Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[1. Call to Order / Roll Cal]

[00:00:05]

PROSPER PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION. THE MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER AT 604. ALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT, EXCLUDING COMMISSIONER PETTIS. AND COMMISSIONER DANIELS WHO LET US KNOW IN ADVANCE. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION. THOSE WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION MUST COMPLETE THE PUBLIC COMMENT REQUEST FORM LOCATED IN THE TOWN WEBSITE ON THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS.

IF YOU'RE ATTENDING IN PERSON. PLEASE SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD CHAIR OR STAFF MEMBER PRIOR TO THE MEETING. AND CALLED UPON PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM STATE YOUR NAME. AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. ITEM NUMBER TWO. THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. IT IS.

[CONSENT AGENDA]

NUMBER THREE IS OUR CONSENT AGENDA. WE HAVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. THREE A. THREE J. AT THIS TIME, I WOULD ASK IF THERE'S ANY COMMISSIONERS THEY WOULD LIKE TO PULL AN ITEM FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. TAKE YOUR TIME. IF NOT. THERE WE GO. I WOULD. I WOULD LIKE TO PULL THREE J. I COULD AND THEN HAD A COMMENT OR I WANTED TO MAKE ON THREE. A. I DON'T NEED TO PULL IT, BUT I NEVER COMMENT IF YOU WANTED TO PULL IT FOR THE COMMENT SO, DAVID, IF WE WANT TO PULL THREE J AND MAKE A COMMENT ON THREE A HOW SHOULD WE PROCEED? UM AND THEN WE WOULD RESPECT THE MOTION FOR THE REST OF THE ITEMS AND THEN WE WOULD THEN PRESENT ON DJ YOU WANT TO MAKE YOUR COMMENT FOR 38? UM THREE A ACCESS. IT'S THREE B THREE B. UH THIS IS ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAN. SHAWNEE TRAIL EDITION. I JUST JUST TO COMMENT ON THERE. I NOTICED THAT, UH, IN THE IT'S AS PART OF THE PLAN. I KNOW IT'S SUBJECT TO THE NAMES OF THE STREETS. BUT ONE OF THE NAMES OF THE STREETS THEY HAD IS A CONTINUATION OF ANOTHER ONE. THAT'S UM MIND IF I CAN. KARA LEAH IS THAT THE WAY IT IS DID YOU FIND THAT? I JUST WENT AND IT WAS A CONTINUATION OF ANOTHER STREET THAT'S ALREADY IN EXISTENCE, FERNWOOD I JUST I JUST WANT TO MAKE EXPRESSES AN OPINION THAT I THINK WE SHOULD NOT NECESSARILY BE CHANGING STREET NAMES THAT ARE ON BETTER CONTIGUOUS LIKE THAT. THEY SHOULD BE THE CONSISTENT NAMES, SO I REALIZED IT WILL BE APPROVING THAT SUBJECT TO THE NAMING THE STREETS LATER, BUT I THINK THAT WE SHOULD BE MAKING SURE THOSE NAMES ARE CONSISTENT.

WHICHEVER ONE IS THE SAME ONE. THAT WE PICKED OKAY, FULLY NOTED. SO THE MOTION WAS TO MOVE . UM, ITEM TJ TO THE REGULAR AGENDA, AND SO WE WOULD EXPECT THE MOTION FROM THE OFFICE FOR THE REST OF THE ITEMS. YOU CAN DO THE FIRST MOTION SO YOU WOULD YOU WOULD PROVE ITEMS 38333.

REACT AND THREE I THANK YOU. I MOVE THAT WE APPROVED CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. THREE A 33 I AND PULL ONE THAT YOU WANT. THREE J. FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION. YOU GET A SECOND. SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR. RAISE YOUR HAND. MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. SO FOR THE ONE THAT HE PULLED. IS THERE

[3j. Consider and act upon a request for a Site Plan for a Public School, on 85.5± acres, located on the southeast corner of West First Street and South Teel Parkway. The property is zoned Planned Development-48 (PD-48) Grey Tract 163. (DEVAPP-23- 0065)]

SOMETHING YOU CAN DO IT? YES. THANK. THREE. AJ YES. SCOPE. SO THIS ITEM IS FOR THREE J. UM THIS IS THE SITE PLAN FOR THAT SHOWS A 550,875. SQUARE FOOT FOR PROSPER IS HIGH SCHOOL NUMBER FOUR. UM, THERE IS A AROUND 75,000 MULTI PURPOSE BUILDING WITH OUTDOOR FIELD PRACTICE FACILITIES. UM AS SHOWN ON THE PRESENTATION IN FRONT OF YOU. AS WELL AS THERE IS A LIVING SCREEN

[00:05:03]

REQUESTS. WE DON'T REALLY GET TOO MANY OF THESE. AND THEN THE LAST ONE WE GOT WAS A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO. UM BUT MORE SPECIFICALLY, ANYTIME THERE IS A NONRESIDENTIAL ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL WE DO REQUIRE SOME SORT OF SOLID WOOD FENCE. AND SO THE LIVING SCREEN IS REQUESTS.

UM FOR INSTEAD OF A SOLID WOOD FENCE, THE LIVING SCREEN IS GOING TO BE IN PLACE. THERE IS AN EXISTING WORD FENCE THAT WAS REQUIRED BY THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SUBDIVISION FOR PARKS THAT LEGACY UH, THIS LIVING VERSUS SCREENING REQUESTS CONSISTS OF THE NELLIE R.

STEVENS 6 FT. 4 TO 5 FT ON CENTERS AND THEN 7 TO 8 FT IN HEIGHT WITHIN THE 15 FT LANDSCAPE, BUFFER AND AGAIN, THIS IS ON THE EASTERN PROPERTY SIDE. AND STAFFERS OF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE LIVING SCREEN REQUESTS AS WELL AS THE ITEM FOR THE SITE PLAN. UM AGAIN, WE TRY TO AVOID A DOUBLE LOSS SITUATION WHEN IT COMES TO A WORD FENCE. SO THAT WAY IT REDUCES, YOU KNOW, RODENTS REDUCES ANY OF THE LANDSCAPING THAT GROWS BETWEEN THE DOUBLE WALLS AND STILL WITH THIS IN MIND. UM AGAIN STATED, WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE LINEAGE RESCREEN REQUESTS, UM, AS WELL AS THE SITE PLAN. I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MR CHAIRMAN. I AM JUST A QUESTION AND I AGREE. I DON'T WANT I DON'T THINK THERE SHOULD BE A DOUBLE WALL HERE. BUT FIRST OF ALL, QUESTION IS DO WE HAVE ANY FEEDBACK FROM THE NEIGHBORS? UH, FROM THE NEIGHBORING NEIGHBORHOOD OVER THERE. DO THEY WANT A LIVING SCREEN WALL? OR THEY PREFERRING THE A SO ARE OUR ZONING ORDINANCE DOESN'T REQUIRE ANY NOTIFICATION. UM, OF LIVING SCREEN. I KNOW WE DID RECEIVE A PHONE CALL ABOUT, UM, YOU KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON ON THE SITE? AS WELL AS, UM, YOU KNOW, I THINK IT WAS THE PROPERTY. UH, JUST RIGHT HERE AROUND WHERE THE MOUSE IS. AND SO WE DID ASK, YOU KNOW, THEY DID ASK ABOUT SOME QUESTIONS. BUT AGAIN, WE DON'T HAVE ANY NOTIFICATION ABOUT THE LIVING SCREEN. WE TYPICALLY, UH , LOOKED AT A LOT OF OTHER PRS DECIDES, ESPECIALLY ALONG ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL UM, JUST TO SEE, YOU KNOW, LOOKING AT THE SAME LANDSCAPING AND MAKING SURE THAT THERE'S NO ISSUES BUT WE SO THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH SORT OF THE LIVING SCREEN THAT WE HAVE OTHER PTSD SCHOOLS, BUT AS FAR AS WE DON'T NOTIFY ANY OF THE LIVING SCREEN. UM LIKE A VARIANCE OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT TO THE TWO NO NEIGHBORING RESIDENTS. WHAT? WHAT CONCERNS ME ABOUT THIS A LITTLE BIT. IS THAT WHAT THE PLANT THAT'S BEING PROPOSED HERE? ALL OF THEM. PRACTICE FIELDS PLAYING FIELDS RIGHT THERE NEXT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. UM, WHICH WOULD MAKE. VANESSA CITY FOR A GOOD WALL BETWEEN THEM TO BE, I THINK TO BE MUCH MORE IMPORTANT. I DON'T KNOW ANOTHER I KNOW. YOU SAID WE HAD LIVING SCREENS AND OTHER SCHOOLS SITUATIONS, BUT I DON'T KNOW IF THEY HAVE TENNIS COURTS AND PRACTICE FIELD JUST RIGHT BEHIND THEM. I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY FEET THERE IS. IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE VERY MUCH. I JUST I JUST THINK IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT THAT THE NEIGHBORS HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF AN INPUT INTO THIS. AND ALSO JUST A QUESTION. UM I DON'T WANT THE DOUBLE WALL EITHER. BUT IS THERE NOT ANY MECHANISM BY WHICH THE EXISTING WOODEN FENCE COULD BE REPLACED WITH THE SOLID MASONRY WALL. UM SO WE, I MEAN, YEAH, THE APPLICANT THAT'S REQUESTING , UM, COULD WORK WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. TO SORT OF REPLACED. YOU KNOW, INSTEAD OF A DOUBLE LAW, THEY WORK WITH EACH INDIVIDUAL, BUT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WHAT 10 10 OR 15 NEIGHBORS. UM AND SO THEY COULD ESSENTIALLY, YOU KNOW, GET A LETTER AND WORK WITH THEM SO THAT THEY AVOID THE DOUBLE WALL AND AGAIN. I KNOW, UM TO TALK ABOUT SOME OF THE CONCERNS, MAYBE OF THE PROXIMITY FOR THE PRACTICE FIELDS. UM YOU KNOW, WE DO HAVE A VERY STRICT LIGHTNING ORDINANCE. UM, THAT DOES ALLOW 0.25, WHICH IS THE MINIMUM FOR RESIDENTIAL SO AT THE TIME OF A BUILDING PERMIT THEY DO REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A PHOTO METRIC SURVEY TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S NO LIGHT POLLUTION FROM THOSE PRACTICE FILMS AS WELL AS ANY NOISE IF THERE'S A NOISE ISSUE DURING, UM THE NIGHT HOURS. UM THERE'S LIKE A LATE PRACTICE FACILITY OR LATE PRACTICE FIRST FOR THE STUDENTS. UM YOU KNOW, WE WOULD LOOK AT AS SORT OF A SOUND NUISANCE AND JUST MAKE SURE THAT THEY'RE FOLLOWING ALL OF THE TOWN AND PROSPER DON'T REQUIREMENTS, SO I JUST WANTED TO MENTION THAT TO EVERYONE HERE. UM AND I KNOW, UM WE DO HAVE A 60 FT BUILDING SETBACKS ALONG THE EASTERN SIDE, HOWEVER

[00:10:03]

, UM, I THINK THE PRACTICE FACILITIES WAS ABOUT MAYBE ANYWHERE FROM 15 TO 30 FT, AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. UM IT LOOKS LIKE THE TIME SPORTS WERE MORE ABOUT 30 TO 35. BUT PRACTICE FACILITIES LOOK LIKE THEY'RE AROUND 15 AND 30 BECAUSE WE DO HAVE A 15 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER. SO AGAIN. I'M SORRY. UM . 15 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER THAT'S SEPARATE FROM WHAT THE SCREENING WALL OR THE LIVING ROOM WOULD REQUIREE A 15 FT LANDSCAPE BUFFALO THAT HAS A SEPARATE REQUIREMENT. IT'S NOT LIKE A DOUBLE DIP. SO THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WE REQUIRE A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TREES. UM I THINK IN THE STAFF REPORT, I PROVIDED A SNIPPET OF SORT OF YOU CAN SEE THAT THE TREES THAT ARE THERE AND THEN THE SHRUBS ARE PART OF THE NEARLY ART STEVENS ARE PART OF THE LIVING SCREEN REQUESTS. SO IT IS A SEPARATE REQUIREMENT. GOOD FOR YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STUFF. HERE. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM THREE. J.

NOW THAT WE HAVE CLARIFICATION. MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM. THREE J. MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER HARRIS. SO I GET A 2ND 2ND. PROMOTION FROM MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER RAISE ALL IN FAVOR. CARRIES 4 TO 1. MOTION APPROVED. CITIZEN COMMENTS. THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ADDRESS THE POINTING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON ANY TOPIC. HOWEVER THE COMMISSION IS UNABLE TO DISCUSS OR TABLE ACTION. TAKE ACTION ON ANY TOPIC NOT LISTED ON THIS AGENDA. PLEASE COMPLETE THE PUBLIC. COMMENT REQUEST FOR AND PRESENTED TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE MEETING. AND DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS? NOPE. MOVE ON TO OUR REGULAR AGENDA. REGULAR AGENDA

[4. Conduct a Public Hearing, and consider and act upon a request to rezone 69.9± acres from Agriculture (A), a portion of Planned Development-40 (PD-40), and a portion of Single Family-12.5 (SF-12.5) to Planned Development-Single Family (PD-SF), generally to allow for a residential development and retirement housing development, located on the southeast corner of Prosper Trail and Teel Parkway. (Z21-0010)]

ITEM NUMBER FOUR. CONDUCT THE PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERED ACT UPON A REQUEST TO REZONE 69.9, PLUS ACRES FROM AGRICULTURAL PORTION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. 40 P D. THEY ASKED 40 A PORTION OF SINGLE FAMILY 12.5 SF 12.5 TO PLANT SINGLE FAMILY P D S F GENERATOR ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND RETIREMENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PROSPECT TRAIL UNTIL PARKWAY. Z 21.0010. STAFF. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. UM THE APPLICANT AS YOU RECALL, UM, APPLICATION WAS ORIGINALLY TABLED ON THE APRIL 18TH MEETING EARLIER THIS YEAR. UM THE APPLICANT DID REVISE THE CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT DUE TO SOME OF THE CONCERNS FROM ARTEMISIA. AND, UM, IT WAS TABLED AGAIN AT THE MAY 16TH 2023 MILLION MEETING. UM SINCE THEN, THE APPLICANT HAS MADE MODIFICATIONS TO COMPLETELY REMOVE THE RETIREMENT HOUSING TRACT. IF YOU'LL RECALL, THERE ARE SORT OF TWO TRACKS THAT WE HAD ON THIS LAND. UM TRACK ONE, TRACK TWO. NOW IT'S ALL GOING TO BE RESIDENTIAL. AND SO, UM, UH, SO THEY DID REMOVE THAT MODIFICATION OF THE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. WE DID KEEP THE SAME LANGUAGE OF THE, UM, AGENDA BECAUSE WE DIDN'T NOTICE IT LIKE THAT. UM BUT JUST WANTED TO KIND OF WALK YOU THROUGH. SO AGAIN, UM, THESE WERE ALL CONSISTS OF LOCKS STARTING AT MINIMUM 10,000 SQUARE FEET. UM THE APPLICANTS PROPOSING 100 AND 70 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS DETACHED LOTS, WHICH THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ARTS WITH DENSITY IS 2.3 LOTS PER ACRE. IN THIS PRESENTATION DID PROVIDE SORT OF A COMPARISON OF WHAT WAS RS OF 10 BASED ZONING DISTRICT THAT WE HAVE IN THE TOWN OF PROSPER. AND WHAT THEY'RE PROVIDED IN THEIR NEW PLAN DEVELOPMENT. AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE'S REALLY NOT A BIG MODIFICATION FROM RSF 10. I CAN 0.1 OUT WHICH IS THE MINIMUM DWELLING ACRE OR AREA. I'M SORRY. UM ARE KIND OF PROSPER REQUIREMENT IS 1800 SQUARE FEET. THEY DID GO ABOVE THAT TO 2400 SQUARE FEET FOR THE MINIMUM DWELLING AREA. UM OF COURSE, THERE'S THIS LITTLE A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT, UM, PROVISIONS, BUT MAJORITY OF IT IS GOING TO FOLLOW OUR SF 10. UM AS FAR AS

[00:15:05]

FOR MATERIALS, THEY DID REMOVE THAT FROM THE EXHIBIT. THEY ARE FOLLOWING OUR TOWN AND PROSPER REQUIREMENTS, WHICH IS SHOWN IN THE COMPARISON TABLE CHART IN FRONT OF YOU. THE APPLICANT WILL ENTER A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THOSE, UM, EXPERIENCE CEREALS TO LOCK IN. UM YOU KNOW, THE VOTING MATERIALS FOR 100% MADE THREE UM, IN ADDITION TO THE SOME OF THE DEVIATIONS FROM THE SF 10, THE APPLICANT DIGITS PROVIDE THAT IT IS GOING TO BE A GATED, UM AND PRIVATE SUBDIVISION AND UM. THE OTHER THING I WANTED TO TALK ABOUT WAS THE FROM OUR LAST MEETING. WE HAD A FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT. UM. THAT THAT WAS SUBMITTED AS WELL. STAFF HAS REANALYZED THE REQUESTS AND SINCE THEY REMOVED THE, UM, APARTMENT OR THE RETIREMENT HOUSING AND PROVIDED THE DENSITY TO FIT IN THE RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY. UM, STAFF WAS OKAY WITH MOVING FORWARD. AND THE CONFORMANCE OF THE ZONING REQUEST DOES MEET THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, SO THAT'S WHY THERE IS NO FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT IN THIS ITEM. UM WITH THAT BEING SAID, UM, WE DID ATTACH THE REPLY FORMS. UM THAT WERE SUBMITTED AND THE ORIGINAL CONTENT OR THE ORIGINAL ZONING REQUESTS. UM WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY ADDITIONAL REPLY FORMS FROM ANYONE, UM AND OTHER THAN THAT STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS WRONG ON YOUR REQUEST, AND I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU ALL MIGHT HAVE, AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE AS WELL. DAVID ONLY QUESTION. I HAD PROBABLY AN EASY ONE, BUT JUST NOMENCLATURE THAT SAYS MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 10 10,000 SQUARE FEET, BUT THE S SINGLE FAMILY ORIGINAL ZONING WRITERS. THAT'S A 12.5 MY UNDERSTANDING THAT RIGHT ARE THEY? ARE WE NOT GOING BELOW? FROM THE MEDIUM DENSITY. YES SO ? SO THAT WAS THE WHOLE CONVERSATION THAT WE'VE HAD IN THE PAST ABOUT SORT OF THE DIFFERENT ALLOWANCE FOR WOOD SONG RANCH. AND SO AS IT CLEARLY SAYS, THAT THE LOT SIZES NEED TO BE BETWEEN 532,000. YOU CAN HAVE A VARIATION LOT SIZES, BUT YOU NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU MEET THAT DENSITY AND SO GIVEN THAT THEY REMOVED THAT HIGHER? UM THE SENIOR LIVING, WHICH WAS SORT OF KIND OF PUT THEM ALSO AS WELL IN THEIR HIGH DENSITY. WE FEEL THAT THEY ARE MEETING THE MEDIUM DENSITY REQUIREMENTS AND AGAIN THIS IS MORE ALIGNED WITH THE, UM YOU KNOW, THEY ARE HAVING THEIR TWO POINT UH, THAT'S 2.32 DWELLING UNIT PER ACRE, WHICH FALLS UNDER THAT, UM, CRITERIA FOR THE MEDIUM DENSITY. IN THEIR EXHIBIT DID TALKS MINIMUM LOTS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET. DOESN'T THAT SAY THAT? IT SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 12 5, BUT THE SENTENCE RIGHT AFTER THAT IT TALKS ABOUT THAT A VARIATION OF LOT SIZES MAY BE PERMITTED. BUT YOU NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU MEET THIS DENSITY WITHIN THAT LOT. REMEMBER HOW WE TALKED ABOUT IN OUR LAST MEETING? HOW WINDSONG RANCH WAS, YOU KNOW WAS 6000 SQUARE FOOT LIVES. AND WE SLEPT AT STAR TRAIL THAT HAD SOME LOTS THAT ARE LOWER AGAIN. WE LOOKED AT THAT'S MORE. AND WE FOUND OUT THAT YOU KNOW THE DENSITY WAS MEETING THAT REQUIREMENT. SO WE'RE FOLLOWING WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS PER THE FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. UM WE ARE LOOKING AT WHEN WE ARE UPDATING OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO MAKE SURE WE LOOK AT THESE DEFINITIONS A LITTLE BIT MORE. UM, BUT AS OF RIGHT NOW, THAT'S WHAT WE'RE FOLLOWING. THANKS, DAVE. I'M STILL A LITTLE UNCLEAR . SO YOU'RE SAYING THAT THE SMALLEST THEY CAN GO IS 10,000 SQUARE FEET BASED ON THEIR P D YES, MINIMUMS 10,000 SQUARE FEET , WHICH IS MORE DENSITY, WHICH IS ACCORDING TO THE CRITERIA ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AGAIN. IT TALKS ABOUT HOW YOU CAN DO 12,500 TO 20,000. THAT'S THE CRITERIA. HOWEVER, YOU CAN GO.

