OFF OF DALLAS NORTH TOLLWAY, AND THAT ALL STARTS PLANNING IN 2024. HOPE TO HAVE THAT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE IN 2026. AND THEN ON SITE INFRASTRUCTURE TO FOLLOW. JUST AFTER THAT. ECONOMICS FOR THE TOWN. TOTAL PROJECT VALUE AT COMPLETION. TAX. PAID ANNUALLY TO THE CITY AND OTHER

[00:25:06]

STAKEHOLDERS LIKE I S D. COLLIN COUNTY AND COLLIN COLLEGE TOTAL 16 MILLION ANYWAY. CAN NINE OF THAT GOES TO THE PROSPER HIGHEST E. I'M HERE TO SLIDE ON THE HOTEL TAX AS WELL AS SALES TAX ANOTHER 7 MILLION A YEAR. MYSTERY TAXPAYER MECHANISMS. WE USED THE DALLAS NO TOYS OR A GUIDE. WITH THE GUIDELINES AS OUR GUIDE, WE'VE CRAFTED THE DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS. DAVID SPOKE A LITTLE BIT ABOUT DIFFERENT FEATURES LIKE BUILDING HEIGHT AND WALK ABILITY. LIVE WORK PLAY MIXED ABUSES, THINGS LIKE THAT. WE TRIED TO CAPTURE ALL OF THOSE WITH WITH THE HELP OF YOUR INPUT AND OTHERS SO WITH THAT. I'LL OPEN IT UP TO ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE FOR US. DOES ANYONE HAVE QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME? WE WON'T WAIT TILL AFTER OKAY? THANK YOU VERY MUCH, OKAY? CENSUS AGENDA ITEM IS A PUBLIC HEARING OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING IT THIS TIME I DO HAVE A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF PUBLIC COMMENT. REQUEST FORMS. UM. SO I'LL ASK THE MAYOR PRO TEMP TO, UH KEEP OUR TIMER. UH WE HAVE SEVERAL. MOST OF THEM ARE IN OPPOSITION. AH BUT I'M GOING TO LET EVERYONE SPEAK. BUT I'M GONNA ASK THEM TO ACCOMMODATE EVERYONE. I'M A LIMIT THEIR TIME TO TWO MINUTES. FOR EACH SPEAKER SO THAT WE CAN GET ALL THE SPEAKERS THROUGH SO PROTEIN WOULD HANDLE THAT FOR ME. UH AT THIS TIME, I'LL ASK BRIAN MEYER. BRIAN MAYER, ARE YOU HERE? THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING, BRIAN MAYER 14 10 BINKLEY AVENUE. I'M LIVING THE VILLAGES RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET HERE. I JUST MOVED FROM STAR TRAIL AND I THINK I WAS BACK HERE BACK IN JANUARY, 17TH WHEN WE HAD THE SAME SORT OF ISSUE JUST EAST OF STAR TRAIL WE HAD OVER 300 RESIDENTS OPPOSING THE HEIGHT AND THE IN THE STYLE OF THIS RESIDENTIAL. UM REPLANNING . I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THE INCREASED TRAFFIC FLOW. THE DELUSION OF OUR HOME VALUES, ESPECIALLY WITH THE 12 STORIES, RIGHT? I THINK SOMETHING LOWER IS DEFINITELY WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR. EVERYBODY COMES TO PROSPER BECAUSE THEY WANT TO SEE THE FOOTBALL FIELD AND WE WANT TO SEE THE SILOS. I DON'T WANT TO SEE SOME BIG, YOU KNOW, GIGANTIC MONSTROSITY HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING RIGHT OUTSIDE MY BACKYARD ANYMORE. LOOKING DOWN INTO EVERYBODY'S POOLS. UM I DON'T UNDERSTAND HALF THE STUFF THAT WAS SAID THERE BECAUSE I'M JUST A CONCERNED CITIZEN. I'LL LET THE REST OF MY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS AND CONCERNED UM CITIZENS HELP WITH THAT. I FEEL THAT IT'S JUST IT'S THE WRONG THING TO DO FOR THE CITY OF PROSPER GOING DOWN THE HALLWAY YOU CAN SEE. I DON'T THINK THERE'S MANY THAT ARE ABOVE 12, AND WE JUST WORRY THAT THIS IS GOING TO SET. THE PRESIDENT'S THAT ALL THE WAY UP HERE NORTH OF 3 80. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE 12 AND THEY'RE JUST GOING TO PUT 12 ALL THE WAY ACROSS. SO THANK YOU FOR THE TIME. HOPEFULLY I DID IT UNDER IN TWO MINUTES. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I APPRECIATE THAT. ALRIGHT. THE NEXT PERSON I'D LIKE TO CALL FORWARD AS BARBARA NUGENT. BARBARA, YOU I SEE YOU. WELCOME BACK. THANK YOU. FIRST OF ALL, I COULD TAKE A MINUTE TO THANK THE MAYOR AND COUNCILMAN. HELP ME WITH THE NAME. CURRENT WHO MET WITH CITIZENS IN THIS ENTIRE CONCERNS. I'VE BEEN GOING TO THESE MEETINGS SINCE APRIL. I THINK I WAS IN THE FIRST PLANNING COMMISSION. AND WHEN I HEARD ABOUT THE HEIST OF THE, UM , OFFICE BUILDING TO ABOUT JUMPED OUT OF MY SKIN. THE FIRST MEETING, UM, THAT I WENT TO WHERE I WAS GIVEN HOPE WITH A MEETING OF WHERE THE MAYOR BEFORE DAWN THAT OR WAS HELD. SAID THAT THIS WAS AN IMPORTANT LOCATION AND PROSPER, AND YOU ONLY GOT ONE CHANCE TO DO IT RIGHT, SO HE WANTED TO SPEND MORE TIME WITH PEOPLE AND LISTEN TO MORE IDEAS. AND IT'S PROBABLY TIME CONCERNED IT'S STILL NOT QUITE RIGHT. I ALWAYS HAVE THE LAST PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AND ALSO THE UM, TOWN COUNCIL MEETING AND YOU HAD SOMEONE HERE FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. WHO WAS UM, GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS OF GETTING PERMISSION TO ADD PORTABLE CLASSROOMS. TO SOME OF OUR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS. YOU TALKED ABOUT DENSITY IN THIS PROJECT. AND HOW MANY MORE FAMILIES MIGHT BE THERE, BUT OUR SCHOOL AT STAR TRAIL IS ALREADY FULL. AND WE HAVE ANOTHER PART OF STAR TRAIL GOING ACROSS THE STREET. I KNOW THAT ORIGINAL DENSITY WAS LIKE NINE SOMETHING PER ACRE IT NOW WITH THE, UM NOT, UM APARTMENT BUILDINGS AND

[00:30:05]

OLD TOWN I CAME TO GOING UP TO 28. PARAYKO IDENTITY AND I THINK WE JUST NEED TO TAKE A LITTLE TIME ON THAT. THE THING THAT REALLY GOT ME OFF MY FEET. THE FIRST TIME I HEARD HER WAS THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDINGS, THE HEIGHT OF THE OFFICE BUILDINGS AND ALL THE OFFICE SPACE IN A TIME WHERE PEOPLE DON'T EVEN WANT TO GO TO OFFICES ANYMORE. THE MAYOR, AND, UH, CONSTANTLY AND KERN, LISTEN TO THIS CITIZEN'S CONCERNS. AT LEAST 40 OR 50 WERE IN ATTENDANCE. AND I THINK THAT TO MAKE THIS WORK. YOU NEED TO LOWER THE HEIGHT OF THE OFFICE BUILDING FROM 12 TO AT LEAST EIGHT, WHICH IS A MAXIMUM AND TOWN OF ROSTER. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. BARBARA YOUR TIME IS UP. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THE NEXT INDIVIDUALS RANDALL ZIGGLER, RANDALL. THANK YOU FOLKS. RANDALL ZIGGLER 39 61 MARIGOLD LANE PROSPERED WHEN SONG DEVELOPMENT I HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK AT THE LAST COUNCIL MENU UNDER THE 11TH ABOUT THIS. MY CONCERN, TOO, IS LIKE MANY OF THE OTHERS. THE THING IS TO GET TO ME WAS THE 12 STORY BUILDINGS. UM I TALKED TO A LOT OF PEOPLE. AS I SAID BEFORE THAT HAD MOVED TO PROSPER OVER THE YEARS SOUTH OF SOUTH AND IT SEEMS THAT THEY WERE LEAVING MORE OF AN URBAN SETTING COMING TO A SUBURBAN SETTING. WHEN YOU LOOK AT DEMOGRAPHICS FOR PROSPER. WE'RE ONE OF THE WHAT IS NUMBER 42 IN THE COUNTRY , WEALTHIEST, WEALTHIEST CITIES . THE HOME VALUES HERE HAVE INCREASED TREMENDOUSLY. THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE LOOKING TO PUT DOWN ROOTS LONG TERM ROOTS. AND WHICH MEANS THEY'RE WILLING TO INVEST IN HOMES THAT ARE ABOVE MANY MARKET VALUES AND OTHER PLACES. AND SO I WOULD IMPLORE UPON THE COUNCIL. THE MAYOR HAS ALL THESE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS COME UP, AND IT'S GOING TO BE MORE OF A SIZE THIS ONE THAT WE REALLY TRULY LOOK AT HOW THEY WILL AFFECT THE OVERALL FEEL OF THAT SOUL OF PROSPER, AS I HAVE SEEN TALKED ABOUT ON FACEBOOK AND OTHER PLACES. I WAS AT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT THIS MORNING. AND IT BROUGHT UP A QUESTION.

WHAT KIND OF RESOURCES EQUIPMENT MAY BE NECESSARY. FOR OUR CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT. SHOULD GOD FORBID YOU HAVE 12 STORY BUILDINGS. AND THERE IS A MAJOR INCIDENT. HOW IS IT TO BE HANDLED? SO WHAT WILL THAT REQUIRE? AS FAR AS FOR THE CITY? EXPENSES APARTMENTS. I UNDERSTAND, IT SEEMS THERE SEEMS TO BE A GOAL OF FLAT AROUND 7000. APARTMENT UNITS AT THE CITY OF PROSPER WOULD ACCOMMODATE I SEEM TO SEE A LOT. I'M GOING UP AND 34 STORY BUILDINGS. THERE'S AN INTERESTING, UM, APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT AVALON COVE. BLENDS INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD OVER THERE, JUST ACROSS FROM PROSPER , HIGH SCHOOL AND FRONTIER FOR ONE BEDROOM, TWO BEDROOM, THREE BEDROOM INDIVIDUAL, THEY LOOK LIKE SMALL HOMES VILLAS WITH PLAN LIKE WINDSONG OR STAR TRAIL OR ANYTHING ELSE. PERHAPS THOSE ARE THE THINGS WE LOOK AT IS CONCEPTS AS WE LOOK GO FORWARD WITH APARTMENT. BUT I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS THAT ARE ALREADY DIVESTED. THE OTHER THING I WOULD ASK. YEAH, I HAVE NO VESTED INTEREST IN THESE COMPANIES. ANYTHING IN THE PROJECT? I AM CURIOUS. IF YOU CAN ANSWER TO ME. ONE OF THE PARTNERS WERE CORNERSTONE IS A COMPANY CALLED ORION REAL ESTATE CAPITAL. I SAW THEIR NAME COME UP IN THE ARTICLE ON JULY 11TH AND I READ IN THE DALLAS PAPER THAT BROUGHT MY ATTENTION TO THIS. THE REASON I BRING THAT UP IS I WENT AND RESEARCHED THE COMPANY AND LOOK AT IT. NOTHING AGAINST HIM. BUSINESS THEIR INVESTORS I'VE ENTERTAINED YOUR YOUR POINT IS NOTED, SIR. YES.

SIMPLY SAY THAT AND YOUR TIME IS UP. BUT THANK YOU AND I WILL. I WILL NOTE AND I BELIEVE THE COUNCIL AGREES WITH ME THAT ALL THE DEVELOPMENTS YOU SPOKE ABOUT ALL NORTH OF FRONTIER RIGHT? WHICH IS NOT IN THE CITY OF OUR TOWN OF PROSPER. OKAY SO IT'S NOT OUR JURISDICTION. QUITE SURE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. NEXT INDIVIDUALS. JEFF POSTON, JEFF I SAW YOU. GOOD EVENING, JEFF FOSTER, UM 19 CANYON AVENUE AND LEGACY GARDENS. AH MAYOR COUNCIL MEMBERS WANT TO THANK AGAIN YOURSELF AND COUNCIL MEMBER KERN FOR TAKING US UP ON THE OFFER TO COME SPEAK WITH OUR COMMUNITY. I DON'T WANT TO REGURGITATE WHATEVER ELSE ASIDE, BUT I DO WANT TO TOUCH ON THE FACT THAT WE HAVE TO BE VERY MINDFUL OF THE DENSITY. UM PROSPER DID NOT GROW THE SAME WAY AS OTHER SURROUNDING AREAS. PEOPLE MOVED TO FRISCO BECAUSE CHEAPER WROTE THAT PEOPLE CAME HERE AND SPEND A LOT MORE MONEY TO BE FURTHER OUT. I TALK TO PEOPLE ALL THE TIME. AND THEY GO. I DON'T GO UP BY PROSPER, BUT WE CHOSE IT. WE'RE SPENDING BILLION DOLLARS ON HOMES TO STAY AWAY FROM THE HIGH BUILDING. WE DON'T WANT IT. MR THIS IS THE CRAZY THING, AND I KNOW YOU BROUGHT UP IN OUR

[00:35:05]

MEETING, TALKED ABOUT INVOLVEMENT EARLIER ON RIGHT? THERE WAS TWO ARTICLES ON THIS, TOO. DEVELOPMENT THAT GOES ON. THERE'S QUITE A FEW LIKE THEY BROADCASTED. THIS WAS REMARKS, SAYING THIS WAS THE COUNCIL DEVELOPER. KEPT ON THE ROCKS. BECAUSE THEY KNOW IT WAS GONNA BE FAVORABLE. EVER SINCE IT CAME OUT THAT YOU GUYS SHOWED IT. THERE WAS AN ARTICLE THAT CAME OUT SPREAD LIKE WILDFIRE. AND I GUARANTEE YOU IF HE'S BEEN SHELVED IT FOR A MONTH. TWO MONTHS. YOU'RE GOING TO HEAR THE REAL PROSPECT COME OUT BECAUSE THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE UPSET.

VERY UPSET. WE UNDERSTAND THEIR TAX MONEY. WE'RE NOT AGAINST DEVELOPMENT. MINDFUL RESPECTFUL, EQUITABLE. DEVELOPMENT THAT TAKES THE PRESIDENT CARDS. I BROUGHT UP A TB. COSTCO. LOT OF PEOPLE SHOP THERE. A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE EXCITED. NOT WORDS, BUT THE THING IS, THEY'RE NOT EXCITED WHERE THE PROSPER ONE'S GONE BECAUSE NO ONE'S I KNOW HE'S GONNA DRIVE ACROSS TOWN.

EVERYONE I NOTICED THAT THEY'RE GOING TO GO ONE SELINA. BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO BE CLOSER. I DON'T HAVE TO CROSS OVER 3 80. OR GO DOWN THROUGH IT. AND THAT WAS SOMETHING I BROUGHT. THE LAST TIME I SPOKE. EVERYONE'S TALKING ABOUT BETTING. AND TRUST. NUMBER ONE. DON'T YOU THINK FIRST GO PROBABLY SAID THE SAME THING TO THEIR CITIZENS BEFORE IT CAME. WHAT A MESS. AND THEN HOW WELL WAS THE VETTING? BECAUSE I'M SURE IT WAS SAID WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT I KNOW YOU GUYS DON'T CONTROL 3. 80 GUYS ALSO DON'T CONTROL THE DIALYSIS. PARK LIGHT. OR THE TOLLWAY. WHERE WAS THE BETTING THERE? I KNOW YOU WILL CONTROL YOUR CONTROL THE TOLLWAY EITHER SO NO TRAFFIC IMPACT. TERRIBLE. ABSOLUTELY. IT REMINDS ME OF BEING BACK IN CALIFORNIA, ACTUALLY, EVEN WORSE. I'M A FREEWAYS ADJUSTMENT , JEFF. THANK YOU. THAT'S THAT'S YOUR TIME. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

EVAN HAINES. THE NEXT SPEAKER. HI I'M EVAN HAYNES. 11 1931 WIN AVENUE. UM AND LIVING LEGACY GARDENS ADJACENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT. UM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND I'D LIKE TO JUST SPRINGBOARD OFF OF WHAT JEFF WAS SAYING HIS LAST POINT ABOUT THE TRAFFIC. THAT'S MY MAJOR CONCERN IS THAT, UM ALREADY SHAWNEE LANE AND PROSPER TRAILER OR A LITTLE BIT OF A BOTTLENECK EVEN WITHOUT 700 UNITS, EMPTYING INTO THOSE ROADS ON A DAILY BASIS, SO THAT'S THAT'S MY MAJOR CONCERN IS THAT THE TRAFFIC THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, ADAM. IN THE NEXT TWO SPEAKERS. ERIC SIZE ERIC. THANK YOU. MY NAME IS ERIC CEASE AND I LIVE IN WINDSONG RANCH. I'M HERE TO OPPOSE THE APARTMENT BUILDING PORTION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. WE'RE HERE IN PROSPER HAVE A SOUL AND I WOULD SAY OUR SOUL IS ITSELF A COMMUNITY. THE PEOPLE AROUND US HAVE ROOTS IN THE COMMUNITY FOR KIDS GROW TOGETHER. OUR FAMILIES GO TOGETHER LIKE LIFETIME FRIENDS. TRANSIENT POPULATION THAT THAT WE'RE ADDING TO PROSPER, WHETHER IT'S JUST DEVELOPMENT OR IN THE FUTURE, MANY MORE DON'T CONTRIBUTE TO THAT SOUL THAT SENSE OF COMMUNITY. THIS WILL BE THE BASELINE FOR A LOT OF DEVELOPMENTS TO COME. IF WE STICK, MORE TRANSIENT POPULATION AND THIS ONE, THE NEXT DEVELOPER WILL SAY WE WANT TO ADD ONTO THAT WE WANT OURS BIGGER AND BETTER THAN THIS ONE THAT SAYS THE PRESIDENT OF JUST CONTINUALLY ADD ON THE TRANSIENT POPULATION. ONE OF THE THINGS I THINK GEOGRAPHICALLY ABOUT PROSPEROUS SOMETIMES IT'S SPOKEN AS A NEGATIVE, BUT I THINK IT'S A VERY POSITIVE THE FACT THAT WE ARE SMALL KIND OF GEOGRAPHICAL AREA. THE OTHER HUGE CITIES AROUND US CAN ADD UP. TIME TO TRANSIENT POPULATIONS CAN BUILD GIANT SKYSCRAPERS AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS. BUT WE I DON'T NEED THAT. WE NEED OWNERSHIP. PEOPLE WHO OWN YOU KNOW WHAT? YEAH THEIR HOMES, WHETHER IT'S TOWN HOMES OR CONDOS. I'M NOT AGAINST THAT. WE COULD EVEN MAYBE TURN THE APARTMENT PORTION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT INTO ACTUALLY CONDOS OR TOWN HOMES, SO WE ACTUALLY HAVE A VESTED OWNERSHIP AND THE NEW RESIDENTS WHO ARE COMING IN AND I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE SHOULD ALWAYS THINK ABOUT IS THE SMALLER PROSPER NOT JUST WITH THE DEVELOPER HOPES TO ACHIEVE THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THE NEXT SPEAKER IS, UH GROUP.

WHAT ARE YOU HERE? LAST NAME IS SPELLED G A D D A. M E D H I OKAY? AH! THIS PERSON IS IN OPPOSITION. I'LL READ THE COMMENTS AS A RESIDENT OF LEGACY GARDENS COMMUNITY PROSPER, I

[00:40:05]

POSED THE REZONING. OF THE EXISTING LAND OF MULTI FAMILY AND BIGGER OFFICE BUILDINGS. I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THE INCREASED POPULATION DENSITY AND CONGESTION CAUSED BY THE MULTI FAMILY UNITS AND INCREASED OFFICE BUILDING CAPACITY. I'M CONCERNED ABOUT CROWDED SCHOOLS NEEDING MORE SCHOOLS, TRAFFIC POTENTIAL INCREASE IN CRIME AND DROP IN PROPERTY VALUES. THE NEXT INDIVIDUAL SPEAK IS OSCAR PEREZ. OKAY OSCARS. COMMENT IS HE JUST WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THIS PARTICULAR ITEM? MATTHEW FALK. HE'S WATCHING ONLINE. COMMENT IS IN REGARDS TO THE SINGLE PLAN DEVELOPMENT BEING PROPOSED BETWEEN FRONTIER PARKWAY AND PROSPER TRAILS. PLEASE OPPOSE THIS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT. MOST OF THE CURRENT RESIDENTS MOVED AWAY FROM BIG CITY LIVING TO RESIDE IN A WONDERFUL TOWN OF PROSPER. INSTEAD OF APARTMENTS, WHICH WILL BRING HIGH DENSITY AREAS AND PUT EXTREME STRESS ON SCHOOLS, ROADS, ETCETERA. WE NEED ELECTED OFFICIALS TO THINK ABOUT CATERING TO THE NEEDS OF THE CURRENT RESIDENTS OF PROSPER. THERE ARE LITTLE OR NO QUALITY RESTAURANTS OR ENTERTAINMENT AREAS. IT IS IRRITATING TO SEE ANOTHER FAST FOOD PLACE POP UP THAT HARDLY ANYONE CARES ABOUT. MOST OF THE RESIDENTS THAT WINDSONG DRIVE TO FRISCO AND PLANO FOR OPTIONS. LET'S BE PROUD OF OUR CITY AND KEEP AS MUCH REVENUE AS POSSIBLE HERE. MICHAEL HANSEN. MICHAEL IS A HAS HIS COMMENT. HE IS. HE SAYS, IS AN OPPOSITION. LEGACY GARDENS IS A CHASE ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY CONSISTS OF 80 FT . LARGE 80, PLUS FEET LARGE LOTS OF BEAUTIFUL HOMES AND MULTI MILLION DOLLAR MND CENTER. MY CONCERN IS THAT THE MND'S REQUIRED FOR SUCH A LARGE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WITH APARTMENTS, ETCETERA WILL NOT BE SUFFICIENT. AND LACEY GARDENS WILL HAVE OUTSIDE PEOPLE COMING INTO ITS POOL, PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS. IN ADDITION, I HAD REQUESTED LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS BE VERY STRICT, LONG, SHAWNEE TRAIL WITH TREES, EVERY 25 FT, OTHER SHRUBS AND PLANTINGS AS WELL AS 50 FT SETBACKS ALONG THIS STRETCH. PLEASE REQUIRE THE DEVELOPER TO BUILD AN 8 FT MASONRY WALL THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF SHAWNEE TRAIL. THE NEXT IS AGAIN WATCHING ONLINE SANTA RAFIQ. IS IN OPPOSITION. I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THE HIGH POPULATION DENSITY THAT THE APARTMENTS WILL BRING TO OUR TOWN AND SCHOOLS. HOW WILL WE ADDRESS THIS? AS THE SCHOOLS ARE CURRENTLY USING PORTABLE SPACES TO ACCOMMODATE IS NUMBER TWO. IS IT POSSIBLE TO REVISE THE 12 STORY BUILDING TO THE EIGHT STORY BUILDING TO BETTER THE TRAFFIC IN THE AREA AND I LIVE IN LEGACY GARDENS? AND THOSE ARE ALL OF THE ITEMS I HAVE. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS PARTICULAR ITEM DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING? THEN AT THAT TIME, I WILL CLOSE . THE PUBLIC HEARING IS OPEN FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION AT THIS TIME. WHO WOULD LIKE TO GO FIRST? I HAVE A COUPLE OF CLARITY QUESTIONS FOR DAVID, JUST SINCE WE HAVE PEOPLE HERE TONIGHT. I WANT TO MAKE SURE THEY UNDERSTAND SOME OF THE PRESENTATION THAT YOU MADE. CAN WE GO BACK TO THE SLIDE THAT SHOWS ALL THE MULTI FAMILY? UM IN THE CHART? SORRY. IT'S OK. ARTISTIC NO, I THINK YOU'RE BEFORE HIM. YEAH, I KEEP GOING. TOO FAST. I THINK IT'S BACK. OH, YOU KNOW, I'M STILL IN AND MISS IT. I'M STILL IN NO ONE'S PRESIDENT. YOU GOTTA GO TO FEAR . YEAH IT WAS IN YOUR PRESENTATION. SORRY. THAT'S OK. MY DAD. OKAY, PERFECT RIGHT HERE. SO I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY THIS. SINCE WE DO HAVE NEIGHBORS LISTENING AND WATCHING THIS, UM WE TALKED ABOUT THIS A LOT. AND AS THE NEW COM PLAN GETS, YOU KNOW PULLED OUT. WE'RE GOING TO SEE THESE NUMBERS OF WHAT MULTI FAMILY, YOU KNOW IS, UM IT'S GONNA BE PREFERRED AND PROSPER. AND I THINK WE LOOKED AT WE LOOK AT 69 90 WE GO. THAT'S KIND OF SCARY, BUT I'LL I JUST WANT TO POINT OUT A COUPLE OF THINGS AND THAT IS THAT, UM LADERA IN PARTICULAR, YOU KNOW, HAS 245 UNITS. AND THOSE ARE REALLY IT'S CLASSIFIED AS MULTI FAMILY. BUT THOSE REALLY ARE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES IN A 55 PLUS DEVELOPMENTS.

