[8. Consider and act upon approving Change Order Number 01 for CSP 2022-48-B to Mario Sinacola & Sons Excavating, Inc., related to construction services for the First Street (Coit-Custer) 4 Lane project (CIP No. 2014-ST); and authorizing the Interim Town Manager to execute Change Order Number 01 for same.]

NUMBER EIGHT COUNCILMAN COTTON. UH WELL, THE ITEM IS RELATED TO THE $250,000. CHANGE ORDER FOR MARY PERSON, NICOLA TO ACCELERATE. THE. CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSECTION, THE INTERSECTIONS, EXPANDING OUT THOSE INTERSECTIONS AT BOTH CASTOR AND COURT. FOR FIRST STREET IS MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE WAY THIS WORKS. UH AND AH! MAY HAVE HAD A MISTAKE SOMEWHERE, BUT I UNDERSTOOD THAT THAT 250,000 SO WHAT IT'S DOING IS ACCELERATES IT FOR A PERIOD OF MAYBE I GUESS TO GET IT DONE IN TIME FOR SCHOOL TO OPEN. IN LIEU OF TOWARDS THE END OF SCHOOL. WHEN I THINK THE PROJECT'S SUPPOSED TO BE COMPLETED, SO ACCELERATES IT FOR 6 TO 9 MONTHS. IS THAT THE WAY THAT WORKS GLAD YOU'RE BACK UP HERE? WE DIDN'T. WE DIDN'T DISTRACT YOU OVER THERE. YES SIR. YEAH, AS WE'RE AS YOU'RE AWARE, THE CYNICAL WAS ABLE TO COMMIT TO THE TWO LANES. AND SO THE CONCERN WAS ONE SCHOOL OPENS. WE'LL JUST HAVE THE TWO LANES. AND KNOWING THAT OUR PINCH POINTS ARE GOING TO BE AT THE INTERSECTIONS THAT WAS THE MAIN CONSERVATIVE. LET'S COME BACK TO COUNCIL WITH HERE'S AN OPTION. THE THAT ENGINEERING WE THINK IS. IS WORTH WORTH IT JUST BECAUSE THOSE ARE GOING TO BE THE PINCH POINTS AND IT COULD BE SEVERAL MONTHS. AFTER SCHOOL OPENS BEFORE THAT WOULD WOULD WOULD BE IN PLACE. OKAY SO LET'S SAY IT WILL ACCELERATE THE OPENING OF THOSE INTERSECTIONS. BYE. SIX MONTHS. IT COULD BE 69 MINUTES. YES, 6 TO 9 MONTHS. UH AND MY UNDERSTANDING WHEN THIS HAS BEEN DISCUSSED BROUGHT UP BEFORE WAS THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT? WAS PAYING FOR THE $250,000 FOR THAT.

MISUNDERSTANDING. SCHOOL IS NOT PAYING ANYTHING TOWARDS THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT AT ALL IS MY UNDERSTANDING. SO UH, SOMEWHAT INDIRECTLY. SO WHEN WE CAME TO CANCEL WITH THE BID AWARD WE HAD THE BUDGET OF 1.149. MILLION. FOR THE THEIR PARTICIPATION FOR THE TWO LANES IN FRONT OF THE SCHOOL, AS WELL AS THE TURN LANE IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE THE SCHOOL. SO WHEN THERE WAS A BUDGET ESTIMATE. AND SO AFTER THE PROJECT WAS BID, AND AFTER REWARDED IT, WE WENT BACK THROUGH AND FOUND WHAT THE ACTUAL COSTS WERE FROM MARIO SENTE COLA ASSOCIATED WITH THOSE IMPROVEMENTS AT THE SCHOOLS, BUT YEAH, AND IT'S ROUGHLY 1.7. SO MANY, SO WE ACTUALLY WILL BE GETTING MORE MONEY FROM THE SCHOOL AGAIN FOR THE PAYMENT, PAYING THEIR MONEY FOR THE WHAT'S UNDER CONTRACT NOW, AND WE'RE ALSO PAYING MORE MONEY IS MY UNDERSTANDING. WE'RE PAINTING A MILLION MORE THAN WE HAD PLANNED AS WELL. RIGHT YEAH, THEREABOUTS AND SO. THE DECISION WE HAVE TODAY. IS DO WE WANT TO SPEND $250,000 OF POUND MONEY THAT COULD BE SPENT ON OTHER PROJECTS IN TOWN, RIGHT? THIS IS 250 OUT OF OUR POCKET GRANTED. WITH YOU. THE CONTENTION IS WE'VE GOT A LITTLE BIT OF A WINDFALL FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. BUT I'D CONTEND WE GOT LESS THAN A WINDFALL BECAUSE WE SPENT MORE THAN THEY GAVE US IN EXCESS. AND OUR DECISION TONIGHT IS DO WE WANT TO SPEND 250? ON THIS VERSUS HAVING IT SET ASIDE FOR ANOTHER CAPITAL PROJECT, AND THIS PROJECT IS TO ME A VERY SHORT TERM. IMPROVEMENT. TRAFFIC BECAUSE THE TRADE IT'S THIS PROJECT'S GONNA GET DONE ONE WAY OR ANOTHER. IT'S JUST GONNA GET DONE SIX OR NINE MONTHS LATER.

UH, AND SO TO ME TO SPEND $250,000 TO IMPROVE THOSE INTERSECTIONS ONLY FOR THAT 6 TO

[00:30:02]

9 MONTHS. VERY TEMPORARY SOLUTION IS. I POOR USE OF THOSE FUNDS. I'D MUCH RATHER AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SPENDING MONEY, TOO. TO IMPROVE THE COURT ROAD. TURN LANES ONTO. FIRST STREET, AS IS WE'RE TALKING ABOUT DOING SOME OTHER THINGS. THAT MONEY COULD EASILY GO TOWARDS THOSE PROJECTS AND MULTIPLE OTHER PROJECTS IN THE TOWN. IN LIEU OF A. TO ME, YOU KNOW IT'S SIX MONTHS. IT'S NOT A THIS. THIS IS NOT SOMETHING WE'RE GONNA DO SIX MONTHS OF ITS GONNA MAKE A CHANGE SIX MONTHS LATER. IT'S DONE AFTER SIX MONTHS, SO WE SPENT $250,000 FOR SIX MONTHS.