UM A VARIATION OF LOT SIZES BECAUSE WE DID THAT ANALYSIS. OKAY WHERE 10,000 TECHNICALLY FALLS IN THE HIGH DENSITY IF WE'RE JUST LOOKING AT THE SCORE FOOTAGE OF THE OF THE SUBDIVISION. HOWEVER, THE DENSITY IS WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT MORE AND SINCE THEY REMOVED THE HIGH DENSITY OR THEY REMOVED THE RETIREMENT HOUSING WHICH WAS SORT OF KIND OF PUSHING IT MORE INTO THE HIGH DENSITY. THEY REMOVED THAT AND SO SINCE NOW THAT THEY'RE FOLLOWING THE DENSITY. WHERE FOLLOWING WHAT? AND WE'RE KEEPING AN ADDRESS RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY. I THINK THE CONFUSING PART FOR ME IS HIDING CITIES UNDER 10,000 MEDIUMS 12 5 TO 20. SO THERE'S LIKE A GAP GAP BETWEEN. YEAH, AND SO THAT AGAIN AS WE MENTIONED, WE ARE UPDATING OUR

[00:20:03]

COMPANY, AND HOPEFULLY WE CAN ADDRESS THEM ALL THOSE GAPS BECAUSE THERE'S ALSO SOMETHING THAT HAS BETWEEN OUR MEDIUM AND HIGH. THEY OVERLAP, TOO. AND SO , UM, WE DEFINITELY NEED TO FIX THAT. THE OTHER PIECE OF IT IS THE APPLICANT IT. LAST MEETING MADE A COMMENT THAT ALL OF THEIR LOTS WERE GOING TO BE 20,000 FT. AND SO THERE'S NO VARIANCE THERE WHEN HE SAYS THEY'RE GOING TO BE 10,000 FT. AND SO IT'S AND LOOKING AT LOOKING AT THE DRAWINGS. I MEAN, THERE'S SOME OF THE OUTER ONES ARE GOING TO BE VARIANT, OF COURSE. BUT THEY'RE NOT ON THE EDGES.

THEY'RE NOT. THERE'S NOT A LOT OF VARIANTS THERE. TO GET THEM. BIG ENOUGH TO GET OVER THE 12 5 AND SO. YOU KNOW, I THINK I THINK WE NEED TO BECAUSE YOU KNOW, I'M I'M THE I WAS KIND OF THE ONE THAT WAS A STICKLER ON THE HIGH DENSITY AND I'M I'M REALLY I'M I'M HAPPY WITH THE PROJECT. I WANT YOU TO UNDERSTAND THAT I AM HAPPY WITH THE PROJECT, BUT MEDIUM AND HIGH DENSITY I WANT TO. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE CRYSTAL CLEAR ON ON WHERE THAT STANDS. AND IF WE'RE IF WE'RE GOOD ON THAT. I THINK WE'RE WE'RE GOOD, BUT WE'RE JUST GONNA BE CLEAR ON IT.

AND WHERE THE NUMBERS FALL. SO. BECAUSE I JUST DON'T SEE. I DON'T SEE CUTTING OUT THE JOHN HOLMES. PUSHING HIM OVER THE 12 5 IF THAT'S WHERE OUR HIGH DENSITY OR MEDIUM DENSITY CRITERIA FALLS. RIGHT? AND MAYBE THE SLOW ONE UP HERE, SO I APOLOGIZE AGAIN. SO WHAT WE'RE SAYING IS INSTEAD OF NOW. BY REMOVING THE RETIREMENT. THE RETIREMENT HOME THE TOWN HOMES THEY'RE NOW ABLE TO HAVE LARGER LOT SIZES THAN THE 10,000 THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED. NO SO THEY'RE GOING TO STAY AT THE 10,000 MINIMUM. THEY'RE JUST GONNA BILL THAT SPACE WITH ADDITIONAL 10,000 SQUARE FOOT HOMES. YES TALKED ABOUT THE VARIANCE AND LOT SIZES AND SOME OF THE OTHER SUBDIVISIONS LIKE WIND SAW. I THOUGHT THAT THE RATIONALE WAS SOME EXCEEDED IN SOME ARE BELOW AVERAGE. IT MEANT THE 12 5 STANDARD. SO THAT WAS SORT OF THE THOUGHT PROCESS.

YEAH YOU HAD SOME THAT WERE LOWER. BUT THEN THERE WERE OTHERS THAT WERE GREATER THAN THAT. AND IF YOU AVERAGE IT OUT OVER THE SPACE, IT MET THE DENSITY REQUIREMENTS BECAUSE THE AVERAGE LOT SIZE PROBABLY EXCEEDED 25. YEAH EVERY SINGLE LOT SIZE ON THIS. AREA IS 10.

NOT TO EXCEED 10. CORRECT THAT THEY'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE 12 NOT BELOW 10. RIGHT SO THAT MEANS SO , ARE THERE. ARE THEY PLANNING ON HAVING SOME LOT SIZES? THAT WILL BE 12 5 13, PERHAPS SO THAT THE AVERAGE IS HIGHER THAN 12 5 . WE CAN REFER TO THAT TO THE TO THE APPLICANT, UM, TO SEE WHAT WHAT THEIR PLANS ARE BUT AGAIN BASED ON THEIR THEIR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, IT'S JUST GOING TO BE A MINIMUM OF 10,000. SO THEN THEN, PLEASE CORRECT ME FROM FROM WRONG AND I KNOW WE'RE GOING TO HEAR FROM THE DEVELOPERS WHO HOPEFULLY CORRECTLY. IF ALL THE LOT SIZES ARE 10,000, THEN THAT MEANS IT AVERAGES OUT TO 10,000, WHICH MEANS THAT IT FIT SQUARELY INTO HIGH DENSITY. DEFINITION NOW I THINK WHAT YOU WERE SAYING IS THAT THERE ARE OTHER OTHER CRITERION IN THAT, YES, ALLOWS IT TO STILL SQUEEZE INTO IT. BUT IT ISN'T THE LOT SIZE BECAUSE AS FAR AS THE LIFE SIZE IF WE JUST WENT ON THAT IT'S A LITTLE DENSITY. BY A GOOD BIT. THAT'S THAT'S THAT'S. THAT'S CORRECT IS THAT IT'S A LITTLE BIT OF THE LOT SIZES AS WELL AS THE DENSITY . AND SO, UM, YOU KNOW, THEY COMPLETELY REMOVED THE RESIDENTIAL TRACK AND UM, NOW THEY'RE STILL PROVIDING MINIMUM 10,000, AND WE CAN TALK TO THEM. WHAT? UH WHAT THEY'RE PLANNING TO DO, BUT BASICALLY THEY CAN COME IN ALL AT 10,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS AND SO THE AVERAGE COULD BE 10,000. BUT HOWEVER, THE DENSITY AND THE REMOVAL OF THE RETIREMENT HOUSING IS WHAT IS FOLLOWING THE. MEDIUM DENSITY THAT WAS OUTLINED AND THAT'S WHY IT'S IMPORTANT FOR US WHEN WE DO THIS COMPLAINT UPDATE TO UPDATE THAT BECAUSE IT SAYS TECHNICALLY AS COMMISSIONER JUST MENTIONED THAT BELOW 10, THOUSANDS HIGH DENSITY AND SO IT'S IT SEEMS LIKE IT'S NOT CRYSTAL CLEAR, HOWEVER, THAT SENTENCE THAT TALKS ABOUT IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT THE LOB SIZES. IT'S MORE THAN THAT. YOU NEED THE DENSITY AS WELL. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE FOLLOWING OFF OF, AND THAT'S WHY

[00:25:02]

IT'S. IT'S A LITTLE COMPLICATED . I KNOW, BUT THAT'S HOW WE'RE GETTING TO WHERE WE'RE KEEPING IT AS MEDIUM DENSITY, AND WE'RE EVERYTHING KIND OF SWITCHED FROM OUR LAST REQUEST CONFUSES ME JUST A LITTLE BIT. IS THAT THE IF THEY HIT 10,000 SQUARE FEET FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL LIFE SIZE BUT CAN STILL FALL IN THE WE ARE . SORRY HIDE, WHICH IS A MEDIUM , BUT THEY CAN STILL FALL WITHIN THE MEDIUM DENSITY RANGE OF 1.6 DWELLING UNITS TO 2.5 MILLION UNITS PER ACRE. HOW THAT HOW THOSE TWO HOW YOU CAN DO ONE AND STILL MEET THE OTHER. ONE OF THE MATH IS OFTEN ONE OF THOSE AREAS RIGHT BECAUSE THEY SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO MEET THE 1.6 TO 2.5 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. IF YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT I'M SAYING, YEAH , MAYBE SOMETHING NOW LET ME PREFACE IT BY SAYING I AGREE WITH PREVIOUSLY WITH COMMISSIONER PRIVATE PETTIS AND I THINK WE SHOULD. TROLLS ALSO MENTIONED THAT 10,000 IS A PRETTYIGH BAR FOR IDENTITY. I MEAN, THAT'S A LOT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE, SO YEAH, BUT I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THOUGH, THAT AS WE KIND OF EXPLAIN, ESPECIALLY FOR THE PUBLIC. THAT THEY UNDERSTAND EXACTLY WHY WE'RE GIVING THEM THIS DESIGNATION. WE'RE NOT JUST TRYING TO SQUEEZE OR A CIRCLE INTO A SQUARE PEG. THERE IS REAL RATIONALE. THAT MAKES SENSE, ESPECIALLY SINCE WE BROUGHT UP THE WINSTON STAR TRAIL UP. AND THIS DOESN'T DISPROVE THAT. BUT THERE ARE OTHER REASONS WHY THIS MAKES SENSE. OKAY, THANK YOU.

THAT HELPS POINT ABOUT THIS DOESN'T DISPROVE IT BECAUSE IT WAS SOLD. JUST NOW IS A SIMILAR TO WINDSONG WHEN IT'S NOT SO I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO CONTINUE, OR YOU WILL LIKE THE APPLICANT TO COME UP. WE'RE HERE FOR YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? GOT ME. YEP. THANKS, DAD. IN THE EVENING. COMMISSIONED MY NAME IS CLINT RICHARDSON ADDRESSES 10 9 50 RESEARCH ROAD. FRISCO TEXAS 75033 HERE ON BEHALF OF THE OWNER, DEVELOPER OF THE LAND PROSPER HILLS LP. AH SOME KIND OF PIECEMEAL IS DOWN. SO ONE OF THE QUESTIONS WAS THE REZONE FROM 12.5 TO 10. IF YOU LOOK AT THIS MAP CAREFUL. AND WITHDRAWING. OKAY? SO THIS BOUNDARY THIS NORTH SOUTH BOUNDARY. CONTINUES DEAD SOUTH RIGHT NOW, UH, AND I DID HEAR YOU SO THIS IS TWO DIFFERENT TRACKS OF PROPERTY OWNED BY THE SAME GROUP, ESSENTIALLY THE SAME GROUP. THEY WERE INTENDING TO DEVELOP THIS ESSENTIALLY ONE LARGE GATED COMMUNITY SO THIS TRACK TO THE EAST AND SOUND SF 12.5. SO THERE'S THIS TINY LITTLE TRIANGLE DOWN HERE. WHERE IF YOU JUST PROJECTED THAT BOUNDARY DOWN IS IN THAT CURRENT ZONING. BUT IT DIDN'T FIT INTO THE OTHER PLAN. SO THERE'S A LITTLE TRIANGLE OF LAND. IT'S GOING TO BE DID FROM ONE ENTITY TO THE OTHER VIA CONVEYANCE, PLATT AND IT'S GOING TO BE, BUT THERE IS THAT LITTLE TINY, TRIANGULAR AREA THAT'S CURRENTLY ZONES SF 12.5, WHICH IS WHY THAT'S PART OF THE REZONING CASE NOTES THAT IT'S BEING REZONED FROM 12.5 TO 10 WITH PD 10 AND THEN THE REST OF THE MAJORITY THE REST OF THE SEVENTIES SHAKERS ZONE AG, SO THAT'S WHY IT'S 22 STEP. OR TWO PIECES OF PROPERTY BEING REZONED INTO ONE COMMUNITY. UM, GOING BACK TO THE . THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN. I THINK DAVID EXPLAINED IT PRETTY WELL. THAT IT'S YES, THE MINIMUM LIGHT SIZE IS 10,000 SQUARE FOOT AND ON THIS PLAN, MANY OF THE LOTS ARE PROBABLY RIGHT AT 10,000 SQUARE FOOT, SOME IN THE CORNER. SOME OF THE ODDBALL SHAPED ONES WILL BE 11 5 WHATEVER THE NUMBER IS, BUT THE INTENT WOULD BE MOST OF THEM BE RIGHT NEAR THE TARGET OF THE 10,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS AS DAVID MENTIONED, UH, IF YOU LOOK AT THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP RIGHT NOW. I THINK THE LAST THING WE NOTED ONE OF THEM YOU NOTED THAT THE ONLY THING IN PROSPER RIGHT NOW THAT'S BROWN IS ARTEMISIA, AND THAT WAS DONE. 2012 OR EVERYONE THEY CAN'T PLAN WAS FIRST DRILLING UP. SINCE THAT TIME, LOTS OF PROPERTIES HAVE BEEN REZONED. UM YOU KNOW, STAR TRAIL AND WINSTON HAD EXISTING ZONING AT THE TIME. I CAN'T PLAN ENSURE ANY PLAN IS AN ASPIRATIONAL DOCUMENTS SAY, HEY, IF WE HAD OUR DRUTHERS, WE WOULD IS THAT WE'VE DRAWN UP ON THE BOARD, NOT TAKING ACCOUNT EXISTING ZONING. HOWEVER THOSE TRACKS HAVE BEEN REZONED OVER THE YEARS AND AT THE TIME, UH, STAFF DID NOT. BROUGHT BRING FORWARD A REDO OF THE MAP. UM TO YOUR POINT, MRS HARRIS, THAT IF YOU TOOK THE AVERAGE SQUARE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF WATTS, I WOULD BET MY HOUSE WITHOUT NO ONE TO NOT HAVING THE PLATTE DOCUMENTS RIGHT FROM THERE. THEY WOULDN'T GET CLOSE TO AVERAGING 12,500.

THEY DO HAVE SOME 20,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS. A COUPLE OF DOZEN WHATEVER THE NUMBER IS, BUT MOST OF THEM ARE IN THE 75,858,400. WHEREVER THERE, PD. THERE'S A WHOLE RANGE THEY HAVE IN THE PD.

[00:30:05]

BUT ON AVERAGE OF WINDSONG, IT'S GONNA BE WELL WELL, WELL BELOW 12,500 SQUARE FEET. SO THERE'S IF YOU WERE TO TAKE A VERY STRICT INTERPRETATION OF THE YES MENTIONED A ONE SONG AND YOUR PURPOSE AND THEIR NUMBERS AS IF YOU BUILT IT IS THAT I'VE JUST BEEN BEEN AROUND THIS NEIGHBORHOOD FOR A LONG TIME. IS THIS AN ACCURATE NUMBER? IS THIS JUST YOU JUST GOING OUT OF NUMBER? UH HAD TO SAY I DON'T HAVE OFF 27 OF THEIR PLANTS TO GO DO THIS MATH BUT LIKES THAT I FEEL BARELY COMFORTABLE ON MY OWN KNOWLEDGE AND IN MY HISTORY IN THE TOWN TO SAY YES, THEY WOULD NOT AVERAGE 12,500 SQUARE FOOT. LOTS OF ON A GROSS IF YOU LOOKED AT THE ENTIRETY OF THE WINDSONG COMMUNITY, UM BUT I THINK WHAT STAFFS INTENTION AT THE TIME OR INTERPRETATION AT THE TIME WHEN THOSE CASES BECAME REZONING, BUT IF YOU'LL GET STAR TRAIL PART OF IT'S YELLOW. IT'S OBVIOUSLY NOT ONE ACRE LOTS OVER THERE. SO AT THE TIME THAT THEY FELT LIKE THE OVERALL INTENT OF THE PD WITH A MIX OF UNITS OR DIFFERENT NODES IN DIFFERENT AREAS AND THE OVERALL DENSITY, WHICH IS DRIVEN BY OPEN SPACE, BLOOD POINT ALL THOSE THINGS THAT KIND OF GET BAKED INTO IT.

BUT IT STILL FELT FIT, MET THE INTENT OF THE MEDIUM DENSITY AND THUS STAR TRAILS, NOT BROWN ON THE MAP. WINDSONG IS NOT BROWN AND MATT PORTIONS OF THIS EMAIL. THERE'S LOTS OF NEIGHBORHOODS THAT IF YOU WENT BACK AND SAID, HEY, IF IT'S 12,499 OR LAST, IT NEEDS TO BE BROWN ON THE MAP.

MOST OF THE MAP WOULD BE BROWNED. AND THAT'S JUST KIND OF A REALITY OF THE ITERATION OF THE THING SO TO DAVID'S POINT. UH, THERE'S TWO KIND OF THINGS THERE'S A LOT SIZE, AND THEN THERE'S THE DENSITY AND YOU CAN COME AND TAKE THE DENSITY AND DO THE MATH TO THE LOT SIZE OR YOU CAN TAKE THE LOT SIZE AND DO THE METHOD OF THE DENSITY. BUT I BELIEVE THE INTENT WHEN THEY IDENTIFIED THOSE LOST SIZES AND DENSITIES OR HERE'S KIND OF GOAL AREAS. SO WITH THE FLOODPLAIN THE OPEN SPACES THAT ARE IN THIS PLAN, WE ARE THE DENSITIES WRITING THE FAIRWAY OF WHAT'S NOTED IN THE COP PLAN FOR THE DESCRIPTION OF MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AS WE MENTIONED BEFORE WE WERE EXCEEDING QUITE A BIT OF ALL THE RESIDENTIAL STOCK AROUND US TO THE NORTH AND TO THE WEST. RTG IS OBVIOUSLY NOT IN THE TOWN, BUT YOU KNOW IT'S THERE. SO THIS WE FEEL LIKE THIS NEIGHBORHOOD EXCEEDS THE STANDARDS, EVERYTHING NEARBY. AS FAR AS LOT SIZES. IT WAS GOING TO PLAN TO BE GATED, SO THAT PROVIDES A QUALITY BENEFIT. THE INTENT FOR BOTH THESE NEIGHBORHOODS, THE ONE TO THE EAST, AND THIS ONE IS TO HAVE A CUSTOM HOMES, SO YOU'LL NOTICE ON SOME OF THE LOT SIZES WE ASKED FOR REDUCED LIKE DEPTH. THAT'S JUST A MATH OF HOW IT FITS ON THE BEST PROPERTY WITH STREETS AND LOTS. UM AND ONE OF THEM THAT WE DIDN'T THAT'S AND DAVID SUMMARY. WE ALSO ASKED FOR A REDUCTION IN THE VERY HARD FROM 25 FT. TO 20 FT. IT'S IN THE PD LANGUAGE BUT WAS MISSED ON DAVID SUMMARY HERE, AND THAT'S AGAIN. THAT'S TO PROVIDE MORE FLEXIBILITY FOR LARGER, SINGLE FAMILY. PREDOMINANTLY WE'RE GONNA MAKE CUSTOM HOMES FOR MOST OF THEM. BE MORE PREDOMINANT, HAVE ONE STORY HOMES, SO JUST ALLOWING MORE FLEXIBILITY IN THE DESIGN PROCESS FOR A CUSTOM HOME KIND OF DESIGNED THERE. AH! I THINK THAT WAS THE BIG ONES. OH SOME OF THE COMMENTS FROM THE RESIDENTS TO THE SOUTH. I'LL GO AHEAD AND ADDRESS THOSE UH, THERE WAS SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT A WALL IN BETWEEN US. AND THEN I'M NOT SURE WHAT HAS GENERATED THAT THERE WOULD NOT LOOKING AT THIS PLAN. THEY WOULD NO BE NO WALL BETWEEN THEM AND THE OPEN SPACE OR EVEN ON THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY. THAT'S DEVELOPMENT IF YOU LOOK ON THE PLANET'S SIDE, YARDS, STREETS AND OPEN SPACE, AND THERE WOULDN'T BE ANY WALL BETWEEN THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE OPEN SPACE. UM THE TREES WE CAN'T COMMIT TO ANY SPECIFIC TREES, PRESERVATION. IT'S UH THE TOWN HAS VERY GOOD ORDINANCES AND RULES ABOUT WHAT YOU CAN AND CAN'T DO WITH TREES AND IN FLOODPLAINS, UH AND WHEN, UNTIL YOU GET INTO THE ENGINEERING DESIGN AND GET INTO THE DETAILS OF IT'S HARD TO KNOW EXACTLY. YEP THAT TREE STAYS OR THAT TREE. THERE'S PENALTIES AND CARROTS, CARROTS AND STAKES OF ALL KINDS OF THINGS TO HELP DRIVE THAT PROCESS ONCE YOU GET INTO IT, BUT IDENTIFYING SPECIFIC TREES OR SPECIFIC AREAS AT THIS POINT WOULD BE PREMATURE AND SUBJECT TO BEING HURT FEELINGS ON DOWN THE LINE OF SOMETHING SLIGHTLY CHANGED SO AH! I THINK THAT'S ALL I SEE. YOU HAVE A GUEST WILL BE HERE HAPPY HE HAD ASKING. ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE. I HAD A QUICK QUESTION. AND THIS IS, UM ACTUALLY PICKING UP PIGGYBACKING OFF SOMETHING I THINK COMMISSIONER CHARLES MENTIONED AT THE LAST DISCUSSION. SO I'M LOOKING THROUGH HERE AND I MAY HAVE MISSED. I MAY HAVE MISSED, BUT I DIDN'T SEE ANYTHING LIKE A PARK OR A, UM. YEAH ANY AMENITIES THROUGHOUT. DID I MISS THAT? SO THERE'S A LITTLE GREEN SPACE THERE ON THE SOUTH SIDE. THE MEDICINE FOR IS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE EAST. THERE'S A PLAN TO BE. IT'S STILL IN THE PLANNING STAGES, BUT THE