IT'S VERY DIFFERENT. I JUST I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THAT SOME OF THE MULTI FAMILY OR TOWN HOMES THAT ARE IN ONE SONG RANCH, SOME OF THE MULTI FAMILY COUNT OR TOWN HOMES THAT ARE ALLOWED IN OTHER PLACES, AND YEAH, I JUST I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE PEOPLE UNDERSTAND IT'S NOT WE DON'T HAVE 6990 APARTMENTS APPROVED TODAY. I JUST THAT'S JUST, YOU KNOW, I THINK PEOPLE GET THAT NUMBER IN THEIR HEAD AND THEY THINK OH MY GOSH, IT'S A LOT OF APARTMENTS AND IT'S NOT ALL APARTMENTS. SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE THAT CLARIFICATION FOR

[00:45:01]

PEOPLE AS THEY IS THERE LISTENING TO THE DECISIONS THAT WE MAKE? SURE. OKAY. THANK YOU.

MATT TOPIC. COULD I JUST EXPAND A LITTLE BIT REAL QUICK, I THINK IN THE WORK SESSION, I SPECT.

MOST OF THE PEOPLE WEREN'T HERE. BUT I THINK DAVID TALKED ABOUT THESE ENTITLED MULTI FAMILY UNITS OF 3700. I GUESS WE'VE GOT . AT THIS POINT, WE'VE GOT 1500 MULTI FAMILY UNITS. EITHER BUILT OR UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN TOWN. AND THAT INCLUDES LADERA IS IN PART OF THAT. BUT ANYWAY, WE'VE GOT ENTITLED 3600. MORE. BUT I THINK YOU YOU TOOK THE POSITION THAT THE VAST MAJORITY OF THOSE ARE VERY UNLIKELY TO EVER BE BUILT. YES SIR. VARIOUS REASONS . I DON'T WANT TO GET INTO ALL THOSE REASONS, BUT THERE'S REASONS THOSE WILL NOT GET BUILT. YES, SIR. AND MAIN REASON SIMPLY PUT IS THEY WERE ENTITLED 15 TO 20 YEARS AGO. IN MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OR EXCUSE ME IN PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS. PDS WHICH ARE ALMOST CERTAINLY NOT GOING TO GET BUILT BECAUSE THE WORLD'S CHANGED IN 15 OR 20 YEARS, AND SO AS THEY COME BACK, AND THEY WANT TO MAKE CHANGES TO THOSE THEN THERE'S APARTMENTS WILL DROP OFF BECAUSE THEY WON'T MY ASSUMPTION IS THEY WON'T ALL GET REAPPROVED AS PEOPLE ARE GOING THROUGH THAT PROCESS AND FOR THE SAKE OF JUST THE NEIGHBORS THAT ARE HERE. UM THE REASON WHY WE SAY SOME OF THAT IS IN SIMILAR TO THIS DEVELOPMENT THAT WE'RE TAKING UP TONIGHT. THERE ARE TRIGGERS THEIR MEANING. YOU HAVE TO DO SOMETHING TO GET THE APARTMENT ENTITLEMENTS, OKAY? SO THERE ARE THERE ARE RIGHT NOW. PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS ON THE BOOKS. ONE OF THEM HAS 2900 APARTMENTS PLAN AND THEIR PLAN DEVELOPMENT, WHICH CANNOT BE BUILT BECAUSE THEY HAVE NOT MET THEIR TRIGGERS, NOR CAN THEY MEET THEIR TRIGGERS BECAUSE THEY'VE SOLD OFF PART OF THE PROPERTY. SO WHEN WE SAY SOME OF THESE CAN'T BE BUILT, IT'S TRUE.

THEY CAN'T BE BUILT BECAUSE THEY DON'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS TODAY IN THE PD, AND THEY CAN'T MEET THOSE REQUIREMENTS SO THE PD IS GOING TO HAVE TO BE REOPENED AND THOSE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO BE RENEGOTIATED AT THAT TIME. SO I MEAN, YOU CAN SHAKE YOUR HEAD? NO, BUT IT'S TRUE AND THE SAME THING WITH THIS THERE THERE ARE TRIGGERS IN PLACE HERE, SO YOU KNOW IF THOSE THINGS DON'T GET DONE, THE APARTMENT ENTITLEMENTS ARE NOT MET. THEY CAN'T BUILD THEM. JUST JUST TO JUST TO CLARIFY AND EDUCATE A LITTLE BIT. SO SINCE WE DID OPEN THAT UP CHARLES AND AMY SO DAVID, YOU'VE LAID YOU'VE LAID OUT THE FACT WE HAVE THE 7000. WHAT'S YOUR ESTIMATE OF THE ONES THAT CAN BE BUILT? BUT I THINK YOU ACTUALLY COVERED THAT NUMBER IN THE PLANNING SESSION. ALSO WHAT WAS THAT NUMBER? I BELIEVE THAT WHAT YOU'LL SEE OUT OF THIS GROUP THAT THE LISTINGS THAT ARE ON HERE. AND SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 2500 AND 3000. AND I THINK THAT THE OTHER 4000 WILL EITHER GO AWAY OR MOVE. BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY THE COUNCILS IN A POSITION TO PASS THE BUCK TO YELL, BUT COUNCILS IN A POSITION TO PROVE SMALLER AMOUNTS IN OTHER LOCATIONS, NOT SAYING THAT THE 3000 OR GOT MOVED FROM FROM ONE PLACE TO THE NEXT, BUT IN GENERAL, I THINK IT WOULD WOULD BE VERY REALISTIC TO SAM THAT THAT SIX OR 7000 AFTER THE CITY WAS BUILT OUT WOULDN'T BE ANYMORE AT THE END OF THAT PROCESS THAN THAN IT IS NOW BECAUSE I THINK THE ENTITLEMENTS ARE KIND OF CHANGE. I THINK IT WOULD BE UNREALISTIC TO THINK ANYTHING ELSE. THANKS. THANK YOU FOR THAT. I WANT TO JUST GET A BASIC THING OUT THERE FOR EVERYBODY. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A DECORUM IN HERE FOR BOTH THE COUNCIL AND THE PARTICIPANTS WHERE WE'LL BE RESPECTFUL AND MORE PEOPLE ARE SPEAKING WILL WILL NOT ENGAGE IN, UH UH, ANYTHING BUT RESPECTFUL BEHAVIORS ALL ENCOURAGED THE COUNCIL TO DO THAT, AS WELL AS THE PARTICIPANTS. SO WITH THAT? WHO ELSE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE SOME COMMENTARY? OKAY, UM. SO FIRST AND FOREMOST, THANK YOU ALL FOR COMING OUT AND SPEAKING. I WOULD SAY THAT THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN A DISCUSSION FOR WELL OVER A YEAR AT THIS POINT. SPELL THROUGH PNC MULTIPLE TIMES. THERE'S BEEN WORK SESSIONS, AND SO IT'S NOT JUST ARRIVING FOR APPROVAL WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION. UM I WILL SAY THAT THERE OF THE SPEAKERS TONIGHT. HALF OF THE SPEAKERS. HAVE A CONCERN WITH THE HEIGHT RIGHT AND THE HEIGHT BEING PART OF WHAT'S BEEN APPROVED AS THE DOWNTOWN OR THE HALLWAY CORRIDOR. SO AS IT IS TODAY, 12 STORIES IS ALLOWED, RIGHT? I THINK PART OF THE DISCUSSION AND MAYBE SOMETHING FOR CONSIDERATION AS WITHIN THIS DEVELOPMENT AND HOW IT'S BEEN PROPOSED, WHERE WE HAVE HISTORICALLY HAD CONCERNS. AND RAISES CONCERNS. THOSE HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED AND. EITHER BY UNIT COUNTS OR BY CLARIFICATION. UM I DON'T KNOW THAT YOU KNOW, WITH

[00:50:05]

THE 12TH STORIES. UM IF WE REALLY KIND OF PICKED THAT ONE A BIT. I THINK FOR THE MOST PART, THAT'S THE ONE THAT GIVES ALL OF US HAVE LIVED HERE A LONG TIME. IT'S DIFFERENT, RIGHT? BUT WHEN YOU LOOK AT OUR TOWN, THERE'S ONLY ONE PLACE IN PROSPEROUS SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SHOULD GO.

IF IT SHOULD GO AT ALL RIGHT? UM AND SO LONG, THAT THAT'S ALL. THEY CALLED IT. UM, THAT BEING SAID. UM I DON'T LIVE THAT FAR FROM THIS AREA, RIGHT SO I WOULD SEE THEM AS WELL. UM AND SO I TAKE IT INTO CONSIDERATION. THINGS THAT ARE REALLY IMPORTANT TO ME, AS MANY OF YOU MENTIONED ARE TRAFFIC FLOW. I WILL TELL YOU WE ARE ACCELERATING JUST ABOUT EVERY TRAFFIC PROJECT WE CAN AND PROSPER THAT WE HAVE FUNDS TO DO TO OPEN UP THOSE CORRIDORS AND HAVE WE DONE IT 20 YEARS AGO. WE DIDN'T HAVE THE MONEY 20 YEARS AGO TO BE HONEST, RIGHT OR WOULD HAVE DONE IT. UM SO THESE ARE THINGS WE HAVE TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION. ABSOLUTELY GROUP AGREE WITH THE STATEMENT ABOUT THOSE ALLOCATIONS IN THE P D. TYPICALLY THOSE ARE TWO UNITS PER ACRE. THERE'S NOT A DEVELOPER. CURRENTLY THAT WILL BUILD TWO UNITS PER ACRE. AND SO THOSE THINGS WE HAVE TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION AS WELL. SO I DO THINK IT. IT DOES BEG THE QUESTION TO FIRST AND FOREMOST CAPTURE EVERYTHING THAT'S BEEN COMMUNICATED POINT WISE INTO CONSOLIDATED DOCUMENT. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT I'M A LITTLE NERVOUS ABOUT BECAUSE WE'VE HAD A LOT OF COMMUNICATION. A LOT OF CLARIFICATION, AND I WILL TELL YOU THIS DEVELOPER HAS WORKED VERY WELL WITH THE TOWN. SO THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP. AND THANK YOU. TOWN STAFF FOR YOUR COLLABORATION. I DON'T KNOW THAT WE'VE GOT A CONSOLIDATED DOCUMENT THAT DETAILS SPECIFICALLY PER UNIT COUNT. AND UM, I THINK WE'RE THERE BECAUSE THEY'RE ALL CAPTURED IN EMAILS BACK AND FORTH WITH TOWN STAFF AND DEVELOPER BUT I KNOW THAT WE HAVE A DOCUMENT. SO FOR MY COMMENTS UM MOST OF THE CONCERNS HAVE BEEN RAISED BY THE COUNCIL AND BY STAFF HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED BY THIS DEVELOPER. UM I THINK THEY HAVE ACCOMMODATED REQUESTS AND CONCERNS. I DON'T KNOW WHERE WE STAND ON THE 12 STORIES AND WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE. BUT, UM THOSE ARE MY COMMENTS FOR NOW.

YEAH ACTUALLY, IF YOU THINK BECAUSE WE HAVE HEARD THAT SIGNIFICANT I'D LIKE TO ASK THE DEVELOPER IF YOU KNOW IF WE CAN KNOCK OUT AT LEAST ONE POTENTIAL OBJECTION. AND THAT IS THE EIGHT VERSES 12. SO MY SPECIFIC REQUEST WOULD BE TO LIMIT THE HEIGHT. OF THE ALL BUILDINGS TO EIGHT STORIES. WELL, I THINK WE'VE HEARD IN THE. THE COMMUNITY AND YOU MENTIONED THAT IN THE WORK SESSION. I THINK WE'RE PREPARED TO MOVE IT TO EIGHT STORIES. THANK YOU TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY AS A GOOD NEIGHBOR. THANK YOU. GOOD. ALRIGHT SO WE'VE WE'VE CLARITY ON THAT GOING. UM AND FOR JUST THE COUNCIL ON PAGE 1 73 WHEN IT TALKS ABOUT BUILDING CRITERIA AND BUILDING HEIGHT IN OUR THING, WE'RE GOING TO CHANGE THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT TO 12 FROM 12 STORIES TO EIGHT STORIES. IT DOESN'T CLARIFY IN THIS DOCUMENT, UM, WHERE THOSE EIGHT STORIES WOULD GO, SO IN OTHER WORDS, IN IN THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT. THIS IS IN THE HIGHWAY SUBJECT. YOU CAN'T GO IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUB SUB DISTRICT. SO JUST FOR POINT OF CLARITY. I DON'T NUMBER B TWO SAYS MINIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT FOR THE OFFICES. FOUR STORIES COULD BE EIGHT RIGHT IF WE CHANGE THAT RIGHT, MULTI FAMILY IS THAT THE SAME IN YOUR MIND FOR MULTI FAMILY AND A THE APARTMENTS AND CONDOS, THEY COULD GO UP TO EIGHT STORIES OR WE LIMIT ARE WE GOING TO MAX? THOSE OUT AT FOUR. I THINK WE'D LIKE TO ESTABLISH A CEILING 284 TO BE OUR PREFERENCE . SAME THING FOR THE HOTEL, AND THEN IT SAYS MINIMUM ON THE RETAIL IN THE, UH THEN THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT. THE MINIMUM IS ONE BUT AGAIN JUST SO EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS ANY BUILDING IN THAT SUB DISTRICT. ACCORDING TO THE WAY THIS IS WORDED WOULD BE COULD BE EIGHT STORIES. THAT'S OUR UNDERSTANDING AND BUILDING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUB DISTRICT TO THE WEST WOULD BE COULD BE THREE. CORRECT I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE UNDERSTOOD ACCORDING TO THIS DOCUMENT. DOES THAT MEAN? WE NEED TO CHANGE OUR DESIGN GUIDELINES THEN BECAUSE NO, NOT NECESSARILY. IT'S I THINK PART OF MY PARTICULAR REQUEST IS IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA. I THINK AS WE MOVE CLOSER TO 3 80 12 STORIES MAY BE APPROPRIATE. JUST ASK QUESTIONS . YEAH BUT VALID QUESTION. WE HAD. OTHER QUESTIONS FOR OR COMMENTS FROM FROM THE COUNCIL TO BRING UP WITH. YEAH YOU GOT IT. YOU GOT THE FLOOR THINGS.

OKAY SO JUST FOR AGAIN CLARITY FRONT FOR OUR NEIGHBORS. EXHIBIT C IS THE DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENTS

[00:55:03]

THAT ARE IN OUR PACKET. IF YOU GO ONLINE AND DOWNLOAD THE PACKET, AND IN THIS IN THIS, IT SAYS, WHERE CONFLICTS MAY ARISE BETWEEN EXHIBIT C AND EXHIBIT D. EXHIBIT C SHALL GOVERN SO IT MEANS THAT THE WORDING IN THIS DOCUMENT GOVERNS. THAT'S WHY FOR ME, I'M PRETTY NITPICKY ABOUT WHAT IT SAYS. WHICH IS WHY I'M GOING TO GO THROUGH THIS EXERCISE HERE. JUST EXPLAINING IT SO EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS. WE DID TALK ABOUT ON PAGE 17 THAT THAT STATEMENT IS ON PAGE 1 67 BECAUSE I HAVE THAT SAME CONCEPT PLAN C. YOU DON'T WANT PAGE 1 70 . WE DISCUSSED THIS IN THE WORK SESSION, BUT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PEOPLE THAT ARE HERE. THE APARTMENTS COUNT. IT WAS ORIGINALLY 65% STUDIOS AND ONE BEDROOMS. AND 35% 2 AND THREE BEDROOMS THAT IS CHANGING. TO 65% STUDIO AND ONE'S 33% 2 BEDROOM AND 2% 3 BEDROOMS. NO. NO WE I MEAN, THAT WAS SOME NUMBERS THAT WERE 1, 65 AND 1, 65 AND 10. ONCE IT 185 2 BEDROOMS, TWO NO MORE THAN 165, 2 BEDROOMS AND NO MORE THAN 10 3 BEDROOM BEDROOMS. THE REST WOULD BE STUDIOS ARE ONES. WE NEED TO VERIFY WITH THE DEVELOPER THE SAME THING THAT HE'S AGREEABLE TO THAT THOSE ARE HIS NUMBERS NUMBERS. WE DO NEED TO MAKE SURE WE'RE GOING NOLAN YOU WANT DON'T . JUST THE APARTMENTS, THE PARENTAL APARTMENTS. YOU DO AGREE TO THOSE? THANK YOU. IN THE NUMBER THREE TALKS ABOUT RETAIL AND TALKS ABOUT WHAT'S ALLOWED IN RETAIL WHEN I MAKE A NOTE HERE IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, UM I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE PUT IN AMY'S CLAUSE THERE, WHICH IS A FAMILY FRIENDLY USES ONLY SO THAT EXCLUDES THINGS LIKE PACKAGE. LIQUOR STORES, TATTOO PARLORS, SHOPS, UM THINGS LIKE THAT. UM. AND I JUST WANTED WE DO THIS ON EVERY SINGLE ONE. I THINK. WHERE THERE'S HOUSING FOR SURE, BECAUSE THAT FIRST STAFF IT NEEDS IT NEEDS TO BE A STAFF.

YOU'RE GONNA HEAR THE SAME EXACT COMMENT FROM THE COUNCIL UNTIL IT'S IN THERE. EVERY SINGLE TIME I HAVE PICKED UP ON THAT. YEAH THANK YOU. CLAUSES. IMPORTANT, UM SO PARKING AND THIS IS PROBABLY A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT ON PARKING. YES. IT TALKS ABOUT SHARED PARKING IN THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT QUITE OFTEN, AND THEN IT MAKES THE STATEMENT SEVERAL TIMES THROUGH THIS DOCUMENT THAT WE'RE TOWN HOME USES ARE CONCERNED PARKING WILL NOT BE SHARED. MY CONCERN WITH THAT IS YOU'RE YOU'RE EXCLUDING SHARED PARKING FOR THE TOWN HOMES ONLY, BUT NOT THE RETAIL PORTION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT. SO IF THE IF THE RETAIL COMPONENT AS THE THREE STORY BUILDINGS IN THE RETAIL COMPONENT AND YOU HAVE AND YOU DON'T HAVE ENOUGH PARKING IN THAT AREA PEOPLE ARE NOT GOING TO GO TO THE HIGHWAY, SUBDISTRICT AREA AND PARK.

THEY'RE GOING TO PARK WHERE THERE'S AN EMPTY SPACE IN FRONT OF THE TOWN HOME. SO I'D LIKE TO SEE THAT CHANGED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT TO SAY THAT THERE ISN'T ANY SHARED PARKING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT THAT THERE CAN BE SHARED PARKING IN THE IN THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT BECAUSE I UNDERSTAND THE REASON THERE. I JUST I THINK IT'S GONNA BE A PROBLEM FOR ALL THOSE TOWN HOME OWNERS, AND THEY'RE GOING TO GET FRUSTRATED REALLY QUICK. WHEN THE RETAIL THEY'RE PARKING THEIR FILLS UP AND THEN THEY'RE TRYING TO COME HOME AND THE PARKING PLACE THAT THEY HAVE IN FRONT OF THEIR TOWN. HOME IS FOR SOMEBODY EATING IN A RESTAURANT. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? YEAH JUST TO UNDERSTAND, ORIGINALLY HAD INTENDED FOR THE STREET AND BETWEEN THE APARTMENTS AND THE TOWN HOMES TO BE SHARED PARKING, JUST PUBLIC ACCESS. THERE WAS PARKING PROVIDED BEHIND THE TOWN HOMES FOR THE TOWN OF INDIVIDUALS. WE WANT TO TAKE AWAY SHARE PARKING. ON THE STREET IN FRONT AND JUST DEDICATE THAT RESIDENTIAL IS THAT CORRECT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT. IF YOU LOOK AT THE MAP, CAN WE PUT THEM IN THE CENTER OF THE STREETS AND MAYBE ON ONE SIDE OF THE STREET, WE COULD DO NO PARKING OR SHARED ON THE OTHER SIDE. IT COULD BE FOR RETAIL. THAT'S FINE. JUST DON'T MY CONCERN REALLY IS FOR THE TOWN HOMEOWNERS I JUST DON'TON WANT THEM TO, BECAUSE BECAUSE THE WAY THIS READS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT, THE RETAIL CAN BE THREE STORIES. THEY DON'T HAVE. YOU MENTIONED ONE STORY IN YOUR PRESENTATION, BUT IT IT CAN BE THREE STORIES, ACCORDING TO THIS DOCUMENT. SO IF YOU HAVE A THREE STORY RETAIL SPACE, YOU KNOW YOU'VE GOT A CLUB OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, AND PEOPLE ARE THERE AT A HAPPY HOUR OR SOMETHING. YOU KNOW THEY'RE GOING TO BE PARKING IN FRONT OF THE TOWN HOMES AND THOSE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO COME HOME AND BE UPSET, SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'VE GOT PLENTY OF PARKING FOR WHATEVER USE YOU DECIDE IF YOU DECIDE 43 STORY RETAIL SPACE. THAT MAKES SENSE. SO AS IT IS NOW THE DIVIDING LINE BETWEEN HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT

[01:00:03]

NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT VIPER CASE THAT MAIN ROAD THERE. AND WE'LL JUST DO NO NO SHARE PARKING ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT PERFECT. OKAY THEN WE'RE GONNA GO TO PAGE ONE WAS 72. THIS IS PROBABLY A QUESTION FOR YOU, NOLAN OR MAYBE STAFF. UM, ON J TALKS ABOUT FENCING.

AND IT SAID VINCENT, IT'S HUSBAND. SING IS ALLOWED BETWEEN THE PRIMARY FACADE OF THE BUILDING AND THE PROPERTY LINE. IN THE ABOVE INSTANCES, THE FENCE SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 42 INCHES. FENCING IS RESTRICTED TO ROT ON T BILLS, STEEL OR SIMILAR MATERIALS OR MASONRY, THE MASONRY PORTION OF ANY FENCE IN FRONT OF A BUILDING SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 3 FT. AND THEN IT GOES ON TO DESCRIBE THE MASONRY BUILDING. CAN YOU GIVE ME AN EXAMPLE OF WHERE THAT WOULD APPLY? BECAUSE I THINK WHAT I WANT TO AVOID US, AND WE ALWAYS TRY TO AVOID THIS. WE DON'T WANT , YOU KNOW CORRIDORS WHERE PEOPLE ARE DRIVING, EVEN IF ITS INTERIOR TO LOOK LIKE A CAVE BECAUSE IT'S GOT MASONRY FENCING. SO CAN YOU KIND OF TELL ME WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THERE. JUST TO CLARIFY, YOU SAID ANYTIME A MASONRY WALL IS IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING. IT CAN ONLY BE 3 FT, RIGHT? YES OKAY, SO THAT WOULD BE FOR EXAMPLE, IN FRONT OF THE TOWN HOMES SAY WITHIN THE SUB DISTRICT OR EVEN FACING SHAWNEE TRAIL. WE MAY WANT TO CREATE PORCHES OR PATIOS WHERE THE WALL COULD BE INTEGRATED INTO THE NATION. LOOK OF THE HOME. WE WOULDN'T WANT TO EXCEED 3 FT. BECAUSE THEN YOU START OBSTRUCTING VIEWS, AND IT GETS TO WHERE, LIKE YOU SAID, LOOKS LIKE A TUNNEL. RIGHT SO WE LET WE LIMIT THOSE CONDITIONS AT 3 FT, SO YOU CAN HAVE SOME SEPARATION FROM THE PEDESTRIAN SPACE BUT ALSO ENGAGE IT VISUALLY LIKE MASONRY, AND THEN IT WOULD BE LIKE WROUGHT IRON. OR NO, IT JUST WOULD BE AMAZING IF YOU LIKE A LITTLE RETAINING WALL. YEAH, OKAY. AND THEN OPEN. OKAY? I WAS JUST MAKING SURE THAT I UNDERSTOOD. WHAT CAN WE FOLLOW UP ON THAT AMY? THAT'S ONE OF MY QUESTIONS. SO I THINK THAT WOULD BE THE ONLY LOCATION THE ENTIRE TOWN THAT WE HAVE A STREET LENGTH MASONRY WALL. I THINK YOU'RE RIGHT. GOODBYE.