WHEREAS WE COULD SPEND 250,000 ON A PROJECT ON A ROAD THAT COULD BE PERMANENT. PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT INSTEAD OF JUST A SIX MONTH AND NINE MONTH IMPROVEMENT. MAYBE THIS IS A DECISION OF WHETHER WE WANT TO SPEND 250. TO A TO PROVIDE SIX MONTHS. 6 TO 9 MONTHS. WHATEVER LET'S SAY DURING THE SCHOOL YEAR, WHICH IS THE ISSUE. PROBABLY SIX MONTHS NO MORE THAN SIX MONTHS BECAUSE BY THE TIME THEY GET STARTED AND FINISHED AND BY THE TIME AT SCHOOL'S OUT PROBABLY SIX MONTH WINDOW. TO ME THAT MONEY INSTEAD OF IMPROVING TRAFFIC. FOR THOSE SIX MONTHS ONLY. IT WOULD BE MUCH BETTER SPENT ON IMPROVING TRAFFIC PERMANENTLY. IN ANYWHERE ELSE IN TOWN, INCLUDING THE INTERSECTION AT COURT IN FIRST OR MULTIPLE OTHER POSITIONS. CAN YOU BRING UP THE SLIDE THAT SHOWS THE CHANGE AND THEN EXPLAIN TO US? WHAT YES. WHAT'S IMPROVING? OKAY? YEAH. SO FOR THE FIRST SECTION IS THAT HERE. THIS IS FIRST STREET AND THEN THE JUST EXPANDING THAT THAT NORTHERN SIDE OF THE INTERSECTION JUST TO GET A FULL FULL INTERSECTION BACK TO GREENS POINT. SO THAT'S ROUGHLY EVEN CLARIFY THAT THAT'S MAKING THE SECOND THE NORTHERN PART THERE, AND IT'S NOT JUST THE ANGULAR PART. THAT CONNECTS IT RIGHT. AND ALSO THAT TRANSITION THAT WOULD BE A TEMPORARY TRANSITION. IT'S ACTUALLY THE PERMANENT PART ON THE NORTH SIDE. CORRECT THE PERMANENT. THAT'S WHY I PERMANENT, BUT IT'S GOING TO BE PERMANENT SIX MONTHS LATER, ANYWAY UNDER OUR CURRENT CONTRACT, AND WHAT THIS ONLY ACCELERATES THAT IT WILL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC. IT'LL BE OPEN CONDITIONS. CURRENT ROAD CONDITIONS BASICALLY IN THAT SPOT, AND YOU WOULD HAVE CURRENT ROAD CONDITIONS, AND THAT'S ABOUT ALL THE WAY SO YOU'D HAVE ALL NEW CONCRETE HAS SHOWN HERE. AND LIKE COUNCILMAN, GOD SAYING IT'S $1000. TO ACCELERATE. BEFORE SCHOOL STARTS, SO YOU HAVE A FULL FUNCTIONING INTERSECTION THERE, BUT IF WE IN THE INTERIM TIME THERE'S STILL BLACKTOP. WHATEVER IS CURRENTLY THEY'RE CURRENTLY YEAH. WHAT YOU HAD SAID THEY WERE GOING TO IMPROVE THE TWO LANES TO CONCRETE ON THE SOUTH SIDE TO LANDS ON THE SOUTH SIDE WILL BE THERE. THIS IS ON THE SOUTH SIDE THAT THAT YELLOW IS TWO LANES THAT'S GOING TO BE THERE ANYWAY BY THEM. THIS IS NOT ACCELERATING THAT THAT'S GOING TO BE IN PLACE. ALL THIS DOES IS ACCELERATE THAT NORTH STRETCH THERE. 100 YARDS. 200 YARDS, QUARTER MILE, WHATEVER IT IS FOR SIX MONTHS. THAT'S ALL THIS DOES IS ACCELERATE THAT AND OF COURSE, THE OTHER END SO THAT YOU CAN STACK UP AT THE INTERSECTION BASICALLY IN THE IN THE DEEPER STACKING IT'S VERY SIMILAR TO THE CONCERN WITH COIT ROAD WE TALKED ABOUT COMING SOUTH IF YOU DON'T HAVE THAT KIND OF THROAT. AS YOU'RE COMING TO AN INTERSECTION. YOU'RE NOT ABLE TO GET CARS IN THERE TO STACK THEM. SO WHEN YOU GET THE SIGNAL WORKS IT'S GONNA BE. THERE IS SOME STACKING ALREADY ALLOWED AT THAT INTERSECTION, BUT IT'S NOT DEEP, VERY LITTLE. NOT VERY MUCH, SO I HAVE A DIFFERENT KIND OF QUESTION.

HUNDREDS IF AH! MY NON EDUCATED NON ENGINEER. OPINION IS THIS SECTION IS THE MOST IMPORTANT SECTION I WANT TO ASK YOU YOUR OPINION IF WE CHOOSE TO DO ONLY SECTION ONE, AND WE DON'T DO SECTION TWO. WHAT IS THE IMPACT? THIS IS WHAT I SEE THAT BACKS UP AS WELL AS QUITE GOING SOUTH FIRST STREET AND PEOPLE ARE GOING TO TRY TO TURN LEFT. TO GO TO SCHOOL. IT'S GOING TO BE TERRIBLE, SO I FEEL LIKE WE NEED TO DO THE SAME THING. AS YOU KNOW, UM, WE TALKED ABOUT IT.

QUITE AND FIRST. MY QUESTION HERE IS IF WE JUST DID SECTION ONE FOR $100,000. WE DID NOT DO THIS SECTION TO CHANGE ORDER FOR ON CUSTER CUSTER FOUNDERS FIRST CUSTARD OF FOUNDERS UM WHAT WOULD THE TRAFFIC IMPACT BEING YOUR OPINION? NOW IT'S I WOULD PROBABLY SWITCH HIM JUST AND I'LL GET TO THAT HERE IN A SECOND. AS FAR AS THIS AND THE REASON I SAY THAT IS THIS IS KIND OF YOUR OUTGOING TRAFFIC. SO. YOUR IDEA OF DOING QUITE TO COME IN IS PROBABLY GOING TO BE MORE VALUABLE. BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE EVERYBODY'S GOING TO GET A SCHOOL AT THE SAME TIME. I'M GOING TO KIND OF COME IN. WE'RE GONNA GET A LOT MORE. I GUESS IT'S GONNA BE HEAVIER THAN WHERE IS THIS? MAYBE MORE OF YOUR OUTBOUND TRAFFIC IN THE YOU KNOW. AFTER SCHOOL. SO THIS ONE

[00:35:06]

MAY NOT BE AS IMPORTANT BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO BE RELEASED AT DIFFERENT TIMES. POTENTIALLY I THINK IT'S STILL IMPORTANT. DON'T GET ME WRONG. I STILL THINK $100,000 TO GET THE INTERSECTION FUNCTIONING. SO THAT WE'VE DONE EVERYTHING WE HAND BEFORE SCHOOL STARTS. AND NOT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THE COMPLAINTS. I THINK IT'S WORTH IT. THE REASON I SAY, SECTION TO BELGIUM AHEAD OF THAT ONE REAL QUICK. $150,000 THOSE THOSE TWO SOUTHERN LANES FOR CLARITY.