[00:35:05]

INTENT IS TO HAVE A 10,000 SQUARE FOOT, A C SPACE AND EVENT SPACE KIND OF A MINI CENTER. FOR BOTH THESE COMMUNITIES COMBINED. THE OTHER COMMUNITY, I THINK HAS 200 I WANT TO SAY 206 SLOTS, AND THIS ONE IS 100 IN. MY MEMORIES FROM 166. SO THERE THE RESIDENTS OF THE COMMUNITY WOULD SHARE THAT. THERE'S AN OPEN SPACE ALSO IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE EAST, SO THERE WOULD BE A MAIN MINI CENTER AND OPEN SPACE SECONDARY OPEN SPACE IN EDINBURGH AND THE EAST WEST SIDE OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD AND THEN OPEN SPACE IN THIS NERVE, BUT AND IT IS GATED. AND THERE WILL BE SO THERE'S GOING TO BE AN OPENING. THAT ALLOWS THOSE TWO NEIGHBORHOODS TO FREELY GO BETWEEN CORRECT. IF YOU SEE ON THE PLAN, THERE'S A STREET CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TWO NEIGHBORHOODS THAT WE PLAN PURPOSELY TO ALLOW BACK AND FORTH GATED. NO, IT WOULD NOT BE GETTING THIS WOULD BE IS THIS WILL ACT AND FEEL AS ONE COMMUNITY WILL BE IN THE SAME H AWAY. IT'LL HAVE ALL THE THINGS TOGETHER, SO THIS IS IT'S MORE OF A STAGE DEVELOPMENT. UM AT THE TIME, HE HAD ALWAYS KINDA ENVISIONED THE SENIOR HOUSING BEING ON THE CORNER, AND I'M NOT GOING TO PROMISE YOU. WE MAY NOT COME BACK BEFORE YOU ON THREE MONTHS WE FOUND A LESBIAN USER SAYS HEY, I GOT THIS GREAT PRODUCT. WE MAY COME BACK BEFORE YOU AND SAY HEY ON THE CORNER, AND IT MAY NOT BE THE SAME CONFIGURATIONS. WE PASSED OUT, BUT, UH, IT WAS IN OUR BEST INTEREST. GO AHEAD AND GET THIS SETTLED BECAUSE THE SENIOR HOUSING WAS SUCH A WILD CARD AND HAD A LOT OF QUESTIONS THAT Y'ALL HAD FRANKLY, I HAD BEFORE THE OWNER AS WELL THAT WE WOULD GO AHEAD AND GET THE BASES OWNING THIS F 10. AND IF NOTHING MATERIALIZES, KIND OF BASICALLY PUT HIM ON THE CLOCK. IF YOU CAN'T FIND A REALLY GOOD USER, YOU THINK AND WIN THE DAY AS OWNING THAT WE'RE JUST GOING TO GO WITH SINGLE FAMILY PLAN. AND SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE DOING WITH THIS TOWN. UM IT SEEMED AS IF WE GOT, UH, A NUMBER FIRST. LET ME ASK MHM THINK WE EVER WENT THROUGH, BUT THE RATIONALE BEHIND THE GATED COMMUNITY YOU SAID THAT IT WAS IT WAS FOR QUALITY. IT WAS IT'S FUNNY BECAUSE ME PERSONALLY, I'M NOT A BIG FAN OF GETTING COMMUNITIES.

UM AND WHEN I SAT IN YOUR ROLE, AND FRISCO ACTUALLY VOTED AGAINST ONE GOT LOST 5 TO 1.

IT'S MEATBALLS DOWN TO KIND OF A GATING AND TO A MARKETING KIND OF THING IN A SENSE OF SECURITY, WHETHER THAT'S REAL OR NOT. DEBATABLE BUT IT DOES, UH, JUST BY DEFACTO RESULT IN HIGHER QUALITY HOMES BECAUSE AS A WHEN YOU BUY INTO THIS COMMUNITY, YOU'RE GOING TO KNOW THAT SOMEDAY YOU MIGHT HAVE TO PATCH THAT ROAD YOURSELF BECAUSE IT'S PRIVATE PROBABLY KEPT UP ROADS AND INSIDE THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO JUST BY THE MECHANISMS OF EVERYTHING THAT GO INTO GATING AND ALL THE RULES OF THE TOWN PLACE SINEW FOR GATING AND HAVING A PRIVATELY MAINTAINED PUBLIC STREET SYSTEM. THE HOMES. JUST THE MATH JUST WORKS OUT THAT YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE HIGHER END HOMES THAN THE OLD ONE OF THE REASONS WHY I BRING THAT UP IS BECAUSE WE DID RECEIVE UM, I DON'T THINK THAT WE RECEIVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THIS FOR OKAY. JUST THE ONES FROM THE PREVIOUS THE PREVIOUS PRESENTATION, THERE WERE A NUMBER OF PUBLIC COMMENTS AND I BELIEVE IT WAS MENTIONED ALSO THAT IN. TWO OF THE THINGS THAT GO A LONG WAY WITH KIND OF ENGENDERING YOURSELF TO THE COMMUNITY. THAT YOU'RE SORT OF ASKING TO ACCEPT YOU AND TO ALLOW YOU TO BUILD AND BECOME A PART OF YOUR, UM ONE IS YOU PROVIDE AMENITIES THAT CAN BE SHARED NOT JUST BY YOUR NEW PEOPLE MOVING INTO YOUR SUBDIVISION IN YOUR COMMUNITY, BUT PEOPLE IN SURROUNDING COMMUNITY RIGHT? IT OFFERS SOME SORT OF A BENEFIT TO THEM TO HAVE YOU AS A PART AS THEIR NEIGHBOR. UH, SO IN IN THIS PARTICULAR OFFERING. THERE WILL BE NONE OF NO AMENITIES AT ALL. AND THEN IT WILL BE GATED. SO EVEN IF THERE WERE AMENITIES, IT WOULD ONLY BE ACCESSIBLE TO THE YEAH, THAT'S KIND OF THE PRODUCT OF BEING GATED. THE RESIDENTS ARE MORE OR LESS SELF CONTAINED IN TOUCH AND SOUTHERN NEIGHBORHOOD. CORRECT YOU KNOW, AND THAT UH, ALL THE OTHER STUFF ASIDE, I THINK YOU'VE COVERED A LOT OF THE OTHER ISSUES THAT WE HAD THAT IT WOULD PROBABLY BE THE ONLY STANDING ISSUE THAT I HAVE IS THAT AS GOOD AS A PRODUCT AS IT MAY BE TO THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY AND THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE SAID THEY'RE NOT BIG FANS. I DON'T KNOW THAT YOU ALL HAVE DONE ANYTHING TO SELL THEM AND TO SAY TO THEM. HEY! WE WOULD BE A GREAT NEIGHBOR FOR YOU. WE WILL CONTRIBUTE TO THE QUALITY OF LIFE THAT YOU ALREADY HAVE HERE. ESPECIALLY GIVEN SOME OF THE THINGS THE HURDLES THAT WE'RE TRYING TO OVERCOME THE DENSITY QUESTION THE ISSUES THAT THEY HAVE WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT. UM DO SOME OF THOSE THINGS I JUST AND I THINK AND TO THAT POINT THOSE AREN'T UNIQUE TO THIS DEVELOPMENT OR ANY OTHER. I MEAN, THE FOLKS AT ARTESIA. YOU KNOW WHERE THEY'RE LIVING RIGHT NOW IS ONCE A PRISTINE CREEK AS WELL. SO YOU KNOW, NEVER TREES THERE AND THERE WERE YOU KNOW, IT'S THAT'S NOT UNIQUE TO ANY DEVELOPMENT. THERE'S GOING TO BE IMPACTS THE TREES AND LITTLE PONDS AND

[00:40:02]

THINGS THAT HAPPENED ALONG THE WAY. UH, ON THE BENEFIT TO THE COMMUNITY. IT'S NOT IT'S NOT TIRED OF THE ZONING. OBVIOUSLY WE'RE DOING IT SEPARATELY. BUT WE ARE ALREADY ENGAGED WITH THE PARKS DEPARTMENT TO DO. TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE COMMUNITY PARK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PROSPER TRAIL, EXTENDING IT FROM WHERE IT STOPPED NOW AT THE EASTERN EDGE OF WIND SONGS FACE NINE RIGHT ACROSS STREET, EXTENDING IT EASTWARD, LOOKING TO DO SOME GRADING IMPROVEMENTS AND DOING SOME VOLUNTARY MOWING SO THAT THAT PART COULD BE AN OPEN PLAYER TO RIGHT NOW, IT'S JUST KIND OF AGRICULTURAL USE, SO WE'RE ALREADY DOING THAT WITH WITH PARKS DEPARTMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE EAST, AND WE WOULD EXPAND ON THAT WITH THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. OBVIOUSLY THAT DOESN'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE ZONING CASE, BUT TO YOUR POINT OF WE'RE TRYING TO REACH OUT AND BE PART OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WE ARE DOING THAT.

OKAY LET ME JUST CLARIFY A COUPLE OF THINGS. COMMENTS. YOU MADE THE FIRST OF ALL I KNOW YOU. THERE'S ANOTHER TRACK TO COME LATER. YES SIR. TALKING ABOUT RIGHT NOW, BASED UPON THIS TRACK TRACK TO ONE DENSITY ON THIS TRACK WILL BE 2.32. WATTS PER ACRE. I BELIEVE THAT'S CORRECT. MATH MAXIMUM DENSITY, RIGHT, CORRECT AND SO THAT I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT'S NOT YOU'RE NOT CALCULATING THAT, BASED ON THE OTHER TRACKS AS WELL AS TO THE BEGINNING, AND DOES THAT I THINK YOU SAID, IT'S SOMETHING THAT DOES THAT 2.32 LOTS PER ACRE INCLUDE THE FLOODPLAINS CORRECT THE TOTAL PROPERTY. SO WHAT'S TH WE ACTUAL DENSITY THAT YOU PROCEDURE JUST IN THE. AREA I DON'T HAVE THAT, HOLMES. YOU HAVE THAT NUMBER? NO, SIR. I DON'T. HOW MUCH HOW LARGE OF THE MUCH OF THE ACREAGE IS BLOOD PLAY OF THIS. IT'S NOT NOTED ON THERE. I DON'T KNOW.

SO, SO, TECHNICALLY THE LIVING THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS OF THIS COULD BE MORE COULD BE MORE DENSE THAN 2.3 TO WATCH. THAT'S CORRECT, BUT THAT'S NOT HOW IT'S CALCULATED WITH THE WAY THE TOWN'S DONE HISTORICALLY OR ANY OTHER TIME. JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THAT. YES, SIR. UM JUST NOT TO INTERRUPT, BUT I WAS GONNA ASK THE SAME QUESTION BECAUSE WE ARE MAKING IT MORE THAN EMERALD RIGHT THAT IT'S A STANDARD WAY OF CALCULATING BUT YOU'RE PUSHING CLOSE TO THE HIGHEST OF THE DENSITY. INTERVIEWS IN ALL THE FLOODPLAIN TO GET THEIR HIGH DENSITY. OKAY, I WOULD HAVE MET. YEAH. BECAUSE JUST LOOKING AT THE MAP OF FLOODPLAIN AREAS FAIRLY A GOOD PROPORTION IN THIS ACREAGE CORRECT. THE OTHER QUESTION. I HAVE AND IT HASN'T BEEN DISCUSSED HERE AND MAYBE IT'S BEFORE I WASN'T ON THE COMMISSION BEFORE IN PRIOR MEETINGS, SO I OKAY. DON'T MEAN TO BRING UP ANYTHING OLD AGAIN. WELCOME BUT, UH, I'M TROUBLED BY THE FACT. THAT THE ONLY. EXIT OUT OF THIS ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD IS ON IT. DUMPS ON THE TEAL. AND WHEN YOU GET THE OTHER, I REALIZED WHEN YOU GET THE NEXT TRACK, THERE'S A LITTLE CROSSOVER THAT THAT I ASSUME WILL EXIT SOMEWHERE ELSE. BUT THAT'S IN THE FUTURE, AND I DON'T KNOW HOW FAR AND IT'S ALSO NOT GOING TO BE NATURAL. FOR PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN THIS THE WAY THIS IS STRUCTURE RIGHT NOW THEY'RE GONNA THEY'RE ALL GOING TO GO TO TEAL. NO MATTER WHAT, YOU HAVE A REAL QUICK POINT OF QUANTIFICATION. THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE EAST IS ACTUALLY AHEAD OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. IT'S UNDER CONSTRUCTION NOW, AND IT CURRENTLY HAS TWO CONNECTIONS OUT TO PROSPER TRAIL. SO BETWEEN THE NEIGHBOR, THE FULL NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WILL BE THREE EXITS OUT TO RTR ROADWAYS TO OUT PROSPER TRAIL ONE TO DEAL WASN'T THERE, ONE OFF ACROSS THE TRAIL THERE WAS AND AFTER LOOKING AT IT, HAVING THREE ENTRANCES OFF OF PROSPER TRAIL WITH THE GATING AND EVERYTHING THAT SEEMED EXCESSIVE, I MEAN, IT DIDN'T WARRANT HAVING THREE NEIGHBORHOODS WHEN YOU YOU LOOK AT IT ON A WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD SAYS SO, ESSENTIALLY ACTING AS ONE. I GUESS I GUESS NOT HAVING THE OTHER TRACK. IT'S NOT IN FRONT OF US, SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE. JUST LOOKING AT THIS PIECE. IT JUST SEEMS MISSING WITHOUT WITHOUT SOME CONTEXT TO THE EAST. YEAH, I DO AGREE WITH YOU, AND IT WOULDN'T EVEN MEET THIS FIRE COATS IF WITHOUT THE OTHER COMMUNITY BEING PART OF, AND THAT WAS ONE OF THE COMMENTS WHEN WE DID TAKE IT OUT THAT THE FIRE MENTIONED THAT. HEY, YOU MAKE SURE THAT THESE ARE FUNCTIONAL THE CROSS ACCESS THERE'S NO GATES, AND WE ASSURE THEM YES, THAT'S THAT IS THE CASE BECAUSE, AS I SAID IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE EAST IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION NOW AND WILL BE SIX MONTHS A YEAR YEAR AND A HALF AHEAD OF THIS BECAUSE THIS NEIGHBORHOOD BEING COMPLETED AND I APPRECIATE THAT, JUST UNDERSTAND THAT FROM MY PERSPECTIVE WITHOUT SEEING WHAT TRACK THAT FUTURE TRACK LOOKS LIKE THE ONE THAT'S UNDER THE EAST. LOOKS LIKE IT'S MISSING, AND I CAN ONLY CONSIDER THIS AND IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S MISSING AN EXIT POINT UNDERWEAR ON PROSPER

[00:45:03]

TRAIL. THAT IS SOMETHING THAT IS A CONCERN BECAUSE PEOPLE PEOPLE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PROPERTY. I MEAN, IF YES, THEY I MEAN, THEY'RE ONLY EXIT REALLY IS GOING TO STEAL. OR THEY HAVE TO GO OUT. THROUGH THE OTHER NEIGHBORHOOD. GO A LONG WAY. THAT'S LET'S SEE.

BUT I JUST. ON THE OTHER ONE. HOW MANY? HOW MANY LOTS. DO Y'ALL HAVE SOLD ANY OTHER? ANY OTHER DEVELOPMENT RIGHT NOW? NOTHING SOLD YET, BUT HE HAS COMMITMENTS FOR EVERY ONE OF THEM. SO YOU SAID. THAT'S 206. I BELIEVE 106 MEDIUM DENSITY HOMES, 12 5 YEARS. YOU DON'T HAPPEN TO KNOW. ON THIS. THERE'S NO DIMENSIONS OR ANYTHING BUT YOU DON'T HAPPEN TO KNOW WHAT THE AVERAGE LOT SIZE ACTUALLY IS. IS THERE AS I SAID EARLIER, MOST OF THE LOTS WILL BE NEAR THE 10,000. SQUARE FOOT TARGET. I FEEL LIKE YOU MAY HAVE SOME IN YOUR BENEFITS. WHY I'M ASKING LIKE THE ONES UP OFF OF PROSPER TRAILS SEEM LIKE YOUR SMALLEST LOTS. THOSE ARE PROBABLY YOUR BARE MINIMUM LOTS. I'M GUESSING AND MAYBE THIS CUTE MAYBE THE POWER POINT SKEWED, BUT I'M WONDERING IF SOME OF THESE LOTS THROUGH YOUR THERE'S LIKE FOUR MIDDLE KIND OF BLOCKS. IF YOU WILL, SOME OF THOSE LOOK A LITTLE BIGGER THAN THOSE YEAH, THERE'S GONNA BE SOME VARIATION JUST BUT ANYTIME YOU CURVE A ROAD OR YOU TURN A CORNER YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE YOU KNOW, EVERYBODY HAS SEEN THAT IN THEIR OWN NEIGHBORHOOD THAT THERE'S LOTS SO QUICKLY. PEOPLE LIKE THOSE BIG BACKYARDS. UH SO YOU KNOW, THERE'S SOME INEFFICIENCIES IN EVERY PLAN AND THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE YEAH, I DON'T. I DON'T WANT TO THROW A PERCENTAGE OF, BUT THERE IS GOING TO BE SOME PERCENTAGE OF THE LOTS THAT EXCEED THE 10,000 SOMEBODY CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT.

AND THAT THAT WOULD COME OUT AND WHEN WE GET INTO THE PLANNING OF THIS IS THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN THAT GIVES YOU A PICTURE. WHAT? I DON'T KNOW THAT THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE PLAN IS GOING TO LOOK LIKE. THAT'S THAT'S YOU KNOW, WE GET INTO THE ENGINEERING AND PLANNING WITH STAFF AND GO THROUGH THAT PROCESS, AND IT WOULD COME BACK AS A PRIMARY. PLATT AND FINAL PLAN ON A CONSENT AGENDA FOR YOU GUYS TO SEE YOU LATER ON. BUT FOR PURPOSES OF THE ZONING CASE, THIS IS A PROBABLE LAYOUT. I WOULD JUST SAY, UH WE KNOW IT'S GOING TO COME BACK. YOU'VE HEARD THE CONCERNS FOR EXITS. YOU'VE HEARD THE CONCERNS. FROM THE FOLKS HERE SO THEY WOULD DO IT.

JUST OPEN IT UP NOW FOR PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING IN HERE TO SAY, BUT WE'RE NOW GOING TO OPEN UP TO THE PUBLIC. IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO COME UP TO THE PODIUM, POLICE STATE YOUR NAME YOUR ADDRESS. WE HAVE ANYONE HERE? WELL LIKE LOOKS LIKE A NO. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING WITH THAT. AND WE'LL TAKE IT BACK TO THE COMMISSION. YOU GUYS HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR TOWN STAFF? DO YOU HAVE ONE? AND THIS FIRST STAFF DAVID JUST ON THE WORDING OF THE OF THE ITEM THAT'S BEFORE US ITEM FOUR. UH, FIRST OF ALL, I MEAN, IS CLARIFY. WE ARE NOT APPROVING THIS AS THE DRAWING THAT'S IN FRONT OF US WERE APPROVING A ZONING. THIS IS ONLY REZONING. IS THAT RIGHT? SO FOR PDS IN THE TOWN PROSPER, WE DO REQUIRE A CONCEPTUAL PLAN SO THIS WOULD BE PART OF THE ORDINANCE. BUT CONCEPTUAL PLAN IS THERE AS HE SAID, THERE IS GOING TO BECOME LATER PRELIMINARY PLANT AND PLANT THOSE THINGS ARE THINGS THAT WILL BE ABLE TO DO SO WE ARE. IT IS GOING TO BE PART OF THE ORDINANCE, BUT IT WOULD BE A CONCEPTUAL PLAN SO THEY COULD DO SOME VARIATIONS OF THAT. AGAIN.

WE DO HAVE CRITERIA IF THERE'S AN INCREASE OF NUMBER OF LAUDS X Y AND Z, BUT YOU KNOW IF THEY DO EXCEED THAT WE'LL HAVE TO BRING IT BACK FOR, LIKE AMENDMENT, BUT IT WILL BE PART OF THE ORDINANCE. BUT IT IS A CONCEPTUAL PLAN. YOU HAVE A CALCULATION OF THIS. THIS 2.32 LOTS PER ACRE. THAT DOESN'T INCLUDE THE FLOODPLAIN. DO YOU HAVE A CALCULATION? NO, I DO NOT. AND THEN MY MAIN QUESTION WAS GOING TO ASK WAS ON THE WORDING OF ITEM FOUR. IT TALKS ABOUT UH, PRODUCTIVE HERE. PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST TO REZONE BLAH, BLAH, BLAH GENERALLY TO ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND RETIREMENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING RETIREMENT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT STATUS SHOULD BE SCRATCHED. SO THAT'S HOW WE NOTICED THAT ORIGINALLY, AND SINCE WE CONTINUED THE PUBLIC HEARING, WE DIDN'T CHANGE THAT.