LET'S TALK INTENT HERE, IS IT BUT THAT'S WHAT IT IS. IT'S ST 3 FT WALL ALL ALONG THAT IN BECAUSE YOU CAN HAVE A WALKWAY. WELL, THIS IS IN THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT. THIS IS IN THE HIGHER WAY SUBDISTRICT LANGUAGE, BUT IT'S THE SAME IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE ONE OF THE SPEAKERS ALSO REQUESTED AND MASONRY WALL. A LONG SHAWNEE TRAILS. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT MAKES THAT'S BECAUSE EVERYWHERE ELSE WE HAVE A WROUGHT IRON FENCING ALONG THAT THOROUGHFARE RIGHT ALONG SHAWNEE AND NEEDS TO BE WROUGHT IRON WITH A FOOT.

THAT WAS THE REQUEST WAS 8 FT. THIS IS OH, RIGHT. YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE IT? YEAH FRONT PORCH WITH THE THREE IF YOU WANT IT OR THEIR FRONT FROM THE STREET, A FRONT PATIO WITH A 3 FT. MACE FOR YOU HIDES WHATEVER THEY MAY KEEP ON THAT PATIO. I THINK THAT MAKES SENSE SMALL AREA, BUT IT SHOULDN'T RUN ALONG THE FULL LENGTH SHOT. NO, YOURS. I'M TALKING ABOUT THE SEVENTH NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT, SO THE WAY I LOOK AT THAT IT WOULD RUN ALL THE WAY FROM THE SOUTHERN ENTRY AREA. THERE'LL BE A BREAK FOR THE ALLEYWAY THERE AND THEN WOULD RUN ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE NEXT ALLEYWAY. NO I THINK THE FRONT DOOR IS GOING TO INTERFERE WITH THAT. WE WOULDN'T PUT A FENCE ALONG SHAWNEE TRAIL OF ANY SO IT'S GONNA BE A LITTLE FENCE AND THEN OPEN. I JUST I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE LIKE HE SAID, WE DON'T HAVE SOME BIG LINEAR. MASONRY WALL. YOU KNOW, SOMEWHERE LIKE THAT HERE. THE INTENT IS TO CREATE A FRONT PORCH STYLE COMMUNITY ALONG SHINING RIGHT. SO YOU AS YOU EITHER DRIVE PAST IT OR WALK PAST IT. YOU HAVE HE'S FRONT PORCHES THAT YOU EXPERIENCE YOU KNOW, YOU WOULDN'T PUT A WALL UP IN FRONT OF PEDESTRIAN PATH THAT WOULD OBSTRUCT THAT BECAUSE YOU WANTED TO ENGAGE THE VESTRY IN CAP. SO THAT WALL THAT 3 FT WALL LONGSHOREMEN ONLY IS BROKEN BY EVERY FRONT DOOR CORRECT. YEAH DOOR HAS A PATH TO DECIDE, RIGHT? YEAH. SIDEWALK. THAT HAS TO STOP SO THAT YOU CAN HAVE A FRONT PATH SIDEWALK. BUT THEN IF IT'S A 20 FT POUNDS YOU'RE GONNA HAVE 15 FT OF PATIO OR 12 FT OF A PATIO LOOK GOOD. WALL RETAINING WALLER'S SCREENING 3 FT. TALL AND THEN YOU'RE GONNA HAVE 5 FT OF OPEN SPACE WHERE THERE'S A SIDEWALK TO GO TO THE FRONT DOOR. THE END OF THAT WAY.

I SAID, YEAH, BROKEN UP. OKAY, THAT MAKES MORE SENSE THAN MOST. TELL THEM. OKAY THAT MAKES MORE SENSE. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTOOD IT VERY CLEAR . IT'S NOT RUNNING THE FULL LENGTH AS SHOWN IN UP AND DOWN. OKAY, THAT'S FINE. UM ON. IT WAS ALSO IN THE HIGHWAY DISTRICT.

[01:05:03]

YES IT'S THE SAME IN THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT LANGUAGE IS THE SAME. I WOULDN'T HAVE A GREAT EXAMPLE OF THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT USING A LOW WALL LIKE THAT, UNLESS IT WAS IN A RETAIL SINGLE STORY BUILDING WHERE YOU'RE TRYING TO ENCLOSE OUTDOOR PATIO, BUT LEAVE IT OPEN VISUALLY. I DON'T EXPECT TO USE THAT A LOT IN THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT. UM ON CONTINUING WITH LANDSCAPING PAGE 1 73 JUST BECAUSE WE'VE HAD ISSUES WITH THIS AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS AROUND TOWN WANT TO MAKE SURE IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, WE ARE ADDRESSING MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING AND WHAT I MEAN BY THAT IS NOT ONLY IN THIS. IT TALKS ABOUT KEEPING YOUR AREAS FREE OF WEEDS, INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES AND TRASH. WHAT I MEAN IS WHEN THINGS DIE. OR THINGS DON'T GROW THE WAY THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO THINGS LIKE THAT, THAT THEY GET REPLACED, UM, IN A TIMELY MANNER, AND ALL THAT STUFF WORK WITH WORK WITH TERRY YES, AMY'S GARDENING CLAUSE BECAUSE WE HAVE HAD ISSUES ENFORCING PEOPLE REPLACING THEIR PLANT MATERIAL AND TIMELY MANNER , AND IT JUST STARTS A LITTLE GLAD OVER TIME, SO WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE STAYING ON TOP OF THAT. AND THAT WE HAVE SOME TEETH TO ENFORCE IT, TOO, AS WELL. AND YOUR P O ATION SHOULD BE HANDLING IT, TOO. THAT WOULD THAT WOULD INCLUDE PRESUME GRASS AND WEEDS AND THINGS LIKE THAT MULCHING IRRIGATION THAT WORK. THERE'S AN AMY MAINTENANCE STANDARDS THAT IS YEAH, YEAH, THAT ALIGNS WITH OUR EXPECTATION FORCE. I KNOW, BUT IF YOU SELL, IT MIGHT NOT ALIGN WITH THE NEW OWNER, SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE IT'S THERE. MM BUILDING CRITERIA WHERE HE TALKED ABOUT THAT WHICH WAS PAGE SO 1 73. WE TALKED ABOUT EIGHT STORIES, TAKING IT FROM 12 TO 8. UM PAGE 1 74 C.

TWO UM, IT SAYS ONLY PRIMARY BUILDING MATERIALS ARE ALLOWED ON THE FIRST FLOOR, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SOME INTEREST PANELS. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, THE FIRST FLOOR SHALL BE AT LEAST 9 FT. HIGH AND AT A MINIMUM 90% SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MASONRY CLADDING. THIS IS IN THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT AND SINCE WE CHANGED THE HEIGHT, THE MINIMUM THE HEIGHT ON THE FIRST FLOOR, WE SHOULD SAY THAT'S 14 FT. THEY'RE OKAY WITH THAT CHANGE. OKAY? SO INSTEAD OF IT, SAYING NINE, IT SHOULD SAY 14. UM. THEN ON PAGE 1 76 AGAIN. THIS IS THE HIGHWAY. UM SUBDISTRICT PERMITTED USES. I WANT TO MAKE SURE ON BANK SAVINGS AND LOAN OR CREDIT UNION. WE ARE CLARIFYING. THERE'S NO DRIVE THROUGH. THERE. THE FIRST OPPORTUNITY. I'VE HAD TO BE ABLE DRIVE THROUGH. IF YOU HAVE AN A T M MACHINE WHERE YOU CAN PULL UP AND WALK UP TO IT, BUT IF IT HAS LIKE A CANOPY, AND IT'S A DRIVE THROUGH WITH A TELLER AND ALL THAT THAT'S A DRIVE THROUGH ON THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING. YEAH YES, YES. YES. I DON'T WANT THE CANOPY THAT OVERHANG ALL THAT, OKAY? UM THERE'S A USE THAT SAYS FARM RANCH STABLE GARDEN OR ORCHARD.

I BELIEVE THAT WAS PULLED FROM THE DALLAS NO TOY GUIDELINES. WE CAN STRIKE. LET'S DO THIS DOESN'T FIT THERE AND THEN IT SAYS BLUE TRUCK PARK CONDITIONAL . ARE THOSE CONDITIONS. DOES THAT MEAN THE CONDITIONS THAT ARE JUST IN OUR ZONING ORDINANCE? CREATE THAT MAY BE OKAY? NOT RATHER THAN MY LIFE. MAYBE LOCATIONS OR, YOU KNOW, CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF WHERE THEY ARE HAVE TWO BATHROOMS. I MEAN, YOU KNOW THOSE TYPES OF THINGS THAT WE WANT TO PUT IN THERE TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S A POSITIVE EXPERIENCE FOR WHOEVER. PATRONIZING AND OUTDOOR MERCHANDISE DISPLAY TEMPORARY IT'S NOT. AND THE ONLY REASON WHY I ASK IS BECAUSE WE HAVE VERY FEW RETAILERS THAT WE ALLOW OUTDOOR MERCHANDISE DISPLAY AND IT'S KROGER. YOU KNOW SOME OF THOSE MORE BIG BOX TYPE THAT HAVE THE PORCH THINGS AND YOU KNOW YOU CAN PICTURE STUFF, BUT WE'VE HAD OTHER RETAILERS THAT HAVE ASKED IF WE COULD DO THAT, AND WE GENERALLY DON'T ALLOW IT . SO THAT'S WHY I'M ASKING THEM. WHAT? WHAT IS IT FOR? I THINK THAT'S A USE. WE CAN STRIKE IF IT'S NOT PERFECT. LET'S START THAT NOT WORKING. PAPER THAT WAS PAGE 1 77. UM. THEN UNDER PRIVATE UTILITY OTHER THAN LISTED, I'D LIKE TO MAKE THAT AN SCP JUST SO IF THERE'S A PRIVATE UTILITY USE, WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO SAY YES OR NO, UM TECHNOLOGY IS CHANGING, SO I'M SURE THERE'S

[01:10:01]

GOING TO BE TECH USES THAT COME ALONG OVER THE YEARS BY THE TIME THIS IS IN 10 15 YEARS, AND I WANT US TO BE ABLE TO BETTER LOOK AT IT. OKAY YOU'RE RIGHT ON THAT ONE. DID YOU? DID YOU SAY PRIVATE CLUB? WELL ON THAT ONE THERE PRIVATE CLUB ALREADY HAS SEEN FOR CONDITIONS.

WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? EXACTLY WHAT DAVID SAYS CONDITIONAL. SO ONCE ONCE THEY DECIDE THEY WANT THAT THE CONDITIONS CAN BE OKAY, STOP. UM I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO DO SCHOOL, PRIVATE OR PAROCHIAL SCHOOL AS AN S, U P AS WELL. THAT'S FINE. AND THEN, UM I DON'T KNOW WHAT A TELEPHONE EXCHANGES. I THINK I WAS A DNT LIST. STRIKE THAT YOU KNOW, THAT'S A GIRL WITH. YEAH, I GOTCHA. WHILE WE'RE ON THAT ONE TO ANOTHER ONE IS THE WIRELESS CELL TOWER S U P IS THAT WE WANT RIGHT THERE ALONG THE WAY, THEY HAVE TO COME TO US AND WE I MEAN, JUST LIKE THE ONE THAT CAME TO US OFF A PROSPEROUS TRAIL, AND HE SAID NO, IT WAS TOO CLOSE TO THE ROAD. OKAY, SCP? YEAH. MM. WE TALKED ABOUT THE SHARED PARKING. THIS IS PAGE 1 81 GOING INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT WHO TALKED ABOUT THE SHARED PARKING. WE'VE WE'VE ARRANGED FOR THAT. HMM LET'S SEE DANCING. I THINK MOST OF THIS HAS BEEN. PERMITTED USES AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT PAGE 1 86. OBVIOUSLY WE NEED TO TAKE OUT PAID PARKING LOT OR GARAGE THAT DOESN'T FIT THERE. AGAIN BANK WE WOULDN'T WANNA SAY NO DRIVE THROUGH. STRIKE FARM RANCH STABLE GARDEN ORCHARD. WE TALKED ABOUT THAT ALREADY. THEY DO THEY? ARE YOU REMOVING PAID PARKING GARAGE ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT? YES THERE SHOULDN'T THERE SHOULDN'T BE THAT ON THE NEIGHBORHOODS OF DISTRICT. YEAH. OUTDOOR MERCHANDISE DISPLAY. WE CAN TAKE THAT OUT AS WELL. PRIVATE UTILITY SCP AGAIN THEIR SCHOOL S U. P AND TAKE OUT TELEPHONE EXCHANGE. AND THEN, UM. ON THE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS. THIS IS GOING TO START A PAGE 1 89. TALKS ABOUT. THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF CONFUSION HERE IN THE LANGUAGE. UM IT SAYS DETENTION AREAS SHALL CONTAIN A CONSTANT WATER LEVEL AND ARE LANDSCAPED OR. OTHERWISE TREATED AS AN AMENITY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT.

THEY MAY BE USED TO MEET THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT. AND THEN A NUMBER SEVEN SAYS DETENTION OR RETENTION PONDS WHEN ACTIVATED WITH PEDESTRIAN ACCESS. CAN YOU CLARIFY THAT A LITTLE BIT, DAVID, IF WHAT WOULD HAVE TO HAPPEN BECAUSE THERE'S A COUPLE OF POND FEATURES AND SO IF THEY'RE GOING TO COUNT THAT AS OPEN SPACE, IT'S GOING TO BE AN AMENITY. BUT WHAT WOULD HAVE TO HAPPEN FOR IT TO BE CONSIDERED AN AMENITY? WHAT WOULD HAVE TO BE PUT IN FOR IT TO BE CONSIDERED AN ENERGY? GENERALLY SPEAKING, IT WOULD BE SOMETHING LIKE FOUNTAINS TRAIL THAT GOES AROUND IT, DEPENDING UPON HOW BIG IT IS, PERHAPS DEPENDING ON WHERE THE LOCATION IS A LITTLE TINY, PEER. NOT SO MUCH LIKE A FISHING PIER, BUT YOU KNOW A LITTLE SOMETHING TO WALK OUT TO IT SOMETHING WHERE YOU'D ACTUALLY BE ABLE TO UTILIZE IT WITH SOME PERSPECTIVE, OTHER THAN STANDING ON THE SIDE AND JUST LOOKING AT THE WATER AND USUALLY, PARKS DEPARTMENT GETS PRETTY HEAVILY INVOLVED IN THOSE BECAUSE WE LET THEM DETERMINE IF IT'S AN AMENITY, OR IT'S JUST THE PROBLEM WAITING TO HAPPEN. OKAY GREAT. SO STAFF IS GOING TO HAVE A LOOK AT THAT. WHICH IS MAKES ME HAPPY. UM THEN ON PAGE 1 90 WE AGAIN? WE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT THIS, BUT I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE PUT THIS IN THIS DOCUMENT SINCE THIS THIS DOCUMENT IS THE DOCUMENT. C THREE A MHM. CURRENTLY IT SAYS, TYPICAL FLOOR HEIGHT 10 TO 12 FT. WE WANT TO, SAY 14 FT. FIRST FLOOR CEILING HEIGHT FOR RETAIL SINCE 50% OF THOSE BUILDINGS OR RETAIL AND 12 12 FT. RESIDENTIAL AND THEN I DID NOT SEE IN THIS DOCUMENT, WHEREAS SAYS THAT THE MULTI FAMILY HAS TO HAVE STRUCTURED PARKING. OR A RAP. IT TALKS ABOUT 80. RESIDENTIAL SHOULD BE IN STRUCTURAL PARKING, BUT THAT COULD BE ANYWHERE IN THE DEVELOPMENT. SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE THE MULTI FAMILY HAS ITS OWN. STRUCTURE PARKING GROUP, PREFERABLY IN A RAP PRODUCT INSTEAD OF JUST OKAY.

THIS PARKING GARAGE OVER HERE SERVES THE MULTI FAMILY HAD IT. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THE LANGUAGE IS CLEAR ON THAT. I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO SAY. I'M NOT A LAWYER, SO I'LL LEAVE THAT TO

[01:15:04]

STAFF, BUT I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE MAKE SURE IT'S THAT WAY. BUT I CAN TELL YOU FROM AN ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE, THEY WOULDN'T BUILD A GARAGE NEXT TO IT BECAUSE THEY'RE WASTING ALL THAT RIGHT. THERE IS A THERE IS A DEVELOPMENT IN FRISCO, WHERE THE PARKING GARAGES TO THE SIDE AND IT IT DOESN'T LOOK GOOD, SO I WOULD REALLY I PREFER TO HAVE NOT THERE. BUT WHEN WE WENT ON TOUR, THERE WAS ONE WHERE IT WAS ON THE SIDE AND YEAH. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE AVOIDING THAT. I KNOW IT'S CHEAPER TO DO IT THAT WAY. BUT, UM PAGE 1 94 2 SYLLABLE CLEANUP. IT MENTIONS CLEAR FORK. SORRY. I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE WE'RE PROSPER. OKAY PAGE 1 95 IT TALKS ABOUT AMENITIES. MM. OKAY I WOULD LIKE IT TO SAY A POOL. THIS IS FOR ACTUALLY BE SPECIFIC. YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE HOTEL AND THE THREE ITEMS THAT ARE REQUIRED. SORRY. SORRY. HOTEL FULL SERVICE HOTEL. MY MOTHER HOTEL. I WOULD LIKE TO SAY A POOL AND THREE OTHERS. UM I WOULD ALSO LIKE THAT ONE TO SAY STRUCTURED PARKING. IT DOESN'T SAY THAT. AND I WOULD LIKE D TO ALSO INCLUDE ROOM SERVICE. INSTEAD OF JUST THE THREE MEALS A DAY. HMM ARE YOU AGREED AS THIS? WE'RE JUST TAKING NOTES ON THIS OR THESE ARE THINGS THAT I THINK I HAVEN'T HEARD ANYTHING THAT WE WOULDN'T AGREE TO YET. STEP DOWN. THAT'S ALRIGHT. PICKY BUT THANK YOU SURE, OKAY. UM. THE OTHER QUESTION I HAVE IS AND IN THIS SUB DISTRICT IT SAYS HOTEL SEE CONDITIONAL. SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT TERRY QUESTION. BECAUSE WE SPECIFICALLY SAY FULL SERVICE HOTEL. BUT IN THE LIST OF USES IT, SAYS HOTEL IT DOESN'T SAY FULL SERVICE TO TELL US HOTEL SEE SO COULD THEY PUT A LIMITED SERVICE HOTEL BECAUSE THAT MEETS OUR REQUIREMENTS IN OUR ZONING ORDINANCE, OR I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE NOT GETTING A LIMITED SERVICE HOTEL IN THIS DEVELOPMENT. CONDITIONAL ITEMS ARE ALL THE THINGS THAT MAKE US OLDEST PARTY. CONCERNED, OKAY? OKAY? WE DO BADLY ON THE CONDITION. YEAH, THEORETICALLY, THEY. UPSTAIRS CAN EITHER BE FULL SERVICE AND CREATE. DEFINITION OF WHAT FULL SERVICES IN OUR DEFINITIONS AS FAR AS YOU GO. TO ME, IT'S EASIER TO JUST PUT IT. WELL AND IT'S IN HERE. I MEAN, IT SAYS, UM, UH, PROVIDE MANAGEMENT STAFF ON SITE 24 HOURS A DAY PICK FOR AMENITIES HAVE ROOM STORES HAVE FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT 20,000 SQUARE FEET OF MEETING SPACE. UM ALL ROOMS ACCESS THROUGH INTERNAL HALLWAY, LOBBY OR COURTYARD. UM AND THEN WE'RE ADDING STRUCTURE PARKING. SO UM, I THINK THAT'S A FULL SERVICE HOTEL. BUT I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THERE WASN'T A LOOPHOLE WITH THE LIST OF YOU KNOW, PERMITTED USES ANYTHING. I'VE SEEN LIMITED SERVICE HOTEL SOMEWHERE ELSE. I'VE SEEN OTHER FULL SERVICE DEFINITIONS, INCLUDING A PORTAL TO SHARE. OH, OH, YEAH. YEAH SO THAT'S ALL FOR ME. MAYOR. I'M SORRY. I TOOK UP SO MUCH TIME JUST NO, THANK YOU FOR ALL THOSE ARE I WANT TO BE SURE THAT WE'RE COMFORTABLE. THAT THE APPLICANT IS AGREEABLE TO SAY. I HAVE NOT HEARD ANYTHING THAT I AM NOT AGREEABLE TO FOR THE RECORD WERE AGREED WITH ALL THOSE ITEMS. ALL OF THEM. YEAH. CHRIS. OKAY UM, I DO . I WANT TO ECHO COUNCILMAN RAY SAID TO IN REGARDS TO EVERYONE IN ATTENDANCE AND ALL THE FEEDBACK THAT WE'VE GOTTEN FROM FROM THE COMMUNITY. UM WE STRIVE TO LISTEN AND GET PERSPECTIVE AND APPLY, AND I ALSO THINK THE APPLICANT FOR UM NOT JUST TODAY, BUT OVER TIME. ACQUIESCING TO A LOT OF OUR REQUESTS AND NEGOTIATING AND TRYING TO GET TO THE BEST DEVELOPMENT, SO I APPRECIATE THE GOOD FAITH EFFORT THERE. UM I JUST WANTED TO ADDRESS A COUPLE OF THE THINGS THAT I HEARD, AND I'M THANKFUL FOR THE EIGHT STORIES AS WELL. I THINK OVERWHELMINGLY, THAT'S THE LARGEST, UH, QUANTITY OF COMMENTS THAT I'VE PERSONALLY RECEIVED IN PERSON EMAIL AND HERE TONIGHT, SO THANK YOU FOR ADDRESSING THAT. I THINK THAT GOES A LONG WAY INTO, UM KEEPING, UH KEEPING ARE PROMISED TO INCORPORATE FEEDBACK THERE.

UM THERE'S A COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS, ONE THAT WE'VE ANSWERED BACK AND FORTH THROUGH STAFF QUESTIONS. I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY. ONE SPECIFICALLY, WE DO RECEIVE A LOT OF COMMENTS IN REGARDS TO DENSITY AND TRAFFIC. UM AND I THINK THAT'S PARTLY BECAUSE THE HALLWAYS NOT FINISHED, PROSPERITY IS NOT FINISHED AND SHINY. CHARLES NOT FINISHED. UM AND WE HAD DISCUSSED THE UM PIECE OF SHAWNEE TRAIL THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED PROBABLY BEFORE YOU

[01:20:10]

GUYS DIDN'T EVEN MOVE ANY SORT OF DIRT TYPE THING. AND MAYBE THIS IS A QUESTION FOR DAVID.

AND I BELIEVE THIS WILL BE IN IN SOME SORT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. BUT HAVE YOU GUYS DISCUSS WITH STAFF AND EVERYTHING ELSE, AND THERE'S AN AGREEMENT THAT THAT PORTION WILL BE BUILT WHETHER OR NOT WE BUILD IT, OR THEY BUILD IT, AND WE'RE REFUNDING OR YES, WE KNOW THAT PART'S TRUE, BUT WE HAVEN'T WORDED WHAT IT WAS SAYING THAT DEVELOP OKAY? YEAH I FELT I DON'T EVEN KNOW IF THAT SHOULD POSSIBLY BE A TRIGGER THAT WE ADD JUST BECAUSE I FELT LIKE IT'S A NO BRAINER. BUT IF WE DON'T HAVE IT IN THERE UM THEN THEN, MAYBE THAT WOULD HELP.