THAT'S ALREADY BEEN COMMITTED. THIS IS THE NORTHERN PIECE. THIS NOT ONLY HELPS WITH THE INTERSECTION OF CUSTER, WHICH WE TALKED ABOUT TRYING TO ACCELERATE, PAY SOME FUNDS TO DO THE SIGNAL AHEAD OF TIME. THIS THIS WILL ALLEVIATE THE ISSUES WE WERE EXPERIENCING EVERY YEAR RIGHT NOW WITH FOUNDERS ACADEMY , SO THIS NOT ONLY TAKES CARE OF SOME OF THE ISSUES WITH THE HIGH SCHOOL GETS THE INTERSECTION BLOWN UP, BUT THIS WILL ALSO HAVE ALL THE TURN LANES MEDIAN OPENINGS THAT WILL FACILITATE FOUNDERS ACADEMY SO KIND OF AGAIN ONLY ACCELERATING ACCELERATING RIGHT NOW THERE'S A PROBLEM AT THIS. FOUNDERS UM YEAH, THEY'RE JUST THEY'RE JUST COMING OFF TWO LANES RIGHT NOW. AND THAT'S THE ASPHALT SO THEY STILL GET JUST THOSE TWO LANES SO I THINK YOU'VE GOT SCHOOL HAD TWO LANES. I MEAN, THAT'S WHERE I GO LONG TIME. AND ALSO AS PEOPLE ARE LEAVING COURT THAT IS IN A THAT'S IN THE AFTERNOON. AND IT'S A IT'S A TRAFFIC PROBLEM, BUT IN A RUSH HOUR TIME, PERIOD MORNING, MAYBE COMING IN MAYBE A RUSH HOUR TIME PERIOD. BUT WHEN THEY LEAVE SCHOOL IS THAT TYPICALLY RUSH OUT? TO ADD JUST TO ACCELERATE, NOT ADD JUST THE NORTH SIDE OF BOTH OF THESE ACCELERATED FOR SIX MONTHS FOR 250,000 THAT COULD BE SPENT ON SOMETHING ELSE. I JUST DON'T THINK IT'S WORTH THAT. I THINK WE COULD SPEND THAT 250 REAL QUICKLY ON OTHER PROJECTS THAT ARE PERMANENT PROJECTS. PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS JUST WOULD LIKE TO CLARIFY TWO THINGS. FIRST OF ALL. I WOULD SAY THAT WITHOUT THE AGREEMENT WITH THE DISTRICT IN EXISTENCE. WE WOULD NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO HAVE THESE ADDITIONAL FUNDS. SO JUST TO CLARIFY THAT I WOULD ALSO BEEN SECOND SAY THAT, REMEMBER THAT THE PROPOSALS THAT WE'RE PUTTING BEFORE YOU ARE A DIRECT AND A DIRECT RESPONSE TO REQUEST OF COUNCIL. TO BRING TO YOU. THE ABILITY TO ACCELERATE. THE ACCESS IN THESE AREAS. AND THAT'S WHERE THESE CAME FROM. SO I JUST WANT TO BE REAL CLEAR. I BELIEVE THAT BECAUSE OF THE FUNDING MECHANISM WE HAVE IN PLACE. AND THE FACT THAT WE CAN ACHIEVE ACCELERATION. I THINK THIS PROPOSAL IS PROBABLY THE BEST PROPOSAL TO ACHIEVE YOUR REQUEST IF YOU'VE CHANGED YOUR MIND. THAT'S A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT ISSUE. I HAVEN'T CHANGED MY MIND. I UNDERSTOOD THIS TO BE FUNDED. THROUGH THE SCHOOL AND I THINK I WANT TO BE CLEAR IF WE DON'T PROVE THIS. WE HAVE 250,000 MORE IN OUR ACCOUNT THAN IF WE DO APPROVE IT. IS THAT RIGHT OR NOT? IT'S 250 RIGHT OUT OF OUR POCKET. THE TOWN'S POCKET IT SENT. THE TEXT OF THE SCHOOL ISN'T PAYING FOR ANY OF THIS WILL BE 250,000 MORE DOLLARS LEFT OVER FROM THE FUNDS THAT WERE RECEIVING FROM THE DISTRICT. KNOW THAT THOSE FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED TO THE PROJECT ALREADY AS IT IS, YOU CAN YOU CAN SAY IT RELATES TO THE DISTRICT MONEY, BUT THE END OF THE DAY IT'S 250 THAT THE TOWN HAS TO SPEND OR NOT SPEND. IT'S NOT CITY. IT'S NOT SCHOOL MONEY BECAUSE THAT SCHOOL MONEY IS ALLOCATED TO THE EXISTING CONTRACT WAS. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT SCHOOLS ARE NOT RELATED TO THE EXISTING CONTRACTS MORE. IT'S MORE MONEY THAN WE ANTICIPATED WHEN WE BUDGETED, BUT IT'S OUR COST IS MORE MONEY. WELL, I UNDERSTAND, BUT JUST LOOKING AT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTRACT. WE'RE GOING TO RECEIVE MORE DOLLARS. THAT ARE REQUIRED TO PAY THIS THIS BILL. YEAH BUT THEY'RE NOT PAYING FOR THIS. THERE'S THERE WERE RECEIVING MORE MONEY THAN THEY PAY. A LOT OF THINGS THEY'RE NOT PAYING FOR. THIS IS SEPARATE FROM THAT. WE'RE MAKING A DECISION TODAY.

DO WE WANT TO SPEND $250,000 OF TOWN MONEY? THIS ISN'T SCHOOL MONEY. WE'RE MAKING A DECISION ON BECAUSE SCHOOL MONEY WE'RE GETTING IT WHETHER WE DO THIS OR NOT. BETTER THAT MILLION. FOUR ARE THE MILLION. THE MONEY THAT WE'RE GETTING FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. RELATES TO OUR CURRENT EXISTING CONTRACT TO REIMBURSE US WHAT THEY OWE US UNDER THAT CONTRACT. AND WE'VE AGREED TO THAT CONTRACT AND WE HAD TO PAY MORE UNDER THAT CONTRACT TO NOW WE'RE SAYING DO WE WANT TO SPEND 2 50 MORE? SCHOOL DISTRICT DOESN'T PUT UP ANY OF THAT. IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING. WE'RE PUTTING UP ALL OF THAT ADDITIONAL 2 50 SO AT THE END OF THE DAY YOU COULD SAY YOU ALLOCATED OUT OF THAT 2 50 OR WHATEVER, AT THE END OF THE DAY. WE'RE LEFT WITH 250,000 LESS DOLLARS IN THE TOWN BANK ACCOUNT. THEN WE WOULD BE IF WE DECIDE NOT TO DO THIS. SO TO ME, THAT'S A TOWN COST. OKAY SO I WANT TO BE CLEAR ON THIS. SECTION ONE AND SECTION TWO. YOU'RE SAYING THOSE SECTION TWO

[00:40:07]

MAKES TRAFFIC EASIER FOR FOUNDERS. I THINK WHEN YOU CAN RIGHT NOW WE KNOW FOUNDERS. ALL THEIR ACCESS COMES OFF FIRST STREET. THEY'RE ONE DRIVEWAY OFF CUSTOMERS EXIT ONLY, OKAY, ONLY HAVE ACCESS OFF. FIRST READ ON FOUNDERS WHEN THE HIGH SCHOOL OPENS, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE THAT PANCAKED ON TOP OF FOUNDERS. I MEAN, IT'S GOING TO BE JUST GRIDLOCK. IT'S ALREADY GRIDLOCK.

WITH FOUNDERS SO. YES WE'RE PAYING ADDITIONAL MONEY TO ACCELERATE. BUT IT'S GONNA UNDERSTAND IT'S GONNA BE A NIGHTMARE WITHOUT HAVING ADDITIONAL LANES, TURNING MOVEMENTS THAT JUST FACILITATE THAT INTERSECTION, AND THAT'S WHY WE DIDN'T TAKE JUST BLOW OUT THE INTERSECTION TO MAKE THE INTERSECTION WORK. WE'RE SAYING LET'S TAKE IT PAST FOUNDERS.

IT'S ALSO NOT TEMPORARY, RIGHT. IT'S CONCRETE, PERMANENT CONCRETE SECTION. YOU'RE RIGHT.

RIGHT PAYING FOR A FASTER I GUESS WHAT I'M TRYING TO GET TO IS MY CONCERN. AGAIN MY CONCERN IS REALLY COIT AND I KNOW HOW BAD THAT BACKS UP NOW WITHOUT THE HIGH SCHOOL BEING THERE.

THAT DIRECTLY AFFECTS PROSPER HIGH SCHOOL. BECAUSE WHAT PEOPLE WILL DO IS THEY'LL DROP OFF AT THE SCHOOL AND THEY'LL GO THROUGH WHITLEY PLACE OR OR WHEREVER YOU GET OUT WHAT THEY'RE GONNA DO IF WE DON'T DO THE CUSTER END. IF WE DON'T DO THAT END IF WE JUST DO THIS END AND I WOULD RATHER SPEND 100 AND $50 1000. TO DO WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT ON COIT AND FIRST BECAUSE THAT'S GOING TO BE THAT AFFECTS EVERYBODY TRYING TO GO SOUTH. 23 80 WHETHER THEY'RE TURNING ON THE HIGH SCHOOL TO GO TO THE HIGH SCHOOL OR NOT. AND THAT'S THAT'S WHERE I WOULD RATHER USE THE FUNDS. BUT I DO THINK YOU NEED THIS SECTION. I DON'T I DON'T THINK YOU GET AWAY FROM NOT DOING THIS SECTION. PERSONALLY THIS IS ONLY A QUESTION OF TIME. IT'S ALL GOING TO HAPPEN. SO I MEAN, I KNOW. I MEAN, WHAT KIND OF GETTING TO THESE THINGS, BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY. WE HAVE TO DECIDE THAT THERE'S VALUE. $250,000 OR IF YOU WANT TO BREAK IT OUT, 100.