WHEN WE DO NOTICE IT FOR THE NEWSPAPER NOTICE. WE WILL FIX THAT TO REMOVE THAT MODIFICATION . BUT OUR MOTION TODAY SHOULD INCLUDE THAT MODIFICATION BEING MADE RIGHT. YOU CAN MORE THAN HAPPY TO, BUT THAT'S WHY I DIDN'T WANT TO TOUCH IT BECAUSE WE DIDN'T WANT IT TO BE AN ISSUE WITH THE NOTICES THAT WE SENT OUT. THANK YOU, DAVID JUST AND YOU MAY NOT HAVE THIS OFF HAND,

[00:50:05]

SO IT'S NOT EVEN A BIG DEAL IF YOU DON'T HAVE IT, BUT HOW MANY OTHER HOW MANY OTHER DEVELOPMENTS DO WE HAVE THAT ARE ALSO ENCOMPASS PORTIONS OF A FLOODPLAIN. I MEAN, WE DO TEND TO RUN INTO A LOT OF THE FLOODPLAIN WITH ANY OF OUR SUBDIVISIONS. I THINK WE JUST WORKED ON A PLANT THAT YOU ARE JUST LOOKED AT THE CONSENT AGENDA SIDE. I THINK IT WAS A PRELIMINARY PLOT THAT WAS A LONG IN THE FLOODPLAIN. UM YOU KNOW, WE DO. WE DO TEND TO HAVE THIS COMMENT. WE EVEN HAVE CERTAIN CRITERIA THAT UM, IF ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPS ALONG THE FLOODPLAIN, WE NEED TO HAVE A 60% OF OPEN SPACE. OR UM, YOU CAN'T HAVE PROPERTY LOTS BACK INTO A FLOODPLAIN FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES, AND SO WE DO HAVE THAT SO WE DO TEND TO RUN INTO THESE THESE SITUATIONS WITH THE FLOODPLAIN. UM BY UM, YOU KNOW, WE DO HAVE THE WINSTON BRANCH WE DO HAVE OBSERVED THE FOOT. THE DANGER. UM UH, I DON'T KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING THAT RIGHT, BUT, UM YOU KNOW THAT FLOOD BEING KIND OF RUNS TO THE WEST, AND THEN WE HAVE ANOTHER ONE. THAT KIND OF RUNS TO THE EAST A LITTLE BIT SO NOT MAJORITY, BUT I DO SAY LIKE HALF OF OUR SUBDIVISION.

SOMETIMES YOU RUN ALONG THEM SIMILAR TO THIS WHERE IT TAKES UP PROUD, AND I WOULD GUESS. 50 60,000 SQUARE FEET, MAYBE A LITTLE MORE LIKE THE ONE. YOU ARE JUST LIKE THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA. UM MAYBE IT WAS NOT AS MUCH, BUT IT WAS A GOOD PORTION OF IT, UM, PRETTY SIMILAR. MAYBE JUST A LITTLE BIT LESS. THANK YOU. SURE. ANY MORE QUESTIONS. SORRY. TOWN STAFF. I WILL TAKE IT BACK TO THE COMMISSION. UM I FORGOT TO SAY, WELCOME TO BLEND BLEND. THAT PLANTS UM, AS A NEW COMMISSIONER, SO NOT TO SAY THAT. SORRY. PUT THAT ON RECORD , UM, BUT WE CAN GO AROUND. WE CAN START WITH YOU BLEND, UM, WITH DO YOU WANT TO ADD? HOW YOU FEEL, AND THEN WE CAN GO DOWN AND THEN GO FOR A MOTION. I DON'T KNOW THAT I HAVE ANY SOMETHING ELSE THAT I WOULD ADD . I'M CONCERNED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT, YOU KNOW, AS THE X ACCESS ON THE PROSPER TRAIL THAT THE SOLE ACCESS THE TEAL THAT CONCERNS ME A LITTLE BIT ABOUT IN THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN. I HOPE TO SEE THAT FIXED. PERHAPS WHEN THE PLATTS COME BACK, YOU KNOW, WE'LL SEE. UM BUT THAT THAT CONCERNS ME A LITTLE BIT, BUT OTHERWISE I DON'T KNOW THAT I HAVE ANY MAJOR. ISSUES OR CONCERNS. KRISHNA REEVES. AS AS I MENTIONED EARLIER. I'M I'M OKAY WITH THE WITH THE 10,000.

FOR LOTS. I THINK THAT THAT WITHIN THE NEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, I THINK THAT WE NEED TO TIGHTEN UP. OUR DEFINITIONS OF MILLION DENSITY AND HIGH DENSITY. FROM THAT ASPECT WITH REGARDS TO THIS I. SOME OF THE THINGS THAT LEARN ABOUT THAT I THINK ARE VALID WITH REGARDS TO BRINGING IN. THE WAIST AREA. I NEVER THOUGHT ABOUT THAT. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT I DIDN'T REALIZE GLAD TO KNOW ABOUT THAT. BUT YOU KNOW THAT THAT'S THE WAY THE WAY THINGS WORK. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT, UH. IT IS WHAT IT IS. BUT YOU KNOW I THE PROSPER TRAIL EXIT TAKING THAT OUT. I GET WHY THEY TOOK IT OUT. I GET WHY YOU TOOK IT OUT. BUT I THINK THAT IS A CONCERN FOR THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT. BECAUSE FOR US. THESE ARE TWO SEPARATE DEVELOPMENTS. SO IT'S. YOU KNOW, I GET THAT IT IS CONNECTED TO THE OTHER ONE. BUT IT IS TO SEPARATE DEVELOPMENTS. AND SO I'M THINKING ABOUT THE PEOPLE THAT ARE BUYING IN THIS DEVELOPMENT. SO THAT IS SOMETHING THAT IS A CONCERN. MR HARRIS. YEAH, I'M UM FINE FOR THE MOST PART WITH THE 10 10,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT ISSUE. I THINK I WAS FINE. THE LAST TIME THE CONVERSATION CAME UP MY MAIN CONCERN IS THAT THIS IS A, UH, IN ADDITION TO OUR COMMUNITY. AND IT SEEMS TO SORT OF BE A ONE WAY SORT OF EXCHANGE HERE, RIGHT ? UM SO GATED COMMUNITY. PEOPLE WHO MOVE INTO THIS COMMUNITY WILL BE DRIVING THROUGH OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS. THERE WILL NOT BE A PARK OR ANYTHING UNTIL WHEN AND IF THE NEXT TRACK, UH HAS BUILT AND COMPLETED. SO THEY WILL BE USING THE COMMUNITY PARKS. THEY WILL BE USING THE PROBABLY PARKS AND OTHER SUBDIVISIONS WHO HAVE THEM WHO HAVE REALLY NICE ONES WILL PROBABLY BE USING THOSE AS WELL, BUT NO ONE WILL BE ABLE TO USE

[00:55:04]

ANY AMENITIES THERE. THERE WILL BE NO AMENITIES THERE, AND THERE WILL BE GATED. SO EVEN IF THEY DID HAVE AMENITIES, IT WOULD NOT EVEN BE CONTRIBUTING TO THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY THAT TO ME. IS A CONCERN RIGHT? BECAUSE UM, I THINK THAT IF YOU ARE COMING TO A COMMUNITY LIKE PROSPER UH UM. A VERY CLOSE KNIT COMMUNITY THAT HAS A VERY SMALL TOWN FIELD. I THINK THAT IT IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF, UM, A NEW COMMUNITY MEMBER TO HAVE SOMETHING THAT THEY'RE OFFERING SOMETHING THAT THEY'RE SAYING, HEY, WE'RE GOING TO BE IN ADDITION TO THE COMMUNITY, NOT JUST TO THE PEOPLE WHO BUY OUR HOMES. SO THAT'S ONE CONCERN THAT I HAVE IF I WOULD LOVE THIS PROJECT IF THERE WAS IF YOU TOOK OUT THE RETIREMENT, UM, AREA AND USE THAT SPACE TO PUT IN A PARK FOR THE KIDS OR PUT IN A GREEN SPACE, MAYBE YOU'RE WALKING OR ANYTHING THAT COULD HELP ADD TO IT RATHER THAN JUST PUT HOUSE HOUSE HOUSE HOUSE HOUSE HOUSE HOUSE HOUSE HOUSE. AND AGAIN, RIGHT? SO UM, I UNDERSTAND. THERE ARE FINANCIAL. UM UM, NEEDS THE NEEDS THAT HAVE TO BE MET, AND, UH AND YOU KNOW, I UNDERSTAND ALL OF THAT. BUT AGAIN, THERE IS A COMMUNITY ASPECT HERE THAT I THINK IS MISSED WITH THIS WITH THIS OFFERING, AND I WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOMETHING MORE IN TERMS OF THAT. I ALSO THINK COMMISSIONER BLANCHARD HAD A GOOD POINT IN TERMS OF THAT SINGLE ACCESS POINT. UM SO, YEAH, THAT'S JUST MY ONLY CONCERN, YOU KNOW? THE OTHER PIECES. I THINK YOU ALL SPOKE TO JUST FINE, AND I'M COMFORTABLE WITH THAT. BUT I JUST DON'T KNOW THAT THIS PROVIDES ANYTHING BENEFICIAL TO THE SURROUNDING AREA AND REALLY JUST ADDS TO MORE PEOPLE IN THE PARKS. MORE PEOPLE IN THE SCHOOLS MORE PEOPLE IN THE WITHOUT NECESSARILY PROVIDING ANYTHING FOR THOSE COMMUNITIES AND THOSE PEOPLE WHO HAVE LIVED THERE WHO YOU'RE GOING TO BE SHARING SPACE WITH, SO THAT'S JUST MY ONLY CONCERN. MR CARSON.

I THINK FOR THE MOST PART, I'D LIKE WHERE IT'S HEADED. THAT CERTAINLY AGREE THAT GETTING RID OF THE RETIREMENT PIECE WAS POSITIVE. UM I TOTALLY AGREE WITH WHAT YOU GUYS BROUGHT UP ON THE PARK SPACE. YOU KNOW, THIS IS PURELY A PRO DEVELOPER COMMUNITY BENEFITS THEM MORE THAN THE RESIDENTS WHICH I GET. AND I'M OKAY WITH THAT. BUT UM, THE OTHER WHENEVER YOU LOOK AT IT, IF YOU LOOK AT THESE TOGETHER, YOU KNOW THAT'S PART OF THE PITCH TO US IS IF YOU LOOK AT THEM TOGETHER, THAT'S LIKE 403 170 LOTS. WELL IT WAS ALL THE AMENITIES IN THE FIRST THE RIGHT PHASE. WHATEVER THAT'S CALLED PROSPER BLAZE CONTEMPLATED FOR 400 RESIDENTS BECAUSE THAT'S A LOT DIFFERENT THAN 100 AND 70 OR 2 50. YOU KNOW, THE MARKET WILL SOMEWHAT DRIVE THAT PROBABLY SELL ALL THE HOUSES PRETTY FAST, BUT I DON'T THINK I DON'T. I DON'T LOVE THAT. THERE'S NOTHING THERE. THERE'S NO NO WALKWAYS THROUGH THE GREEN SPACE. UM, I DID NOTICE ON THE PLAN. IT'S A LITTLE OVER 10 ACRES THIS FLOODPLAIN SO 12 TO 13% OF THE OVER THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT, THIS FLOOD POINTING TO HIM. MY ONLY CONCERN ON THE SMALLER LOT SIZES AND I GET I DON'T MIND HOW IT'S GETTING CALCULATED. THAT'S CONSISTENT, BUT WE'RE GIVING THEM A BIT OF A DON'T WANT TO USE THE TERM VARIANTS, BUT WE'RE ALLOWING A SMALLER LOT THAN WHAT'S ALLOWED IN THE MEDIUM DENSITY WITHOUT ANY AMENITY WITHOUT ANY COMMUNITY PARK WITHOUT ANY OTHER. SO THAT'S MY OWN NAME. RESERVATION. REALLY? ALRIGHT. I GUESS I'LL. I CAN ECHO EVERYONE UP HERE. I'VE BEEN SHAKING MY HEAD AND A GREEN ALONGSIDE WITH EVERYONE. ME I AM NOT A FAN OF THE LOWER DENSITY. UM, JUST ME PERSONALLY. UM AND AT THE SAME TIME IF WE CAN GET SOME OF THESE THINGS IN PLACE. I KNOW. WE JUST TALKED ABOUT A SECOND AGO THAT THIS COULD COME BACK WITH SOME MORE CHANGES. DAVID. I DON'T KNOW IF THE CHANGES WILL COME BACK AND IT'S LIKE, HEY, DO WE GO? THEY WANT TO GO LOWER AND DO LIKE 7000 SQUARE FEET NOW BECAUSE THEY'RE TRYING TO FIT SOMETHING ELSE IN WOULD CAN I JUST STOP RIGHT AT THE 10,000. BECAUSE THAT'S THAT'S PROBABLY MY BIGGEST CONCERN IS JUST THE CHANGES THAT COULD BE POTENTIALLY COMING. IF WE APPROVED THIS TODAY. SO THAT'S ALL I HAVE. SO I'LL CLOSE THIS. IT WASN'T FOR YOU TO STAND UP. DAVID. I'M SORRY. I WAS JUST I WAS LOOKING AT YOU, THAT'S ALL. UM SO BASICALLY IN LIGHT OF WHAT YOU SAID THAT THERE'S 10 ACRES, FLOODPLAIN. MY CALCULATION IS THAT 2.8. FOR JUST SIMPLE. 2.84 DENSITY. BASED UPON THE JUST THE RESIDENTIAL AREA. I KNOW THAT'S NOT THE WAY IT'S ACTUALLY CALCULATED. I'M JUST CALCULATING JUST THE RESIDENTIAL AREA FOR OUR PURPOSES. THAT IS TIME I THINK WE'RE DONE DISCUSSING. I WOULD GO FOR A MOTION. UM UM, I LIKE.

[01:00:01]

TO MOTION TO APPROVE MOTION TO DENY TO CHANGE. I WILL ATTEND IT. ASK HIM THE QUESTION BEFORE WE MOTION. ALRIGHT LET'S GO BACK TO QUESTION TO DAVID. DO WE HAVE HOW MUCH TRUE SF 10 DO WE HAVE IN PROSPER BECAUSE IT DOES FIT IN KIND OF THAT WEIRD. MODEL IN THE LAND AND THE LAND USE PLAN MEDIUM HIGH, ETCETERA. HOW MUCH TRUE ASSET TENTATIVELY APPROVED AS OF LATE. IT'S A GOOD QUESTION . I'M TRYING TO SEE IF, UM YOU KNOW, AS OF 10 IS IN OUR BASED ZONING DISTRICT. RIGHT? SO, UM WE DO HAVE SOME. I WOULDN'T SAY A LOT. UM WE DO HAVE A LOT OF, UM BASED ZONING OF SF 15 FOR SOME REASON, JUST BECAUSE WHEN ANYTHING WAS ANNEX IT BASED IT FOLLOWED THAT, BUT TO ANSWER FOR SF 10 WITHOUT LOOKING AT THE MAP . UM I KNOW THERE'S SOME PROPERTIES THAT HAVE A BASELINE , BUT I WOULD SAY WE DON'T HAVE TOO MANY THAT FOLLOWS AN S OF 10. UM I THINK MY BROOK HOLLOW HAS THEIR OWN STANDARDS. AND THEY HAVE, YOU KNOW, KIND OF LIKE WINDSONG RANCH. UM THEY'VE GONE THROUGH MULTIPLE PD AMENDMENTS LAST SEEMA. I MEAN, YOU KNOW NO ONE'S REALLY FOLLOWING A BASED ZONING, BUT BUT I WOULDN'T SAY THAT. THAT NOT THAT MANY FOR US OF 10. AND THE OTHER QUESTIONS OR CAN WE GO FOR A MOTION? HE ASKED THE QUESTION AGAIN. ANOTHER QUESTION FOR DAVID, PLEASE. I'M SORRY. I JUST, UH THIS IS THE TIME TO GET AWAY TO GET THEM ALL OUT. SO I AM ARE THERE, NOT STANDARDS. THIS TOWN STANDARDS REGARDING GREEN SPACE IN IN A IN A NEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. ISN'T THERE A MINIMUM AMOUNT OF GREEN SPACE IT'S REQUIRED. AND DOES THIS ARE WE INCLUDING THE FLOODPLAIN HERE AS THE GREEN SPACE REQUIREMENT FOR THIS PARTICULAR? OKAY TRACK . SO, YES, WE DO HAVE UM, PARKLAND DEDICATION. THAT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY SINGLE FAMILY. RESIDENTIAL UM, I'M PULLING IT UP, BUT I BELIEVE THAT THEY YOU KNOW, YOU CAN PROVIDE SOME SORT OF PARK SPACE, OR YOU CAN PAY THE AMOUNT IN LIEU OF AND SO YOU WOULD PAY THE FEE AND THAT WOULD GO TO THE PARKS DEPARTMENT. UM I BELIEVE WHAT THEY DID IN THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IS THEY'RE GONNA DO. THEY'RE GOING TO PAY THE AMOUNT THAT'S REQUIRED FROM THE PARKS DEPARTMENT INSTEAD OF PROVIDING A PARK SPACE, SO THAT WOULD GO TO THE FINE FOR THE PARKS DEPARTMENT. UM AND AGAIN. I DON'T HAVE THE EXACT CALCULATIONS, BUT THEY WOULD PAY A PRETTY GOOD AMOUNT FOR ANY OF THESE RESIDENTIAL TRUCKS BECAUSE WE DO WANT PARKS, RIGHT? WE DO WANT UM AND SO THEY DO HAVE THE OPTION TO PAY OR PROVIDE SOME SORT OF BIGGER SPACE. BUT A LOT OF TIMES WE DON'T COUNT THE OPEN SPACE BECAUSE IT NEEDS TO BE SORT OF A SEPARATE UM A SEPARATE PART. SO THIS SO IN OTHER WORDS, THIS CONCEPT PLAN HERE MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS BASED UPON THE PAYMENT. OR PARK SPACE? YES AND THEY AGAIN SO IN THEIR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE PAIN, SO THEY'RE GOING TO PAY. UH THEY'RE GONNA GET WITH THE PARKS DEPARTMENT, UM, PROVIDE HOW MANY RESIDENTIAL THAT THEY'RE ACTUALLY PROVIDING THAT AT THE TIME OF THE PLATT AND THEN THEY WOULD ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT OF WHAT THE AMOUNT IS. AND THEN THAT WOULD GO INTO THE PARKS. ONE OKAY? WE CLOSED PUBLIC AREAS. UM BUT SINCE YOU ARE AN APATHETIC I CAN THINK THAT WOULD BE AN ISSUE. OKAY? THANK YOU. YEAH. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND ALL OVER AGAIN. RICHARDSON AGAIN. 10 9, 50 RESEARCH ROAD, FRISCO, TEXAS AND 5033 JUST REAL QUICK ON THE PARKS. TO YOUR QUESTION. DAVID DID A GOOD JOB. IT'S I THINK ONE ACRE FOR EVERY 35 UNITS. TYPICALLY PARKED DEPARTMENTS DO NOT LIKE LITTLE SMALL PARKS. SO FOR THIS NEIGHBORHOOD I CAN'T DO THE MATH OFF MAYBE THREE OR FOUR ACRE PARK, WHICH DOESN'T GET THE BANG FOR THE BUCK MAINTENANCE. THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS THAT CAN REGULATE SO THEY TRY TO CONGLOMERATE GET FEES FROM THE SMALLER DEVELOPMENTS AND BUILD BIGGER PARKS. FOR INSTANCE, THE COMMUNITY PARK THAT'S ALREADY OWNED RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET. SO UM, ALSO TO YOUR POINT ABOUT THE BRINGING TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WE WILL BE PAYING THE PARK FEES WE WOULD PARK DEDICATION BEING WE WILL BE PAYING THE PART FEES, WHICH IS $1500 PER LOT OUT THERE. THERE IS A HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL ALONG BOTH TEAL AND PROSPER TRAIL THAT WE BUILT AS PART OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD THERE. CAN'T THERE . THE OLD PARKS MASTER PLAN HAD A TRAIL ALONG THE FLOODPLAIN ON

[01:05:02]

THE SOUTH THAT WAS TAKEN OUT. COMBINATION OF ARTEMISIA STAR TRAIL JUST DIDN'T HAVE A WAY TO GET THROUGH THERE. SO THAT WOULD JUST BE LEFT NATURAL. SO AS A RESIDENT, IF YOU WANT TO BRAVE THE CHIGGERS AND THINGS YOU COULD WALK THROUGH THAT FORD POINT, BUT THERE WOULD BE A HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL AS PART OF THE TOWN'S MASTER PLAYING SYSTEM ALONG BOTH TEAL AND PROSPER TRAIL, AND THAT WOULD TAKE YOU DIRECTLY TO THE COMMUNITY PARK RIGHT ACROSS ON THE NORTH SIDE.

UH, JUST ON THIS MAP, JUST, UH NORTHEAST AND THAT'S ALREADY WORKING WITH THE PARKS DEPARTMENT TO DO SOME IMPROVEMENTS TO THAT PART AS PART OF ALL THREE NEIGHBORHOODS.