ESPECIALLY THIS SYSTEMS THAT LIVE RIGHT THERE OFF THE TRAIL. ISN'T IT SOMETHING, THOUGH THERE IS A GOING TO BE REQUIRED ANYWAY, AS PART OF THIS THAT'S THAT WAS MY QUESTION. IS IT OR ISN'T IT AND I MEAN, I KNOW THAT IT IS PROBABLY TO DEVELOP IT. BUT IS IT YOU HAVE TO GET TO HAVE FIRE ACCESS TO ANYWAY HABITABLE SPACE, SO YOU WOULD HAVE BY DEFAULT. HAVE ABILITY TO FIRE TRUCK. OK CITY ROAD. OKAY SO I JUST WANNA MAYBE VERBALIZE THAT THAT WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT THAT, AND THAT IS A PIECE OF IT. IN REGARDS TO PROSPER TRAIL. DO YOU KNOW THE TIMING? I KNOW THAT THERE'S SOME OTHER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS ELSEWHERE THAT ARE REQUIRED. UM. DAVID DAVID, COME CLOSER. GOSH THANK YOU. I'M SORRY. YULAN WILL PROBABLY KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT. YOU WANT TO TAKE THAT ONE ON BECAUSE IT WAS A QUESTION OUT OF THE RESIDENTS OF LEGACY GARDENS. IS THAT ADDRESSING THAT, SO THANK YOU. WHEN. AS FAR AS A RIGHT NOW PROSPER TRAIL WESTERN THE DNT, THE QUESTION IS WILL BE EXPANDING. IT'S CURRENTLY NOT ISOLATED ON OUR FIVE YEARS C I P LOOKING OUT. TO DO THE EXPANSION. DON'T PROSPER TRAIL WAS THAT THEY DNT SO IS IT NOT PART OF AN ANOTHER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT WE HAVE ANOTHER PROPERTY OWNER OR NOT RIGHT THERE. WITH THE FURTHER WEST. WHEN YOU GET INTO THE LEGACY, WE DO HAVE SOME DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS THAT WERE WORKING ON THEIR WITH STAR TRAIL THAT WE HAVE IN PLACE AS WELL AS WHICH YOU'LL SEE ON THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING WITH PARK PLACE DEVELOPMENT. I THINK WHAT YOU'LL SEE HERE IS IF THIS DEVELOPMENT COMES ONLINE OR EVEN THE DEVELOPMENT THERE AT THE HARD CORNER. PROSPER TRAIL AND D AND T. THEN THROUGH THEIR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. YOU COULD SEE THE NEED TO TRIGGER WORK OUT THROUGH THOSE DEVELOPMENTS IS THE NEED TO EXPAND IT GONNA BE TRIGGERED BY THOSE DEVELOPMENTS. BECAUSE IT JUST FEELS LIKE I MEAN TO THE RESIDENTS POINT. IT JUST FEELS LIKE IT WOULD BE AN INSTANT BOTTLENECK. I KNOW THE TIMING IS DIFFERENT, BUT YEAH, AND ALSO THE TOLLWAY ITSELF. THE MAIN LANE SHOULD BE AH! STARTING CONSTRUCTION 20 START THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO START INTO THIS YEAR. UH AND THEN BE DONE BY LATE 26 EARLY 27. SO MORE LIKELY THAT THEY WILL ALREADY BE IN PLACE. SO YOU HAVE MORE WELL KNOWN BORN OF CAPACITY ON THE D N T. SO I THINK, AS THE DEVELOPMENTS OCCUR MORE BETWEEN PROPER TRAIL IN FRONTIER ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE DNT YOU'RE GOING TO LOOK AND SEE, YOU KNOW , DEPARTURE WITH THOSE DEVELOPMENTS NOT ONLY WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT AND SHINY, BUT YOU LOOK AT PROSPER TRAIL AND ALSO IS, YOU KNOW THEY'RE GOING TO LOOK AND SEE WHAT'S THE BEST AVENUE FOR THEIR ACCESS, NOT JUST WITH PROSPER TRAIL AND SHINY, BUT EVEN AS SHAWNEE NEED TO BE EXTENDED ALL THE WAY TO FRONTIER THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS WE CAN DO SINCE THOSE ARE ROADS ARE THERAPY PLAN. HOW CAN WE PARTNER THE BEST TO GET THE TRAFFIC ALL ALL THE WAY THROUGH AND RAN THAT DEVELOPMENT? THANK YOU. THANKS FOR YOUR TIME. APPRECIATE IT. I THINK ANOTHER MAIN ONE, AND I'M ASSUMING THIS IS ADDRESSED, BUT DAVID SPECIFICALLY IN REGARDS TO THE FIRE REQUIREMENTS. UM I DON'T BELIEVE THIS HAS GONE THROUGH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT YET. UM AND POSSIBLY WE CAN FIND OUT OR JUST VALIDATE THE YOU KNOW THE CAPABILITIES THAT WE HAVE THE CAPABLE OF CURRENT CAPABILITIES ARE SOON FUTURE CAPABILITIES TO HANDLE THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING. I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT. I THINK THAT'S MY MAIN. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. CHARLES. WELL AS A RULE HERE, I THINK UH, THIS DEVELOPER HAS BEEN VERY COOPERATIVE. I THINK AMY AND CHRIS AND I FIRST MET WITH THEM ALMOST A YEAR AGO. MAYBE MORE THAN A YEAR AGO. NOW I THINK IT WAS JUNE OR JULY. AND HAVE THEY'VE COME INCREDIBLY LONG WAY FROM WHERE THAT WAS SO THE CONCERNS YOU HAVE HERE. YOU WOULD HAVE HAD A LOT OF CONCERNS SOME TIME AGO, BUT THEY'VE COME. AN INCREDIBLY LONG WAY HAS BEEN,

[01:25:01]

UH, INCREDIBLY COOPERATIVE. AND AGREEABLE THAT I THINK WHAT WE'VE GOT HERE IS A DEVELOPMENT THAT CAN BE INCREDIBLY SUCCESSFUL. AH IT YOU KNOW, AS FAR AS ROADS AND COSTS. YOU KNOW, IF IT'S SUCCESSFUL, IT GENERATES $3.5 MILLION A YEAR AND ADDITIONAL TOWN TAX. 10 MILLION IN SCHOOL TAX. SO A LITTLE MORE THAN BE ABLE TO PAY FOR WHATEVER SCHOOLCHILDREN COME OUT OF THIS AND I THINK HISTORY IS THAT THE SORT OF APARTMENT UNITS DON'T GENERATE A LOT OF SCHOOLCHILDREN, SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN. SO YOU KNOW MY CONCERNS AMY AMY, OF COURSE, COVERED ANYTHING PLUS A LITTLE THAT I CAN THINK OF. RIGHT? I DON'T THINK I DON'T THINK YOU MADE IT CLEAR WHAT THEY DON'T THINK MADE CLEAR WAS. I THINK WE AGREED TO A 14 FT MINIMUM ON COMMERCIAL ON THE FIRST FLOOR AND A 12 FT MINIMUM. UM RESIDENTIAL ON THE FIRST FLOOR.

OKAY I DIDN'T HEAR THE 12 FT. I MISSED THAT 14 ON RETAIL 14 12 RESIDENTIAL, OKAY? THAT'S IT. DO WE NEED TO SEND BACK FOR ANOTHER BAG OF CHEETOS? YEAH. SO AS LONG AS I'VE BEEN ON COUNCIL, WE'VE BEEN LOOKING FORWARD TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS TOLLWAY. UM AND THEN YOU KNOW IT WAS SOMETHING THAT WE REALLY WANT TO. TO GET RIGHT. UM, THE ONE I SHOULD SAY WE'VE HAD TO, I THINK DEVELOPMENTS. COME BEFORE US NOW. ONE WAS STRICTLY APARTMENTS AND WE OPPOSED IT AND WE SAID, THAT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR. THIS DEVELOPMENT IS MORE THE LINES OF WHAT? WHAT WE WANT . IT'S A DESTINATION FOR FAMILIES. AH IT'S GONNA HAVE RETAIL IS GONNA HAVE RESTAURANTS . IT'S GONNA GREATLY HELP US DIVERSIFY OUR TAX BASE, WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT WE NEED TO DO. IT WAS IT WAS GREAT DURING COVID. THAT WE WERE, UH, BEDROOM COMMUNITY, BUT UM WE'RE TRYING TO KEEP OUR TAXES. LOWER OR AT THE SAME RATE AND THIS WILL WILL HELP US GET THERE. THE WHOLE TOLLWAY WILL. IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE PLAN TO DEVELOP. UH, THE IDEA OF NOT LETTING SOMEBODY COME IN AND MAKE A DEVELOPMENT. UM, WE JUST. YOU REALLY CAN'T DO THAT. WE DON'T OWN THE PROPERTY.

IT'S THEIR PROPERTY. WE TELL THEM WHAT WE WANT, AND THEN THEY BRING IT TO US AND WE DECIDE. UM IF WE THINK THAT'S A GOOD FIT, AND IN MY OPINION UM, THEY HAVE DONE JUST ABOUT EVERYTHING WE ASKED FOR. I. HAD A PROBLEM WITH THE 12 STORY BUILDINGS. I'LL TELL YOU, BUT, UM I GREATLY APPRECIATE YOU REDUCING THOSE 28 . AND I THINK THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE OUT THERE WHO WHO DO AS WELL. UM AGAIN THAT WAS LIKE CHRIS SAID THE BIGGEST CONCERN UM THERE ARE SOME THINGS YOU KNOW. TRAFFIC IS TRAFFIC AND ALONG THE TOLLWAY. PEOPLE ARE GOING TO MOVED US LANA. AND THEY'RE GOING TO BUILD APARTMENTS RIGHT ON OUR BORDERS. AND THERE'S NOT MUCH WE CAN DO ABOUT IT, AND THEY'RE GOING TO FILL OUR SCHOOLS. UM NOW YOU COULD SAY, WELL, WE CAN'T ADD TO THAT. BUT WE ARE UM, WE ARE. I THINK WE'RE MISSING THE BOAT AND TAX DOLLARS IF WE DO NOT TRY TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF WHAT WE HAVE. UM ONE THING THAT. THAT STRUCK ME IN SOME OF THE COMMENTS WAS TALKING ABOUT THE SOLAR PROSPER. AND I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THE BUILDING IS GOING. TO ADD TO OR DESTROY THE SOLAR PROSPER. UM, FOR ME. IF YOU WANT TO SEE THE SOLAR PROSPER COME OUT TO THE HOMECOMING PARADE IN A COUPLE OF WEEKS. UM THAT'S WHERE YOU'LL SEE THE COMMUNITY. AND THE ONENESS THAT WE HAVE SO UH UM. AGAIN I APPRECIATE EVERYONE'S INPUT. I'M GLAD WE WERE ABLE TO MINIMIZE THE HEIGHT. THANK YOU. UH UM. BUT. THIS DEVELOPMENT IS . IN MY OPINION, I BELIEVE AS WE AS WE SIT HERE, WHAT WE'VE DISCUSSED THIS IS THIS IS WHERE IT NEEDS TO BE. UM, IT'S NOT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE YOU KNOW, UM, NEIGHBORHOOD THAT'S ON 3, 80 OR AND THE AND THE TOTAL WAY. SO, UM THOSE WERE THE TARGETS, I THINK FOR MULTI FAMILY, AND THAT'S IN MY OPINION, THIS THIS IS PROBABLY WHERE IT NEEDS TO BE. COUNCILMAN, RIGHT? SO I JUST PARTING COMMENTS. UM, WE'VE TALKED ABOUT A LOT OF STUFF. THERE'S A LOT THAT HAS BEEN INCORPORATED. I JUST WANT TO POINT OF CLARITY. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT REDUCING THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDINGS THAT ARE ABOUT TO THE

[01:30:04]

WEST SIDE OF THE HALLWAY AND THOSE BEING REDUCED DOWN TO EIGHT STORIES. THAT DISTRICT, THOUGH, ALSO ENCOMPASSES THE MULTI FAMILY. I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT MULTI FAMILY STAYS AT THE FIVE STORY THAT WAS PROPOSED SO FINE STORY, MULTI FAMILY AID STORY ON THE BUILDINGS. YOU STILL HAVE THE TOWN HOMES. I DON'T WANT THERE TO BE A GENERAL UNDERSTANDING OR MAYBE LOOSE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE EIGHT STORIES ALSO APPLIED TO THE MULTI FAMILY. I DON'T THINK YOU COULD DO IT WITH THE ACCOUNTS THAT YOU'VE PROVIDED, BUT JUST FOR THE RECORD, I WANT TO CAPTURE THAT. SO WE STARTED THE DISCUSSION. I THINK CREATING A. EIGHT STORY CEILING HEIGHT.

THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT. I'M SORRY. NOT CEILING HEIGHT. STORIES STORY.

HEIGHT, EIGHT STORY HEIGHT. UM SO NOW WE WANT TO. KIND OF FURTHER IDENTIFIED. THE MULTI FAMILY IS A DIFFERENT MAXIMUM HEIGHT WITHIN THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT THAT THE INTENT I DON'T THINK YOU HAVE PROPOSED 12 STORIES FOR THE MULTI FAMILY AND THE WAY WE BUILD THESE I THINK SIX STORIES BY FIRE CUT IS THE HIGHEST YOU CAN GET. SO I GUESS WITH RESPECT. THAT'S THE HIGHEST WE COULD BUILD THEM. SO COULD WE DO SIX STORIES MAXIMUM FOR THE MULTI FAMILY AND THEN EIGHT FOR THE OFFICE FAMILY? DO YOU MEAN APARTMENTS OR CONDOS PARTICLES? CAN I DO THIS TOO? I KNOW I DIDN'T KNOW IF HE WAS TRYING TO LIMIT THOSE 28 STORIES TO SOMETHING LOWER THAN EIGHT STORIES. I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO LIMIT HERE. SO TO LET ME I'M GONNA TAKE A LITTLE BIT OF COUNCILMAN RAISED HERE. PREVIOUSLY WE HAD THREE DISTRICTS IN HERE WE HAD A HIGH OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT, THE MIDDLE DISTRICT IN THE HIGHWAY DISTRICT. AND SO WHAT? COUNCILMAN RAY IS REALLY LOOKING FOR. YOU'VE NOW YOU'VE NOW CONSOLIDATED THAT HIGHWAY DISTRICT. INTO ENCOMPASSING ALL MULTI FAMILY, SO IT'S DISINGENUOUS TO SAY THAT BECAUSE WE WANT BECAUSE WE WERE GOING TO LET YOU HAVE THE EIGHT STORIES ON THAT FAR EASTERN SIDE OF THAT DEVELOPMENT. USING THIS IS THE THIS IS THE LATEST ITERATION THAT HAS A SEPARATE HIGHWAY DISTRICT WHERE THERE IT'S ONLY TWO SO I SUPPORT COUNCILMAN REYES. UH, UM. PROPOSAL TO LIMIT THAT IT WAS I DID NOT BELIEVE IT WAS EVER INTENDED THAT ACROSS THAT ENTIRE DISTRICT, YOU COULD HAVE A STORY BUILDINGS. OKAY? I MEAN, I REQUESTED IT. BUT IF IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S IMPORTANT TO THE TOWN AND WE CAN DO IT, I THINK I THINK THE IMPORTANT I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO WHAT'S BEEN PROPOSED IS A TAPERING EFFECT. RIGHT? YOU HAVE A CONDO LEVEL. WE HAVE MULTI FAMILY LEVEL AND YOU HAVE THE BUILDINGS. AND THAT TAPERING NEEDS TO BE MAINTAINED. AND SO IF THE FURTHER MOST EASTERN PROPERTY OR BUILDINGS ARE AT THE 8 FT LEVEL EIGHT STORY I'M SORRY. KEEP ON. CHARLES BUT I THINK YOU KNOW TO KEEP THE CONSISTENCY OF WHAT YOU PROPOSED. WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT IT STILL HAS THAT TAPERED EFFECT. SO I CAN RESPECT THAT.

IT'S FINE. WE DID SPECIFICALLY WELL. WELL, THE CONDOS WERE WHAT THREE STORIES, RIGHT. FORD MINIMUM 44 AND RIGHT NOW MAXIMUM MAKE GO AWAY CONDOMS, URBAN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE CONFERENCE. CONDOS ARE IN THAT. THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING. THE WHOLE DISTRICT NOW ALLOWS THAT EVERYTHING THAT WAS SEPARATED OUT. IT'S ALL TOGETHER. YEAH, THE WAY THE LANGUAGES IN THIS IT SAYS THAT EVERYTHING IN THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT CAN BE 12 STORIES. 12 STORIES, WHICH WE CHANGED TO EIGHT. AND THAT THE MINIMUMS ON THE HOTEL, THE MULTI FAMILY APARTMENTS AND THE MULTI FAMILY CONDOS WOULD BE A MINIMUM OF FOUR. THAT COULD BE UP TO EIGHT. SO IF YOU WANT IT TO BE A TAPERING LIKE YOU'RE SAYING YOU JUST NEED TO SAY MINIMUM OF FOUR MAXIMUM OF WHAT BY 56 TAKE THE CONSENSUS. I'LL ASK EVERYONE WHO'S NOT SITTING AT THE DIETS TO REFRAIN OR I'LL ASK YOU TO LEAVE. OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, SO MINIMUM OF FOUR WHAT WE WHAT IS A REASONABLE SOLUTION TO THAT. KEEP IN MIND IF IT WERE TO GO TO SIX THAT WOULD REQUIRE A PODIUM TYPE PRODUCT. I PRESUME PODIUM TYPE PRODUCT MEANS YOU BUILD ON TOP OF THE GARAGE. ONLY WAY YOU BUILD A STICK CONSTRUCTION AND GET THE SIX STORIES WITH THE CODE. A PODIUM PRODUCT WILL COST MORE. AND HAVE HIGHER RENTS. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT THAT. HIGHER VALUE. FOR THE UNITS. BUT JUST JUST FOR SO YOU KEEP ALL THINGS IN PERSPECTIVE. FIVE STORY LIMIT CAN BE DONE WITH THE RAP PRODUCT , WHICH IS STILL AN EXPENSIVE UNIT AND A VERY VALUABLE UNIT. BUT BUT IT WON'T BE QUITE AS

[01:35:05]

MUCH AS A SIX STORY MIGHT BE IF YOU'RE TRYING TO KNOCK THAT LAST FOUR OFF, WHICH THE RIGHT TO DO THAT. YOU'RE LIMITING THEM FROM DOING A PODIUM. WHICH THEY'RE NOT LIKELY TO DO ANYWAY. IN MY OPINION, THE REASON HE SAYS HE'LL AGREE TO FIVE JUST FINE. BEFORE YOU DON'T WANT A THREE STORY GARDEN. DON'T WANT HIM TO BE THE SAME SO YOU BEFORE, BUT I WOULD SAY KEEP YOUR MINIMUM, THOUGH AT FOUR, BECAUSE YOU DON'T YOU DON'T WANT A THREE STORY GARDEN PRODUCT, YOU KNOW, I MEAN, YOU WANT THAT WRAP PRODUCTS OR IS THERE ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE CONDOS GOING TO EIGHT? OH, MY GOSH. THOSE CONDOS AT EIGHT BUT WOULD BE AWESOME. WHEN YOU'RE NOT NOT, THAT'S NOT SORT OF. THAT'S TRUE. IT DOESN'T GIVE YOU THE TAPERING EFFECT ACROSS LAYER TO THE WEST. THE SECOND CONDO, MAYBE BADLY. THE FRONTS, THE TOLD THEM RIGHT. SO THAT'S WHY I WAS SAYING ABOUT IT WITH THIS. IF YOU HAD THE DISTRICTS, YOU COULD MAYBE DO SOMETHING. SO MINIMUM FOR MAXIMUM FIVE. COUNCILMAN RAY, YOU HAVE THE FLOOR. SO MINIMUM OF FOUR I WOULD ENCOURAGE MAXIMUM FIVE. FOR THE MIDDLE SECTION OF THAT DISTRICT AND WHAT THE EIGHT STORY BEING ON THE FURTHER MOST EAST. PROPERTIES. SAY THAT ONE MORE TIME. THIS SECTION RIGHT HERE IN THE MIDDLE. FOR MINIMUM FOUR MAXIMUM FIVE. ON THE EASTERN PORTION OF THAT PROPERTY.

THERE'S BE FOR MAXIMUM BABY. STAYED ON. STATE ALUM STATED THAT THREE DISTRICT THAT GETS YOU IN THAT SIDE CONTINUED TAYLOR. YEAH THAT'S FINE. JUST YOUR IF YOU'RE TAPERING. ON THE FREEWAY OVER HERE. YOU'RE STANDING RIGHT, SO LET'S JUST BE MORE SUPPOSED TO BE MORE SPECIFIC BUILDING C ONE WOULD ALLOW THE TALL TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE STORIES. LET'S SEE C TWO C TWO WOULD BE 81 WOULD BE FIVE WOULD BE A MAXIMUM FIVE DOWN. RIGHT. THAT'S SPECIFICALLY . YEAH AND THEN YOUR UNITS IN THE MIDDLE 55 MAXIMUM FIVE H ONE H ONE FIRE ADVICE. SO WE HAVE A WE HAVE THREE DEFACTO. DISTRICTS NOW BY HIGH HEIGHT. OKAY THAT'S I'M JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE CLEAR. EVERYBODY ON THE COUNCIL UNDERSTANDING WHERE WE ARE. WHAT WE'RE. THERE'S THE BUILDINGS THAT ARE LISTENING RIGHT HERE. THE ONE AND C TWO C TWO IS THE BASICALLY THE BUILDING ALONG THE TOLLWAY. YES SIR. THE ONE THE BUILDING IN THE MIDDLE 55. SO IT . AND THAT WOULD BE MY COMMENTS.

OKAY. SORRY. SO WHAT HE'S DOING IS TAKING THE LANGUAGE IF YOU JUST ADD THE LANGUAGE SUCH THAT YOU KNOW, RIGHT NOW WE HAVE EIGHT STORY CAP MAXIMUM AND THE SUB IN THE SUB. HOW WE DISTRICT , THE HIGHWAY DISTRICT IF WE NOW SAY ANOTHER. MAX IS THAT C ONE NOT M U R 12 AND THREE AND H ONE ALL NOW HAVE A FIVE STORY CAP. MAXIMUM HEIGHT ON IT. THAT WOULD THAT WORKS. YEAH. OKAY. NO DEAL.