$150 ABOUT $1000 OF VALUE. ACCELERATING THIS 180 DAYS. AND THAT'S WITHOUT ANY KIND OF DELAYS OR ANYTHING ELSE THAT OCCURS. IN THE PROCESS, RIGHT SE NORTH SIDE CORRECT. THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SOUTH SIDE IS GOING TO BE DONE REGARDLESS ACCELERATES THE SEGMENT ON NOT ALL THE YELLOW HERE. JUST THE SEGMENT ON THE NORTH SIDE AND THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TWO I SEE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. I DON'T KNOW OF, UH PROJECTS THAT COULD YOU COULD GET THE BALL ROLLING, I GUESS WITH $100,000. THAT'S NOT GONNA THAT'S NOT. THERE'S NOT A LOT OF PROJECTS YOU COULD DO WITH $100,000. BUT YOU'RE GONNA HAVE 250 IN YOUR BANK ACCOUNT NEXT SIX MONTHS. NOW YOU CAN DO IT. THEN YOU'RE GONNA BE ABLE TO HELP THOSE TWO PROJECTS. MIGHT OUTLAY. ANYBODY ANY ANY OTHER PROJECTS? YOU HAVE THAT YOU'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO DEDICATE $250,000 TO THE AMOUNT OF PEOPLE YOU'LL BE ABLE TO HELP JUST WITH THAT. WE'RE SIX MONTHS. YEAH. EXCEPT I THINK IF I'M NOT I THINK THE QUIT PROJECT TO DO THE SAME THING ON KUWAIT AND FIRST IS ABOUT 102 150,000.

I THINK WE THROUGH THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE, I THINK WE SET ASIDE LIKE 3 35 ON THAT ONE. IT MAY BE IT WON'T BE THE CONCRETE PERMANENT. PROBABLY IT WILL BE MORE OF A TEMPORARY, BUT I'M JUST TRYING TO TIME TRYING TO TIE IT TOGETHER TO MAKE OUR CITIZENS LIVES EASIER AND GET THE MOST BANG FOR OUR BUCK THAT WE CAN GET INSTEAD OF HAVING TO COME BACK LATER AND SPENT ANOTHER 150 OR 300,000, AND I FEEL LIKE SECTION ONE IS WORTH THE MONEY. I DON'T KNOW ABOUT SECTIONS HERE. I'M WILLING TO BUT THAT GO AND TO ALLOCATE THOSE FUNDS ELSEWHERE. MY GENERAL FEELING IS THIS I DON'T AGREE WITH SPENDING MONEY TO JUST SPEED IT UP. CLOSE MONTH. I MEAN, WE'RE DOING THESE. I UNDERSTAND WHY WE'RE DOING THEM. BUT AND WE'RE ALREADY SPENDING QUITE A BIT MORE. ADDING MORE. THAT'S JUST MY PERSONAL TAKE. YEAH, I ATTEND A BELIEVE THAT.

ONCE A PROJECT IS FINISHED, NO ONE REMEMBERED. IT'S LIKE COMPARISON. UH, BUT I THINK PEOPLE TEND TO FORGET THE PAIN. UM, AND SO I'M NOT SURE. AGAIN IT'S A PAYING FOR TIME, AND I'M NOT SURE IF THAT INTERVAL IS REALLY WORTH ALL THAT I'M KIND OF WITH YOU ON THE HEAD OF PIG BETWEEN THE TWO SECTIONS. I'M KIND OF WITH WITH YOU ON THE SECTIONS, BUT I I'M STRUGGLING WITH THE VALUE. VERSUS TIME, PART. I THINK I'VE SAID WHAT I MEANT. UM I BELIEVE THESE

[00:45:08]

PROJECTS WILL LEAVE THE EIGHT A LOT OF PROBLEMS THAT ARE GOING ON RIGHT NOW. UH IF YOU SEE THOSE THIS INTERSECTION AND FOUNDERS IN THE MORNING IT'S DIFFICULT TO GET AH, THREE OF THOSE INTERSECTIONS SO UM. I'M I'M IN FAVOR OF IT. I THINK IT I THINK IT LIKE I SAID IT WOULD HELP A LOT OF PEOPLE. IT WOULD JUST AND THAT AMOUNT OF MONEY YOU CAN'T. THERE'S NOT A LOT OF PROJECTS YOU CAN DO AND START. I GUESS RIGHT CHUNK OF IT, BUT YOU CAN'T COMPLETE A LOT OF PROJECTS JUST WITH $250,000. WHEN I WHEN I STREET CONCRETE USED TO COST A MILLION. I'M SURE IT'S WAY MORE THAN THAT NOW. $250,000. I THINK IT'S I THINK IT'S WORTH IT. THANK YOU. SO I'LL GIVE AN EXAMPLE OF THIS PAST WEEK. I WAS I STAYED HOME. LIKE I HAD TO GO OUT ABOUT EIGHT O'CLOCK ON AND THE EXIT EXITED FOR BROADMOOR LANE ONTO PROSPER TRAIL. THE TRAFFIC WAS BACKED UP. FROM THE COIT PROSPER TRAIL INTERSECTION TO PASS MY INTERSECTION AND I COULDN'T GET OUT OF MY OWN NEIGHBORHOOD. THAT'S JUST AND WORK THAT'S A MILE AWAY FROM PEOPLE STILL TRYING TO TURN DOWN COIT SO YES, IT'S A LOT OF MONEY. AND THEN AT THE SAME TIME , IT'S NOT THAT MUCH MONEY IN THE BIGGER PICTURE OF 1000 PEOPLE A DAY WHO YOU'RE GIVING GOING TO GIVE THEM. 10 MINUTES BACK OF THEIR LIFE. BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT WAITING TO TRAFFIC. IT'S A THIRD OF THE SCENT ON EVERYBODY'S EVERY PERSON IN THE TOWN A THIRD OF A CENT OF THE TAX RATE. I KNOW IT'S NOT MUCH MORE THAN HAMBURG HERE. I HEAR YOU 40 BUCKS A MONTH FOR EVERY PERSON FOR SIX MONTHS, 40 BUCKS, SO I I'M A BELIEVER THAT AGAIN. 1000 PEOPLE YOU RELIEVING PAIN FROM IT'S ABOUT $40 A MONTH PER PERSON. $47 A MONTH. 40 40,000 MONTH WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO DO THE SECTION ONE? I JUST THIS THIS FRIGHTENS ME. JUST LIKE AT THE END OF SIX MONTHS. IT'S DONE. I SPENT 200. BUT YOU WANT TO START OFF THE SCHOOL YEAR AND HALF THIS CHANGE DON'T MORE PAID WORK. I KNOW, BUT YOU'RE GOING TO START OFF THE SCHOOL YEAR WITH A TON OF PAIN. I MEAN, THESE PEOPLE ARE GONNA BE ALREADY WAITING ON QUITE ROAD TO MAKE A LEFT, AND I HAD ALL THE COLEMAN LANES OPEN AND STILL EXPERIENCE. THANK YOU. IT'S GONNA HAPPEN AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR. THEY ACCELERATED IT, SO YEAH. YOU KNOW THAT'S FAIR, BUT I STILL THINK OUR JOB IS TO REASONABLY MAKE OUR LIFE MAKE OUR CITIZENS LIVES. OUR NEIGHBOR'S LIVES IS THAT YOU KNOW AS BEST AS YOU CAN, MONTHS, BUT AND SO THAT'S WHY I'M SAYING WOULD YOU DON'T TAKE KIDS TO SCHOOL ONE? DO YOU GO DIFFERENT ? DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS, SO YOU PICK THEM UP FROM SCHOOL? UM THAT'S OKAY. WELL IF THAT'S THE CASE, I WILL MAKE EMOTION. I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CHANGE ORDER FOR MARIO SAN NICOLA TO INCLUDE SECTION ONE FIRST STREET QUITE ROAD TO GREENS POINT. I'LL SECOND. OKAY.

WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILOR BARTLEY'S SECOND BY DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM ALL IN FAVOR. OKAY? ALL OPPOSED. CAN I ASK A QUESTION? NOW THAT WAS THE WAS THAT BROKEN OUT IN THE CONTRACT. RIGHT SO THAT WE HAD SO THAT THERE WAS A THAT WAS AN OPTION TO NICK WITH MARIO SENTE COLA ONE. A DOLLAR AMOUNT ON THE CONTRACT. WAS THAT BROKEN OUT OR NOT? RIGHT NOW IT'S ALL LUMPED INTO ONE CHANGE ORDER, BUT YOU KNOW WELL YEAH. WE'LL MAKE IT HAPPEN. IF THAT HAPPENS, THE PAPERWORK CAN BE MADE TO MATCH WHAT YOU APPROVE. OKAY SO I'LL CAN FIX THAT. ARE THERE ANY OTHER EMOTIONS? I MOVED THAT WE DEMAND EMOTION. OKAY, DENY THE ACCENT. ONE SECOND. WE HAVE EMOTION BY CHARLES SECOND BY CHRIS ALL IN FAVOR. ALL OPPOSED. OKAY THIS IS FUN. TURN SOMEBODY ELSE'S. IT'S ALWAYS BETTER TO COMPROMISE THAT YOU CAN MAKE MY MOTION AGAIN. NO IT WAS 3 TO 3. BUT YOU DIDN'T DO YOU GOT ANOTHER OPTION ON THAT. IF YOU'RE DOING BOTH. THE ONLY OTHER MOTION THERE IS TO KNOW THERE'S TWO IT'S JUST THERE'S 22 LOTIONS ACTUALLY, TOO. ALL RIGHT, SO I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE SECTION ONE AND TWO I'LL SECOND THAT. THAT MOTION SECOND ALL IN FAVOR. OKAY? ALL OPPOSED.