THIS DEVELOPER HAS GENERALLY IN THIS AREA SO UM BUT AS FAR AS THE RESIDENTS YOU KNOW, THE OPEN SPACES AND WINDSONG AND ALL THE OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS, THEIR PRIVATE AREAS, SO IN THEORY RESIDENTS IT'S FOR THE RESIDENTS OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD ONLY SO THAT WOULD BE A SIMILAR SITUATION HERE THAT YOU KNOW WHAT IF THEY PUT PICNIC BENCHES OR WHATEVER IN THEIR LITTLE OPEN SPACE THAT WOULD BE FOR THE RESIDENTS OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD? OTHER NEIGHBORS WOULDN'T BE USING THAT. BUT AS FAR AS THE PARK'S USES EVERYTHING, THESE RESIDENTS, THESE HOMEWORKS WE PAYING THE FEES THAT ANY OTHER NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD BE. THEY GO TO IMPROVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, THE COMMUNITY PARKS ALL AROUND ALL AROUND THE TOWN. I GUESS WE CLOSED THE HEARING AGAIN. ALRIGHT SO I GUESS AT THIS TIME WE CAN ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO THE APPROVED DENIAL TABLE, DAVID. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE ITEM. ITEM FOUR. TWO. WHAT DATE WOULD WE HAVE TO MAKE THAT DAVID? JUST TO BE THE LAST JUST FOR CLARIFICATION. YOU SAID TABLE BOTH JUST BE ITEM FOUR THAT WERE ON THE HERD FOUR AND FIVE. UM PURCHASED ON FOUR RIGHT NOW, UM FOUR AND FIVE. IT'S JUST IT'S JUST FOR YEAH, I THINK I SAW I HEARD, HE SAID FOR I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT, UM WILL WE GIVE WE COULD TABLE TO THE NEXT MEETING, WHICH IS THE LET ME SEE HIM ON CALENDAR. IT WOULD BE THE ONE SECOND. UM SO, UM. AS FAR AS FOR THE DAY, AND WE'LL HAVE TO JUST MAKE SURE THAT IF THAT MOTION CARRIES THAT WE, UM EITHER CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO THE SET DATE.

OR UM, UM, YOU WOULD NEED TO, UM WE CAN CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN STAFF WILL HAVE TO RE NOTIFY EVERYONE AGAIN. SO JUST MAKE SURE I'M WORKING. HELP YOU WITH THE MOTION, BUT TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, OUR NEXT PNG MEETING IS THE 20TH. UM THAT'S THE UPCOMING MEETING, WHICH IS IN TWO WEEKS. AND THEN AFTER THAT, UM. WE HAVE THE BELIEVE THE 18TH JULY 18TH. WE DON'T HAVE. WE DON'T HAVE ONE ON THE FOURTH FOR FOURTH OF JULY.

THAT WE HAVE IN THE OTHER MOTIONS. ANYONE WOULD LIKE OUTSIDE THE TABLE ONE TO THE NEXT MEETING. I KNOW YOU EVERYONE HAD A BUNCH OF CONCERNS. SO.

LET ME AGAIN. LET ME JUST CLARIFY. I'M FIRST OF ALL I'M NOT IN FAVOR OF TABLING BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE WORK. I THINK WE TABLE FOR THE PURPOSE OF HAVING THEM DO SOMETHING.

WE'RE NOT ASKING THEM TO DO ANYTHING DIFFERENT. DAVID AGAIN THIS WHAT? WE'RE. APPROVING OR DISAPPROVING IS MERELY A ZONING. ZONE. THIS SF UH, FROM FROM AGRICULTURAL AND FROM AGRICULTURE, ZONING TO AN SF ZONING IS THAT CORRECT SO WE WOULD RESUME THIS TO A PLAN DEVELOPMENT? UM, I KNOW IT WAS AG AND I THINK IT'S SOME PORTION OF PD 40 SOME PORTION OF AS F 12.5. BUT YOU WOULD REZONE IT TO YOUR, UM, REQUESTED TO RESIGN TO YOUR PLAN DEVELOPMENT. AND. BY DOING THAT WE ARE WE ARE APPROVING THIS PLAN DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT'S IN HERE NOW. THAT WOULD MEAN WE WOULD BE THE EXHIBIT D THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT ARE IN HERE. 2.32

[01:10:05]

ACRES, LOTS PER ACRE. MAXIMUM DENSITY MAXIMUM NUMBER OF 170 LOTS. UM AND. WE'RE NOT ARE WE ARE WE TIED OR WE COMPLETELY BOUND BY THIS CONCEPTUAL PLAN. UM. IF THEY BRING THAT BACK AS THEIR SITE PLANNER, REBOUND BY THIS SO AGAIN, UM YOU WE WOULD INCLUDE THE EXHIBIT C, WHICH IS YOUR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS? UM THAT I THINK IT'S LIKE A PAGE OR TWO, AND THEN EXHIBIT D, WHICH IS YOUR CONCEPTUAL PLAN? SO AGAIN, THIS WOULD SORT OF BE PART OF THE ORDINANCE. UM BUT WE DO ALLOW SOME FLEXIBILITY. YOU KNOW THEY IF THEY WANT TO COME BACK AND ADD IN, YOU KNOW THAT THE SECOND POINT OF ACCESS THAT YOU MENTIONED OR THAT WAS A CONCERN ALONG. UM YOU KNOW THE NORTHERN SIDE THEY CAN BUT BUT IT WOULD BE PART OF THE ORDINANCE. THAT FLEXIBILITY IS ON THEIR SIDE, NOT NECESSARILY ON OURS. WE CAN'T UNLESS WE YEAH, RIGHT. SO THE TABLE IT YEAH. WELL. I DON'T LIKE THAT IDEA SINCE WE'VE ALREADY TABLED IT ONCE BEFORE, BUT NONETHELESS, OKAY. OKAY WITH IT TWICE CONCEPTUAL PLANETS HERE BECAUSE WE HAVE ISSUES. WE HAVE CONCERNS THAT HAVE BEEN EXPRESSED WITH REGARD TO THIS CONCEPTUAL PLAN. BUT UM. THEY HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE SOME CHANGES TO ADDRESS SOME OF THOSE CONCERNS. WE WOULD NOT NECESSARILY HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY OF THE NEXT SITE PLAN. TO ADDRESS THOSE CONCERNS IN THAT, WOULD WE? WE FORCE THOSE KINDS OF CHANGES. SO YOU SO DONE NOW. SO THE CONCERNS THAT YOU HAVE AGAIN WE WILL COLLECT ALL THE CONCERNS THAT ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS MADE WITH A RECOMMENDATION FROM PLANNING AND ZONING AND TAKE THAT TO TOWN COUNCIL, AND SO THEY CAN HAVE SEEN SOMEWHERE THEY HAVE SOME MODIFIED. SOME OF THE CONCEPTUAL PLANS ARE INCORPORATED SOME OF THOSE CONCERNS BEFORE IT GETS TO TOWN COUNCIL. UM SO THEY ULTIMATELY CAN, BUT TOWN COUNCIL IS GOING TO GET A LIST OF ALL THE CONCERNS EVER MENTIONED HERE AND ALSO EXPLAINED IN THE STAFF REPORT. SO THAT WAY THEY'RE AWARE OF YOUR CONCERNS, AND, UM YOU KNOW THEY CAN, AND THEN WE WOULD LIST OUT IF THEY DID MAKE ANY CHANGES IN THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN OR THEIR STANDARDS. WE WILL LIST THAT AT THE TOWN COUNCIL MEETING. SO BUT FOR COMMISSION OF LANCE SAID KNOWLEDGE WE CAN APPROVE. WE CAN DENY AND IT STARTS ALL OVER AGAIN. OR WE CAN TABLE TO GET THE ACCESS OTHER STUFF YOU GUYS WANT THIS WILL BE THE ONLY TIME THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO DO THAT. SO YES. SO THIS IS JUST A CORRECT? YEAH SO? SO EVEN WITH ANY, UH, WITH APPROVAL , RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL OR DENIAL, IT WOULD STILL GO TO COUNT TOWN COUNCIL. UM TABLING, I GUESS THAT YOU MENTIONED IT WAS STEVE. IT'S BEEN TABLED TWICE ALREADY. UM THIS WOULD BE THE THIRD TIME. UM AND SO JUST JUST MOMENTS TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT, UH YOU WOULD STILL GO TO COUNSEL WITH APPROVAL OR DENIAL FROM PNC. OKAY? A MOTION THAT WE DENY, UM AGENDA. ITEM FOUR. YEAH I THINK IT'S AGENDA ITEM FOUR.

MOTION THAT WE DENY AGENDA ITEM FOUR. SO WE HAVE A MOTION TO DENY AGENDA ITEM FOUR BY COMMISSIONER HARRIS. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. IN A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CARSON ALL IN FAVOR. RAISE YOUR HAND. CARRIES 32. ITEM NUMBER FIVE CONDUCTED

[5. Conduct a Public Hearing and consider and act upon a request for a Specific Use Permit for a new Wireless Communications and Support Structure, on .1± acre, located on the south side of Prosper Trail, west of Preston Country Lane. (ZONE-22- 0001)]

PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERED ACTIVE PARTNER REQUESTS FOR SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. THE NEW WIRELESS COMMUNICATION AND SUPPORT STRUCTURE ON ONE PLUS ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PROSPER TRAIL WEST OF PRESTON. COUNT COUNTRY LANE. ZONE 22.001. OH, AND, UH, COMMISSIONER REES HAS TO RECRUIT MCCLURE HIMSELF FOR THIS ONE. I FORGOT. HMM GOOD EVENING. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUEST IS TO ALLOW A CONSTRUCTION OR CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 105. WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT STRUCTURE. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONE. UM AG, UM WITH A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT S 34, WHICH WAS FOR THE WHISPERING FARMS USE UM, AND THE APPLICANT, UM, SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. I'M SORRY SHOWS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION AND TENNIS. THAT WOULD BE PLACED

[01:15:01]

IN THE STRUCTURE AND THEIR ASSOCIATED 55 50 LEASE AREA. UM I'M GONNA BRIEFLY JUST KIND OF GO THROUGH AND AS YOU CAN SEE THE AREA THAT'S INDICATED IN BLUE. UM THE APPLICANT IS ALSO IN ADDITION TO PROVIDING THE WIRELESS CARRIERS TO BE COMPLETELY SCREEN, UM, THE APPLICANTS PROPOSING SOME SORT OF WATER TOWER FEATURE. IF YOU'LL RECALL, THIS IS, UM, HAD ANOTHER ONE SIMILAR LIKE THIS. AND I KNOW THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO KIND OF PRESENT, MRS. TWO OUT OF SEVEN. I BELIEVE UM, AND SO THEY HAVE PROVIDED TO SCREEN THE CARRIERS TO WATER TOWER LOOK AND PROVIDE SOME SORT OF LOGO FOR WHISPERING FARMS. UM IN ADDITION TO SCREENING THE TENANTS UM, THEY ARE ALSO PROVIDING A 8 FT, UM, CMU, UM, WALL WITH A STONE WITH HERE. TO SORT OF SOFTEN AND SOMEWHAT SCREEN THE BOTTOM BASE , ESPECIALLY FROM THE RIGHT AWAY OR ANY OF THE RESIDENTS OF SURROUNDING AREAS AND ALSO IN ADDITION TO THAT, UM THE APPLICANT IS ALSO PROVIDING, UH A LIVING SCREEN SO YOU CAN SEE SOME SHRUBS. UM AND THEY'RE JUST TO KIND OF SOFTEN THE 8 FT WALL.

HMM. I'M GONNA GO BACK TO THIS SLIDE BECAUSE WE BROUGHT THIS UP LAST TIME. BUT IN 2020, THE TOWN OF PROCESS PORTS CROSSWORD DID A SURVEY FOR AREAS OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION AND SUPPORT STRUCTURE. THE GOAL WAS TO PROVIDE DEVELOPERS AREAS THAT WERE WELL SUITED FOR, UM, A SUCH USE AND TO PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. OF COMMUNICATION TOWERS FOR THE TOWN OF PROSPER. WE DON'T WANT TO HAVE AND WE ALL KNOW THAT WE NEED. UM CAN YOU, UH, COMMUNICATION TOWERS WITH OUR TELEPHONE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE MOVING TO THE AREA. HOWEVER WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE PLANNING COMPREHENSIVELY. AND SO THIS MAP WAS AN ATTEMPT TO SORT OF LOOK AT WHAT WE HAVE. UM IN THE TOWN OF PROSPER. AND AS YOU CAN TELL THAT, UM SOME OF THESE AREAS ARE EXISTING SCHOOL DISTRICT. SOME OF THESE AREAS ARE EXISTING WATER TOWERS. UM THERE'S I THINK THERE'S POTENTIALLY FOR A NEW WATER TOWER THAT'S COMING, BUT ALSO KEEP IN MIND THAT THERE ARE SOME AREAS THAT ARE NOT, UM. YOU KNOW, INDICATED OR COVERED ESSENTIALLY BY ANY OF THESE AREAS OF OPPORTUNITIES. THE AREA THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT MORE TODAY IS SPECIFICALLY IN THIS RED BOX. AS YOU CAN TELL. UM YOU KNOW, THERE IS SOME SORT OF, UM UH, THE GAP BETWEEN THE, UH UM, THE COVERAGE FOR THE AREAS OF OPPORTUNITIES. UM AND AGAIN, THE APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON WHY THIS SPECIFIC AREA IS REQUESTED. UM, IN ADDITION TO THAT. JUST KIND OF RUNNING THROUGH. WE DID NOTIFY, UM PROPERTY NOTICES TO THE SURROUNDING AREA. WE DID GET ONE JUST AFTER WHICH I BELIEVE DOUG PROVIDED AN OPPOSITION LETTER. UM AND SO WE DIDN'T RECEIVE ONE OPPOSED REQUESTS. UM. AND THAT'S SOME OF THEIR THEIR CONCERNS THAT THEY HAD FOR THE, UM, REPLY FORM. AS ALWAYS, WE DO HAVE A ZONING ORDINANCE THAT CONTAINS FOUR CRITERIA AND CONSIDERING AND DETERMINING THE SCP REQUEST . UM STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE SNP REQUESTS AND , UM I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS HERE AS WELL. THE APPLICANT DOES HAVE A PRESENTATION. THAT IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, ALSO HANDOUTS IF YOU WOULD LIKE THAT WE CAN PASS OUT. BUT I DON'T KNOW THAT I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. WHEN THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR TOWN STAFF. THIS MAN COME UP IN OUR LAST BECAUSE I KNOW THIS IS THE I WANT TO SAY THAT 3RD 3RD AND 4TH TIME THAT WE'VE LOOKED AT CELL TOWERS. UM DO WE HAVE A. CAP OR A SPECIFIC NUMBER. UH SO TOWERS THAT YOU KNOW WE ARE WILLING TO BUILD HERE OR IS THAT NUMBER JUST KIND OF UNLIMITED OR LIKE, HAVE WE OR HOW WE EVEN GIVEN A THOUGHT TO THAT? YEAH. SO AGAIN, THAT THAT, UM. THAT SURVEY WAS AN ATTEMPT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE JUST NOT HAVING A CHARACTER A TOWER ON EVERY CORNER. UM WE ARE KEEPING AN INVENTORY OF ALL THE COMMUNICATION TOWERS. UM I THINK WE HAVE ABOUT EIGHT OR NINE THAT WE KNOW OF. THERE MIGHT BE SOME THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY AND MAYBE IN SOME SOME OF THE WATER

[01:20:04]

TOWERS. UM AND YOU KNOW WE HAVE SOMETHING FOR HORIZON. WE HAVE SOME THAT ARE MULTIPLE CARRIERS.

UM BUT AGAIN, THE INTENT IS TO NOT HAVE, UH, CARRIER ON EVERY CORNER AND, UM, YOU KNOW, AS WE'RE CONTINUING TO GROW, AND AS WE'RE CONTINUING TO HAVE MORE COMMUNICATION TOWERS WERE HOPE TO HAVE SOME BETTER INVENTORY FOR EVERYONE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT JUST PUTTING THEM IN EVERY CORNER SO NO, I DON'T THINK THAT REALLY ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION. BUT, UM YOU KNOW, WE DON'T WE DON'T HAVE A MAXIMUM AND I THINK WE'RE JUST, YOU KNOW, WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S NOT, UM AND IF THEY AREN'T GOING TO BE PLAYERS, HOW WE CAN GET THEM INTEGRATED INTO THE DESIGN ASPECT, YOU KNOW A WINDMILL, UH, WATER TOWER. SO THAT WAY YOU DON'T SEE THEM AND YOU SEE, YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES I'VE SEEN SOME OF THE POLLS. THERE'S FLAGPOLES THAT YOU CAN DO. AS WELL. SO, UM, THAT IS A GOAL FOR THAT. SO I'M LOOKING AT THE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION EXHIBIT THAT YOU HAVE. AND JUST CURIOUS, UM THAT SHOWS THE COVERAGE FROM OF WHAT YOU WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED. COLORED OKAY, SO RIGHT THERE, SO AND LITTLE. BLUE CIRCLE. THAT'S RIGHT NEXT TO IT.

IT SHOWS A PROPOSED WIRELESS COMMUNICATION STRUCTURE. UH, WHERE THERE'S. NEXT TO THAT NEXT TO THE SCHOOL FOR EXISTING SCHOOL. YOU SEE THAT WITH THAT, SO THAT I'M ASSUMING THAT THE BROWN DOT THERE, WHICH IS A PROPOSED AND IT'S NOT BEEN BUILT OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, RIGHT? NO IF THIS ONE WERE APPROVED WHERE THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT. DO WE KNOW IF THE COVERAGE FROM THAT WOULD BE ADEQUATE TO COVER THAT SAME AREA WHERE IT'S PROPOSED. I MEAN, WOULD YOU JUST MOVE THAT OVER TO THAT ONE AND I DON'T THINK THAT I THINK THAT YOU'RE THE BRIGHTNESS TOWN PROPERTY PROPERTY THAT'S IN ANOTHER CELL TOWER. THAT'S NOT OKAY. I'M NOT IT MUST BE COLORBLIND.

COLORBLIND. OKAY, SO THERE'S NOT A THERE'S NOT A TOWER. EXISTING OR PROPOSED IN THAT LITTLE CIRCLE. THEIR EXISTING WOULD BE GREEN OR BLUE. I KNOW THERE MIGHT BE SOME, UM EXISTING WATER TOWERS THAT MAYBE IT WAS A PRIVATE WATER TOWERS, SOME SOME SORT OF, UM, BECAUSE I THINK THERE IS ONE IN THIS AREA. UM BUT, YOU KNOW, I THINK WHEN THEY DID THE SURVEY IN 2020 IT WAS WATER TOWERS THAT HAVE ATTENDED CARRIERS ON THEM CURRENTLY, OR ANY FUTURE WATER TOWERS THAT THE TOWN IS BEING IS BUILDING THAT COULD POTENTIALLY HAVE AVAILABILITY FOR WATER CARE, OUR WIRELESS CHARACTERS. SO WHEN YOU'RE WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE WATER TOWERS, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT TRUE WATER TOWERS. ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE STEALTH? WHAT A TRUE WATER TOWERS. TODAY WOULD DISCOMFORT. THIS IS THE ONLY COMMENT FORM. WE GOT THAT THAT'S CORRECT. COMMISSIONER YES. I'M SORRY. I'M SORRY. I'M I'M GOOD OR NOT. I'M STILL THINKING ABOUT IT. BUT I'M I'M I'M FINE. THAT'S ALL MY QUESTIONS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS WHEN THE OTHER COMMISSIONERS. AND I'M JUST PROUD OF OPENING THE PUBLIC HEARING. UM AFRICAN DOES HAVE A SLIDE, SO I'M JUST SWITCHING OVER APOLOGISTS. ANYONE SAY IT AND I'M GONNA ASK FOR THE APPLICANT TO COME UP. NUMBER SIX. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS BACK AND FORTH.

UM YES, YOU WOULD JUST NEED TO GO BACK TO MY FLIGHT. OKAY? YOU JUST HELP ME IN A SECOND. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS BILL BOWMAN. LIVE AT 75 AWAIT WORCESTER WHEEL FOR TEXAS. AND I'M HERE REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT OR NOT, WHO IS ANTHEM NET. WE HAVE COURSE. WE'VE BEEN BEFORE THIS BOARD AND THE COUNCIL BEFORE WITH A SIMILAR SITE CALLED PROSPER STAR. UM ANTHEM NET HAS A POINT MASTER PLAN FOR THIS COMMUNITY OF I THINK RIGHT NOW WE'RE HOLDING AT SEVEN SITES, AND ALSO THIS WILL BE THE SECOND OF SEVEN THAT WOULD COME FORWARD AS NEED PERMITS AND AS THE GROWTH OCCURS, UM, WE DO HAVE I DO HAVE SOME SLIDES. I WANTED TO SHOW YOU BUT OUR SLIDES MAY COMPLEMENT THIS. AND UH, THEY JUST SHOW YOU A LITTLE BIT MORE INFORMATION. SO, UH, I DON'T REALLY I'M KINDA OUT OF STEP HERE IN THAT I WANTED TO DISCUSS . I DON'T WANT TO ANTICIPATE YOUR QUESTIONS. BUT I CERTAINLY WANT TO ANSWER EVERY QUESTION YOU HAVE. SO WOULD YOU RATHER ME JUST TALK OR DO YOU WANT TO ASK SOME QUESTIONS, AND WE ANSWER THEM. HOWEVER YOU WANT TO DO IT

[01:25:05]

PRESENTATION. OKAY WELL, WE'LL TALK TO THIS SLIDE. THAT'S UP THERE. NOW THAT YOU GUYS ARE LOOKING AT, BECAUSE YOU SEE, OUR STAR IS WHERE THE NUMBER TWO IS WITH THE BLACK ARROW POINTING TO IT. UM AND YOU KNOW, WE ALREADY HAD THE ONE CALLED PROSPER STAR . SO WHAT'S HAPPENED IS THE CITY'S GOT THIS GREAT DESIGN FOR IN A PERFECT WORLD WHERE THINGS WOULD GO IN THIS PARTICULAR INSTANCE. AND THIS IS GONNA THIS WILL REVERT TO MY SLIDE. I'LL GET TO MY SLIDE IN A SECOND THINGS ARE KIND OF OUT OF ORDER HERE. UH WHEN YOU SEE OUR COVERAGE SLIDE, YOU WILL SEE THAT THE PROPOSED SITE TONIGHT HITS A COVERAGE MARK THAT THE R F ENGINEERS, THE DESIGN GROUP AT VERIZON IS LOOKING TO HIT IN TERMS OF NUMBER OF HOMES, ROOFTOPS IN BUILDING COVERAGE.