MAYOR PRO TEM YOU HAVE THE FLOOR NOW. THANK YOU. FIRST OF ALL, THANK YOU FOR EVERYONE. OR A NEIGHBOR'S FOR COMING HERE AND SPENDING SO MUCH TIME OF YOUR TIME HERE TONIGHT. I'M NOT GONNA REHASH ALL OF THIS, UM OBVIOUSLY , WE'VE GONE THROUGH A LOT OF DIFFERENT ITERATIONS OF THIS. I AM VERY MUCH IN SUPPORT. OF THIS KIND OF THREE TIERED APPROACH THAT COUNCILMAN RAY UM TEMARII HAS PROPOSED. UM AND I ALSO JUST WANT TO RESTATE SOMETHING FROM THE WORK SESSION ON SETBACKS. I THINK WE AND DAVID, I THINK YOU CAN COMMENT TO THIS. WE DID SAY THAT, UH, DO REALLY KEEP THIS WALK, WALK ABILITY. CONCEPT UM, KIND OF MAKE IT WORK. THAT THE SETBACKS WE HAD CUMULATIVELY WORSE EFFICIENT TO MAKE THAT HAPPEN. WHETHER IT'S THE 50% COMMERCIAL ON THE GROUND FLOOR OR THE 50. RESIDENTIAL TO BE ON THE GROUND FLOOR. CORRECT YES, SIR. AND THEN OBVIOUSLY DOVETAILING INTO THAT, UM COUNCILMAN BARTLEY, UH, SPOKE ABOUT THE 14 FT CEILING HEIGHTS ON THE GROUND FLOOR FOR COMMERCIAL. THE 12 FT, UH, CEILING HEIGHTS FOR RESIDENTIAL, WHICH ALLOWS FOR STAIRS. ON THAT PIECE, SO I THINK WE'RE GOOD THERE. UM EVERYTHING ELSE. I HAD COMMENT WISE. I DON'T WANT TO REHASH EVERYTHING. UH BUT I BELIEVE WE WILL BE. OH, WE'VE

[01:40:02]

ALREADY GONE THROUGH THE BEDROOM RATIOS THAT THE 12 AND THREE BEDROOM RATIOS SO WE'VE BEEN THROUGH ALL THAT, UM. EVERYTHING ELSE. I HAVE GIVE US BACK TO QUALITY. UM AND I THINK WE'RE GOING TO BE PROBABLY ADDRESSING A LOT OF THAT IN THE BILL THAT THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, CORRECT. YES, SIR. OKAY, PERFECT. I DON'T HAVE MUCH MORE THAN THAT. I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THIS, THOUGH. I REMEMBER WHEN I WAS NEW TO PROSPER COMING HERE AND YOU KNOW, I LOOKED AT PROSPER AND IT WAS IT WAS A CERTAIN WAY AND AT THAT POINT IN TIME AS A SNAPSHOT AT THAT POINT IN TIME, WE HAD A LONG WAY TO GO WITH DEVELOPMENT. I REALLY, REALLY UNDERSTAND. WHERE EVERYBODY. MY NEIGHBORS ARE IN THIS ROOM THAT ARE COMING HERE AND THEIR CONCERNS. IT'S IT WAS ONE OF THOSE THINGS. UM I WAS VERY CONCERNED THAT THINGS ABOUT THE CHANGES THAT WERE COMING BECAUSE THEY WERE VERY DIFFERENT AND THOSE DIFFERENCES HAVE HAVE REALLY EVOLVED OVER THE YEARS, EVEN GREATER LEVEL. BUT ONE THING I WILL SAY THAT I LEARN FROM PREVIOUS COUNCILS BOTH AS A CONSTITUENT AND THEN SERVING WITH THEM WAS THAT WHEN WE DO THIS EXERCISE IF WE PAY ATTENTION TO THINGS THAT WE PAID ATTENTION TO TONIGHT, AND THEN FOLLOW IT UP WITH QUALITY. THAT IS WHAT REALLY, REALLY MAKES A DIFFERENCE. AND I AM VERY THANKFUL THAT SOME OF THE THINGS THAT PREVIOUS COUNCILS DID. I WAS PART OF SOME OF THAT. AND NOT A PART OF SOMETHING THAT WAS PREVIOUS TO ME. I'M GLAD THAT WE DID THOSE THINGS BECAUSE IT BROUGHT A LOT OF YOU HERE AND I WILL FOREVER BE GRATEFUL THAT WE DID THOSE THINGS AND MY HOPE IS THAT THROUGH THIS EXERCISE TONIGHT AS WE WORK THROUGH THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THERE THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, IT WILL CONTINUE THAT BECAUSE I THINK THAT IS WHAT'S GOING TO COUNT AND THAT'S GOOD GOING TO BRING THE KIND OF DEVELOPMENT THAT WILL BENEFIT US AND LIKE TO FINISH UP WITH I WAS THINKING ABOUT THIS THE OTHER DAY AS WE'RE ABOUT TO GO THROUGH BUDGET SEASON. YOU KNOW THAT OUR PROPERTY TAXES R 46.3% OF OUR UM OF OUR BUDGET. SALES TAX IS 24.2. WE WERE NOT THERE. NOT THAT LONG AGO. WE WERE NOT AT THAT 24.2% SO WE'VE REALLY THESE THINGS HAVE COME ALONG. I WANT TO SEE THAT THAT NUMBER CONTINUES TO GROW TO TAKE PART. SOME OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OFF OF US AND OUR NEIGHBORS AND THAT'S ROBERT FINISHED. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, GREG. OKAY? YOU CAN HAVE A SEAT FOR A LITTLE BIT. THANKS. ALL RIGHT, DAVID, I'D ACTUALLY LIKE TO START WITH YOU. WOULD YOU PUT UP THE TIMELINE SLIDE OF THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT? AND WHILE WE'RE DOING THAT I DO WANT TO THANK THE DEVELOPER FOR WORKING DILIGENTLY WITH OUR STAFF STAFF FOR WORKING DILIGENTLY ON THIS. AH R P AND Z . SO AS WE BRING THE TIMELINE UP HERE. THIS IS WHAT I WANT TO WALK THROUGH TO MAKE SURE FOR EVERYONE HERE TONIGHT. THAT LOOKS LIKE WE'RE TOO FAR FROM THE FROM THE RIGHT THERE ON IT WAS FROM THE WORK SESSION. DAVID HE SHOULD HEAR THE WORKSHOP SO OKAY, I BELIEVE THAT THEN I'LL PARAPHRASE IT. I BELIEVE THAT SLIDE SAID THAT WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON THIS FOR 233 DAYS. SINCE IT WAS SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 7TH OF LAST YEAR. SO OKAY, SO IT SOUNDS CLOSE. BUT THEN THERE WAS EXTENSIVE WORK THAT WENT ON BEFORE THAT. SO IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND SHARING THAT WITH THE PUBLIC, OKAY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. YES. SO THE APPLICATION WAS MADE NOVEMBER 7TH. AH CARRIED THROUGH P AND Z FEBRUARY 7TH. WE HAD A MEETING WITH THE TOWN COUNCIL. WE HAD A TOWN COUNCIL DID A JOINT WORK SESSION WITH THE PNG MARCH 27TH, AT WHICH TIME IT WAS REMANDED BACK FOR THE FIRST TIME THAT I KNOW OF, FROM A COUNCIL MEETING TO BACK TO THE P N Z FOR AN EXTENSIVE REWORK THIRD PNC SESSION FOLLOWED. BYE BYE FOURTH ANOTHER TOWN COUNCIL MEETING ANOTHER WORK SESSION THAT OCCURRED TODAY. ANOTHER HOUR OF THAT, AS WELL AS THE APPROXIMATELY HOUR AND 20 MINUTES THAT WE'VE SPENT AT THIS POINT, SO I WANT TO POINT OUT SIMPLY THAT THIS WAS NOT KIND OF PIGGYBACKING ON CRAIG ANDERSON'S COMMENTS. THIS WAS HAS BEEN AN EXTENSIVE, BELIEVE REVIEWED PROJECT. IT IS IMPORTANT THAT IT IS REVIEWED EXTENSIVELY BECAUSE THIS WILL BE THE COMPARED TO THE GATES, THE NEXT BIGGEST PROJECT , IT WILL BE THE FIRST FULL, PROPER MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT THAT IN OUR COMMUNITY. AND SO I THINK IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT WE CARRY THROUGH WITH THIS LEVEL OF DUE DILIGENCE. THANK YOU FOR SHOWING THAT NEXT THING IS TO THANK THE CITIZENS OF LEGACY GARDENS, WHO INVITED COUNCILMAN CURREN AND I HAD TO COME OUT AND TALK WITH HIM. AND THEY GAVE US THEIR VERY, UH POINTED AND VOCIFEROUS COMMENTS. I APPRECIATE THAT. THAT'S WHAT

[01:45:03]

MAKES A DEMOCRACY STRONG AND HOPEFULLY YOU ALL HAVE HEARD SOME OF THAT COME THROUGH THIS EVENING. ADDITIONALLY TO THOSE OF YOU HAVE WHO HAVE BEEN TAKEN THE TIME TO SEND ME AN EMAIL BOTH FOR AND AGAINST THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT. I WANT TO ENCOURAGE YOU AND THANK YOU FOR DOING THAT. THAT AGAIN IS WHAT MAKES OUR COMMUNITY STRONG. UH, I WANT TO PIGGYBACK ON WHAT COUNCILMAN HODGES SAID. IF YOU TRULY WANT TO SEE THE SOUL OF PROSPER COME TO THE HOMECOMING PARADE, WHETHER THAT BE WANNA GROW. PROSPER HIGH SCHOOL OR ROCK HILL, AND YOU WILL TRULY SEE THE SOUL OF PROSPER THERE. IT'S NOT HERE, AND IT'S NOT IN BUILDINGS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

IT'S IN THE PEOPLE OF PROSPER SO UH, WITH THAT I WILL CONTINUE ON . I'M GOING TO GO THROUGH A SERIES OF QUESTIONS. THEY'RE NOT QUITE AS EXTENSIVE AS AMY BECAUSE SHE GOT SOME OF THEM FOR ME. SO THANK YOU. UH BUT I WILL TELL YOU THE FIRST THING THAT CONCERNS ME. IS, UH. I'D LIKE TO JUST EXPLORE AND IT WAS A COMMENT OF THE DEVELOPERS EXPERIENCE AND THIS SIZE AND, UH , DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT. SO, UH, WE'VE GOT A WHOLE BUNCH OF PARTNERS IN THIS.

DO WE HAVE ANY SENSE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS AND THEIR PREVIOUS CREDENTIALS? I ALWAYS LIKE TO DEVELOP AN ANSWER THAT LET'S LET THE DEVELOPER THANK YOU FOR THAT. SO MY COMPANY CORNERSTONE PROJECTS GROUP FOUNDED IN 2010. GOING ON 14 YEARS IN BUSINESS. SINCE THAT DAY. WE'VE BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH WHAT I WOULD CALL TOO LARGE AND SUCCESSFUL MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITIES WITH URBAN CENTERS SUCH AS THIS ONE BEING CLEAR FORK AND FORT WORTH. IT'S PROBABLY IT'S PROBABLY ABOUT THREE TIMES THE SIZE OF PRADERA. IT'S BEEN GOING ON FOR ABOUT 20 YEARS. TODAY WE'VE GOT ABOUT DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF WORKING ON THE GROUND AND WE'RE PROPOSING AREAS ABOUT 3 MILLION SQUARE FEET. WITH A SERIES OF DIFFERENT USES AS WELL. MY HOSPITAL AND CIVIC THINGS LIKE THAT. UH, SECONDLY, BEEN WORKING ON THE BRADY IN DEVELOPMENT ARLINGTON FOR ABOUT SEVEN YEARS. I THINK THE NATURE OF THESE TYPES OF COMMUNITIES YOU JUST DON'T HAVE A LOT OF THEM GOING ON AT ONCE. YOU KIND OF LATCH ONTO ONE, AND IT'S BIG AND IT GOES ON FOR A LONG TIME. OUR PARTNER ORION. REAL ESTATE CAPITAL. THEIR NAME KIND OF SPEAKS TO THEIR POSITION IN THE DEAL. THEY THEIR COMPANY THAT. RAISES AND DEPLOYS CAPITAL FOR REAL ESTATE PROJECTS, WHETHER GROUND UP OR EXISTING. SO I THINK IT'S A GOOD MARRIAGE IN A SENSE THAT WE HAD THE BOOTS ON THE GROUND EXPERTISE TO PULL SOMETHING LIKE THIS TOGETHER, THE RELATIONSHIPS AND THE ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING LEASING. MARKETING. SECTORS AND THEY BRING. THE CAPITAL AS FAR AS EXPERTISE IN THAT RAISING IT, DEPLOYING IT AND STRATEGIZING OVER LONG PERIODS OF TIME. HOW TO MAKE THIS A SUCCESSFUL DEVELOPMENT. THANK THANK YOU FOR THAT. NO ONE WHILE YOU'RE HERE.

I ACTIVELY LIKE TO ASK THE QUESTION. WHY WHY WAS THE DECISION MADE TO MOVE IT FROM 3 TO 2 DISTRICTS? WELL, IS THERE SOMETHING SPECIFIC ITEM THERE THAT I DIDN'T CATCH? I DON'T THINK I FOLLOW 3 TO 2 DISTRICTS. THREE DISTRICTS ORIGINALLY AND THEN YOU WENT TO THE OKAY TO GET THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. I DON'T CURIOUS TO UNDERSTAND IT. AS FAR AS THE HIGHWAYS HOW IT STARTED THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT VERSUS THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT GOING FROM 3 TO 2. IT FELT LIKE AT THE TIME EARLY ON THAT THE USES WITHIN THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT OR MORE. LET'S CALL IT, UH SYMBIOTIC IN THE SENSE THAT IF YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE MORE DENSITY WITHIN THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT WHEN WE STARTED ANALYZING IT. THE SETBACKS. HEIGHTS. NOT BARRING WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT TONIGHT AS FAR AS THE TAPERING HOW WE'RE GOING TO ADJUST THAT, BUT ALL THAT KIND OF SEEMED TO PACKAGE WELL WITHIN ONE COMMERCIAL IDENTITY DISTRICT AND THEN KEEPING THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT SEPARATE FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WHICH IS SUFFERING FROM THE NEIGHBORHOODS. I SUPPOSE YOU COULD SAY SIMPLICITY AT THE END OF THE DAY. BUT I THINK WE'VE WE'VE CAPTURED A LOT OF DETAIL WITHIN THAT. THROUGH THE PROCESS THAT IT PROBABLY JUST AS EASY NOW TO CREATE THREE, OKAY? UH QUESTION FOR YOU IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT, THE

[01:50:02]

TRIGGER THERE FOR YOU TO BE ABLE TO BUILD IN THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT IS THE READING A SINGLE RETAIL BUILDING. GOING VERTICAL. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THAT CHANGE TO THAT RETAIL BUILDING HAVING A CEO PRIOR TO STARTING ON THAT. YEAH, WHEN WE AGREED TO GO VERTICAL WITH IT.

WE DIDN'T. WE DON'T FEEL LIKE THAT. WE WILL BE STOPPING THE TRAIN AT THAT POINT. TO USE AN ANALOGY. SO YEAH, THAT'S FINE. AND YOU ONLY HAVE THOSE TWO C TWO RETAIL BUILDINGS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT. I THINK THERE'S ONLY 222 BUILDINGS THERE, OKAY? ALONG THAT SAME LINE. IN THE. PUBLIC AMENITIES THAT ARE AVAILABLE THROUGHOUT THE BOTH NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT. I'D LIKE TO SEE THOSE BEING MADE AVAILABLE. PRIOR TO THE. OR IT'S SOME TIMELINE MUCH SOONER, SO THAT THE FOLKS THAT HAVE THE TOWN HOMES WE DON'T WAIT TILL THE END OF THE HIGHWAY SUBDISTRICT THAT THEN WE PUT THE PUBLIC AMENITIES AND SO I'D LIKE TO SEE SOME QUICKER PHASING OF THAT. WHAT? WOULD YOU SUGGEST FOR ME? BECAUSE MY ANSWER IS ALL OF THEM HAVE TO BE IN FIRST SO YOU CAN MEET ME SOMEPLACE OTHER THAN THERE. ALL OF THEM. THERE'S PONDS. THERE'S LINEAR PARKS. THERE'S UH. IT LINEAR PARK ACTUALLY, TO THE BOTTOM HALF.

YOU KNOW, THERE'S ONLY 42 TOWN HOMES, IT SAYS THERE CAN BE. THERE'S A MINIMUM OF 42. I THINK. OKAY I THINK 42 SHOWN ON THE PLAN ON EXHIBIT D AMENITIES DONE BEFORE THAT I GAVE HIM MY ENTRY POINT. I WANT TO HEAR WHAT HIS ANSWER IS. UH, JUST THE WAY THE. FINANCIALS WORK IN MY MIND.

I THINK IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO FINISH ALL THE AMENITIES WITHIN NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT CONCURRENT WITH THE CEOS OF THE TOWN HOMES AND THEN BUILD THE ROADS AND INFRASTRUCTURE THAT WOULD SERVICE THEN THE NEXT PHASE OF USES. SO WHAT PUBLIC AMENITIES ARE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT. A PORTION OF THE LINEAR PARK. PORTION OF THE LINEAR PARK. YES ON THE SOUTHERN SIDE. WE HAVE PEDESTRIAN TRAILS. UM. JUST LIKE IN ANY NEIGHBORHOOD. WE THROW UP ONE OF THE MAP OF THAT PARTICULAR THE OKAY? YEP YES, RIGHT. YEAH, RIGHT THERE. SO THE LINEAR PARK DOWN THERE ON THE BOTTOM SOUTH. RIGHT HERE. I'M GOT MY CURSOR SO THAT COULD BE COMPLETED BECAUSE WE DO SHAWNEE TRAIL ORDER OF OPERATIONS AND THEN WE COME IN. WE BUILD THESE ROADS INSIDE THIS ROAD ALL THE WAY DOWN HERE ALL THE WAY OUT TO HERE AND THEN WE COULD ADD THIS IN. I MEAN, PROBABLY DO IT ANYWAY, BUT WE COULD BE MORE DETAIL ABOUT THAT. GETTING THAT PUT IN THE PARK SPACE FOR THE TOWN HOMES. ALSO WITH THAT TRIGGER BEING COMPLETED WHEN HE WHEN THEY BUILD THE THEY HAVE TO DO THAT TO BUILD THE MULTI FAMILY WHEN THEY BUILD A MULTI FAMILY, THEY HAVE TO BUILD THE BOULEVARD AND THE TOWN SQUARE. AT THE SAME TIME. SO YOU WILL HAVE THE AMENITY. FOR THE MULTI FAMILY IN THE TOWN SQUARE BILL AT THE SAME TIME THAT THE MULTI FAMILIES BUILT PLUS THE BOULEVARD JUST JUST TO CLARIFY JUST TO MAKE SURE PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THAT YOU COULD ADD THE POND, ONE OF THE BOND FEATURES IN ADDITION, BUT THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE THAT BIG AMENITY AND THE BIG BOULEVARD WHICH IS THE WALKABLE RETAIL. IT DIDN'T SOUND LIKE HE WAS GOING TO HAVE THE LINEAR PARK DONE ORIGINALLY. BUT I THINK HE'S AGREEING TO THAT AT THIS TIME, SO THAT BY THE WAY, IS STRONG AND OUTLINE AGAIN. WE'VE GOT THE HIGHWAY SAID SORRY. THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBDISTRICT, THE LINE GOES ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE. SO WHEN I SAY COMPLETE I'LL JUST BE CLEAR THAT THE GREEN SPACE AT THE SOUTH END WOULD BE COMPLETE AS WELL. SO IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD SUBJECTS ARE CORRECT. YEAH.

OKAY? THANK YOU. LET ME YOU GET GOOD AT OKAY? PAGE 1 67. I'M DOING THE AMY AMY LIST, SO I APOLOGIZE. AH! I NEED TO UNDERSTAND. I DON'T THINK I GOT A WELL ENOUGH. I HEARD THE QUESTION COME UP ABOUT WHERE CONFLICTS AS I DON'T SEE WHERE CONFLICTS MAY ARISE BETWEEN EXHIBIT C AND EXHIBIT D SHALL GOVERN. THE EXECUTIVES EXHIBIT SEASHELL GOVERN. EXPLAIN TO ME.

I NEED TO KNOW WHAT THOSE DIFFERENCES ARE BECAUSE I CAN'T. THE REASON WE PUT THAT IN THERE BECAUSE INHERENTLY THIS IS A COMMON WELL. THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND ANYTIME YOU HAVE A PLAN

[01:55:07]

AND TEXT SAME IS TRUE OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND AN ARCHITECTURAL DELIVERABLE. YOU HAVE YOUR SPECS AND YOU HAVE YOUR DRAWINGS. YOU HAVE TO PICK ONE THAT'S GOING TO GOVERN BECAUSE THERE'S GOING TO BE INCONSISTENCY. THIS SPECS AND D I'M JUST MAKING SURE THAT FOR ABOUT THE ACTUAL WORDS THAT MATTER, AND D IS THE PICTURES THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY UNDER PAGE 1 67 ALSO, I THINK IS OR MAY BE OFF BY ONE. HERE THE THERE IS A P O A YEAH. WE HAVEN'T DISCUSSED AND I DON'T KNOW, AND I'LL DEFER TO OUR TOWN ATTORNEY IS A PART OF ZONING OR THE DEVELOPMENT.

OKAY, SO. ALRIGHT. SO IN THE DOCUMENT, IT SAYS THERE WILL BE A P O. A. IT SAYS THAT THAT WILL BE APPROVED BY TALENT STAFF. ARE WE GOING TO HAVE WHAT OUR CRITERIA IN THERE SPECIFICALLY TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN TEETH AND THERE'S A REAL THERE'S A CONCLUSION. WHEN I GET TO THE CRITERIA THE TOWN'S CRITERIA TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT THE TOWN IS LIKE WIND UP FOR SOME SORT OF MAINTENANCE OBLIGATION. THAT'S THAT'S ALL WE LOOK AT. WE DON'T GET INTO CANADA MEAT POTATOES OF THE OS OR THE POS. WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IF SOMEBODY DOESN'T HAPPEN IN A LINEAR PARK YEAH, THAT ALL OF SUDDEN, WE DON'T TAKE ON THAT RESPONSIBILITY. OKAY, SO WE LOOK AT ONLY FOR THAT VERY LIVING TO THE PURPOSE THAT NO DIFFERENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE TOWN. OKAY.

THANK YOU. WELL WELL, NO, I MEAN , FOR EXAMPLE, WHEN YOU HAVE AN ENTRYWAY, AND THERE'S A FIGHT OVER WHO OWNS IT, THEY SAY HERE TOWN. YOU DO IT LIKE NO, WE MAKE SURE THAT THERE WAS MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES BELONG TO THE O A. FOR EXAMPLE, NOT THAT THEY NEVER BECOME THE TOWNS. ALL THE ENTRYWAY SIGN. WHAT BECOME OUR RESPONSIBILITY. LANGUAGE. THAT WERE PROTECTIVE ABILITIES, RIGHT? AND WE'RE NOT GETTING INTO CLASSES OF OWNERSHIP AND WHO HAS HAS WE DON'T GET INTO ANY OF THAT. THAT'S FOR THEM TO DO WE JUST MAKE SURE THE TOWN'S PROTECTED AND THEY'RE NOT EARNED THOSE DOCUMENTSDO. SO ALL RIGHT HERE, LET ME CARRY YOU THROUGH MY THINKING MY CONCERN. IS THAT WE WANT WHERE THESE TOWN HOMES ARE FOR SALE. THE CONDO UNITS ARE FOR SALE. TO FORCE OWNERSHIP. IN THE P O A OR AN H CONDO DOCUMENT. HOW DO WE ENSURE THAT THESE DO NOT BECOME RENTAL PROPERTIES. IS THAT IN THE PEAK CAN I PUT IT IN THE P O A. THE OWNER USUALLY PUTS THAT IN THE IN THE OWNER OF THAT INDIVIDUAL UNITS, SO I MUST SAVVY PERSON. I'LL GO OUT THERE AND BUY ME THREE CONDOS AND ALMOST START RENTING THEM OUT FOR THE SAME AS THESE APARTMENTS. WHAT TOOLS DO WE HAVE TO PREVENT THAT? YEAH I'M LOOKING AT YOU, BUT THAT'S MY THAT'S MY BIG CONCERN. IF I WAS A RESIDENT OF WANT TO, WE WANT TO PROHIBIT RENTALS FOR TOWN HOMES. DID WE DO THAT IN WINDSONG? DID WE DO THAT ANYWHERE ELSE? ACTUALLY HAVING A YES, THERE ARE A LOT OF NEIGHBORHOODS THAT WILL HAVE A CAP, SO THEY WILL SAY YOU CAN ONLY X NUMBER OR PERCENTAGE.

WELL IT'S IN THE HOH. WELL, MOST OF THE TIME. IT'S IN THE H O A DOCUMENT, SO THE DEVELOPER DECIDES THE NUMBERS 10 WHO WERE THE 1ST 10 PEOPLE TO GET TO RENT 1ST 10, PEOPLE THAT REGISTER WITH THE H L. A IS TYPICALLY HOW IT WORKS. SO IF THEY GO MORE THAN THAT, WHAT DO YOU DO? THEY DON'T ALLOW IT, AND YOU USUALLY HAVE TO SIGN SOMETHING TO CLOSING. THAT SAYS I'M NOT GOING TO LEASE THIS. I'M BUYING IT FOR MY PERSONAL USE, AND IT WILL NOT BE LEAST YOU'RE NOT INVESTOR.

LOTS OF NEIGHBORHOODS MAKE PEOPLE SOMEONE SONG RANCHERS, ONE OF THEM OUT HERE. YES YES, THERE ARE NEIGHBORHOODS PROHIBIT HOMES FROM THERE ARE BUILDERS AND I'M SAYING, DO WE LOOK AT THE DOCUMENTS? OH I DON'T KNOW NEIGHBORHOODS TO TELL THEM THEY CAN'T RENT OUT THEIR HOMES.

USUALLY IT'S THE H O A I MEAN, THAT'S WE REALLY WANT TO GET INTO THAT BUSINESS. GUYS DON'T WANT TO START TELLING PROPERTY OWNERS HOMEOWNERS WHETHER THEY CAN RENT THEIR HOMES. NOT ONLY I DON'T WANT TO. I DON'T WANT TO GIVE 230 CONDOS. WHAT'S THAT? I HAVE A SHORT TERM RENTALS, BUT YOU'RE GIVING 230 CONDOS FOR SALE. THAT IS BUILT IN TO BE YOU KNOW WHAT'S GONNA HAPPEN WITH THAT? AND THIS IS IT WON'T IT WON'T TAKE LONG AT ALL. SO WHAT I HEAR IS ONE. WE MAY NOT HAVE AN APPETITE FOR THAT. AND I DON'T HEAR THAT WE HAVE A WAY OF PREVENTING IT. NOT SURE HOW WOULD BECOME AWARE ON A PRIVATE TRANSACTION. THAT ONE'S OVER. SOMEONE BUYS THEM AND THEY RENDER. I'M I'M NOT SURE THAT WE WOULD EVER HAVE ANY WAY OF KNOWING THAT, AS A PRACTICAL MATTER, GREATER CONCERN OVER THE MAINTENANCE OF THE AREA THAT ARE OWNED BY 40 DIFFERENT 42 DIFFERENT OWNERS. IT WILL HAVE A P O A BUT CONDO ASSOCIATION, LIKE EVERY OTHER DEVELOPMENT IN

[02:00:08]

TOWN HAS AWAY AND WE DON'T LOOK AT THE P O IS TO SEE WHETHER OR NOT IN FACT, IT'S NOT A GOOD IDEA. I DON'T THINK FOR US TO REVIEW P AWAY TO SEE THE WHETHER OR NOT THEY HAVE ADEQUATE MAINTENANCE FOR THEIR YARDS OR HOUSES. WE HAVEN'T DONE THAT BEFORE. I HATE FOR US TO GET IN THAT HABIT. REVIEWING P OAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THAT'S WHERE STUFF IS IN THERE. IT FALLS IN. BUT THAT'S THE WAY IT IS A NEIGHBORHOOD. RIGHT RIGHT. WE WANT TO GET START GETTING IN THAT BUSINESS WHERE WE REVIEW P O A DOCUMENTS AND TELL PEOPLE THEY SHOULD DO THIS AS WE ARE INSIDE. DIDN'T WE ALREADY HAVE ALREADY KNOW? NO UNDERSTANDING FOR THIS PURPOSE OF LIABILITY.