[00:50:08]

OKAY? YEAH. WOMEN, PLEASE. ALL RIGHT. LOOK. WHAT WHAT WAS THINKING ABOUT THIS AGAIN? ALL RIGHT. WARDEN. WE'RE ARGUING OVER. SAVING. $250,000 WHICH IS LEGITIMATE. I DON'T WANT I DON'T WANT TO BUILD. DON'T WANT TO BELITTLE THAT. YOU'RE YOU KNOW WHEN I SAY 1000 PEOPLE I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE ACTUAL ENROLLMENT IN IN, UH PROSPER OR WALNUT GROVE HIGH SCHOOL IS. BUT WHAT'S ENROLLMENT AND FOUNDERS ACADEMY? OKAY ALL THOSE PARENTS THAT ARE DROPPING OFF WHO ARE GOING TO BE DISADVANTAGED BY, YOU KNOW, LOOK AT THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF IT, CHARLES. YOU KNOW YOU PUT PEOPLE TO WORK FASTER. ALL RIGHT, YOU CAN GET MONEY INTO THOSE PROSPER HIGHEST D D. OKAY, GREAT.

THEY'RE STILL PROPERTY OWNERS. CITIZENS IN OUR IN OUR COMMUNITY YOU CAN GET IF YOU DROP YOUR KIDS OFF, YOU CAN GET TO THE GOLF COURSE SOONER. I'M NOT. NO NO, NO. I'M TALKING ABOUT THE PARENTS OF THOSE KIDS ARE DROPPING THEM OFF THE ECONOMIC BENEFIT. YOU GIVE THEM BY GIVING THEM AN EXTRA 10 MINUTES A DAY SCHOOL DISTRICT BE INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT ISN'T HERE. TO ME. THIS IS A LARGELY CAUSED BY THEM BEING EARLY. YOU KNOW, STARTING A YEAR EARLIER THAN WE THOUGHT. WHY ARE THEY STARTING A YEAR EARLIER? THEY'RE NOT DOING IT JUST WHIMSICALLY. THEY'RE GOING BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE DEMAND FOR THAT THE STUDENTS ARE THERE THEY'RE TRYING TO SERVE THEIR STUDENTS ARE JOB IN THAT AND PROVIDE THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND THE THOROUGHFARES THAT ARE NEEDED TO GET IT DONE. I DO NOT DISAGREE THAT $250,000 FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME. IS NOT WHERE I WOULD WANT TO SPEND THE MONEY, BUT I ALSO DON'T WANT TO HAVE ALL THE CARS THAT ARE ON COIT BACKING UP BECAUSE WE'RE MAKING THAT LEFT HAND TURN. OKAY THAT'S THEN GONNA DISRUPT THE NON SCHOOL PEOPLE. TRY AND TRY AND GET OUT AT 3 18 QUITE AT THAT SAME TIME ANYWAYS, ALREADY BACKED UP ALL THE WAY. SO YOU'RE YOU'RE NOT JUST THE SCHOOL PEOPLE. IT'S ALL THE TALKING ABOUT FOR 30 MINUTES TWICE A DAY. RIGHT? YES SIX MONTHS. 30 DAYS, 30 MINUTES FLAT ABOUT 30 MINUTES BECAUSE I MEAN MINUTES, SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THAT'S PAINFUL. THAT'S PAINFUL. AND LET'S LOOK AT THE OTHER THINGS. HAVE YOU CHECKED OUT THE ACCIDENTS THAT ARE THREE ETIENNE COY. BECAUSE OF THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC CREATING COURT HAVE. WE GOT THREE COURT FUNDED? YES I BELIEVE THAT'S NOT THAT'S NOT THIS AGENDA ITEM. SO ALL RIGHT.

SO YEAH, LIKE I SAID, I DISAGREE. I AGREE WITH YOU, 100% IT'S MORE MONEY THAN I'D LIKE TO SPEND DON'T WANT TO DO THAT, BUT JUST LITERALLY AMOUNT OF IDLING TIME PEOPLE ARE GOING TO HAVE SITTING THERE. THEY'RE GONNA THEY'RE GONNA WHO ARE THEY GONNA BE YELLING AT? THEY'RE GONNA BE YELLING AT CHARLES. MY PHONE NUMBER. SO IT'S JUST A MATTER OF THAT'S THAT'S OUR JOB TO SOMETIMES MAKE THE TOUGH DECISION. TO IMPROVE PEOPLE'S LIVES WHEN YOU HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY SO. SO I WOULD I WOULD ACCEPT THE MOTION. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE EMOTION THAT APPROVES BOTH OF THESE TO GET IT DONE. SOONER SO WE CAN MAKE OUR CITIZENS LIVES BETTER. FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME. I THINK THERE'S A LOT OF CITIZENS IN WEST PROSPERED THAT WOULD LOVE TO $150,000 SPENT ON THE ROAD OVER THERE. BRING A PROJECT. BUT I'LL GIVE YOU 10 OF THEM. OKAY YOU CAN GET DONE FOR 2 50 TO 50 WILL HELP GET TO THE FINISH LINE ON. OKAY? COULD WE ASK THE I S D IF WE LET'S SAY WE APPROVE YOUR MOTION. TO SPLIT THE COST OF THIS ACCELERATION HAVEN'T HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH DR BRADLEY. BECAUSE THE PART OF THIS WAS ALSO TO SEE IF THEY COULD DO ADDITIONAL FOUR LANES IN FRONT OF SCHOOL. AND THEY'RE FACING THE SAME DILEMMA YOU ARE, YOU KNOW, RISING COSTS ON EVERYTHING . AND SO YOU KNOW, THEY JUST DIDN'T HAVE THE SAME DILEMMA AND THEY CHOOSE NOT TO SPEND THE MONEY. AND SO THEY HAVE INTERESTING. YEAH, WE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS. IT WOULD BE NICE. I MEAN, THE SOONER THE BETTER JUST BECAUSE OF THE ACCELERATION P SEVEN. I MEAN, JANUARY IT'S DONE. CAN'T DO IT, IT'S PROBABLY MORE VALID. THAT'S RIGHT. THERE WE GO. THANKS, DAVID. CHARLES. I'LL GO WITH AMY'S DAVIES COMPROMISE. JUST MENTION AGAIN. YOU'RE GOING TO GO TO THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER TOLD YOU THAT THIS WAS THE LEAST. DESIRABLE. LET'S GET TO IT. YES BUT OKAY TO RELIEVE TRAFFIC OFF OF COIT. IS THIS THE BETTER ONE OR NOT? I THINK YOU'RE GONNA GET YOUR IDEA OF COIT. BRINGING THEM IN AND IS THE BETTER IDEA. THE COIT. EXCUSE ME FIRST WITH COY GOING OUT. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? I

[00:55:06]