ALSO, WHAT'S NOT SHOWN ON YOUR MAP? AS AN EXISTING SITE. WE HAVE TO THE EAST OF CUSTER ROAD , SO THOSE PARTICULAR DOTS THERE IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER THAT BLUE CIRCLE THAT HAS THE TWO DOTS IN IT. UM YOU'LL SEE THAT DOESN'T FIT THE PROPOSEDCOVERAGN AT THIS TIME. AS THE AREAS BUILD OUT AND GET MORE AND MORE DENSE. UM WE DO HAVE TO SPLIT THESE SITES. SO A SITE THAT COVERS AN AREA NOW MAY NEED ANOTHER SITE IN THE FUTURE BECAUSE EACH SACK CAN ONLY COVER SO MUCH TRAFFIC.

AND AS YOU KNOW, DATA HAS JUST MADE THAT AN EXPONENTIAL DEMAND ON THE SYSTEM WHEN IT USED TO BE VOICE. IT WAS A LOT LESS COVERAGE NOW WITH DATA AND WITH EVERYBODY USING THESE THINGS FOR EVERYTHING. THE DEMANDS INCREASE. UM LET ME SEE IF I CAN GO TO THAT NEXT. HOW DO I GET OVER TO MINE? PRETTY GO. SO WHAT WAS THAT MINE OF YOURS? OKAY, I'M SORRY. LET ME SEE IF I CAN GET TO THAT. PARTICULAR SLIDE TO SHOW YOU I JUST TURNED IT OFF. GREAT. I APOLOGIZE. YOU GOTTA ROOKIE HERE YOU ARE FINE. LET ME SEE WHAT I HIT THAT BUTTON RIGHT THERE. DON'T HIT. DON'T HIT THE RED BUTTON. WHICH BUTTON DO I HEAR? THE LEFT AND RIGHT OR LEFT AND RIGHT, OKAY, LEFT AND RIGHT, SO OKAY? LET ME TRY THIS. I APOLOGIZE. GOODNESS. TALK ABOUT A ROOKIE. LET ME JUST LET ME GO THROUGH THESE AND MAYBE I CAN ADDRESS ALL YOUR QUESTIONS. UH THIS IS OUR WE HAVE SOME PHOTO SIMS HERE SHOWING THE BEFORE AND AFTER THIS PARTICULAR SLIDE SHOWS YOUR VIEWS 12 AND THREE.

SO AS WE GO THROUGH THIS, YOU'LL SEE THERE IS A VIEW NUMBER ONE. WHICH IS THERE ON THE NORTH. AND THAT'S THE BEFORE SITE LOOKING AT THE I THINK IT'S AN EQUESTRIAN CENTER AND THEN YOU'LL SEE IT WITH THE WATER TANK INSTALLED. THEN WE'VE GOT, UH WHAT NUMBER TWO, WHICH IS FROM THE EAST LOOKING BACK TOWARD THE WEST, AND THE VIEW NUMBER THREE IS THE OPPOSITE. SO THAT'S VIEW NUMBER TWO LOOKING FROM THE EAST, AND THERE IS THE, UH, WATER TANK AND THEN FROM THE WEST, THERE'S THE VIEW. AND THEN THERE'S THE WATER TANK. THIS IS THE SLIDE. I WANTED TO GET TO THAT SORT OF COMPLEMENTS THE SLIDE THAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT. A MINUTE AGO. YOU CAN SEE. ONE POINT TO THIS DOES HAVE A POINTER. THERE'S WHISPERING FARMS RIGHT THERE. THERE'S OUR PROPOSED THAT AND YOU CAN SEE. I WAS TALKING ABOUT A SITE THAT WAS EAST OF CUSTER. THAT'S AN EXISTING VERIZON SITE. YOU CAN SEE HOW THESE EXISTING VERIZON SITES PLAY OUT. SO THE GAP IS RIGHT THERE IN THE CENTER, SO TO SPEAK, SO IF WE GO TO THE NEXT ONE, YOU'LL SEE COVERAGE WITH THAT SITE AS YOU CAN SEE HOW THE COVERAGE KIND OF REALLY EXPANDS. RED BEING WHAT WE CALL GENERALLY IN BUILDING COVERAGE. AH THE YELLOWS ARE WHAT WE CALL IN CORK COVERAGE AND THEN THE GREEN OR, UH, OUTSIDE COVERAGE. SO TO USE YOUR PHONE. WE DEARLY IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT. YOU WANT TO SEE THE ENTIRE MAP? BE RED COURSE THAT'S I'VE NEVER SEEN THAT. BUT THAT WOULD BE A PERFECT WORLD WHERE EVERYBODY BE ABLE TO USE ALL THEIR DEVICES INDOORS AND ALL THIS CONCRETE AND STEEL WOULDN'T MATTER IN TERMS OF THE ABILITY TO USE YOUR DEVICE. SO I KIND OF WANTED TO TOUCH ON THOSE THINGS. COUPLE OF THINGS FROM THE CITY. UH WE COULD GO BACK TO THE CITY MAP.

THEY HAD ASKED US TO DO A DECELL LANE, WHICH WE PROVIDED. WE PROVIDED THE LANDSCAPING. AND SO I THINK WE'RE PRETTY MUCH DONE EVERYTHING THE CITY HAS REQUESTED US TO DO UP TO THIS POINT. OF COURSE, WE'RE PAINTING THE STRUCTURE FOR THE CITY GUIDELINES AND PER THEIR REQUEST. AND I THINK WE DID A SIMILAR THING AT PROSPEROUS STAR BACK IN JANUARY. SO ANYWAY, THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO GIVE YOU BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. TURN YOUR MIC ON. OKAY? UM. IT'S JUST A QUESTION. SO THE ONE THAT CURRENTLY EXISTS THAT YOU MENTIONED IS THAT IS THAT THE

[01:30:05]

SAME STEALTH WATER TOWER THAT IS THAT THE WHAT YOU USE TALKED ABOUT IT. PROSPER STAR? YES SIR . THAT'S THE ONE THAT GOT APPROVED PENS AND COUNCIL BACK AT THE FIRST OF THE YEAR. WATER TOWER. LOOK ALSO EVERYTHING. IT'S A WATER TOWER. LOOK RIGHT NOW WE'VE GOT SEVEN ON THE DRAWING BOARD, BUT ONLY I THINK THERE ARE THREE OF THE SEVEN OR WATER TANKS. I KNOW IT'S NOT ALL OF THEM. THERE ARE SOME OTHER DESIGNS OUT THERE. WE JUST HAVEN'T GOTTEN TO THE MATURITY OF THOSE SITES BEING NEEDED YET I WAS JUST CURIOUS TO ON THIS PARTICULAR SITE, YOU KNOW? COULD THERE NOT BE SOMETHING OTHER THAN THE WATER TOWER. LOOK AT THIS TIME. I MEAN, FLAGPOLES, SOMETHING THAT'S A LITTLE LESS WATER TOWER IS A LITTLE MORE TRUCE IT THAN SOME OF THESE OTHER OPPORTUNITIES. WHAT WHY YOU CHOOSE THE WATER TOWER FOR THIS PARTICULAR JUST THOUGHT IT FIT WITH THE AESTHETIC OF THE COMMUNITY. IT'S EQUESTRIAN CENTER. SO YOU'RE KIND OF THINKING. OKAY WHAT'S OUT THERE ? WE'VE GOT A CLOCK TOWER WE COULD DO, WE COULD DO A GIANT TREE. UH, WE COULD DO A FLAGPOLE. THERE IS AN ISSUE WITH FLAGPOLES, THOUGH, AS WE GET MORE AND MORE MATURE INTO THIS NETWORK SINCE I WAS A CITY PLANNER BEFORE I WAS A, UH WORKING ON THIS SIDE. AND 20 YEARS AGO. FLAGPOLES WORK GREAT , UH, THEY LOOK LIKE COLUMNS WITH FLAGS ON TOP. YOU KNOW, THEY'RE A LITTLE THICK. UH AND I HAD SEVERAL CITY PEOPLE TELL ME THEY WERE A LITTLE BIT TOO THICK AND THEIR OPINION BUT IT WAS A GREAT SOLUTION, AND IT STILL IS A GREAT SOLUTION IN SOME CASES, BUT OUR ISSUE IS WITH ALL THE FIVE G STUFF AND ALL OF THE DATA AND ALL THE ANTENNAS. BUT YOU HAVE TO PUT INSIDE OF THE FLAGPOLE THERE JUST SO MUCH EQUIPMENT THAT GOES IN THERE THAT THESE FLAG PILLOWS BEGIN TO GAIN WEIGHT, AND SO IN MANY CASES, IT LOOKS LIKE A COLUMN WITH A FLAG. THE FLAG BEGINS TO LOOK. I HATE TO SAY IT INAPPROPRIATE ON SOMETHING SO THICK IT BEGINS TO LOOK LIKE A REALLY THIN WATER. WATER TANK LIKE YOU'D SEE UP IN RURAL TEXAS OR RURAL OKLAHOMA. SO ANYWAY, BUT THAT'S SO ARE THE IN THIS WATER TOWER IS, ARE ALL THE ANTENNAS HIDDEN INSIDE OR THEY EVERYTHING'S CONTAINED INSIDE.

YOU DON'T SEE ANYTHING BUT WHAT YOU SAW IN THE PHOTO CM THAT'S CORRECT. AND I WILL SAY ON THIS ONE. THESE ARE DESIGNED FOR FOUR CARRIERS. THIS PARTICULAR SITE ALREADY HAS ONE CAREER BOOKED, AND THERE'S ANOTHER CARRIER WHO'S APPLIED PENDING APPROVAL OF THIS ONE. SO WE HAVE TO, UH, CELLPHONE CARRIERS WHO WANT TO BE HERE RIGHT NOW. THANK YOU. AND I FORGOT YOU WEREN'T HERE.

SO BACK. THINK IT WAS JANUARY WHEN WE APPROVED THIS FOR THE LAST ONE? AND I THINK WE ALL WERE TALKING ABOUT WATER TOWERS AND DOING A DESIGN THAT FITS THE COMMUNITY. YEAH. JUST JUST HIT MY MEMORY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANYTHING ELSE? OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. SO WE'RE HOPING THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO WE HAVE ANYONE? HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO COME UP AND SPEAK. IF YOU DO, PLEASE SAY YOUR NAME ADDRESS. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION. TAKE THAT AS A NO. WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. WE'LL START WITH COMMISSIONER CARSON. THOUGHTS. I HAVE TOO MANY. I'M INTERESTED, PREDICTS POUND ON YOUR PREVIOUS APPROVAL BACK IN JANUARY. A LITTLE BIT OF WHAT WAS THIS A SIMILAR DESIGN THAT WAS APPROVED THEN I THINK WE DID A WATER. WE DID A WATER TOWER BACK THEN. RIGHT, DAVID? WE PROVE THE WATER TOWER. IT WAS INSIDE OF A COMMUNITY. WE ASK THAT THEY PUT A COMMUNITY DESIGN ON IT. WE ASKED THAT PAINTED. AND THEN IF IT WAS GONNA BE UP, CAP, HOW WOULD IT BE UP CAT? WOULD IT BE THE CITY HAPPENED TO WAIT FOR IT TO DETERIORATE AND THEN? UM SINCE AND LIKE A FINE OR SOMETHING TO THE OWNER TO HAVE IT DONE? UM BUT FOR THE MOST PART, WE ALL AGREED THAT IT WAS A GOOD IDEA. PLUS, WE NEED THE CELLPHONE. YEAH, THE DATA. SO THIS IS A YOU KNOW, I'M INTO THAT ALIANT PREVIOUS APPROVAL, ORDEN. NO, I DON'T. I DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. YEAH. NOPE I THINK WE COVERED EVERYTHING THE FIRST TIME FIRST GO AROUND, AND I'M ASSUMING THE NEXT FOUR OR FIVE. WE'RE GOING TO BE SIMILAR TO THIS SO NO NO ISSUES FOR ME. YEAH I HAD. I CERTAINLY THINK THERE IS A NEED FOR MORE WATER AND FOR MORE CELL TOWERS, I I'M NOT SURE THE WATER TOWER LOOK IS GOING TO BE APPROPRIATE FOR EVERY SITE, YOU KNOW, SO I CERTAINLY HOPE YOU HAVE SOME OTHER IDEAS AND OPTIONS THAT WILL LOOK AND FIT IN WELL IN THE FUTURE IS IF THEY COME UP, BUT FOR THIS PARTICULAR SIDE, I THINK IT LOOKS FINE. ALRIGHT. WITH THAT I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE NOW. UM, MOTION TO APPROVE. FIVE. SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL STAFF RECOMMENDED THINGS LIKE YOU SAID

[01:35:02]

, SO I GOTTA I GOTTA A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER CARSON FOR BECAUSE THE ITEM NUMBER FIVE SUBJECT TO THE STAFF APPROVAL THAT I GET HIM 2ND 2ND. AND IT'S A NEXT SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BLANCHETTE. THAT'S IT. GLANCES, GLANCES. ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION CARRIES. UM 100. RELIEF. I'LL GET. DO YOU WANT TO? I THINK WE JUST HEARD. ARE CONDITIONER. REEVES IS BACK. JUST A QUICK QUESTION, DAVID.

DAVID. WHEN WE RUN A BIT LONG DO WE EVER TAKE A SHORT RECESS FOR ANYONE? HAS THAT EVER HAPPENED? I'M JUST CURIOUS. NO I DON'T THINK I'M CURIOUS. YEAH. AND I'M ONLY TALKING ABOUT THOSE THREE HOUR ONES, LIKE HAVE YOU HAD SOME LONG ONE FOR OKAY. LOOKS LIKE WE'RE UP AND RUNNING BACK ON PRESENTATION.

[6. Conduct a Public Hearing and consider and act upon a request to rezone 0.3± acres from Single Family-15 (SF-15) to Downtown Retail (DTR), on Lots 3-5. (ZONE-23- 0001)]

COMMISSIONERS OF THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUEST IS TOO AS MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY. IT'S JUST REASON ON THE PROPERTY. UM AS YOU CAN SEE THE CURRENT PROPERTY IS SF 15. UM AND THE ONLY REQUEST IS TOO UM, FOLLOW, SORT OF WHAT'S UM, JUST TO THE SOUTH AS DT R AND JUST TO THE EAST OF GTR, WHICH IS DOWNTOWN RETAIL. UM AT THE TIME OF THE APPLICATIONS CONSIDERED A STRAIGHT ZONING, SO THE APPLICANT IS NOT REQUIRED. TO SUBMIT AN EXHIBIT. UM OF A DETAILED EXHIBIT LIKE YOU TYPICALLY WOULD SEE. AND SO THIS IS MORE SPECIFICALLY A STRAIGHT REZONING REQUESTS, WHICH WE HAVE TYPICALLY ONLY SEEING DOWNTOWN. WE'VE HAD A COUPLE OF THESE PREVIOUSLY. AS FAR AS THE ZONING CONFORMANCE TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THIS DOES THIS AREA IS, UM , INDICATOR. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES INDICATE THIS AREA DOWNTOWN RETAIL AND SO THIS IS ONLY REQUEST WILL BE IN CONFORMANCE TO THE COMMON PLAN. UM STAFF DID SEND OUT NOTICES TO THE SURROUNDING AREA AND STAFF DID RECEIVED, UM ONE REPLY FORM BUT WAS NOT AN OPPOSITION OF THE REQUEST. JUST HAVE SOME GENERAL QUESTIONS. YOU KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON WHAT'S HAPPENING? OTHER THAN THAT STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ZONING REQUESTS AND I WILL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. I WAS JUST A QUICK IS THIS SORT OF INEVITABLE THAT WE'RE GONNA GET A LOT OF THIS AS THAT DOWNTOWN AREA. AS WE'RE GONNA NEED TO EXPAND THE RETAIL WITHIN THAT DOWNTOWN AREA AS MORE RESIDENT AS WE INCREASED RESIDENCE IS THE WE'RE TOLD, UM , EXTENDS A BIT MORE WILL START SEEING MORE PEOPLE WANTING TO GO DOWNTOWN FOR RETAIL. AND IS THAT SOMETHING THAT'S KIND OF COVERED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE ONE THAT'S IN DRAFT IS ADDITIONAL RETAIL SPACE IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA, SO WE HAVE A DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED LAST YEAR. AND SO THAT AND AGAIN I'M MORE THAN HAPPY TO SHARE THE LINK WITH EVERYONE REALLY GREAT DOCUMENT THAT WE HAVE STARTED TO LOOK AT AND IMPLEMENT. UM BUT IT DOES INCLUDE A KIND OF WHAT THE FUTURE AND WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR. UM ARE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RELIES ON THAT AS WELL, AS RELIES ON. SORT OF, UM, YOU KNOW, WE DO HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE, YOU KNOW, LAND USES FOR THIS AREA. UM WE ARE GETTING AN UPTICK ON DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AS YOU ALL KNOW, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY, IF YOU LOOK THAT WAY, YOU CAN SEE THREE BUILDINGS UNDER CONSTRUCTION. AND SO WE ARE, AND I THINK WE HAD ALREADY THREE OR FOUR ZONING JUST WITHIN THIS YEAR. FOR DOWNTOWN OFFICE DOWNTOWN RETAIL AND JUST LET YOU KNOW WE ARE GETTING A LOT MORE AS MORE AND MORE DEVELOPMENT COMES, UM, WE

[01:40:04]

ARE LOOKING AT APPROVING THAT ARE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MULTI FAMILY IS GOING TO BRING MORE RETAIL, MORE RESTAURANTS. SO YES, WE ARE GETTING A LOT MORE ACTIVITY IN OUR DOWNTOWN.