AND WHAT WAS YOUR UNDERSTANDING? I THOUGHT WE ALREADY HAD THIS DISCUSSION IN SOME FORM. I THINK I AGREE WITH THE DISCUSSION THAT IF YOU IF YOU WANTED A MECHANISM TO PROHIBIT RENTALS AND CONDOS OR TOWN HOMES. OR ANY FEE. SIMPLE PROPERTY. YOU WOULD PROBABLY MANAGE THAT IN THE P O A AND. WE HAVE TO PRESENT ONE STAFF, SO. GREAT CONCERN THAT WE CAN PUT LANGUAGE IN THERE FOR IT. I JUST DON'T LIKE DOING THAT. I JUST THINK OUR STAFF SHOULDN'T BE REVIEWING DOCUMENTS FOR ANYTHING BUT WHAT WE HAVE HISTORICALLY LIABILITY ON. I DON'T I DON'T NECESSARILY DISAGREE WITH WHAT YOU'RE SAYING AS FAR AS THE REACH GOES, BUT I MEAN, IT'S ALREADY WITH THE COMPONENT OF THIS AND IT'S I DO THINK IT TO THE MAYOR'S POINT. IT'S A COMPONENT OF UNDERSTANDING WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN IN THIS PIECE? WHEN WE'RE YOU KNOW, A PROVEN THAT TOTALITY OF DEVELOPMENT. ARE WE GOING TO START DOING THIS? ANOTHER DEVELOPMENTS. EVERY DEVELOPMENT FROM NOW ON. WE'RE GONNA START DOING THIS BECAUSE EVERYBODY CAN RENT THEIR HOMES AND RENT THEIR HOUSE THEIR THEIR APARTMENTS AND CONDOS. SO WE'RE GONNA START DOING IT. DOES LADERA HAVE THAT RESTRICTION? THERE'S THE TOWN HOMES IN WINSTON RANCH, HAVE THAT. DID WE REQUIRE THAT? DID WE PUT IT IN THERE? TELL THEM WE HAD TO SEE IT IN THEIR AGREEMENTS, BUT WE'RE GONNA START REVIEWING AGREEMENTS TO THAT EXTENT. THAT'S WHAT YOU WANT TO DO. I JUST THINK IT'S SOME POINT WE BECOME OVERREACHING HERE AT SOME POINT. YOU KNOW, PEOPLE HAVE HAVE HALITI OF A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WHERE WE'RE ACQUIESCING ON OTHER THINGS THAT WE WOULD MAYBE RATHER NOT. THAT MAKE SENSE. YOU KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING? LIKE IT'S I DON'T THINK IT HAPPENED TO ANYTHING. I THINK THIS IS TOWN HOMES CAN BE RENTED IF I BUY A TOWN HOME AND I OWN IT. I THINK I OUGHT TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO RENT IT IF I WANT TO. SAME WITH UNLESS YOUR HOUSE LISTEN FOR ME. YOU CAN DON'T UNLESS THERE'S AN ORDINANCE IN THE TOWN AND I KNOW THAT IN COMING IN THERE'S AN ORDINANCE IN TOWN. BUT, YOU KNOW 96 IT'S QUITE THE QUESTION IS WHETHER OR NOT WE WANT TO CONTROL THAT. I THROW IT OUT FOR THE REST OF THE COUNCIL. I HEARD THE DEVELOPERS COMMENTARY. SO THANK YOU. UH, AH PAGE 1 82 LANDSCAPING, YOUR OVERRIDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND TOLLWAY DESIGN GUIDELINES. I COULD NOT DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT AND ALL THIS IS A QUESTION FOR STAFF ARE THE IS THIS ZONING. PD. BETTER OR WORSE THAN THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND TOLLWAY DESIGN GUIDELINES. I WOULD SAY. RIGHT NOW IT'S BETTER. BUT ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE'RE DOING IS WHAT WE'RE REVIEWING. OUR LANDSCAPE BOARD AND INCE'S, UM, CITYWIDE, WHICH, OF COURSE, WOULD INCLUDE THE TOLLWAY AREAS SO THAT 1 MAY BECOME BETTER ONCE IT GETS ASSUMING IT DOES GET AMENDED. BUT FOR NOW, I'D SAY THIS ONE IS BETTER. YES, SIR. THANK YOU.

PAGE 1 95 ITEM. I'M SORRY. OKAY? I PAID 1 95 ITEM E ONE B. MOBILE FOOD VENDORS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE WITHIN 50 FT. OF AN ENTRANCE OF A PRIMARY BUILDING THAT HOLDS A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.

HOWEVER, THEY MUST HAVE ACCESS TO A PUBLIC RESTAURANT. SO I'M NOT GONNA I CAN'T TELL PEOPLE THEY CAN RENT THEM. BUT I'M GONNA TELL THE BUILDING OWNER HE'S GOT TO HAVE A PUBLIC RESTROOM FOR THE MOBILE FOOD TRUCK. I DON'T I DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT PROVISION AND WHAT WE'RE TRYING DON'T EVEN UNDERSTAND WHAT IT SAYS SO. HAS TO BE A PUBLIC RESTROOM PROVIDED CORRECT. YEAH SO OKAY. DOES THAT MEAN SO THERE WILL BE PUBLIC RESTROOMS PROVIDED BY THE RETAILERS? FOR MOBILE FOOD VENDORS. TYPICALLY, WHAT HAPPENS IS THE MOBILE FOOD VENDOR.

[02:05:07]

NEEDS. TO GO SOMEPLACE AND THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BE ALLOWED TO BE IN THE ROADWAY, SO THEY WIND UP BEING ON PRIVATE PROPERTY SOMEPLACE. AND THAT DEAL FOR BEING ON THAT PRIVATE PROPERTY THEY MAY OR MAY NOT NEED ELECTRICITY THEY MAY OR MAY NOT NEED WATER DEPENDS ON THE WAY THAT THEY'RE SET UP WITH THEIR MOBILE VENDOR, AND THEY ARE ALMOST ALWAYS NOT HAVE PUBLIC BATHROOMS IN THEIR THEIR MOBILE UNITS. AND SO THOSE ARE ACTUALLY THINGS THAT WOULD ALL BE IN THE CONDITIONS. THAT COUNCIL MEMBER PARTLY AND I WERE TALKING ABOUT A LITTLE BIT EARLIER. THOSE ARE THE KINDS OF THINGS THAT YOU COVER WHEN YOU ALLOW THE VENDORS SO THEY DON'T BECOME A PROBLEM OR IT DOESN'T BECOME A PROBLEM WITH THE PEOPLE WHO OWN THE BUILDING THE STICKS AND BRICKS BUILDING WHERE THEY ARE, SO IT'S A IT'S A PARTNERSHIP ARRANGEMENT THAT EVERYBODY HAS TO GET SOMETHING TO WHERE IT DOESN'T BECOME A PROBLEM. BUT BUT THAT THAT STATEMENT IS BASICALLY THERE HAS TO BE ACCESS TO BATHROOMS ARE GOING TO ATTRACT PEOPLE TO COME TO HEAR YOUR MOBILE VENDOR. THEN YOU HAVE TO HAVE BATHROOMS FOR THE PUBLIC, AND THAT'S ALMOST ALWAYS IN A STICKING BREAKFAST, ILLIT E. THAT'S EITHER ATTACHED OR ADJACENT TO IT. OKAY THE NEXT ITEM C MOBILE FOOD VENDORS MAY BE LOCATED ON PUBLIC PUBLIC PROPERTY OTHER THAN THE PUBLIC STREET TRAVEL LANES. SO DOES THAT MEAN IN THE LINEAR PARK, THEY CAN PART AND THAT WOULD BE UP TO THE P O A AND HOW THEY'RE SET UP ON PUBLIC. WE'RE NOT GOING TO ALLOW THEM IN THE MIDDLE OF A PUBLIC STREET. BUT THERE MAY BE PUBLIC AREAS WHICH ARE EITHER THE PARKS OR, UM, DETENTION POUND AREAS OR THINGS ALONG THAT LINE WHERE THEY ALLOW HIM TO GO. YES THEY MAY EVEN SET UP SPECIFIC PLACES FOR HIM. YOU KNOW, LIKE A FOOD PART WHERE YOU HAVE A BUNCH. THE. WE DISCUSSED IN OUR WORK SESSION, THE SUNSET ZONE REZONING. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE COME TO CONSENSUS THAT WE'RE GOING TO PUT SOMETHING IN THERE IN THIS PARTICULAR ZONING AND FUTURE CASES ON A SUNSET PROVISION OF THE ZONING AND IN THE DEVELOPED PLANET AGREEMENT. COUNSELORS THE OPTION ABILITY REVIEW SORTS OF REVIEW. WHAT. REVIEW YES, REVIEWED THE PROGRESS OF WHAT'S GOING ON. IT'S NOT AUTOMATIC ZONING GOES AWAY BY ANYONE NOT WANT TO BE SURE WE DON'T RESTRICT FUTURE COUNCILS DECIDED THEY WANTED DREW EARLIER. EXACTLY RIGHT. WHATEVER A SUNSET PROVISION REVIEW TO PUT YES. OKAY? IS THERE ANY FOLLOW UP FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS? TELL MANAGER MARIO DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTARY? WELL, UH, THERE'S A LOT OF BEEN A LOT OF DISCUSSION, AS NOTED EARLIER IN THE PREVIOUS LIFE. THIS HAS BEEN AN ONGOING CONVERSATION HAS HAD A LOT OF LOT OF REVIEW OPPORTUNITIES. AND SO, UM, YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE PLEASURE OF THE COUNCIL IS. BUT THERE IS A LOT OF COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MENTIONED TONIGHT, UH, FROM THE COUNCIL ALONG ALSO THROUGH THE WORK SESSION PROCESS THIS THIS EARLIER THIS EVENING. UM I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT STAFF HAS TIME TO CAPTURE ALL THE COMMENTS WHETHER IT'S GOING BACK AND REWATCHING THE MEETING AFTER TONIGHT. WE'RE SITTING NOW WITH THE DEVELOPER WITH THE APPLICANT AND MAKING SURE THAT WHATEVER AGREEMENTS YOU HAVE HAS BEEN REDLINE APPROPRIATELY AND INCORPORATED WITH THE COMMENTS THAT YOU HAVE SO AGAIN. I'M NOT TELLING YOU WHAT THE COUNCIL TO DO, BUT THERE IS A LOT OF COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE AND MR WELCH HAS TAKEN OUT TAKING THEM UP. YES, AND SO. AGAIN WE NEED TIME TO JUST GO THROUGH THAT. MAKE SURE THAT INCORPORATED YOU ALL MADE STATE IN LATIN. CLEAR THAT THE DOCUMENTS YOU HAD IN FRONT OF YOU DIDN'T HAVE SOME OF THE OTHER COMMENTS THAT WERE MADE, SO I THINK IT'S ONLY FAIR TO THE COUNCIL THAT WE HAVE A DOCUMENT THAT YOU CAN READ AND UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS THERE BEFORE. WHAT'S RED LINE TO INCORPORATE THE NEW FEATURES AND AGAIN TO MAKE INSURANCE IS THAT THE APPLICANT AGREES WITH THAT, UM AND AGAIN AS MR WELCH SAID, THERE'S 25 30 COMMENTS, SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GET THIS RIGHT. AND SO, UH, MAYOR. I'M JUST SAYING, WE JUST NEED SOME TIME TO DO THAT. BUILDING MATERIALS AND VERY. THAT COULD BE A SIGNIFICANT PART OF THIS AGREEMENT, AND WE HAVE SOME REFERENCES MATERIALS, SUCH AS IN THE IN THE IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE. I THINK WE NEED SOMETHING. LEFT LOOSE LANGUAGE AND SOMETHING SUCH AS I THINK WE

[02:10:06]

NEED TO HAVE AN IDEA OF WHAT THOSE BUILDING MATERIALS ARE SO WE CAN WORK IT. OKAY, GOOD. THAT POINT TO YOUR BACK ONTO YOUR COMMENTS, MARIO. UM WE NEED TO MAKE SURE IF THAT'S NOT ALREADY UNDERSTOOD THAT WE INCLUDE EVERYTHING THAT WE DID DURING THE WORK SESSION AS WELL. IS THAT AND I WOULD ASSUME THERE IS A MAJOR MAJOR MEASURE OVERLAPS. JUST IN CASE THERE'S NOT ONE, MAKE SURE WE CAPTURED AND IF YOU RECALL WHEN , WHEN WE VISITED THIS DISCUSSION, WAY BACK WAY BACK IN JULY OF THE PREMISE WAS TO HAVE THE WORKSHOP LIKE WE HAD TONIGHT. GET ALL THE ISSUES OUT ON THE TABLE AND STILL ALSO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE ON IT.

IF ALL THE ISSUES GOT AGREED UPON AND AGAIN, IT SEEMS LIKE THERE'S A LOT OF AGREEMENT CONSENSUS, BUT THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF CONVERSATIONS. I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GET A RIDE AND SO AGAIN, WE ALSO MENTIONED TO. I MENTIONED TO YOU ALL BACK A MONTH AGO THAT IF WE DON'T TAKE ACTION TONIGHT, YOU KNOW, THIS HAS BEEN A NINE MONTH PROCESS. I THINK WAITING TWO WEEKS. IT'S PROBABLY NOT A DEAL BREAKER, BUT WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE WE GET IT RIGHT. SO AGAIN. I WANT TO SPEAK FOR THE APPLICANT. BUT THAT'S FROM THE STAFF PERSPECTIVE. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE GET IT RIGHT, ESPECIALLY WITH THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS OF THIS CASE BEING OUR FIRST ONE. THANK YOU, MARIO. SO. NOLAN IF IT'S THIS WERE TO BE TABLED FOR TWO WEEKS. IS THAT YOU AGREEABLE TO THAT? FOR FOUR WEEKS. TWO WEEKS. GOOD EXCEPT THE MOTION ON THAT. I'D LIKE TO MOVE THAT WE TAKE READY TO I KNOW, BUT I THINK I KNOW AH! YEAH IT SOUNDS LIKE WE HAVE LONG LISTS OF COMMENTS. TO MEMORIALIZE. I SUPPOSE. IS THERE AN OPTION? WHERE WE CAN CAPTURE THOSE IN THIS HEARING OR IS THAT UNFORESEEABLE. HOT. I WOULD BE HONEST. FOR ME TO GO BACK AND DRAFT A MOTION WITH 25 OR 30 CHANGES PAGE BY PAGE IS GOING TO TAKE WE COULD PROBABLY GET THE AGREEMENT DONE AND THE AMOUNT OF TIME I MEAN, YES, MBL OF LENGTHY AMOUNT OF TIME WE GO THROUGH AND DAVID, YOU HAVE COMMENTS AS WELL. SO I ALSO HAVE FIVE OR SIX COMMENTS FOR THE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND MY HESITATION IS IF WE LEAVE SOMETHING OUT THEN WE'RE GONNA BE BACK HERE TRYING TO HAMMER IT OUT IN TWO OR FOUR WEEKS. SO. GENERALLY THINKING SPEAKING, I'D RATHER GET IT RIGHT. EVERYBODY TAKE A LOOK AT IT. YOU GET TO SEE IT. WE GET TO SEE IT WORK THROUGH ANY ISSUES THAT COMES BACK NEXT TIME. IT'S PRETTY MUCH A DONE DEAL. SO, TERRY, WE HEARD YOU SAY THAT YOU WOULD YOU THINK IT IS APPROPRIATE TO GOOD SHOUT. WILL WEEKS GIVEN. YEAH, I THINK AT LEAST TWO WEEKS, OKAY? BECAUSE WE HAVE TO DO THE DEVELOPED AGREEMENT AND DAVID, HIS FOLKS HAVE TO REVISE THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. OKAY UM, SO WE'LL MOVE INTO. WITH TWO WEEKS. IT'S AUGUST. 22ND THAT DO IT. TERRY THAT'S DOABLE. TWO WEEKS. DAVID IS TWO WEEKS. OKAY FOR YOU TO DO IT, OKAY? DO WE WANT IT TO SPECIFIC? YOU WANT TABLE TO SPECIFIC DATE? YES. THE AUGUST 22ND. SO I. THIS ROOM.

WOULD BE A TABLE. THIS AGENDA ITEM. NUMBER NINE. TWEEPS. BE AUGUST 20 SECONDS. IS THAT CORRECT? MOVE THAT WE TABLE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER NINE TO AUGUST 22ND. I HAVE A MOTION BY GREG ANDRES SECOND WELL 2ND 2ND BY MARCUS RAY ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU TO THE APPLICANT STAFF FOR THE DILIGENT WORK. I'D LIKE TO TAKE A FIVE MINUTE RECESS FOR THE COUNCIL. COME BACK AT 8 40, PLEASE. THANK YOU.

WITH THAT WILL. COUNCILMAN RAY WILL BE RIGHT BACK WITH US. LET'S GO AHEAD AND BACK, GO BACK INTO REGULAR SESSION. UH, WITH NO AUDIENCE. THANK YOU. WE ARE NOW ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 10.

[10. Consider and act upon a resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Prosper, Texas, declaring the public necessity to acquire certain properties for right-of-way, drainage easements, and temporary construction easements for the construction of the First Street (DNT – Coleman) project; determining the public use and necessity for such acquisition; authorizing the acquisition of property rights necessary for said Project; Page 3 of 4 appointing an appraiser and negotiator as necessary; authorizing the Town Manager to establish just compensation for the property rights to be acquired; authorizing the Town Manager to take all steps necessary to acquire the needed property rights in compliance with all applicable laws and resolutions; and authorizing the Town Attorney to institute condemnation proceedings to acquire the property if purchase negotiations are not successful.]

[02:15:05]

AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 10 IS TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON THE RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL, THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS. DECLARING THAT PUBLIC NECESSITY TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN PROPERTIES FOR RIGHT AWAY DRAINAGE EASEMENTS IN TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FIRST STREET. DNT TO COLEMAN PROJECT DETERMINING THE PUBLIC USE AND NECESSITY FOR SUCH ACQUISITION. AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS NECESSARY FOR SAID PROJECT. APPOINTING AN APPRAISER NEGOTIATORS NECESSARY AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO ESTABLISH JUST COMPENSATION FOR THE PROPERTY RIGHTS TO BE ACQUIRED. AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO TAKE ALL STEPS NECESSARY TO ACQUIRE THE NEEDED PROPERTY RIGHTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND RESOLUTIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE TOWN ATTORNEY TO INSTITUTE CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS TO ACQUIRE THE PROPERTY OF PURCHASE NEGOTIATIONS ARE NOT SUCCESSFUL, MR HUMAN WEB. UM THE FIRST THREE D N T. COLEMAN PROJECT IS SPECIFICALLY FOR THE POTENTIAL ROUNDABOUT AT THE INTERSECTION OF COLEMAN LAST YEAR. Y'ALL DID THIS SIMILAR PROCESS FOR THE MAJORITY OF THE PROJECT. SO TONIGHT WE'RE ASKING FOR YOU TO DO A ROLL CALL VOTE TO, UH, GIVE US THE AUTHORITY TO CONTINUE THE NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE RIGHT AWAY THE EASEMENTS AGAIN. FOR THE INTERSECTION SPECIFICALLY FOR THE ROUNDABOUT. AS PART OF THAT PROJECT. TO KEEP IT SHORT. ASK IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. IF NOT AGAIN. THIS DOES REQUIRE A ROLL CALL VOTE. ANYONE IN THE COUNCIL OF QUESTIONS FOR HUMAN YEAH, OUR COMMUNICATIONS WITH THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS THUS FAR.

UH, CURRENTLY, UH, VERY LITTLE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS WERE WAITING FOR THE FOR THIS ACTION TO REACH OUT MAKE THAT INITIAL OFFER. TO HAVE MOTION. ROLL ROLL CALL. BUT DON'T WE HAVE TO HAVE A MOTION? PLEASE MAKE NOTION AND MOVED TO APPROVE THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION DECLARING THE PUBLIC NECESSITY TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN PROPERTIES FOR THE RIGHT AWAY DURING THE ACHIEVEMENTS AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS AND DRAINAGE MEANS EASEMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FIRST STREET DNT TO COLEMAN PROJECT WITH SUCH PROPERTIES BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION. DETERMINE THE PUBLIC USE IN NECESSITY FOR SUCH ACQUISITION AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS. SARAH. NECESSARY FOR SET PROJECT APPOINT AN APPRAISER NEGOTIATOR AS NECESSARY AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO ESTABLISH JUST COMPENSATION FOR THE PROPERTY RIGHTS TO BE ACQUIRED. AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO TAKE ALL STEPS NECESSARY. TO ACQUIRE THE NEEDED PROPERTY RIGHTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND RESOLUTIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE TOWN ATTORNEY TO INSTITUTE CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS TO ACQUIRE THE PROPERTY IF PURCHASED NEGOTIATIONS. NEGOTIATIONS ARE NOT SUCCESSFUL.

I'LL TAKE IT. I AM POOR. UM, FORWARD. AND FOR IMPORT YES. THANK YOU.

[11. Discuss and consider submission of the Preliminary FY 2023-2024 Budget. ]

GETTING.

DID YOU TAKE PICTURES? MAYOR? I'D LOVE TO SEE THAT. OKAY THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. AGAIN THANK YOU TO FINANCE STAFF. CHRIS AND WHITNEY ARE HERE TONIGHT. AND. HAD A BIG PART OF THE EFFORT, BUT ALSO THANK THANK YOU TO ALL THE DEPARTMENT HEADS WHO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROCESS AND GOT TO SEE INFORMATION WE ASKED FOR. SO I'M GOING TO KICK IT OFF WITH THE FIRST OF SIX BUDGET RELATED AGENDA ITEMS. THIS WILL GIVE YOU THE OVERVIEW AND THEN CHRIS WILL WALK US THROUGH THE PROCEDURAL ITEMS THAT WE HAVE TO DO DO START THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ADVERTISING PROCESS. SO THE POINT OF THE TIMELINE IS SIMPLY, UH, WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON THIS FOR A LONG TIME WE STARTED OFF BY GIVING YOU THE MULTI YEAR PROJECTIONS AND ASKING FOR COUNSEL. UH FEEDBACK ON WHAT YOU WANTED TO GET MORE INFORMATION ABOUT. WE THEN WENT INTO A SERIES OF

[02:20:01]

SUBCOMMITTEE MEETINGS. WE'RE PRESENTING THE BUDGET TONIGHT. AND PASSING ALL THE PROCEDURAL ITEMS AND THEN WE WILL. IF COUNCIL TAKES STAFF RECOMMENDATION, GO BACK. HAVE SOME SUBCOMMITTEE MEETINGS. UH AND THEN ON AUGUST 22ND HAVING INITIAL DISCUSSION. OF THE ITEMS . WE HAVE A BUDGET TOWN HALL MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR THE AUGUST 31ST AND THEN WE'RE PLANNING ON FINAL ADOPTION ON SEPTEMBER 12TH. SO THE BUDGET STARTS WITH THE STRATEGIC VISION. OF THE COUNCIL, AND I LOVE THIS STRATEGIC VERSION BECAUSE IT'S SHORT. AND THIS IS ONE OF THE FIRST STRATEGIC VISIONS I CAN ACTUALLY REMEMBER WITHOUT HAVING TO GO BACK AND REFRESH MY MEMORY. THE FIVE VERY SIMPLE, UM. STEPS THAT STAFF NEEDS TO BUILD INTO THEIR BUDGET , ACCELERATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT OF DOWNTOWN IS A DESTINATION. ENSURING THAT OUR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS ALREADY DEVELOP. EXCELLENCE IN MUNICIPAL SERVICE AND THEN WORKING TOWARDS A GROWING AND DIVERSIFIED TAX BASE. SO THE BUDGET OVERVIEW. IS WE? MAYBE WE MAY HAVE A SMALL TOWN FUEL, BUT WE DON'T HAVE A SMALL TOWN BUDGET. WE ARE RAPIDLY APPROACHING $100 MILLION AND OPERATING. EXPENDITURES WILL PASS THAT NEXT YEAR. WITHOUT A DOUBT, YOU CAN SEE THE GENERAL FUND IS JUST UNDER 50 MILLION. AND IF YOU FOLD IN THE CRIME AND AH FIRE CONTROL DISTRICTS WERE OVER THAT THAN OUR ENTERPRISE FUNDS OR NOW OVER 40 MILLION. WE HAVE DEBT SERVICE APPROPRIATIONS OF JUST UNDER 15 MILLION AND WE ARE BRINGING NEW CAPITAL INITIATIVES OF JUST UNDER $100 MILLION THIS YEAR AS PART OF THE BUDGET. SO IN TERMS OF THE KEY REVENUE DRIVERS. UM. GOTTEN SEVERAL QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS. I WILL POINT IT OUT. PROPERTY TAXES HAVE NOT GONE DOWN. IN FACT, THEY'VE GONE UP JUST UNDER 30% IN TERMS OF VALUATION. NOW THAT'S SPLIT BETWEEN INCREASES IN EXISTING VALUATIONS. AND UH, NEW VALUE ADDED DUE TO NEW CONSTRUCTION. IN FACT, WERE WE HAVE MORE VALUE ADDED THIS YEAR FROM NEW CONSTRUCTION, WHICH, WHEN YOU GET TO BE A TOWN THE SIZE WE ARE, THAT'S VERY UNUSUAL . SO THAT SPEAKS OF THE VITALITY OF PROSPER. ON THE SALES TAX SIDE WERE PREDICTING AN 8.6% GROWTH. AH IT'S IMPORTANT TO KEEP IN MIND THAT SALES TAX AND PROPERTY TAXES TOGETHER OR 70% OF THE GENERAL FUND BUDGET. AND IF YOU TAKE OUR TOP FOUR REVENUES, THAT'S 90% OF OUR BUDGET, WHICH WOULD BE BUILDING PERMITS NEXT AND THEN FRANCHISE.