THINK YOU AGAIN THAT WE DRIVE AROUND THE MORNINGS ARE USUALLY THE PEAK AND THE MAYOR AND THE MAYOR SAID IT TOO. IS THAT NON TRAFFIC GOING SOUTH IS GOING TO GET TANGLED WITH THE TRAFFIC GOING LEFT. I MEAN, I THINK, GIVE US JUST HELP WITH THIS ONE. I'LL MAKE THE MOTION TO APPROVE IT WITH SECTION ONE. OKAY, I'LL SECOND IT NO. I THINK THAT'S AMY SOAP. ALL RIGHT, ALL IN FAVOR OF THAT. OKAY? WE'VE GOT FIVE ALL OPPOSED. OKAY. MOTION PASSES. A COMPROMISE WAS. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, HUGH LANE. OH, ALRIGHT. UH AGENDA ITEM. 16 IS, UH. OKAY THIS IS A ABOUT CONSIDERING ACT

[Items 16 & 17]

UPON THE ORDINANCE, REZONE 7.9 ACRES, AND I THINK, CHRIS UM. I WOULD LIKE A LITTLE BIT MORE EXPLANATION, AND I PULLED THEM BOTH BECAUSE I'M FELT LIKE THEY WERE TOGETHER AND I WAS CONFUSED. THIS ONE TO BE SURE, I PULLED THE RIGHT ONE. A LITTLE BIT INTERESTING. I'M INTERESTED IN THE SPECIFIC DETAILS ON THE PLANS IN REGARDS TO THE 80. UM AND I COULDN'T QUITE FOLLOW AND I DIDN'T GET A CHANCE TO SEND YOU AN ADVANCE. SO IF YOU COULD JUST WALK US THROUGH HOW THEY'RE MEETING THAT REQUIREMENT THAT WAS PART OF THE AGREEMENT. SURE. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL PA. RODRIGUEZ SENIOR PLANNER STEPPING IN FOR DAVID, SO PLANNING MANAGER UM TO MY KNOWLEDGE. UM. IT WAS CONVEYED TO ME THAT THE PREVIOUS COUNCIL MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 27TH. THEY WERE ORIGINALLY PROPOSING 60% MAKES ME ON LOTS ONE AND TWO. UM AND THERE WAS A CONDITION TOO.

ARE YOU ALL TO PROVE IT TO, UM ARCTIC TO GET THEM TO GET TO 80% MASONRY? AND SO, UM, THE DEVELOPER HAD SUBMITTED A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT YESTERDAY AND THAT THAT'S CURRENTLY WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING. SO 8% MASONRY ON THAT I GUESS I SEE IT IN THE IN THE WRITING, BUT I DON'T SEE IT ON THE PLAN. AND MAYBE I'M MISSING SOMETHING. YEAH.

HEY TERRY. TERRY EXCUSE ME, CAN YOU THEY WANT TO SPEAK INTO THE MIKE. THAT'S ON NOW. UM THE EXHIBIT THREE ON THE ELEVATIONS. THE BOXES ■SHOW FOR EACH BUILDIG . AND SO FOR THE OFFICE BUILDINGS ARE ALL AT LEAST 60% MASONRY AND FOR THE RETAIL BUILDINGS. THAT ARE THEY ARE.

THERE IS A TOTAL GOODBYE. AGE. 1 61 OF YOUR GENDER PACKET. THERE'S A TOTAL FACADE. THE PERCENTAGES THERE, SO THEY ALL THE ALL THE BUILDINGS MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE EITHER 60% OF HER OFFICE, OR 80. THEIR RETAIL FORMATION. AND THOSE ARE THINGS THAT THE ELEVATIONS ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE DOCUMENT. NORM, FORCIBLE. CHRISTINE. WINDOWS. UH, IT DOES NOT. I'LL JUST SAY THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE FOR FILLING IT. APPRECIATE IT. UM I VOTED AGAINST THIS THE LAST TIME WE SAW IT, AND I AM STILL COMMITTED TO THE 100% MASONRY. UNLESS THERE IS SOME BENEFIT NOT TO BE. 100% AND I DON'T SEE THAT. SO, UM I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS AND AGAIN IF WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO UH, LESS THAN OUR STANDARDS, THEN MAYBE WE SHOULD NEED TO READJUST OUR STANDARDS. THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING BECAUSE I THINK IN MY MIND IT WAS THE OFFICE BUILDINGS THAT NEEDED TO BE 80% SO CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHAT THEN SET IS AND WHY THAT COUNCILS MASONRY? THAT'S ONE OF THE MATERIALS AND MAYBE SOMEONE ELSE KNOWS. I APOLOGIZE . I DON'T HAVE THE INFORMATION ON THAT. I BELIEVE INSET IS LIKE A BREAK LIKE THAT. IT'S LIKE A I WOULD ALMOST CALL THEM THE NEAR.

I THOUGHT IT WAS MORTAR. IT WAS USUALLY THE TIMES I'VE HEARD INSET WAS FERTILE. HELP ME. BUT

[01:00:07]

THE FENCE SAID I'M FAMILIAR WITH IT IS A IT'S A THINNER MASONRY PRODUCT. IT IS OKAY. IT IS BASICALLY LIKE IF YOU LOOK AT THE BACK WALL INSTEAD OF A STANDARD. BLOCK. IT MAY BE OFFENSIVE MOUNTED TO THE WALL. AND THAT'S WHAT I'M FAMILIAR WITH. OKAY. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN OUR STANDARDS? I MEAN, TYPICALLY , WE TRY TO SUGGEST 100% MASONRY . UM, BUT IN THIS CASE, YOU KNOW WE TRIED TO GET THEM TO JUST SORT OF BUMPED THAT 6% UP. AND THEY HAD AGREED TO 80% AND THAT'S THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT'S IN THE, UM, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. NO I THINK THE QUESTION WAS IF IT'S MASONRY PRODUCT, BUT IT'S THE THIN SET. YEAH THAT'S ACCEPTABLE IS MASONRY KNOWLEDGE? YES. YEAH I'M WITH JEFF. I WAS AGAINST US. I'M JUST REITERATING THAT I WOULD HAVE PROBABLY PULLED IT AND VOTED AGAINST IT REGARDLESS, BUT THIS JUST KIND OF CONFIRMS TO ME AGAIN. MY HESITATION. ON THIS PARTICULAR ONE. IT JUST FEELS LIKE, UM A CONSTANT CHANGE AND LESSENING OF THE REQUIREMENTS, SO I'M AGAINST IT, BUT FEEL FREE TO CAPACITY. OKAY SO, TERRY, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND. SO THE PACKAGE THAT I HAVE HERE DOES NOT INDICATE LOTS OF ONE AND TWO HAVE 80% MASONRY, BUT YOU HAVE SOMETHING DIFFERENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT HAVE THE ORDINANCE REQUIRES THE OFFICE STRUCTURES WE 60% MASONRY RETAIL BE 80% MASONRY. MM HMM. EXHIBIT THESE ARE DEVELOPED AGREEMENT HAS THE LOTS AND THE TYPES OF USES AND THE APPROPRIATE MISSIONARY REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO THE ORDER. SO I THINK IT THE ATTACHMENTS COMPLY WITH YOUR ATTENTION TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT COMPLIES ANYONE.

CAREFULLY SAVED THE ORDINANCE REQUIRES. 100% IS TALKING ABOUT THE ORDINANCE OF WELL, WE'RE GOING TO PROVE WHAT WE AGREED. ALRIGHT COULD COULD YOU JUST SHOW ME WHERE THAT IS ON THE SLIDES THAT SHOWS THAT THEY'VE GOT 80. UM BECAUSE I CAN'T FIND IT. YEAH, I DON'T THE ORDINANCE ON THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. IN THE SLIDES OF THE SHOW ME SOME WORK IS IN OUR PACKAGE. WE HAVE ALL OF YOUR PAGE 1 58 OF THE AGENDA PACKET. BECAUSE I DON'T SEE THAT ON THERE SO. I THINK WE HAVE ALL OF THOSE PAGES PRESENTATION. OKAY? YEAH, I THINK CONDENSED VERSION. YEAH, THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING. I DON'T SEE IT ANYWHERE. WITH THAT IN THE AGENDA. HAPPIER EXHIBIT.