HMM. MAYBE JUST A QUICK QUESTION, CAN YOU. THAT'S PROBABLY SHOULD KNOW THIS. BUT WHAT WHAT DOES DOWNTOWN RETAIL WHAT DOES THAT NECESSARILY MEAN? YES WHAT DOES THAT ALLOW THEM TO? DO I SEE THE KIND OF THE DESCRIPTION COMMERCIAL RETAIL BUILDING. BUT IS IT LIMITED IN HEIGHT OR LIMITED? I'M JUST KIND OF CURIOUS WHAT THE SCOPE OF THAT REALLY LOOKS LIKE. SO AS FAR AS FOR THE SPECIFIC USE, I'M MORE THAN HAPPY TO LOOK AT MORE OF THE USES FOR YOU, BUT, UM, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE DIFFERENT TYPES OF LEVELS OF DOWNTOWN. WE HAVE A AH, DOWNTOWN RETAIL. UM LET ME START FROM THE LOWEST DOWNTOWN OFFICE OBVIOUSLY IS PRETTY A MAJORITY OFFICES. UM, AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE PINK, UM WE SORT OF ENVISION THAT ALONG. UM BROADWAY AS YOU GO TOWARDS THE EAST, UM YOU CAN SEE IN THIS AREA. YOU CAN SEE SOME OF THE PINK ONES. I THINK WE ARE, UM PNG AND COUNCIL JUST RECENTLY APPROVED MAYBE AT THE END OF LAST YEAR. ANOTHER REASON FOR OFFICES, SO THAT IS OUR LOWEST SORT OF COMMERCIAL OR OFFICE TRACKED. UM DOWNTOWN RETAIL IS GOING TO BE CONSIDERED YOUR YOUR MEDIUM INTENSITY USES. UM AND THEN DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL WOULD BE A LITTLE BIT MORE HEAVIER. SO AGAIN, I DON'T HAVE THE EXACT USES MORE THAN HAPPY TO GET YOU A LIST. WHAT UM, KIND OF THE RAID? THE RANGE OF THE D T R D T 02 D T. R. UM AND LIKE I SAID, WE TYPICALLY WANT TO HAVE, UM, IN OUR KIND OF OUR MAIN COURSE. SORT OF A. D. T UM C OR D TR DOWNTOWN RETAIL DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL AND THEN AGAIN, KIND OF HAVE CORRIDORS OF THE DOWNTOWN OFFICE AS YOU KIND OF GET AWAY FROM THE URBAN CENTER. THAT'S HELPFUL. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT. HERE WE ARE. RAMBLAS. ALL RIGHT. SO AT THIS TIME, WE'RE JUST CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING. OH OPENING THE PUBLIC AREA AT THIS TIME, I GUESS APPLICANT PRESENT AT THIS TIME WILL OPEN UP TO A PUBLIC HEARING. IF ANYONE'S HERE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK. TAKE IT AS A NO. RIGHT, SO THEY WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. TALK TO WILL START WITH FIRST COMMISSIONER. NO I THINK THIS IS GREAT. I THINK WE WANT TO EXPAND DOWNTOWN RETAIL AS MUCH AS WE CAN. SO I'M TOTALLY IN FAVOR OF THIS. SORRY. I'M THE SAME. I HAD NO NO QUESTIONS AND REALLY NO COMMENTS. I THINK IT'S A NEEDED THING FOR DOWNTOWN. HARRIS AND MR CARSON. YEAH, IT'S. LIKE I MENTIONED INEVITABLE, RIGHT? WE'RE GONNA SEE A LOT MORE OF THIS SO DOWNHILL EXPANDS FOR RETAIL AND THIS NECESSARY SO NO ISSUES. NO QUESTIONS HERE. ALL GOOD. ALL RIGHT. SO WITH THAT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FROM THE COMMISSIONERS TO EITHER APPROVE OF THE NI, UM I'M NUMBER SIX. FIRST TOWN STAFF RECOMMENDATION OR NOT. UM YEAH. MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM SIX, SUBJECT TO TOWN STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS. THAT EMOTION FROM COMMISSIONER HARRIS. WE HAVE A SECOND. IN A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER BLANCH IT ALL THEIR FAVORITE. RAISE YOUR HEAD. MOTION CARRIES 100. THANK YOU. IT JUST KEEPS GOING. IT JUST KEEPS GOING. IT'S THE SAME APPLICANT. THERE'S UH, AGAIN ANOTHER ONE. TOTALLY DIFFERENT. ONE. OKAY? ALRIGHT,

[7. Conduct a Public Hearing and consider and act upon a request for a Specific Use Permit for a new Wireless Communications and Support Structure, on .1± acre, located on the south side of Frontier Parkway, west of Talon Lane. (ZONE-23-0008)]

I'M. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SEVEN CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERED ACT UPON A REQUEST WAS SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A NEW WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT STRUCTURE. 1.1 ACRE, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FRONTIER PARKWAY, WEST OF TALLINN, LANE. ZONE 23 DAYS, 0008. ALREADY SO GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONER, SO THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUEST IS TO ALLOW FOR CONSTRUCTION. OF A NEW 100 FT, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION AND SUPPORT STRUCTURE. UM AS INDICATED YOU SEE THAT IT'S SOUND AG UM IN THIS IS IN THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT 83, WHICH IS FOR UM, PROSPER RISE THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. UM, THE. APPLICANTS REQUESTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT RICHARDS

[01:45:07]

REQUIRED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PLACE THE UM AND THIS IS JUST A BROADER MAP OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY UM, AND THIS IS JUST MORE OF AN OVERVIEW OF THE AREA AND LOOKING LIKE A LITTLE BIT MORE SPECIFICALLY INTO IT. UM BUT THERE IS A 10 BY 15 WHILE COMPOUND UM WITH A EXCUSE ME, UM , COMMUNICATION TOWER 100 FT COMMUNICATION TOWER. THE, UH APPLICANT DID GO THROUGH AND JUST I DID PROVIDE THIS IN OUR STAFF REPORT. A UM, SINCE THE PROPOSED USE IS ON THE TOWN PROPERTY. THEY DID HAVE TO GO THROUGH A LEASE AGREEMENT THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY TOWN COUNCIL. SO THIS IS AND I BELIEVE IT WAS APPROVED A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO, SO THIS IS JUST NOW ALLOWING THE USE. UM THE APPLICANT, UH, IS PROVIDING, LIKE I SAID, THE COMMUNICATION ATTENDANCE TO GO ABOVE ON. UNLIKE POLE, UM AND WHEN ANALYZING THE REQUESTS LIKE WE DID JUST RECENTLY IN ANOTHER ITEM. YOU CAN SEE THAT THIS IS ACTUALLY ONE OF THE AREAS THAT IS WITHIN THE AREAS OF OPPORTUNITIES IN THAT MAP OF 2020. UM THEY ARE PLANNING TO SEE LOOK AT PUTTING THEM THE CARRIERS ON THE STADIUM LIGHTS. SO THAT WAY THEY'RE KIND OF COMBINING THE INSTEAD OF BUILDING A WHOLE NEW FORWARD, SORT OF COMBINING MULTIPLE LIGHTS AND THE CARRIERS, UM AS ALWAYS, WE DO SEND A 200 FT NOTIFICATION AND, UM, STAFF DID NOT RECEIVED ANY REPLY FORMS. AND UM, YOU KNOW, IT IS AN SCP REQUESTS, SO WE DO HAVE CRITERIA AND STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ZONING REQUEST AND BELIEVE THE APPLICANT IS ALSO HERE. TO PROVIDE A PRESENTATION ON WHY IT'S NEEDED AND ETCETERA. AND I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. AND COMMISSIONS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE TOWN STAFF? THANK YOU, DAVID. THE APPLICANT IS HERE. CAN YOU COME UP STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. BUT THEY SHOULD START. THANK YOU. MY NAME IS JACK SITE WITH NETWORK REAL ESTATE ADDRESSES. 5055 HIGHWAY IN SUITE 200 ST CHARLES, MISSOURI, 63304. I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF T MOBILE FOR NEW COMMUNICATIONS TOWER BEING THIS IS THE SECOND ONE TONIGHT. I THINK YOU GUYS KIND OF HEARD THE GENERAL NEED AND KIND OF HAVE A FEEL FOR THAT. SO I DON'T GET TOO MUCH IN THERE. BUT I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

JUST DON'T WANT TO ACTUALLY WOULD LIKE FOR YOU TO GO THROUGH IT. PLEASE GO THROUGH AN EXTREME DETAIL, RIGHT? SO LIKE THAT I'VE GOT A PRESENTATION HERE LAST TIME BECAUSE I DIDN'T GET TO HEAR IT. OH OF COURSE IT IS DIFFERENT PERSON LAST THE LAST PRESENTATION. NO, YOU'RE RIGHT.

SO YOU KNOW IT WAS MISSED. PLEASE DON'T SKIP OVER WHATEVER HE SAID. SHE SAID. YES IT DEFINITELY GO THROUGH THIS PRESENTATION. KIND OF WHAT WE HAVE HERE SO OBVIOUSLY, A TEAM OLD DISCOVERS A NEED FOR IMPROVED SERVICE IN THE AREA THAT THEY HIRE US TO GO IN COMPLETELY CALL. IT'S LIKE ACQUISITION PHASE, WHICH IS TO FIND A SUITABLE LOCATION. AND THEN AFTER THAT'S APPROVED IF IT IS APPROVED THEY WOULD GO AND BUILD THAT. THAT TOWER. SO WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT HERE IS FRONT OR FRONTIER PARK. PROSPEROUS D SPORTS COMPLEX. UH WE'RE BEHIND THE NATATORIUM, THE VERY CORNER OF THE PARK. THERE'S AN EXISTING LIGHT STANDARD. THAT'S THERE, SO THE PROPOSAL IS TO REPLACE THAT LIGHT STANDARD PLACE THE ANTENNAS ABOVE IT. KEEP THE LIGHTS. THEY'RE THE SAME HEIGHT AND THEN HAVE A 10 BY 15 GROUND SPACE. THAT GROUND SPACE IS A LITTLE BIT AWAY FROM THE TOWER. UM, AND THAT'S JUST BECAUSE OF THE WAY THIS PROPERTY CITY IT MAKES THE MOST SENSE TO PUT IT OVER THERE TOWARDS AN AUDITORIUM AND NOT RIGHT THERE ON THE PARK.

SO WE DID MOVE IT AWAY FROM THE TOWER. THOSE CABLES THAT RUN UNDERGROUND TO THE EXCUSE ME.

AND IT WILL BE HOUSED INSIDE OF A BLOCK WALL WITH THE STONE AND BRICK VENEER. THERE'S ACTUALLY EXISTING FACILITY AT THE PARK THAT HAS THAT SAME WALL AROUND IT, SO IT'S GOING TO BE A MATCH THAT MAKES MOST SENSE THERE. AERIAL VIEW. YOU CAN JUST SEE THAT WE'RE BACK THERE. BEHIND THE NATATORIUM. DAVID KENNEDY COVERED THAT WITH THE LOCATION. THE SCREENING WILL BE THAT BRICK AND STONE VENEER COMPOUND WALL AROUND THE GROUND EQUIPMENT, AND THEN THE ANTENNAS WILL BE MOUNTED TO THAT REPLACEMENT LIGHT STANDARD POLE WITH THE FLUSH MOUNT DESIGN. SITE PLAN.

DAVID CAN ALREADY WENT OVER THERE. I THINK YOU SEE THEY'RE JUST MORE SLIDES IN THERE AND BE HAPPY ANSWERING QUESTIONS ON THOSE YEARS YOU WENT OVER. I WON'T GO INTO EXTREME DETAIL THERE. AND HERE'S THE ELEVATION PAGE SHOWING THAT REPLACEMENT POLL A TOTAL OF 100 FT TO THE TOP, UH, THE LIGHTS WOULD STILL BE PLACED ON THERE. THE ANTENNAS ABOVE. SO GETTING INTO THE NEED

[01:50:05]

OF THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION. SO YOU KNOW, THE CARRIER IDENTIFIES THE NEED BASED ON YOU KNOW THE THEIR EXISTING NETWORK. UM, OBVIOUSLY THE GROWTH IN AN AREA AND THE GROWTH IN. USAGE OF OUR DEVICES OF THE LAST PERSON MENTIONED JUST HAS GENERATED A LOT OF NEED IN THE CELLULAR INDUSTRY. I THINK IT SOUNDS LIKE MOST OF YOU GUYS AGREED WITH THAT. UH WHENEVER WE GET THAT WE LOOK AT HOW WE CAN EFFICIENTLY PLACE THAT SITE WITHIN THE NETWORK PARTICULAR NETWORK OF THAT CARRIER TO GET THE MOST BANG FOR ABOUT COVER IT AND REDUCE THE OVERALL NUMBER OF TOWERS THAT THEY WOULD NEED. AND WE ALSO LOOK AT AREAS THAT ARE GOING TO MEET REGULATIONS. SO YOU GUYS ZONING CRITERIA AS WELL AS ANY, YOU KNOW. FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS THERE MAY BE SO THIS IS GONNA IMPROVE SERVICE IN AROUND THAT GENERAL AREA AND I'LL GET INTO THAT IN A COUPLE MORE SLIDES WILL HAVE THE MAPS THERE. UM SO THIS THEY'RE KIND OF COVERED BEFORE THAT, YOU KNOW, WE'RE RELYING HEAVILY ON OUR USAGE OF DATA IN AROUND OUR HOMES. WITH THAT GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT. NEW SERVICES ARE NEEDED. AND THIS FOLLOWING SLIDES WILL KIND OF SHOW YOU THAT IN A MAP A LITTLE BIT OF VISUAL OF THAT. SO THIS IS ONE OF THE BAND WITH THE FREQUENCIES THAT T MOBILE HAS SO ON THE LEFT, YOU'LL SEE THE EXISTING COVERAGE. AND YOU'LL SEE THERE WHERE THE GREEN IS GOOD AND THEN YELLOW IS A LITTLE WORSE. THAT'S YOU KNOW, JUST INDOOR RESIDENTIAL. THEN YOU GET TO THE ORANGES, THE IN VEHICLE AND BLUE IS OUTDOOR. ON THE RIGHT IS WITH THIS INCLUDED AND IF I CIRCLED HERE, YOU CAN KIND OF SEE THE RED CIRCLE THAT HAS THIS SITE PARTICULAR AND YOU CAN SEE A LOT OF IMPROVEMENT HERE TO THE SOUTH AND THESE RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT WAS NEXT SLIDE. HERE IS ANOTHER BAND WITH THEIR FREQUENCY THAT YEAH. T MOBILE IS USING AND YOU CAN SEE IN THAT A LOT MORE OF THAT YELLOW, ORANGE AND BLUE THAT THEY'RE LOOKING TO APPROVE AND AGAIN THIS SITE. COVERS A LOT OF IT TO IMPROVE IT ALL THROUGH THAT RESIDENTIAL AREA AND PROVIDE THAT COVERAGE. UH ANOTHER COUPLE MAPS. I WANT TO SHOW YOU ARE WHAT THEY CALL THE BEST SERVER MAPS. AND SO THIS IS THEIR EXISTING TOWER. KIND OF WHAT AREA EACH TOWER'S COVERING.

SO YOU'LL SEE IN THIS. THE TOWERS ARE SET UP INTO THREE SECTORS SO EACH SECTOR COVERS THE DIRECTION AND THE DIFFERENT COLORS INDICATING WHAT AREAS ARE COVERED BY THAT TOWER. YOU KNOW , SO THIS IS BOTH BANDS EXISTING AND THEN WHEN I GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE, YOU'LL SEE BOTH BANDS PROPOSED. SO THAT DOES YOU KNOW THOSE AREAS THAT WERE IMPROVED OR ESSENTIALLY TRANSFERRED OVER ONTO THIS TOWER? AND HE GETS THAT IMPROVED COVERAGE FROM THAT? UM I SAID I WOULD BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE REGARDING THE NEED OR THE FACILITY. AT THE END OF THE PRESENTATION. YES, IT IS. OKAY, ALRIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONER'S ON THIS MY ONLY QUESTION I THIS T MOBILE TOWER. IT WILL BE A TEAM ALL FACILITIES . THEY'RE GOING TO REPLACE THE LIGHT TOWER OR THE LIKE STANDARD WITH A NEW AND THEY'LL BE T MOBILE ON IT. SO THEN DO OTHER CARRIERS GET TO GET, UH, JOIN THAT TOWER AS WELL AS THAT. DOES IT WORK THAT WAY OR HOW DOES THAT HOW DOES THAT WORK ON A WHITE STANDARD LIKE THIS? AND THE DESIGN? IT REALLY WOULD BE FOR ONE CARRIER. THEY'RE JUST NOT REALLY SPACE FOR MULTIPLE CARRIERS ON THE LIGHT STANDARD, OR THEY CAN ACCOMMODATE. SO JUST BE FOR T MOBILE IS THE DESIGN. GOTCHA IN THAT, UH, IN THE WATER TOWER TYPE ONES THAT WE APPROVED LAST TIME. BILLS HAVE MULTIPLE CARRIERS. BUT YOU. IN THE WATER TOWER THAT WE APPROVED BEFORE. BILLS CAN ACTUALLY HOLD MORE CARRIERS, OKAY? SO WHAT ARE THE CUSTOMERS? WHAT'S THE CUSTOMER BASE FOR T MOBILE AND PROSPER AREA? I DON'T HAVE THE ACTUAL CUSTOMER BASE WITH ME AND HAVE TO GET THAT FROM THE R F ENGINEERS DID NOT HAVE THAT AS PART OF THIS PRESENTATION. BUT HOPEFULLY ALWAYS GROWING. ALRIGHT THE OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. SO NOW WE'RE OPEN UP TO THE PUBLIC FOR PUBLIC HEARING. IS ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO COME UP AND SPEAK IF YOU DO, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. DOESN'T LIKE WE HAVE ANYONE HERE, DAVID. NO. ALL RIGHT, SO A LITTLE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE IT TO THE COMMISSIONERS WHO LIKE TO GO AND START WITH COMMISSIONER CARSON QUICK, JUST KIND OF A QUICK QUESTION. I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S FORMAL OR NOT, BUT YOU KNOW, IN THE DESIGN, IT'S A PRETTY GOING TO CALL IT STANDARD. TALK LIKE THIS IS PROBABLY A LITTLE LESS THAN STANDARD LITTLE NICER BECAUSE YOU GOT THE LIGHTS ON IT, BUT SIMILAR TO THE GUY BEFORE WHO THEIR COMPANY IS WORKING ON A MORE AESTHETIC DESIGN. THAT'S A LITTLE MORE COHESIVE. IS THERE? IS THERE ANY THOUGHT IN YOUR COMPANY OR WHOEVER DESIGNS THESE

[01:55:04]

TWO? MAKING THESE A LITTLE LESS INDUSTRIAL WHERE IT'S AT? YOU KNOW IT WAS A BIG SPORTS COMPLEX, SO IT'S NOT A HUGE ISSUE, BUT I'M JUST KIND OF CURIOUS THAT SO WOULD YOU LIKE THE APPLICANT TO COME BACK UP? YEAH SURE. YOU WENT TOO FAST. I HIT THE BUTTON. AND YOU DID. YOU TOLD HIM TO GO? WE CLOSED. WE CLOSED IT. SO YOU CAN YOU STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AGAIN? SO MY NAME IS JACK SITE WITH NETWORK REAL ESTATE 5055 HIGHWAY IN SUITE 200 ST CHARLES, MISSOURI 63304. AND YES, WHEN WE LOOKED AT THAT LOOKED AT THE AREA REALLY, WHERE THERE'S EXISTING LIGHT STANDARDS THERE. IT MADE THE MOST SENSE TO DO THE FLUSH MOUNT ON THERE AND USE THOSE STRUCTURES RATHER THAN ADDING A STRUCTURE. UM IT ALSO MADE SINCE THERE'S A SIMILAR INSTANCE OF THIS IN THAT PARK, AND SO IT'S KIND OF A REPLICATION OF THAT, AND THAT'S WHAT MADE, YOU KNOW. JUST FELT LIKE IT MADE THE MOST SENSE. ERIN TALKING WITH, YOU KNOW, THE SD AND THE TOWN AND THE WHEEZING PHASE. WE WENT THROUGH OF THE SPACE, WE COULD LEAST BE ABLE TO PUT STRUCTURE THEY'RE REPLACING A STRUCTURE VERSUS A NEW ONE WAS THE BEST SOLUTION. SO TO THE PERSON WHO'S SITTING LOOKING AT IT. IT'LL JUST LOOK LIKE THE LIGHT THE LIGHTS AND THEN THE ANTENNAS ON TOP, WHICH YOU HAVE TO BE FLUSH MOUNTED, RIGHT? SO IT'LL JUST BE THE ANTENNAS ON TOP OF THE LIGHTS. BUT TO SOMEBODY WHO'S LOOKING AT IT. IT'LL JUST LOOK LIKE A LIGHTING STRUCTURE. THEY WON'T NECESSARILY BE ABLE TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN WHAT PART OF THE LIGHTING STRUCTURE AND WHAT PART IS THE ACTUAL THERE MIGHT BE A COUPLE EXTRA ANTENNAS ON TOP, RIGHT. FOR THE MOST PART, THEY'LL LOOK AT IT INTO YOUR LIGHT STRUCTURE. FOR THE MOST PART, YOU WON'T NOTICE, ESPECIALLY WITH THE GROUND SPACE BEING SEPARATED AND COMPLETELY ENCLOSED BY THAT STONE AND BRICK VENEER LIKE MENTION. THERE'S A KIND OF EXISTING ONE THERE, THEREBY PLAYERS YOU KNOW, SEEING WITH THE ANTENNAS ON ITS. DO YOU KNOW HOW TALL THAT EXISTING LIGHT IS? THAT'S THEIR 80. FT 20 FT DOLLAR BASICALLY TURNS ON IT. NO ONE HAS NOTICED IT. YEAH MY ONLY QUESTION IS FOR DAVID MORE. THIS IS MORE OF A QUESTION OF GETTING INFORMED. AND SO CAN WE SAY SORRY. THANKS THANK YOU TO YOU AND CHINATOWN, STAT. PLEASE COME BACK UP. UM VIOLENT QUESTION IS, DO WE AT SOME POINT IN THE APPROVAL, WHETHER IT'S STAFFER TO US, DO YOU GUYS LOOK AT SCREENING OR ANYTHING ELSE AROUND THAT BIG BLOCK? SORT OF VERY INDUSTRIAL KIND OF LOOK, I MEAN, DO WE REQUIRE SCREENING OR LANDSCAPING OR ANYTHING? SO WE TALKED ABOUT THIS AT THE LAST ONE THAT WE'VE HAD. I THINK EARLIER THIS YEAR, SO WE ACTUALLY DO NOT SO WE ARE TRYING TO GET AS PART OF SOME SORT OF WHEN WE DO THE, UM AND HE'S OWNING. UPDATES. TO HAVE SORT OF SOME CRITERIA, BUT UM, YOU KNOW, WE DON'T REQUIRE A WALL AROUND THE SCREEN THAT THAT COMPOUND WE DON'T REQUIRE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING. I THINK IN THIS ONE, WE DIDN'T HAVE LANDSCAPING JUST BECAUSE OF THE LOCATION VERSUS ANOTHER ONE THAT WAS CLOSER TOWARDS THE RIGHT AWAY AND SOME RESIDENTS AND SO, UM, WE JUST TRY TO SEE WHAT AREAS IT IS, BUT, UM, YOU KNOW, WE ARE TRYING TO SET THAT PRESIDENT OF WE DO WANT SORT OF TO BLEND INTO SOME SORT OF LIGHT STRUCTURE, WATER TOWER AS WELL AS HAVE SOME OF THOSE FEATURES THAT WE TALKED ABOUT THE WALL AND THE LANDSCAPING. MY ONLY THING IS THAT LIKE THAT SOME LANDSCAPING ALL AROUND THERE SEEMS TO MAKE THEM INSIDE THE PARK. OR PUT A BIG CONCRETE BOX OUT THERE RIGHT THERE, THE PICTURE OF WHERE IT IS BECAUSE IT'S BACK BEHIND THE NATATORIUM WHERE NOBODY'S REALLY GONNA WELL, I GUESS THE PART THE FIELDS WILL SEE IT ONE DAY. IT'S PART OF THE IS IT PART OF THE SOCCER FIELDS? YEAH, I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE PART OF ME. SEE IF I CAN GO TO UM YEAH. SO WHEN WE DO HAVE SOME EXISTING TREES OUT THERE. AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN. BUT UM, LIKE I SAID, TYPICALLY, WE DIDN'T PUSH FOR THE LANDSCAPING AND JUST BECAUSE WE DIDN'T SEE THAT IT WAS ON THE RIGHT AWAY OR THERE'S RESIDENTS.