FEES. SO WHAT HAS CHANGED IN THIS BUDGET? WE'VE HAD MULTIPLE ADDITIONS. UH THE FIRST UNDER THE ADMINISTRATION CATEGORY IS OUR MARKET ADJUSTMENT, WHICH WE'LL TALK ABOUT, UH, IN MORE DETAIL. ALL OF US KNOW IT IS BECOMING MORE AND MORE AND INTEGRAL PART OF ALL OPERATIONS , AND SO WE'RE INVESTING IN ITS SECURITY AND SYSTEMS. THERE'S A NON RECURRING ITEMS FOR FIBER.

AH AND WE ARE ADDING A POSITION THERE FOR I HELPED US. THE LARGEST ITEMS SO FAR THIS YEAR, THOUGH, IS THE POLICE GRATIFIED. STAFFING MODEL, WHICH WILL DIVIDE THE TOWN INTO EAST AND WEST DISTRICTS, PROVIDING COMMAND STAFF ALL THE WAY UP ON BOTH BOTH SIDES OF THE TOWN. AND THEN WE'RE ADDRESSING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, UH, STREETS. PARKS AND RECREATION. WE'RE ADDING TO COMMUNITY EVENTS, WHICH DIRECTLY CORRELATES WITH ARE MAKING DOWNTOWN OR DESTINATION, STRATEGIC VISION AND THEN ENGINEERING SOME COMMUNICATION UPGRADES. SO ON THE OTHER FUND SIDE. WE HAVE. AH ARE TREATED WATER SUPPLIER. WE'VE ALL SEEN THE ARTICLES OVER AN 11.

INCREASE IN RATES THIS YEAR ON THE WASTEWATER SIDE. UM. WE HAVE OUR REGIONAL SUPPLIER NEEDING TO BUILD MAJOR CAPACITY ADDITIONS TO THEIR WASTEWATER PLANT, WHICH ARE VERY, VERY EXPENSIVE AND

[02:25:06]

WE'VE LOOKED AT VARIOUS MODELS. DO WE FINANCE OUR SHARE OF THOSE IN THOSE ADDITIONS OURSELVES. DO WE USE THEM, ETCETERA. AND BECAUSE OF THESE LARGE, SIGNIFICANT, UM. COST INCREASES FROM OUR REGIONAL SUPPLIERS WE BROUGHT IN A RATE CONSULTANT THIS YEAR. TO EXAMINE AND PROJECT OUT OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. WHAT THE IMPACTS OF THAT WOULD BE AND THE RECOMMENDATION COMING BACK FROM THE RIGHT CONSULTANT. IS WE WILL NEED MULTIPLE YEAR. RIGHT INCREASES, INCLUDING A BLENDED 7% RATE NEXT YEAR. WHEN I SAY BLENDED IT'S 6% WATER. 9% WASTE WATER. WHICH WATER IS TWO THIRDS OF OUR COSTS. WASTEWATER ONE THIRD, WHICH BLENDS TO THAT 7% RATE.

NOW IT'S IMPORTANT TO KEEP IN MIND. AS SIGNIFICANT A RATE INCREASES 7% IS THIS IS OUR FIRST RATE INCREASE SINCE 2019 SO THE FIRST AND FOUR YEARS SO AND WE ONLY RAISE RATES IF WE NEED TO. IF YOU HAVE A HOT YEAR , YOU CAN ONLY BUDGET FOR AN AVERAGE YEAR BECAUSE YOU NEVER KNOW. WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN. AND IF WE HAVE A CONTINUE TO HAVE HIGH SALES. WE MAY BE ABLE TO NOT HAVE AS MUCH AS THE RIGHT CONSULTANT, UH, PROJECTS, BUT RIGHT NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT 7% FOR NEXT YEAR AND THEN LESSER RATE INCREASES. AFTER THAT. WE CREATED A SOLID WASTE FUND THIS YEAR. UH AND WITH THE R P AWARD. AS WE SWITCH OVER TO THE NEW PROVIDER, WE WILL BE GENERATING FUNDS FOR ADMINISTRATION FROM EVERY RESIDENTS. SOLID WASTE BILL AND THE SOLID WASTE FUND WILL BE SELF SUPPORTING. AH, STORMWATER DRAINAGE. WE ARE NOT HAVING A RATE INCREASE THE LAST RATE INCREASE. THERE WAS 2018. SO LET'S TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT. 662,000 THAT WE MENTIONED FOR MARKET ADJUSTMENTS IN THE ADMINISTRATION COST CENTER. THE LABOR MARKET HERE IN THE DFW METROPLEX IS VERY COMPETITIVE. AS YOU ALL KNOW, AND MUNICIPALITIES ALL COMPETE FOR THE SAME TALENT, AND SO WE'VE DONE MARKET STUDIES, BENCHMARKING AND WE HAVE A MERIT , UH, BUDGED IT IN FOR ALL EMPLOYEES AT THE 3. BUT THEN WE'RE SUGGESTING MARKET ADJUSTMENTS. UM FOR PUBLIC SAFETY 6% PLEASE 3% FIRE. AND THEN OTHER EMPLOYEES. ONLY IF THEY ARE 5% OR MORE. UH BEHIND MARKET AVERAGE, SO NOT ALL GENERAL NON SWORN EMPLOYEES WOULD GET. THE ACTUAL MARKET ADJUSTMENT, ONLY THE ONES THAT ARE BEHIND IN THEIR PARTICULAR CATEGORY. HEY BOB, WILL YOU ALSO WELL WE ALSO AS PART OF THIS, WE ALSO REDUCED ONE OF THE ONE OF THE STEPS ON THE LOWER LEVEL TIERS OF POLICE OFFICER AND FIREFIGHTER PERIOD. THE. 662,000 YEAH. AND THEN HERE IS WHAT WE'RE BRINGING BACK TO YOU IN TERMS OF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GENERAL FUND POSITIONS. WE ALSO HAVE A FEW POSITIONS IN THE UH, UTILITY FUND AND THE STORM WATER. GRANDEST POND AND ONE IN THE SOLID WASTE FUND. SO I MENTIONED THE MULTIYEAR CAPITAL PROGRAM. AH WE'RE ACCELERATING DEBT AS YOU'LL SEE IN A MINUTE. WE'LL GO OVER THAT THIS HAS BEEN THROUGH THE C I P SUBCOMMITTEE AND THEIR RECOMMENDATION. AH SO LET'S TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHERE WE ARE. AND OUR $210 MILLION BOND, BRO GRAHAM THAT WAS PASSED IN NOVEMBER OF 2020 SO RIGHT NOW, WITH. THIS ISSUE THAT'S TAKING PLACE THIS MONTH AND NEXT MONTH. WE WILL BE DOWN TO JUST UNDER $100 MILLION OF REMAINING AUTHORIZATION OF THE ORIGINAL 210. BUT THEN OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS WE WILL HAVE ISSUED ALL BUT 48 MILLION YEAH, IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT. THAT

[02:30:05]

MEANS IN THE ORIGINAL 10 YEAR PROGRAM, WE WILL HAVE ISSUED 75% OF THE DEBT AND THE FIRST FIVE YEARS OF THE PROGRAM. SO WE TRULY HAVE BEEN ACCELERATING. AH THE CAPITAL PROGRAM AND GETTING THOSE PROJECTS GOING AS QUICKLY AS WE POSSIBLY CAN. WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT BEFORE THE POSSIBILITY OF A BOND ELECTION IN EITHER NOVEMBER 2025 OR MAY OF 2026. BOTH OF THOSE ARE PHYSICAL YEAR, 26. WE HAVE TO STICK TO THE STANDARD. UM ELECTION DATES, WHICH IS WHY WE HAVE ONLY THOSE TWO OPTIONS. AND I LISTED THE TBD UNDER REMAINING AUTHORIZATION BECAUSE THE COUNCIL AT THAT POINT AFTER THE BOND ELECTION WOULD HAVE THE CHOICE OF DO WE JUST CONTINUE FORWARD WITH THE ORIGINAL 2020 ISSUE AND SPEND IT ALL DOWN BEFORE DOING ANYTHING ON THE DO.

AH, ELECTIONS IF THAT WAS TO TAKE PLACE. BASICALLY BY 2027. ALL OF THE ORIGINAL 2020. UH AUTHORIZATION WOULD BE GONE AND THERE WOULD BE $9 MILLION LEFT OVER IN 2027 TO START THE NEW PROJECTS OR DO YOU WANT TO START DESIGN AND OTHER THINGS ON SOME OF THE PROJECTS THAT WERE PASSED AS PART OF THE UPCOMING BOND ELECTIONS, SO THAT WOULD BE COUNSEL'S CHOICE SEVERAL YEARS FROM NOW, BUT THAT'S SOMETHING TO START THINKING ABOUT IN TERMS OF HOW ALL THAT PROCESS WOULD WORK. YOU CAN SEE THE ASTERIX SHOW THOSE ITEMS THE YEARS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN THROUGH THE C I P SUBCOMMITTEE AND THEN THE DOUBLE ASTERISK INDICATES JUST BOND CAPACITY BASED ON OUR PROJECTIONS OF A B GROWTH AND WHAT WE KNOW IN TERMS OF EXISTING DEBT SERVICE DROPPING OFF. GOING BACK TO THE JUST REAL QUICK ON THE BOTTOM ISSUANCE. THE 25 26 PROJECTION. UM OBVIOUSLY IT TOOK US A LITTLE BIT OF RUNWAY ON THIS. THIS FIRST BOND. THE $210 MILLION BOND TO GET TO THE POINT WE HAD PERFORMED THE BOND COMMITTEE DO ALL THAT. B. I MEAN, THAT'S RIGHT AROUND. AS FAR AS GETTING THAT GOING SO WHEN DO WE NEED TO DECIDE ON ACTUALLY PULLING TOGETHER? WHAT AND HOW MUCH NOVEMBER OF 2025. IT IS STILL QUITE A WAYS OFF. IT'S OVER TWO YEARS OFF, AND SO THAT WOULD BE A COUNCIL POLICY DECISION, BUT IT'S DEFINITELY SOMETHING WE WANT. YOU KNOW PEOPLE TO BEGIN THINKING ABOUT IN TERMS OF THOSE PROJECTS THAT WE WOULD WANT TO BE THE NEXT STAGE. UH, IN TERMS OF THE TOWN'S DEVELOPMENT. BUT. WE DEFINITELY WANT TO KEEP THAT YOU KNOW COUNCIL FOCUSING ON THAT IS A POSSIBILITY OF WHEN YOU WOULD WANT TO START. I'VE.

I'VE ACTUALLY FROM MY PREVIOUS CITY BEEN THE STAFF LAYS ON WITH A CITIZEN COMMITTEE THAT HELPED PRIORITIZE ALL THE BOND PROJECTS AND WE WOULD TYPICALLY START YEAR TO 14 MONTHS AHEAD OF TIME.

AND YOU START WITH IDENTIFYING POSSIBLE PROJECTS BY POLLING COUNCIL AND STAFF. AND THEN YOU WORK THROUGH THE PROCESS OF VETTING ALL THOSE THOSE ITEMS THROUGH THE CITIZENS SEPTEMBER 24. OKAY? SOMEBODY THAT'S EXCITING TO THINK ABOUT. GETTING THROUGH OUR CURRENT BOND AUTHORIZATION AS QUICKLY AS WE HAVE SO. OKAY SO ON THAT REAL QUICK, BOB, BEFORE WE GO ON, I WANT TO MAKE SURE TO ON THIS SLIDE HERE. IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT BEFORE WE GO SELL THE BONDS. WE HAVE TO HAVE THE TAXABLE VALUE RIGHT TO BE ABLE TO LEVERAGE AGAINST. SO WHAT? WHAT THIS IS SHOWING IS THAT WE'RE GROWING IN THAT THAT VALUE OF OUR COMMUNITY TO BE ABLE TO TAKE IT AND ACCELERATED TO THE EXTENT WE HAVE IN A VERY REASONABLE AND MANAGEABLE APPROACH. I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE CALLING OUT THAT WE'RE NOT BEING CAVALIER JUST TO TRY TO BURN HIS. WE WERE RESTRICTED BY CERTAIN NO, THAT'S ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. AND COUNCIL HAS PUT VERY COMMON SENSE PARAMETERS IN TERMS OF OUR FINANCIAL POLICIES. WE HAVE A 60 40 OPERATIONS TO DEBT

[02:35:02]

SERVICE RATIO TO STAY WITHIN. WE HAVE AH DAD AS A PERCENT OF A V CAP IN PLACE, AND SO WE ARE GOING TO MANAGE THE DEBT PROGRAM AND YOU CAN SEE THE DOUBLE STAR . UH NOTE BELOW, SAYS PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY FUTURE DEBT CAPACITY MAY CHANGE DEPENDING ON A V GROWTH. AND MIXING NEW AND EXISTING AUTHORIZATIONS TO BE DETERMINED. SO BASICALLY THE POINT WE WERE MAKING THERE IS EVERY SINGLE YEAR WERE UPDATING THESE CAPACITY ESTIMATES AND IF THE ECONOMY SLOWS DOWN, I'VE HEARD SOME ECONOMISTS PREDICTING A RECESSION. I THINK IF IT HAPPENS, PROSPER WILL BE SOMEWHAT INSULATED AS THE DFW AREA WILL BE, TOO, BUT IF THAT SLOWS DOWN IF THE GROWTH SLOWS DOWN, AND WE WOULD SIMPLY NEXT YEAR BE TELLING YOU A LITTLE BIT OF A DIFFERENT STORY. AS WE SHOW THESE NUMBERS, I THINK IT'S ALSO IMPORTANT TO FOR THOSE THAT ARE MAYBE LISTENING IN TO NOTE THAT WE'VE BEEN VERY INTENTIONAL TO PAY DOWN DEBT QUICKER, PROBABLY THAN MOST LIKE WE DIDN'T REFINANCE OR REFUND THE DEBT. UM, WE PAID YOU KNOW, TO KEEP OUR DEBT LEVELS AT AN APPROPRIATE PLACE TO GET PREFERRED, YOU KNOW, PRICING ON OUR OUR BONES. ABSOLUTELY WE HAVE 20 YEAR MAXIMUM MATURITY. IS OUR STANDARD ISSUANCE. SO OUR AVERAGE IZATION OF DEBT IS FASTER. I KNOW NEIGHBORING CITIES THAT ARE AT 25 AND 30 YEAR. AND SO WE'VE TRIED TO MANAGE OUR DEBT WHILE STILL TAKING CARE OF THE CAPITAL NEEDS. OF THE COMMUNITY. ONE OF THE COMMENT. YOU SAID EARLIER. I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO CLARIFY WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT THE TRASH AND THE REEF AND I KNOW A COUPLE OF SLIDES BACK, BUT I DIDN'T GET TO INJURY POINT HERE, BUT YOU MENTIONED WITH THE NEW WASTE AGREEMENT. THAT WE WOULD RAISE THE PERCENTAGE OF FUNDS FOR ADMIN. I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO CALL THAT OUT THAT IT'S NOT JUST RAISING FUNDS FOR ADMIN, BUT IT'S AN ALLOCATION. TO THE CONTRACT TO HELP SUPPORT THE CONTRACT. FUNDED BY THE COLLECTION OF FEES. YES. OKAY? OKAY, SO. WE ARE CHANGING A LOT OF THINGS. UM WE STARTED THOSE CHANGES LAST YEAR. WE'RE CONTINUING THE CHANGES THIS YEAR . ONE OF THE BIG CHANGES IS FOR THE FIRST TIME. YOU WILL SEE A CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND BUDGET THAT'S IN YOUR OTHER. UH FUND SECTION OF YOUR BUDGET BOOK. AND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THAT AND WHAT YOU SAW IN THE PAST. IS WE WOULD BRING INDIVIDUAL CAPITAL PROJECTS TO YOU FOR APPROPRIATION. AND THEN EACH YEAR. YOU WOULD RE APPROPRIATE THAT THE APPROACH WE'RE TAKING IS WE'RE HAVING ALL OF THAT IN A CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND AND ADOPTING THEM ON A PROJECT BY PROJECT BASIS, MEANING THAT THE APPROPRIATION STAYS OPEN UNTIL THE PROJECT'S COMPLETE. SO A DIFFERENT APPROACH. AND WE CREATED THE CAPITAL DEDICATED FUND THE LAST YEAR, BUT WE JUST KEPT IT IN THE GENERAL FUND.

WELL, THE ONE OF THE PROBLEMS WITH THAT IS THAT MAKES THE GENERAL FUND LOOK A WHOLE LOT BIGGER IN TERMS OF APPROPRIATIONS, AND IT REALLY IS BECAUSE WE WOULD BRING THE PROPERTY TAX IN AND THEN WE WERE TRANSFER THE PROPERTY TAX OUT TO FUND THE PROJECTS AND SO THIS YEAR. WE. MOVE THE CAPITAL DEDICATED LEVY DIRECTLY TO THE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUN, BUT LAST YEAR WHEN WE CREATED THE LEVY, IT WAS MAJORITY. NON RECURRING REVENUES THAT WE'RE FUNDING IT FROM AND THEN A SMALLER PORTION OF RECURRING OR WHEN YOU MOVE ALL OF THAT OUT. FROM THE GENERAL FUND INTO A CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND. ALL OF THAT BECOMES RECURRING. AND IT PUTS A LITTLE BIT OF FINANCIAL STRESS ON THE GENERAL FUND. BUT IT'S ALSO CLEARER THAT THAT IS A DEDICATED LEVY AND SO. THE OTHER PART OF IT, AND I WE PROBABLY DID NOT DO A GOOD ENOUGH JOB OF COMMUNICATING THIS TO THE DEPARTMENT DIRECTORS. BUT WHEN THE COUNCIL CREATED THE C I P SUBCOMMITTEE, AND WE CREATED THE CAPITAL DEDICATED THE INTENT WAS FOR ALL CAPITAL PROJECTS. TO COMPETE AGAINST EACH OTHER FOR PRIORITY AND FOR THAT COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE TO LOOK AT ALL CAPITAL PROJECTS IN TERMS OF THE PRIORITIZATION. WELL WE GOT SEVERAL REQUESTS. AH IN THE

[02:40:06]

GENERAL FUND, JUST AS A NON RECURRING REQUESTS. WE GOT ONE REQUEST THAT WAS FOR A MILLION AND A HALF FOR REBUILDING THE ROAD IN THE GENERAL FUND. AND SO IS THE EXECUTIVE TEAM WAS GOING THROUGH AND PRIORITIZING. WE SAID, YOU KNOW, THAT REALLY NEEDS TO GO OVER TO THE C IP SUBCOMMITTEE. FOR PRIORITIZATION . SAME THING WITH SOME POND REPAIRS AND SOME OTHER CAPITAL PROGRAMS. AND THEN WE ALSO STRUGGLED A LITTLE BIT WITH AH! STAYING AT THE 11.2 CENTS. WE REDUCED IT TO 10.2 CENTS, WHICH WAS STILL 10% INCREASE IN THAT CAPITAL DEDICATED LEVY. AND, UM . THE IN ESSENCE. WHAT WE'RE DEALING WITH IS AS STAFF. WE HAVE A STRATEGIC VISION. GIVEN TO US BUT SOME OF THE ITEMS AND STRATEGIC VISION IN ESSENCE COMPETE AGAINST EACH OTHER. FOR RESOURCES, AND THE TWO THAT WE'RE STRUGGLING WITH IS ACCELERATING INFRASTRUCTURE. AND PROVIDE EXCELLENCE AND MUNICIPAL SERVICE AND ONLY THE COUNCIL AS THE ELECTED OFFICIALS OF THE COMMUNITY CAN REALLY MAKE THAT POLICY DECISION OF WHAT IS THAT RIGHT BALANCE BETWEEN THE ACCELERATING INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUTTING LOTS OF MONEY INTO CAPITAL PROGRAM AND FUNDING OPERATIONS AS WE GO, AND SO WHAT STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS, AS WE CONSIDER THIS BUDGET. IS THAT AH! CAPITAL DEDICATED SUBCOMMITTEE OR THE CAPITAL. UH IMPROVEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE. THEY TAKE A LOOK AT THOSE ADDITIONAL PROJECTS WHICH WE MOVED OVER AND THEY LOOK AT THE CAPITAL NEEDS AND THEN IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FINANCE COMMITTEE COME BACK WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF IS THE 8.5 MILLION THE RIGHT NUMBER THAT STAFF WE REDUCED IT FROM THE ELIM TOO. BUT IS THAT THE RIGHT NUMBER? DID WE REDUCE IT TOO MUCH? DID WE NOT REDUCE IT ENOUGH? WHAT IS THE RIGHT BALANCE BETWEEN FUNDING IN THE GENERAL FUND AND FUNDING FOR CAPITAL. AND UH, CLARIFYING QUESTION? YES. UM SO. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT 858.5 MILLION, SO WHAT IN SIMPLE TERMS. WHAT WHAT'S THE SOURCE OF THAT MONEY IS THAT ALL FROM PROPERTY TAXES SO LIKE IN THE BUDGET NOTE. YOU KNOW, OUR WE'RE RAISING 7.4 MILLION MORE IN PROPERTY TAXES THIS YEAR THAN WE DID LAST YEAR.

AND WE'RE SAYING THAT WE'RE PUTTING 8.6 MILLION INTO CAPITAL DEDICATED FUNDS ARE THOSE UM THE SAME. POT. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE ? YOU KNOW, SAYING THIS, SO I'M JUST I'M JUST THINKING IN TERMS OF A CITIZEN LOOKING AT THE COVER PAGE AND SAYING, OH, LOOK, THEY'RE GETTING $7.4 MILLION.

YOU KNOW, WHERE'S MY REBATE. UM . BUT HERE THAT THAT DIRECTLY IS GOING INTO SOME OF THESE CAPITAL EXPENSE. THAT'S ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. UH, I THINK THEY WOULD ALSO SAY, WHY HAVEN'T THE ROAD ZEMAN WIDE? YEAH AND WHY IS IT TAKING ME 20 MINUTES TO GET ACROSS TOWN, SO THAT'S THE BALANCE WE HAVE TO STRIKE IS WE ARE RAISING MORE MONEY, BUT WE'RE ALSO HOPEFULLY SPENDING THAT MONEY VERY WISELY. IN A WAY THAT IS AN INVESTMENT NOT IN EXPENDITURE. REALITY IS AN 8.5 WOULD HAVE TO BE IF WE USE IT FOR MAYBE BOND FUNDS. FUGIT PUT ALL INTO IT, COULD YOU WE COULD ACTUALLY IF. THE RATE DEBT SERVICE RATE WE BROUGHT TO YOU IS 17.7 AND SOME CHANGE. AH IF WE WANTED TO EXCEL, A RATE EVEN MORE. WE COULD TAKE SOME OF THE CAPITAL DEDICATED AND ACTUALLY ISSUED MORE DEBT THAN WE HAVE NOW. NOW, WHETHER ENGINEERING COULD GET ALL THAT MONEY SPENT.

IS PROBABLY A LITTLE BIT OF A DIFFERENT SO, BOB THE QUESTION I WOULD FOR THE POLICY QUESTION IS HOW MUCH IS THE PRESSURE THAT YOU WERE LOOKING AT? THAT NEEDS TO BE YOU. WHAT IS THE GENERAL FUND DISCREPANCY? THAT'S RIGHT, AND WHAT WE HAVE DONE. IT IS. WHEN EXECUTIVE TEAM WENT THROUGH THE BUDGET REQUESTS. WE BETTED THE BUDGET REQUEST, AND THERE WERE SOME BUDGET REQUEST. QUITE FRANKLY, THAT WE SAID WE JUST DON'T NEED THIS RIGHT NOW, AND WE JUST TOOK IT OUT ALTOGETHER.