EXHIBIT ME. PAGE ONE. IT STARTS ON PAGE ONE. ANYTHING 1 56 OR ARE THEY ARE THE ELEVATION. AND IT GOES THROUGH. TWO STAGES FOR A LOT 32 PAGES FOR A LOT FOR AND THEN THE RETAIL COMPONENTS OR THE FINAL AND THAT HAS TWO BUILDINGS. 66% THAT'S ON THE NORTH AND THE EAST, THE EAST SIDE OF 65% ANSWER IS SUPPOSED TO BE 60% MINIMUM. HERE WE GO. MATERIALS HAVE STUCK. ONE OF OUR. RIGHT? MAYBE THAT REQUIREMENT TO IF IT'S THAT THERE YOU GO. YEAH.

THIS IS A LOT THREE. SO THIS IS 60% RIGHT, SO THE ONE I'M CONCERNED ABOUT SPECIFICALLY IS THE LOTS ONE AND TWO AT THE 80% RIGHT? SO KEEP IN GO DOWN A FEW MORE PAGES FOR THE RETAIL RETAIL STARTS ON PAGE. 1 60 STARTS TO RETAIL COMPONENT. CAN YOU TAKE THAT AND SCROLL. PAGE 1 61 60.

THANK YOU. AND THAT CORNER THE BOTTOM. CORNER RIGHT HAND CORNER. OF THAT. JUST YOU THE.

IT SHOWS 82% MASONRY FOR THAT STRUCTURE. BUT. BOBBY ON THE EAST SIDE, IT SAYS 55. THAT THIS

[01:05:06]

IS A TOTAL FOR THE BUILDING. THE FOUR ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDINGS. THE FOUR BOXES SHOW EACH ELEVATION EACH EACH FACADE, EACH PHASE OF IT. PERCENTAGE FOR EACH FACE, BUT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT IS FOR THE GOING TO BE AT LEAST 80% MASONRY. SO THE TOTAL FACADE IS LISTED BELOW THE BOXES. NOW SHOWS 82% MASONRY FOR THAT BUILDING. LOT TWO. WHAT THEY. AND THEN YOU GO DOWN ALL 1 61 THE FOLLOWING PAGE. UH HUH. AND THEN THE FOUR BOXES BUT THE TOTAL FACADE BELOW THAT, AND THAT SHOWS 80% AMAZING. SO THEY WANTED. OKAY? THANK YOU FOR POINTING THAT OUT FOR US. SO OKAY, SO WE HAVE WE HEARD FROM JEFF AND CHRIS. CHARLES. YOU HAVE COMMENTS. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION. BASICALLY THIS HAS BEEN THROUGH THIS. WE'VE BEEN THROUGH THIS ALREADY. THEY BROUGHT BACK WHAT? WE'VE ASKED FOR A MOTION. 16 AND 17 WERE ONLY ON 16 THE SAME 2ND 2ND THEY WANT TO SAY MAKE A MOTION APPROVED 16 AND 17 DECEMBER 16 7. I WILL. SECOND OKAY? GOT EMOTION, THE SECOND ALL IN FAVOR. ALL POSED. THE MOTION PASSES FORTITUDE. THANK YOU. OH THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I THINK THE KEY TAKEAWAY FROM THAT IS WE NEED TO CONTINUE TO LOOK AT THAT. REQUIREMENT. 100% MASON. OKAY? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, EVERYONE. AT THIS TIME. OUR

[CITIZEN COMMENTS]

NEXT ITEM IS CITIZENS COMMENTS. THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL. ON ANY TOPIC.

HOWEVER THE COUNCIL IS UNABLE TO DISCUSS OR TAKE ACTION ON ANY TOPIC NOT LISTED ON THIS AGENDA.

PLEASE COMPLETE A PUBLIC COMMENT REQUEST FORM AND PRESENTED TO THE TOWN SECRETARY PRIOR TO THE MEETING. I DO HAVE FOUR CITIZENS COMMENTS. AND THE FIRST ONE IS THAT KATYA? IF YOU JUST STEP FORWARD STATE SAY YOUR NAME, PLEASE. MY NAME IS CARLA. SHE COULD LIVE IN TOWN. THANK YOU.

AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES TO TALK TO THE COUNCIL. AND THE TEAM LEADER OF AN ACE ACTION TEAM BRANCH AT PROSPER HIGH SCHOOL, UM, A STANDS FOR ACTION FOR THE CLIMATE EMERGENCY AND WE ARE GOING AS A NATIONAL ORGANIZATION IS TO RAISE AWARENESS ON THE CLIMATE CRISIS AND ADDRESS ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS. SO MY TEAM AND I ARE HERE TODAY TO ADDRESS THE LACK OF RECYCLING PROGRAM AT THE VARIOUS HIGH SCHOOLS AND MIDDLE SCHOOLS AND THE PROSPEROUS CITY DISTRICT. IT CAME TO OUR ATTENTION THAT A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO A RECYCLING PROGRAM WAS ATTEMPTED AT PROSPER HIGH SCHOOL. HELEN THEY RUN INTO PROBLEMS KEEPING UP WITH ITS MANAGEMENT. SO NOW THE HIGH SCHOOL AND OTHER MIDDLE SCHOOLS ARE LEFT WITHOUT A WAS LIKE GOING TO PICK UP. SO WHEN DIRECTED BY MULTIPLE PROSPER OFFICIALS THAT ALSO COME HERE IN ORDER TO BRING BACKWARDS CYCLING AT OUR SCHOOLS. UM SO WE'RE HERE TO REQUEST THAT AND EFFICIENT RECYCLING PROGRAM IS PLANNED OUT BY THE RECYCLING AND WASTE MANAGEMENT OF THE CITY AND ITS REINSTATED AS PART OF THE SCHEDULED TIME FOR PICK UP, UM PROSPER. I S G STUDENTS. STAFF MEMBERS ARE PROSPER COMMUNITY AND FRIENDS ARE HERE TODAY TO ALSO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE AND VOICE THEIR CONCERNS ABOUT THIS NEED FOR RECYCLING PROGRAM. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS EMILY. EMILY. HELLO MY NAME IS EMILY LINENTHAL ADDRESSES TO 6 TO 4 RAILROADS. NO RECYCLING RESULTS IN EXCESSIVE LANDFILLS AND POLLUTION ON A GLOBAL SCALE.

THIS MEANS THAT WE ARE ADDING TO POLLUTION IN OUR OCEANS AND ON LAND AND CONTRIBUTING TO THE PRODUCING METHANE GAS. AND JUST A TON OF PROSPER. THIS MEANS THAT WE WILL HAVE LESS LAND FOR PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT, WHICH WILL ESPECIALLY BE A PROBLEM DUE TO OUR CONSISTENT POPULATION GROWTH. THESE CONDITIONS ARE EXTREMELY HARMFUL TO OUR BEAUTIFUL DIABETIC BIODIVERSITY

[01:10:05]

AND THE TEACHERS LIVING IN OUR ECOSYSTEM. THERE HAVE BEEN TOO MANY TIMES WHERE YOU ALL HAVE PROBABLY MOVING AROUND, WALKED AROUND AND SEEING EXCESSIVE POWERS OF TRASH AND RECYCLABLE MATERIALS JUST LAID OUT ON THE STREETS AND IN LAKES AND OUR NATURE COMMUNITY IN GENERAL.