IT'S ALL WITHIN THE PART. UM SO THEY WOULD SEE A YOU KNOW AN EFFORT WALL. UM YOU KNOW THAT'S SECURED, AND IT'S ONLY FOUR FOR THAT. YOU KNOW FOR THAT FACILITY , UM, AND THEN THERE'S JUST SORT OF IN THE BACK. UM BUT AS YOU CAN SEE THE WALL, BUT, YOU KNOW, MEETING AND THAT'S WHY WE DIDN'T PUSH FOR THE LANDSCAPING. APPRECIATE THAT YOU THOUGHT THROUGH IT. I THINK IT JUST IT'S A GOOD PRECEDENT. IF WE'RE GOING TO REQUIRE IT SOMEWHERE WE SHOULD REQUIRE EXACTLY, BUT I APPRECIATE THAT. YOU PUT SOME LOGICAL APPLICATION TO IT, SO I'M GOOD. DID YOU HAVE ANY DISCUSSIONS WITH THE PARKS DEPARTMENT? YES SO AGAIN, IT IS ON TOWN PROPERTY. SO I WENT THROUGH OUR TOWN ATTORNEY WENT THROUGH. PARKS DEPARTMENT WENT THROUGH EVERYTHING THAT YOU CAN THINK OF. UM, AND THAT'S WHY THERE IS AT LEAST AGREEMENT THAT WAS SIGNED AND TOWN COUNCIL APPROVED THAT. AND I BELIEVE WE ALSO HAVE THERE'S ANOTHER ONE BELIEVE IT'S SOMEWHERE AROUND HERE. THAT IS ANOTHER. TOWER AS WELL. I THINK THAT'S THE ONE NIGHT THAT HE WAS MENTIONING, LOOKING FOR 80 FT TOWER. THAT WENT THROUGH THE SAME PROCESS IN STP AND THE LEASE AGREEMENT BY COUNSEL. THE OTHER QUESTIONS FOR TOWN STAFF. SO NOW WE'RE OFFICIALLY CLOSING THIS RIGHT?

[02:00:07]

ALRIGHT. SO AT THIS TIME, I WOULD TAKE A MOTION, UM, FOR ITEM NUMBER SEVEN.

ENTERTAINMENT. MR CHAIRMAN. I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER SEVEN. SO WE GOT A MOTION TO APPROVE NUMBER SEVEN BY COMMISSIONER BLENDS IT. FOR SO WHAT THE WIRELESS TOWER BASED OFF A TOWN RECOMMENDATION. DO WE HAVE A 2ND 2ND 2ND FROM COMMISSIONER HARRIS ALL IN FAVOR. RAISE YOUR HAND. OH, CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER EIGHT REVIEW ACTION

[8. Review actions taken by the Town Council and possibly direct Town Staff to schedule topic(s) for discussion at a future meeting.]

TAKEN BY THE TOWN COUNCIL AND POSSIBLY DIRECT TALENT STAFF TO SCHEDULE TOPICS FOR THE DISCUSSION AT A FUTURE MEETING. SO I'LL MAKE THIS QUICK. BUT AS ALWAYS, WE KIND OF GO OVER RECENTLY, TOWN COUNCIL ATOMS TOWN COUNCIL APPROVED THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND THE ORDINANCE ADOPTION FOR MQ PROSPERING NORTH THAT WAS JUST EAST OF PRESTON LANE NORTH OF WHAT IS IT SILVER? SILVERMAN, SILVER MAINLAND? UM THERE'S ALSO TIME COUNCIL ALSO APPROVED THE WINDSONG RANCH. REMEMBER, IF YOU ALL RECALL IT WAS THE BUILDING MATERIALS THAT WERE THEY WERE TRYING TO AMEND. UM, FOR CERTAIN PHASES OF WINDSONG RANCH THAT WAS ALSO APPROVED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND THE ORDINANCE ADOPTION. WHAT WE HAVE GOING TO CHAMP COUNCIL IS PROSPEROUS CENTER OF Y'ALL RECALL, UM THIS WAS THE LIMITED SERVICE FOR THE MARRIOTT OFTEN MAY HARD AND, UM OVER THERE BY SORT OF WHERE WE HAVE ENCOMPASS HEALTH JUST HARD AND 3 80. UM WE HAD PNG IN TOWN COUNCIL, I THINK ADOPTED IT OR APPROVED FOR RECOMMENDATION. UH A YEAR AGO, SO THEY ARE COMING BACK TO, UM, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IN THE ORDINANCE ADOPTION, UM JUST TO GIVE YOU ALL HEADS UP COUNCIL WANTED MORE MAY, 3 ON THE HOLD ON THE LIMITED SERVICE AND SOME ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING. I BELIEVE THAT WAS SOME OF THE CONCERNS FROM PNC AS WELL, UM, THE APPLICANT DID REVISE, AND, UM THEIR LANDSCAPE PLAN BASADA PLAN, AND SO NOW THEY ARE READY TO GO BACK TO TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ORDINANCE ADOPTION UM. AND UPCOMING PNC. UM BEFORE YOU GO TODAY, SO THAT MARRIED THE TWO MINISTERS MARRIOTT ONE. THIS IS ONE THAT WE APPROVED LAST YEAR, RIGHT? YES, RECOMMENDED FROM PNC FOR APPROVAL AND TOWN COUNCIL APPROVED IT AS WELL WITH SOME SOME CONDITIONS TRYING TO GET THE STREETS IN MY HEAD, RIGHT? IS THIS THE ONE OVER THERE? THE FORD FORD FORD. IT'S BY A COMPASS HELD BY, UM IT'S ON THE WEST SIDE OF MAY HARD. UM I KNOW THERE'S A COUPLE OF HOTELS THAT ARE COMING UP OVER THERE. UM DEVELOPER THAT WANTED TO DO THIS ONE PLUS ANOTHER ONE NEXT TO IT OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. OKAY, GOT IT. IT WAS A REASON FOR I THINK OFFICE TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT FOR A FOUR STORY LIMITED SERVICE. UM. I THINK I JUST KEPT THE SAME WINSTON. UM PD AMENDMENTS ARE THE APOLOGIST.

YOU CAN GET RID OF THAT FOR UPCOMING P AND Z. I BELIEVE TODAY WAS A RECENT MIDDLE DAY.

SO WE'RE LOOKING AT ONE PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS AND SIX ALL REFERRED. GIVE THAT TRUE. UM SO JUST KNOW THAT, UM AS ALWAYS, UM , IF YOU ARE NOT PLANNING TO ATTEND THE PNC BEING, PLEASE LET US KNOW. UM SO THAT WAY WE CAN MAKE SURE THAT WE PLAN AHEAD. UM ALSO, WE'RE EXCITED TO INTRODUCE OUR NEW DEVELOPMENT MANUAL THAT WE SHOULD BE POSTING PRETTY SOON, UM THIS IS THIS DEVELOPMENT MANUAL IS GREAT FOR, UM JUST KIND OF GIVING A GENERAL DIRECTION FOR DEVELOPMENT. AND THIS YEAR AND THIS UPDATE WAS PRETTY BIG UPDATE FROM OUR PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT. ANNUALS OF ANYONE HAVE LOOKED, UM THIS AND WE'RE TRYING TO KIND OF MAKE IT MORE USER FRIENDLY WITH FLOW CHARTS AND KIND OF GIVE PURPOSE STATEMENTS FOR EACH CASE TYPE AS WELL AS, UM, KIND OF MAKE IT EASIER FOR EVERYONE. UM WE WILL SEND AN ANNOUNCEMENT JUST FOR YOU ALL TO LOOK AT. UM BUT WE TYPICALLY UPDATE THESE DEVELOPMENT MANUALS EVERY, UM, WANTED TWO TIMES A YEAR. THIS IS A COMPLETE DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENT MANUAL. UM THERE'S FOUR AND I KNOW WE HAVE A LONG MEANING, BUT, UM JESSICA'S GONNA COME UP AND JUST KIND OF TALK ABOUT SOME MIGHT CHANGE AND IPAD TRAINING.

UM AND BEFORE THAT, I JUST WANTED TO INTRODUCE WE DO HAVE A PLANNING INTERN HERE JUST FOR THE SUMMER. UM MAYOR MATHEWS. SHE'S CURRENTLY STUDYING URBAN PLANNING AT KANSAS STATE, SO WE'RE JUST GOING TO HAVE HER FOR THE SUMMERS WERE EXCITED FOR HER TO HELP THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.

OTHER THAN THAT, I WILL TURN IT OVER TO JESSICA, WHO IS ON HER WAY OVER HERE. YES THANKS, DAVID. AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE SHE COMES UP FOR STAFF. ALREADY.

[02:06:16]

HELLO. HELLO. I'M USUALLY BEHIND THE COMPUTER, SO YEAH. STATE YOUR NAME YOUR ADDRESS, SPEAKING TO THE MIC, MA'AM, I THINK THAT'S A LITTLE BIT TOO MUCH INFORMATION FOR YOU GUYS HAVE A POINT. I DO NOT. YEAH I'M DRESSED LIKE THIS. I DO APOLOGIZE, UM FOUR YEAR CODES. I DO NOT WANT IT TO BE ON RECORD, SO I'LL HAVE DAVID, GIVE IT OUT. OKAY WAIT FOR DAVID. THANK YOU.

OKAY SO I ALL YOUR IPAD CODES ARE THE SAME WEIGHT. I'M DOING MY TRAINING FIRST, NOT IPADS. SO . HOW BAD UM, IF YOU LOOK BACK AT THE MONITOR YOU CAN SEE THE GREEN. IF IT IS PRETTY THICK.

AND YOU CAN HEAR YOURSELF OVER. THE SPEAKERS HERE. THAT'S PRETTY GOOD. YOU ALREADY KNOW I WILL SIGN. YOU HEAR ME NOW. CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW? IT'S NOT DOING ANYTHING. IT'S NOT YOU GOT TO TURN IT ON DAMON CLOSER. CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW? WOW. YEAH, I CAN HEAR YOU. BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO REMEMBER SOMEBODY IN THE AUDIENCE. THEY RELIED ON THIS. I MEAN, OF COURSE. WE CAN SOMEWHAT HERE, YOU BUT ALSO I'M SITTING BACK THERE WITH A RACK. WOULD YOU CAN KIND OF HEAR THE HUM. SO IF I CAN'T HEAR YOU WITHOUT THE HEADPHONES ON, I KNOW THAT PEOPLE CAN'T HEAR YOU HERE. AND THEN IF YOU GO ON THE WEBSITE AND LOOK AT LISTEN TO ONE OF THE MEETINGS, YOU'LL SEE WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. THE MAYOR HAS ECONOMY AND LIKE MM, I WATCHED THE MEAT I SEE. SO WHEN YOU'RE ESPECIALLY YOU DID, AND I'VE NOTICED, ESPECIALLY TODAY. WHEN YOU'RE TALKING AND YOU'RE LIKE, HEY, GUYS. HEY YOU SEE THE DIFFERENCE YOU GOT TO TALKING TO YOU CAN'T TURN YOUR HEAD. YOU'RE GONNA TURN YOUR HEAD YOU YOU GOTTA GET UP IN THERE. THE. THE JUST TAKE IT WITH YOU. YEAH, SEE , UM IF YOU NOTICE THE MIXER EVEN WHEN I HOLD ON, IT'S NOT FAR SO I DO HAVE THAT OPTION.

UM, I KNOW THE MAYOR. AT SOME MEETINGS WHEN HE'S DOING A LOT HE WEARS. THE YEAH. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO DO THAT, THAT IS PERFECTLY FINE. UM RIGHT NOW WE HAVE A GOOD AMOUNT OF ALL OF OUR MICS ARE LOVED. IF YOU CAN TELL YES. UH I LITERALLY JUST, UH, TEXT MY BOSS. I WAS LIKE WE NEED TO FIX THIS, SO I WILL BE WORKING TO GET THOSE, UM THIS PORTION OF THE MIC IS JUST PLASTIC AND WIRES. SO IF YOU'RE GONNA MOVE YOUR MIKE TRY TO GO FOR THE LOWER PART. LIKE THE RECORD TO REFLECT THAT WAS CITY COUNCIL AND THAT P AND Z THAT DAMAGED THE MIX. THEY'RE GONNA GET THE SAME TALK THAT YOU'RE GETTING. YEAH UM, I JUST WANTED TO SAY ALSO THE BENEFIT FOR JUST MAKING SURE THAT WE CAN HEAR EVERYONE. UM, A LOT OF TIMES WHERE WE'RE SCRIBBLING DOWN SOME OF YOUR CONCERNS FOR ALL THESE ITEMS, AND SO WE TYPICALLY GO BACK TO THE MINUTE THE VIDEO, UM AND LOOK THROUGH AND WE WRITE OUT MINUTES. WE WRITE OUR STAFF REPORTS. WHEN I WRITE OUT THE STAFF REPORT FOR TOWN COUNCIL I'M GOING THROUGH AND SPENDING SOME TIME TO LOOK AND SOMETIMES, LIKE, UNDERSTAND HALF OF IT. AND SO FEEL FREE TO AND I THINK JESSICA MENTIONED THIS, BUT WE

[02:10:06]

JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE YOU KNOW, FEEL FREE TO GO BACK TO ANY PNC MEETING AND JUST WATCHED FOR 10 MINUTES AND YOU WON'T HEAR SOME OF THE THINGS AND SO THAT'S WHY THIS NEW FACES. WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE PROVIDE, UM AN UPDATE TO EVERYONE AND WHY IT'S IMPORTANT AND I KNOW IT.

SOMETIMES SHE BRINGS A SIGN UP AND YOU KNOW, AND I AND I GET THAT, BUT JUST KNOW THAT WHY WE'RE DOING THIS BECAUSE WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE CAPTURE UM, ALL YOUR CONCERNS BECAUSE I THINK SOMETIMES WE TRY TO NOT ASSUME, BUT BUT WE HEAR SOME OF IT AND THEN WE WERE TRYING TO WRITE IT DOWN AS WELL. AND SO WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE AND I JUST WANTED TO PROVIDE THAT WE UNDERSTAND. SO IF I'M TALKING TO COMMISSIONER CARSON, CAN YOU GUYS HELP ME NOW? I CAN HEAR YOU TALKING TO COMMISSIONER USUALLY HEAR ME NOW. OKAY SO I GOT TO SIT THIS CLOSE AND STAND RIGHT HERE. IT'S PERFECT. I CAN HEAR YOU PERFECTLY. BUT WHEN I'M HERE, YOU CAN HEAR ME. IT'S JUST HOW CLOSE JUST THAT SMALL YEAH. SO CLOSE IS THAT SMALL AND I ALSO HAVE LEVELS BACK THERE. SO UM, LIKE, COMMISSIONER GLEN YOURS WAS CRACKLING. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU COULD HEAR THAT.

OKAY I CAN HEAR IT IN MY EAR SO I CAN TOGGLE THE VOLUME. UM UM COUNCILMAN COTTON VERY LOUD, VERY LOUD SPEAKER. SO I HAVE TO TURN IT DOWN BECAUSE ALWAYS LOUD ON TAPE. UM. WE GOT IT. THANK YOU. YOUR DEEP VOICE. I HAVE TO LOWER DOWN SOMETIMES. SO IT JUST DEPENDS ON THE DAY. YOU HAVE THAT BARRY WHITE THING YOU WANT VERY WIDE. YEAH WHITE RADIO DJ, UH, YOU ALL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ANY ALRIGHT? FEEL FREE. IF YOU ARE ONE DAY, Y'ALL JUST LIKE, HEY, I WANT TO WEAR THE WIRE.

GOOD INFORMATION. SO IF WE NEED A LOT OF LAYERS, JUST ASK. YES IT'S A DIFFERENT CHANNEL. BUT IT'S PERFECTLY FINE, UM THE SAME IF I STEP OUT MAYBE. GO DO SOMETHING. DOUG HAS A MIXTURE OVER HERE. SO HE CAN TOGGLE MIX. HE CAN DO EVERYTHING. IT'S EVERYTHING I HAVE BACK THERE HAS THE POWER YES. GOOD DEAL. UM, IF THERE IS A. PERSON IN NEED THAT CANNOT SPEAK INTO THIS MIKE EXAMPLE. WE HAD SOMEBODY COMING INTO COUNCIL AND THEY WERE IN A WHEELCHAIR. I COULDN'T HEAR WHERE THEY WERE SAYING. UM, WILL ALWAYS HAVE ONE OF THESE MAKES IF ONE OF YOU COULD SAY ONE SECOND, WE NEED TO GET YOU A MIC. THEY HAVE TO SPEAK INTO MIKE. IF NOT, WE CANNOT HEAR THEM. AND PERV. MEETING WALLS WHENEVER WE GET TO A CERTAIN SIZE. WE'RE GOING TO BE IN VIOLATION. I WILL LOOK AT YOU AND BE LIKE, HEY. GET ONE, RIGHT ? YEAH. OKAY, ALRIGHT. GREAT.

THAT WAS THE EASY PART. HERE'S THE FUN PART. I'M GONNA WALK AROUND AND ACTUALLY TELL YOU ALL THE CODE. IT'S ALL THE SAME CODE FOR ALL OF Y'ALL. OKAY, WE CAN CHANGE THE OTHER ONE. OH, IF YOU SWIPE ALL THE WAY OVER. HOLD ON CIVIL SOCIETY, RIGHT. YOU'LL SEE, UH, ICON THAT'S A LITTLE READ CURSIVE I A. IT'S I ANNOTATE. OKAY? SO I HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE INFORMATION ON THIS APP THAT DAVID IS GOING TO. HE'S GONNA GET TRAINING ON IT, AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO SEND OUT THANKS. ALSO, UM ON THE FRONT OF YOUR BEDS. I HAVE TAPED MY BUSINESS CARD. 24 7 IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS. COMMON. MY MOTHER'S FUNGUS MYSELF. SO AS JESSICA MENTIONED, UM KIND OF USING THIS THIS PROGRAM, UM WE'RE GOING TO PROVIDE SORT OF A GUIDE AND A STEP. UM JUST FOR ANY NEW

[02:15:06]

COMMISSIONERS THAT COME IN WE, YOU KNOW, WE'LL HAVE SOME SORT OF PAMPHLET OR OUR GUIDE FOR THEM. SO WE'LL JUST BE LOOKING OUT FOR THAT. AND UM, I THINK JUST FOR RIGHT NOW YOU'RE MORE THAN WELCOME TO STAY AFTER THE MEETING TO KIND OF FINALIZE, UM , THE SETUP FOR THE IPADS, BUT AGAIN, JESSICA DID PROVIDE HER CARD WITHIN THE IPADS AND UM, YOU KNOW AGAIN, WE WOULD RECOMMEND IF Y'ALL CAN STAY A LITTLE BIT JUST TO KIND OF HAVE HER SET IT UP FOR YOU. AND IF NOT MORE THAN WELCOME TO SCHEDULE SOME TIME WITH JESSICA. UM AT A LATER TIME AND COME IN AND GET SOME MORE, BUT AS WE'RE GOING THROUGH TRAINING, I'M GONNA GET MORE FAMILIAR FAMILIAR WITH IT. UM AND THEN WE'LL PROVIDE SOME SORT OF GUIDANCE FOR YOU. UM AGAIN, YOU CAN YOU CAN STILL ACCESS THE AGENDA THROUGH OTHER WAYS AS WELL. UM YEAH, SO YOU WOULD STILL BE ABLE TO DO THAT, BUT WE'RE JUST TRYING TO PROVIDE UPDATES AND MAKE IT EASIER FOR EVERYONE TO LOOK AT, UM AND GO FROM THERE. SO UNLESS JESSICA HAS ANYTHING ELSE BUT WELL, UM, I THINK THAT CONCLUDES THE END OF HER. UM I'VE HAD TRAINING UNLESS ANYONE HAS ANY QUESTIONS FOR MIKE OR IPAD TRAININGS. I'M GONNA NEED TO TALK TO YOU AFTERWARDS BECAUSE I WAS IN THE MIDDLE PART WHEN YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT ALL THAT EVERYTHING PASSES, AND SO I'M I AM IN THERE NOW. I'M CONNECTED. SO YES, EXCEPT FOR JOSH. I ALREADY KNOW. OH THE LAST THING WITH THE ENTITY THAT FRONT SCREEN WHEN YOU LOG IN, YOU CAN PLAY AROUND WITH THAT SCREEN THAT'S ACTUALLY DIED. BUT I CAN SHOW YOU ALL. AND ONE MORE LAST THING WE DO HAVE SECURITY BADGES. UM THEY ALL BEEN HANDED OUT, SO NEVER MIND. THAT'S THE END. THERE WE GO TO A DREAM. OR ACTUALLY PRODUCTION, TOO. RIGHT NOW. WE'RE AT THE END OF THE PNC MEETING. I'LL TAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. MR CHAIRMAN. I MOVE THAT WE ADJOURN THE MOTION TO ADJOURN. 2ND 2ND 2ND BY COMMISSIONER HARRIS ALL THEIR FAVORITE RAISE YOUR HAND. TIME IS 8 21.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.