[02:45:03]

THERE WERE OTHER BUDGET REQUESTS. THAT WE SAID, YOU KNOW , IF WE HAD MORE RESOURCES, WE MIGHT FUND THIS AND SO WHAT WE'VE DONE IN THE BACK OF YOUR BOOK. IF YOU LOOK UNDER THE APPENDIX YOU'LL SEE A WHOLE LOT OF PAGES AND IN THOSE PAGES, UH THERE'S A CREAM COLORED PAGES THAT ARE YOUR DIVIDERS AND THE DIVIDERS ARE ALL LABELED. AND THERE'S THREE CATEGORIES OF DIVIDERS. WE MAY WE VERY MUCH WANT COUNSEL TO KNOW EXACTLY WHAT WE ARE. ADDING TO THIS BUDGET SO THAT COUNCIL FEELS GOOD ABOUT THE ADDITION. AND THE THREE CATEGORIES. I'M SHOWING YOU THE NON DISCRETIONARY PACKAGE THAT WERE ADDED TO THE BUDGET. AND THEN THERE'S ANOTHER CATEGORY OF THE DISCRETIONARY. PACKET REQUESTS THAT WERE ADDED TO THE BUDGET. AND THEN THERE'S A THIRD CATEGORY OF THE DISCRETIONARY BUDGET REQUESTS THERE. WE JUST DIDN'T FEEL WE HAD SUFFICIENT. WE DIDN'T HAVE SUFFICIENT RESOURCES TO FUND IN THE GENERAL FUND, AND SO COUNCIL CAN LOOK THROUGH. THESE CATEGORIES AND EACH SECTION HAS A SUMMARY OF ALL THE ITEMS IN THAT SECTION, AND THEN IN THE SAME ORDER RIGHT BEHIND IT. IS THE DETAIL SHEETS FILLED OUT BY THE INDIVIDUAL DEPARTMENTS TALKING ABOUT WHY THIS REQUEST IS NEEDED. AND WHAT THE EFFECT WOULD BE IF IT WAS NOT FUNDED, AND SO WE'RE TRYING TO PROVIDE COUNSEL AS MUCH INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE TO ASSESS THE HOMEWORK FOR THE COUNCIL IS AT OUR NEXT MEETING WILL BE ABLE TO MAKE THIS DECISION OR AND WE'LL HAVE A FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING. IN BETWEEN, WE WILL HAVE A FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING. THE FINANCE COMMITTEE LOVES TO MEET THERE, SO I THINK YOU'D BE DISAPPOINTED IF WE 7 A.M. MR. COTTON WOULD LOVE THAT. YEAH SO AT ANY RATE WILL HAVE FINANCE COMMITTEE AND WE'RE PLANNING TO SEE IP SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING ALSO SO THAT. C I P COMMITTEE CAN COME BACK AND AGAIN, THEY CAN, UH, SAY WE? WE NEED EVERY BIT OF THAT 8.5 MILLION, OR WE CAN GIVE SOME OF IT UP OR WE NEED MORE AND THEN WORKING WITH FINANCE COMMITTEE, SO I WOULD PROBABLY RECOMMEND C I P COMMITTEE MEETING FIRST. FOLLOWED BY FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING. OKAY CAN I ASK ANOTHER QUESTION? UM IN REGARDS TO THE JUST THE GENERAL FUND SUMMARY, SINCE WE'RE STILL TALKING ABOUT THAT. THERE'S A THERE'S A LINE IN THERE FOR THE NON RECURRING ONE TIME EXPENDITURES. IT'S A DRAWDOWN OF LIKE 3.2 MILLION LITTLE MORE. UM AND I THINK IT BRINGS OUR RESERVE BALANCE UP TO ZERO. YOU KNOW, AS FAR AS THE EXCESS. WHAT'S REQUIRED WHAT'S REQUIRED. WHAT ARE THOSE THESE DISCRETIONARY ITEMS OR IS THAT JUST MORE OF LIKE A GENERIC BUCKET? WELL WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE SUMMARY SHEETS AND THE TABS THAT I SHOWED YOU THERE'S TWO COLUMNS. AND ONE COLUMN IS NET ONE TIME, SO THAT'S THE NON RECURRING COLUMN. THEN THE NET RECURRING. AND THEN YOU'LL SEE THE TOTAL COST OF THAT PARTICULAR LINE ITEM. AS A COMBINATION OF BOTH RECURRING AND NON RECURRING, AND SO THEN WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SHEET IT SHOWS YOU THE TOTAL FOR BOTH NON RECURRING AND RECURRING FOR EACH ONE OF THOSE ITEMS, SO IT IS A DISCRETIONARY ITEMS AND YES, OKAY, COMPONENT. IT'S IN. YES IT'S IN BOTH NONDISCRETIONARY AND DISCRETION , AREAS OF COMPONENTS SO YOU CAN LOOK AT THAT. AND STAFF. OF COURSE, WE MADE OUR BEST JUDGMENT BASED ON THE STRATEGIC VISION OF THE COUNCIL AND WHAT WE'VE NO COUNSEL TO HAVE HIS PRIORITIES, BUT WE MAY HAVE PUT SOME THINGS IN THE COUNCIL. SAYS YOU KNOW, WE'RE NOT SO SURE WE NEED THAT AND YOU CAN TAKE IT OUT. WE WANT TO BE TOTALLY TRANSPARENT IN TERMS OF THE CHANGES BEING MADE TO THE BUDGET THIS YEAR. CAN YOU TELL ME WHERE YOU MENTIONED THAT? SOME OF THE THINGS YOU GUYS WERE MOVING OVER TO CAPITAL PROJECTS THAT WERE IN THE JUST BACK REGULAR BUDGET REQUEST. WHERE ARE THOSE EXTRA ITEMS? I DIDN'T SEE IT ON THE CAPITAL PERMIT PROGRAM. UH, UH WHAT I DIDN'T HIS I'VE SEEN. THAT'S WHAT YOU WANT US TO CONSIDER THE LISTED WE WOULD PUT TOGETHER AS PACKET. THAT. AND I THINK IT'S IN IS IT IN THE ITEMS

[02:50:06]

NOT FUNDED. HE SAID THAT THERE WAS SOME PROJECTS THAT WERE REQUESTED IN THE BUDGET. AND STUFF, BUT THEY WANTED TO MOVE INTO CAPITAL. WHICH IS NOT. THE PAGES SHOULD BE NUMBER CONVICTION. GOTCHA. COUNCILMAN, RIGHT? YEAH, BOB, THANKS. SO ON THE THIRD MANILA SECTION. AND. I HAVEN'T HAD A CHANCE BECAUSE WE JUST GOT THESE PACKETS UPDATED TO YOU KNOW, BEFORE THESE AT THE LAST MINUTE, SO I GUESS MY QUESTION IS ON THE THIRD SECTION WHERE YOU'VE GOT DISCRETION, RIGHT? YOU GOT DISCRETIONARY PACKAGES NOT FUNDED. IS ALL THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION BEHIND THIS LAST MANILA ALL THE ITEMS THAT WERE NOT BECAUSE IT'S A ONE PAGER. HISTORICALLY. IT'S BEEN A LOT LARGER AND THERE'S ADDITIONAL LINE. I'M HOPING THEY PUT THE RIGHT PACKAGE BECAUSE I'VE GOT ONE PAGE FROM MY MANILA FUNDED DUE TO BUDGET CONSTRAINTS. AND THEN ON MY PACKAGE. WE HAVE THE SUMMARY SHEET. AND THEN WE HAVE ALL THE INDIVIDUAL ITEMS, OKAY? DID YOU GET THAT? OKAY SO I DO HAVE THOSE BEHIND THERE, BUT HIS. YEAH I JUST HISTORICALLY THEY'VE THEY'VE BEEN LABELED LIKE NOT APPROVED OR NOT. AND THOSE ARE DUE TO BUDGET REQUESTS AGAIN. WE DIDN'T EVEN SHOW THE COUNCIL. THOSE ITEMS THAT WE JUST PULLED BECAUSE WE THINK THERE ARE LOWER PRIORITY THAN THESE. OKAY I JUST I'M TRYING TO MAP IT TO THE OTHER. FOUR BUDGETS I'VE SEEN AND. TYPICALLY TO HAVE SOME WATERMARK ON THERE THAT WAS NOT APPROVED AND KIND OF SEGREGATED OUT. SO YOU'VE GOT A SUMMARY PAGE AND THEN ALL THE OTHER ONES JUST GAVE YOU THE SUMMARY PAGE.

AND THEN THE INDIVIDUAL DETAILS SHEETS. TALKING ABOUT EACH ONE OF THOSE ITEMS. THANK YOU. SO THE BOTTOM LINE IS ON THIS PARTICULAR ITEM. THIS IS THE INITIAL PRELIMINARY BUDGET COUNCILS ARE RECEIVING A LOT OF IT RIGHT NOW, AND IT'LL BE HOMEWORK FOR EVERYBODY TO GO THROUGH IT ABSOLUTELY AND TO LET YOU KNOW I'M WE CALL THIS A PRELIMINARY BUDGET RATHER THAN THE PROPOSED BUDGET. BECAUSE ONLY THE COUNCIL CAN PROPOSE A BUDGET. THIS IS A STAFF DOCUMENT RIGHT NOW. COUNCIL. HAS TO DECIDE THAT THAT WE'RE GOING TO GO FORWARD WHICH YOU'RE CHRIS'S ITEMS COMING UP. BUT RIGHT NOW IT'S A PRELIMINARY BUDGET AND THEN AS COUNCIL PROVIDES FEEDBACK, ETCETERA, WE WILL COME UP WITH A BUDGET THAT WILL BE PART OF THE PUBLIC HEARINGS, WHICH WILL BE THE PROPOSED THANK YOU. THE OTHER THING TO ALEX MENTIONED THE COUNCIL THAT YOU KNOW, CERTAINLY YOU'RE GETTING A LOT OF INFORMATION TONIGHT AND OVER THE WEEKEND AND BOB AND CHRIS AND MYSELF, AND ANY OF OUR STAFF WILL BE HAPPY TO SIT DOWN ANY ONE OF YOU TO GO THROUGH THIS. PAGE BY PAGE BY THEM, YOU KNOW, JUST TO GO THROUGH IT AND HELP YOU UNDERSTAND AND WHERE THINGS ARE COMING AND WHERE THEY'RE GOING. SO I WOULD ASK THE COUNCIL IF WE'RE GOING TO IF YOU ARE SCHEDULING THAT TRY AND GRAB A TEAMMATE SO THAT YOU CAN THEY CAN KNOCK A COUPLE OF US OUT AT THE TIME RATHER THAN THAT WOULD BE GREAT AND THAT'S A THAT'S A FANTASTIC WAY TO DO IT AND WE'LL WALK YOU THROUGH. ANY ANY OF THESE PARTICULAR ITEMS AND IF YOU HAVE FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS THAT YOU WANT TO ASK. PLEASE JUST EMAIL ME EMAIL MARIO AND WE WILL GET THAT LIGHTS ARE SHUT OFF, BOB. AH YEAH. THE LIGHTS TURNED OFF OUT OF THERE. SO IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ON THAT AGENDA ITEM 11? ALL RIGHT, THEN WE'LL MOVE ON TO AGENDA ITEM. 12 WAS I FAST ENOUGH, MAYOR? UH THANK YOU WERE GETTING GETTING THERE ON THE NEXT. THE NEXT FIVE ITEMS ARE COULD ALL BE ONE PARTICULAR ITEM, AND CHRIS IS GOING TO PRESENT THEM. ALL THAT ONCE AND THEN WE'LL VOTE ON THEM INDIVIDUALLY THAT CORRECT THAT'S THE WAY I UNDERSTAND. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, MAYOR AND PROSPER TOWN COUNCIL. UM THE FIRST ITEM THAT WE HAVE ON HERE IS THE RECEIVING OF THE TAX WORKSHEET. AND ON THERE. THE TWO MAIN RATES THAT YOU NEED TO BE CONCERNED

[02:55:06]

WITH ARE THE NO NEW REVENUE RATE OF THE 0.44816 AND THEN THE VOTER APPROVAL RATE OF 0.51. NO NEW REVENUE RATE IS SIMPLY THE RATE THAT WOULD NEED TO BE ADOPTED TO GENERATE THE SAME AMOUNT OF REVENUE GIVEN THE SAME PROPERTY. UM THE CALCULATION YOU EXCLUDES THE IMPACT OF NEW PROPERTY IN THE NO NEW REVENUE RATE AND ALSO THE IMPACT FROM THE THURSDAY DISTRICTS. FOR THE VOTER APPROVAL RATE. THAT'S SIMPLY ALLOWABLE GROWTH OF 3.5% ON YOUR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION SIDE OF THE TAX RATE, UH AND THEN ADDED TO THAT IS THE CALCULATED, UH, I N S RATE AND WE'RE MANDATED TO HAVE TO PASS THE UN'S RATE AS CALCULATED IN THE WORKSHEET. SO, TAKING A LOOK AT THIS. I WANTED TO COMPARE IT TO LAST YEAR. YOU SEE LAST YEAR ON THE FAR RIGHT HIM COLUMN AND THE CURRENT YEAR YOU'RE CONSIDERING IN THE MIDDLE COLUMN , AND YOU SEE THE NO NEW REVENUE RATE OF THE 0.44816 THE VOTER APPROVAL RATE OF 0.51. AND THEN I INCLUDED THE N S RATE THERE.

THE 0.177. AND THEN THE PRELIMINARY RATE. THAT'S THE RATE THAT WE USE TO BUILD. THIS PRELIMINARY BUDGET DOCUMENT IS THE 0.51. FOR I DON'T 13 IT'S RECEIVING, UM, THE CERTIFIED

[13. Consider and act upon an ordinance establishing the tax year 2023 certified appraisal roll.]

APPRAISAL ROLE. SO THE ACTUAL ROLE WHEN YOU INCLUDE FREEZES OVER 9 BILLION JUST OVER 9 BILLION, EXCLUDING THE FREEZE, AND THAT'S USUALLY THE EVALUATION THAT WE REFER TO IN MOST OF OUR DOCUMENTATION. THAT'S AT THE 8.3 BILLION. I DID WANT TO TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY.

WHILE WE. TO SHOW THE ENTIRE AUDIENCE THE AMOUNT THAT COMES FROM NEW PROPERTY IN THIS YEAR $888 MILLION ALL FROM NEW PROPERTY IS VERY IMPRESSIVE. ALRIGHT AND THEN REAPPRAISAL GROWTH OF 830 MILLION, WHICH IS IMPRESSES IT IMPRESSIVE ITSELF. THAT GIVES YOU THE OVERALL GROWTH RATE OF JUST UNDER 26. SO ON. ITEM 14 IS TO ACT UPON UH, THE 24 PROPERTY TAX RATE. THIS

[14. Consider and act upon a proposed FY 2023-2024 property tax rate. ]

IS NOT TO EXCEED RATE. UM. IN THIS OPPORTUNITY. I ALSO WANTED TO GIVE YOU AN OPPORTUNITY TO LOOK AT THE HISTORICAL RATE. SO ON THIS TABLE HERE I HAVE HIGHLIGHTED IN GREEN WHAT YOU'RE CONSIDERING, BUT THEN, HISTORICALLY IS THERE FOR YOUR REFERENCE. AND I FURTHER BROKEN THAT DOWN. THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF TALK ABOUT REFERENCED. THE CAPITAL. DEDICATED AMOUNT, AND SO I BROKE THAT DOWN. SO YOU CAN SEE WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE. UM FOR THE CURRENT YEAR AGAIN IN GREEN . THAT'S 23 CENTS THAT GOES IN COMBINATION TO THE GENERAL FUNDING TO THE TOURIST FUNDS.

AND THEN THE NEXT COLUMN IS THE CAPITAL DEDICATED. YOU CAN SEE IT LAST YEAR. IT WAS THAT 11 2 CENTS, AND THIS YEAR IS BEING CONSIDERED IT 10. 0.2 CENTS. THEN WE ALWAYS WANT TO DO BENCHMARKING TO SEE HOW WE STACK UP. THE BENCHMARK THAT YOU HAVE IN FRONT IS THE TAX RATE FROM THE CURRENT YEAR, NOT THE PROPOSED HERE, SO A LOT OF MUNICIPALITIES HAVE NOT RELEASED THEIR PROPOSED RATES AND TO COMPARE APPLES TO APPLES. I WANTED TO COMPARE THE ALL THE COMPLETE SET OF INFORMATION THAT I HAD FOR ONE YEAR. AND SO THIS IS FOR THE CURRENT OPERATING YEAR THAT WE'RE WORKING IN. YOU CAN SEE PROSPEROUS, HIGHLIGHTED IN RED. AND THEN I DON'T 15 WERE

[15. Consider and act upon scheduling a public hearing on the FY 2023-2024 proposed Budget. ]

REQUIRED BY STATE LAW TO HOLY PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED BUDGET. THIS WOULD BE ANNOUNCING

[16. Consider and act upon scheduling a public hearing on the proposed FY 2023-2024 tax rate. ]

THAT PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN ITEM 16 IS A PUBLIC HEARING IS REQUIRED. UM IF YOU APPROVE THE 31 CENTS BECAUSE IT EXCEEDS THE NO NEW REVENUE RATE WOULD BE ANNOUNCING THE PLACE. DATE AND TIME OF. THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND THEN A PUBLIC NOTICE WILL BE ADVERTISE IN THE FRISCO ENTERPRISE ON AUGUST 27TH QUESTION ON THAT REAL QUICK HAVE WE WITH THE NEW OF. ENTITIES

[03:00:05]

THAT ARE PUBLISHING HERE. WE CHANGED ANY OF OUR NEWSPAPER RECORDS. FROM PUBLIC NOTICE.

AND THE OTHER ONE IS DALLAS MORNING NEWS. RIGHT? THAT WE CANNOT USE THE OTHER TWO LOCAL COMMUNITY IMPACT AND, UH ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. OKAY CAN I? BECAUSE THAT ALL THESE, THAT'S ALL OF THESE PARTICULARS? IT IS NOW WE CAN DISCUSS AND THEN WE'LL TAKE MOTIONS ON EACH ONE OF THEM. UM IN REGARDS TO THE HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION INCREASE THAT WE PASSED. HOW DOES THAT AFFECT THE RATE CALCULATIONS AND TAX. SO THAT'S GOING TO ACTUALLY INCREASE THAT FREES PORTION THAT WASN'T INCLUDED ON THE SLIDE, BUT IT'S INCLUDED IN THAT 9 BILLION TOTAL NUMBER. OKAY BUT IS IT DOES IT AFFECT THE ACTUAL, UM, CALCULATION ON THE WORKSHEET FOR THE RATES DOES FOR THE VOTER APPROVAL RATE. IT DOES NOT IMPACT THE NO NEW REVENUE, OKAY? THANK YOU. VERY COMPLICATED.

WORKSHEET. YES I WENT THROUGH IT ALL STILL. OH REALLY? YEAH THAT THAT WAS VERY MUCH OKAY. WE'LL

[12. Consider and act upon accepting submission of the tax year 2023, fiscal year 2023- 2024, no-new-revenue tax rate of $0.448160 per $100 taxable value and the voterapproval tax rate of $0.51 per $100 taxable value.]

GO BACK TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 12, WHICH IS THE UH, NO NEW REVENUE REVENUE TAX RATES SO WE WOULD NEED TO HAVE A MOTION. ON ITEM NUMBER, 12 ANYONE YOU'D LIKE TO MAKE A. 0.4. WE HAVE MOTION BY CRAIG ONDERS SECOND BY JEFF HODGES ALL IN FAVOR. THE MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT AGENDA ITEM NUMBER. 13 IS CONSIDERING ACT UPON THE ORDINANCE FOR THE 2023 CERTIFIED TAX APPRAISAL RULE IS THAT EMOTION ON THAT? I'M LOOKING AT COUNTER WOMAN, BARTLEY OR TURN DOWN THE DIRECTION. THANK YOU TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE TAX YEAR 2023 CERTIFIED APPRAISAL ROLE. SECONDED BY CHRIS CURRAN ALL IN FAVOR. DAMI CAPACITY UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. GEN ITEM 14 IS TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON THE PROPOSED BY 2023 2024 PROPERTY TAX RATE.

OKAY, MOTION. LET ME READ THAT AGAIN. SORRY, GUYS. I MOVED TO PLACE A PROPOSAL TO ADOPT FISCAL YEAR 2023 2024 TAX RATE ON 51 CENTS PER $100 EVALUATION ON THE SEPTEMBER 12TH 2023 TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA. SECOND WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND ALL IN FAVOR. NOT TO EXCEED 51 CENTS FOR THE MUSIC CORRECT JUST ON THE INTENTION, OKAY? I'M SORRY. COUNCILMAN HODGE IS 4004. I AM FOR THE PROPOSAL FOR NOT TO EXCEED. YES. I MEAN, YES. THAT MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY ALSO, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AH NEXT ITEM IS 15 TO SCHEDULE CONSIDERING ACT UPON SCHEDULE. THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR FY 2023 PROPOSED BUDGET. I MOVED TO SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE F I 23 24 PROPOSED BUDGET FOR SEPTEMBER 12TH 2023 AT 6 15. WITH THE MEETING TAKING PLACE IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OR PROSPER TOWN HALL. LOOK AT IT AT 2 50 WEST FIRST STREET PROSPER TEXAS MOTION. SECOND BY COUNCILMAN WOMAN BARTLEY ALL IN FAVOR. THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NOT TO EXCEED SEPTEMBER, 12TH OKAY? AND THEN THE LAST ITEM FOR HIS ITEMS 16 TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON SCHEDULE. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED FY 2023 2024 TAX RATE. I MOVED TO SET THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED TAX RATE FOR SEPTEMBER. 12 2023 AT 6 15. PM WITH THE MEETING TAKING PLACE IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF PROSPER TOWN HALL, LOCATED AT 250 WEST FIRST STREET PROSPER

[03:05:08]

TEXANS MOTION BY COUNCILMAN HODGES. THINK ABOUT COUNCILMAN BARCLAY ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY ALSO, THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANKS, CHRIS. THANK YOU. I'M SORRY. THE BUDGET ON HOLIDAY THE END OF THE MONTH. AND THAT'S OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. SAME STOP. OKAY JUST MAKING SURE I DID. I DID HEAR YOU SAY THAT. SO WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THE MEETING TONIGHT. WE'RE GONNA HAVE THE C I P COMMITTEE MEETING OF FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING. WE'LL HAVE A COUNCIL MEETING ON THE 22ND TOWN HALL IN 31ST. RIGHT. AND THEN THE PROPOSED BUDGET WILL BE INCLUDE THOSE ITEMS RECOMMENDED BY THE COMMUNITIES. THAT WILL THAT THE FULL COUNCIL CAN CONSIDER AND.

[17. Discuss and consider Town Council Subcommittee reports. ]

DISCUSS CONSIDER THE TOWN COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS THE SEE EC MET SO AND I KNOW JEFF WAS REPRESENTED THERE. WE HAD WE HAD THE MAYOR'S YOUTH COUNCIL. WE HAD, UH YES, UM THE I CAN GET THIS. THANK YOU. OH, YES. THE NEW PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THANK YOU, CHRIS PERRY. YEAH.

YES, I WAS THERE THAT WE DID DO THAT. YES SO THE END MY REALITY WAS THAT THE C E C WAS VERY THRILLED. TO BUY THE PROPOSAL FOR THE MAYOR USE MAYOR'S YOUTH COUNCIL AND BY OH, CPAC. I BELIEVE IS THE OTHER EVENT, WHICH. POSSIBLY YES. SO STUDENT BROUGHT FORWARD A PROPOSAL THAT GATE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT COMMITTEE WAS ABSOLUTELY THRILLED WITH HIS PRESENTATION, AND THERE'LL BE MORE TO COME ON ALL OF THAT. SO THE LEGISLATIVE SUBCOMMITTEE MET COUNCIL MEN AREN'T ANDRES AND I AND ROBIN WE GOT A FULL REPORT AND. THE H O A COMMITTEE MEETING ON THURSDAY.

MORE H O A PRESIDENT'S MEETING ON THURSDAY MORNING, YOU WILL HEAR MORE FROM REPRESENTING MATT SHAHEEN IF ANYONE WISHES TO ATTEND IN TERMS OF LEGISLATIVE UPDATES. WITH THAT. DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY OTHER SUBCOMMITTEE ITEMS? I'M SORRY. YES, THANK YOU. OKAY NEXT AGENDA ITEM IS

[ Possibly direct Town staff to schedule topic(s) for discussion at a future meeting]