THIS DOES NOT ONLY HER OWN ENVIRONMENT, BUT IT ALSO EXPECTS EVERY PEOPLE'S EVERYDAY LIVES IN OUR TOWN. AT LEAST 75% OF US SCHOOLS HAVE RECYCLING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTED INTO THEIR DAILY LIVES. IT WOULD BE LUCKY TO BE A PART OF THIS PERCENTAGE. AND WITH YOUR APPROVAL, WE CAN DO THAT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS ISABEL. HELLO MY NAME IS ISABELLA HUGHES. MY DRESSES FOR 144 AGATHA LANE. AS OUR TEAM FURTHERED OUR RESEARCH. WE FOUND THAT MANY OF THE SCHOOLS IN THE DALLAS AREA ALSO DO NOT HAVE RECYCLING PICKED UP AT THEIR SCHOOLS. SCHOOLS USE LARGE AMOUNTS OF PLASTIC DURING THE DAY, ESPECIALLY IN CLASSROOMS, OFFICES AND AT LUNCH. WHAT PERCENTAGES VARY IN EVERY STUDY, MOST RESEARCHERS CAN AGREE THAT ANYWHERE BETWEEN 5% TO ABOUT 10% OF RECYCLABLE MATERIAL IS ACTUALLY NOT RECYCLED AND STARTED HIS DUMPED INTO THE DUMPSTER, ALONG WITH ALL THE OTHER TRASH, RESULTING IN PLASTICS AND OTHER MATERIALS, DECOMPOSING AND MICROPLASTICS. AND A STUDY RECENTLY PUBLISHED BY ANIMAL NUTRITION MICROPLASTICS WERE FOUND IN FISH SUCH AS YELLOW PERCH, COMMONLY EATEN FISH. THE RESULTS OF THE FISH CONSUMING MICROPLASTICS INCLUDED ALTERED LIVER FUNCTIONS AND MALNUTRITION. CONSIDER HOW MICROPLASTICS MAY AFFECT PEOPLE WHEN WE CONSUME THEM THROUGH COMMONLY EATEN FOODS LIKE CROPS , HONEY, SALT AND OTHER FOODS WHICH HAVE BEEN FOUND WITH MICROPLASTICS. SUCH FOODS ARE SOLD ALL AROUND THE WORLD, INCLUDING IN OUR SCHOOLS FOR OUR STUDENTS, LUNCHES. WELL, IT MAY SEEM INSIGNIFICANT TO HAVE PROSPEROUS SCHOOLS RECYCLE. WE STILL HOPE THAT OTHER SCHOOLS WILL SOON FOLLOW IF WE CAN PROVE THE SUCCESS AND URGENCY OF RECYCLING, STARTING NOWHERE OTHER THAN OUR CITY AND SCHOOLS. IT TAKES SMALL STEPS TO MAKE A BIG CHANGE, AND I HOPE THAT WE CAN START HERE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. NEXT SPEAKER IS CAVILL.

COVER. FIVE NAME IS CAVEAT, AND MY ADDRESS IS 2908 DRIFTWOOD CREEK TRAIL. AND RICHARD THE HURRIES IN WHY CYCLING STOPPED GETTING PICKED UP AT PROSPER HIGH SCHOOL, AND IT'S BEING PICKED UP AT OTHER SCHOOLS IN THE DISTRICT. IS BECAUSE OF THE HUGE, WASTEFUL AMOUNT OF CRUSH.

THAT HAS BEEN ENDING UP IN RECYCLING BINS AND TRASH AND ORGANIZED A LOT OF THE STUDENTS AT OUR SCHOOLS, ALSO EDUCATED ON THE IMPORTANCE OF RECYCLING. WE UNDERSTAND AND. I CAN'T GUYS THAT THIS IS A MAJOR ISSUE, SO WE ASSURE YOU THAT WE ARE TAKING THE RIGHT STEPS. TO EDUCATE OUR STUDENTS ON HOW TO RECYCLE PROPERLY. WE WILL. WE WILL UPHOLD OUR AND BY GIVING INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS ON RECYCLING. ENCOURAGING STUDENTS TO RECYCLE. PROBABLY THROUGH SECOND COMPETITIONS AND INTERACTIVE ACTIVITIES. UM IN ADDITION, SHOUT OUT TO THE ACE.

ACTION TEAM IN OUR SCHOOL FOR GATHERING OVER 230 SIGNATURES FOR THE PETITION. TO UH, TO ESTABLISH THEIR SEGMENTS SYSTEM OUT OF SCHOOL, AND WE HOPE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA FOR THE NEXT MEETING. THANK YOU. NEXT SPEAKER IS CHLOE. HI MY NAME IS CHLOE HARBOR. MY ADDRESS IS 641 DAIRY AND DRIVE. UM OUR SCHOOLS ALREADY HAVE THE RECYCLING BINS AND MATERIALS. WE NEED TO CARRY OUT THIS PROCESS AND ESTABLISHED THIS SYSTEM BY BRINGING OVER CYCLING SYSTEM INTO THE PICTURE . OUR SCHOOLS WOULD NOT ONLY BECOME MORE RESPONSIBLE AND MINDFUL OF OUR WASTE DISPOSAL, BUT WOULD ALSO BE ABLE TO SAVE SO MUCH MORE. ACCORDING TO OUR PRINCIPAL, MR JONES, RECYCLING HELPS US STAY A LITTLE CLEANER FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND NOT PRODUCE SO MUCH PAPER WAYS. AND SINCE WE PRODUCE A LOT OF PAPER WASTE, IT WOULD BE NICE TO HAVE A PROGRAM THAT CAN HELP US WITH THIS ISSUE. WE PROSPER ISD SCHOOL STUDENTS, STAFF MEMBERS AND RESIDENTS OF THE PROSPER COMMUNITY WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST THAT THIS PROPOSITION GETS ADDED ONTO THE NEXT GENERAL MEETING'S AGENDA. IN THE U. S. COUNCIL MEMBERS CONSIDER ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULED RECYCLING SYSTEM TO COME PICK OF RECYCLING AND PROSPER FASD SCHOOLS. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS THERE. ANYONE ELSE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK DURING CITIZENS COMMENTS? THANK YOU.

OUR NEXT ITEM IS THE REGULAR AGENDA. IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL, PLEASE FILL OUT OF PUBLIC COMMENT. REQUEST FORM AND PRESENTED TO THE TOWN SECRETARY, PREFERABLY BEFORE THE MEETING BEGINS. PURSUANT TO SECTION 551.7 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE. INDIVIDUALS WISHING TO

[01:15:05]

ADDRESS THE COUNCIL FOR ITEMS LISTED AS PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE RECOGNIZED WHEN THE PUBLIC HEARING IS OPEN. FOR INDIVIDUALS WISHING TO SPEAK ON A NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEM.

ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL DURING CITIZENS COMMENTS PORTION OF THE MEETING OR WHEN THE ITEM IS

[21. Consider and act upon the 2023 Prosper Town Council regular meeting schedule.]

CONSIDERED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL. OUR NEXT JUDGMENT ITEM IS NUMBER 21 THAT IS CONSIDERED AN ACT UPON THE 2023 PROSPER TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SCHEDULED MICHELLE. GOOD EVENING MARINE COUNCIL. SO AS YOU KNOW, EACH YEAR, YOU HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW YOUR NEXT SCHEDULED FOR 2023. SO AS IT'S BEEN PROPOSED ON YOUR MEMO ABOUT LINED THE DATES FOR THE 2023 YEAR. AS NORMALLY. THAT SECOND MEETING IN DECEMBER DOES FALL ON A HOLIDAY. SO THAT IS THE ONE DAY WE ARE RECOMMENDING CANCELING. OTHERWISE, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AS PRESENTED ANY ISSUES. AT 14. IT IS VALENTINE'S DAY. YES. NO THAT'S I'M FINE. HAD A YOUR PREDECESSOR. THE MEDIAN. I'M FINE WITH IT FROM ANYONE MOVING WITH CHARLES. YEAH, I'M SORRY, CHARLES YOU AVAILABLE ON VALENTINE'S DAY? NO THAT'S ACTUALLY REALLY GOOD IF I'M GOING ABOUT THIS STUFF, YOU CAN WATCH THIS TAPE. APPROVAL OF ITEM NUMBER 21, PLEASE. THAT MOTION IN A SECOND ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MICHELLE. OUR

[22. Consider and act upon an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2021-55 (FY 2021- 2022 Annual Budget).]

NEXT ITEM IS TO CONSIDER ACT UPON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2021-55, WHICH IS THE FY 2021 ANNUAL BUDGET. WELCOME OUR NEW FINANCE DIRECTOR CHRIS. YEAH. GOOD EVENING, MARY COUNCIL. WOW RESPONSE. SO IT'S WRITTEN TO THE RECORD. AGENDA ITEM. 22 IS TWO. REVIEWING APPROVING A BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 22. SO THIS BUDGET AMENDMENT WAS PRESENTED TO THE FINANCE SUBCOMMITTEE, AND IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AND I'LL JUST GO THROUGH A COUPLE OF SOME OF THE AMENDMENTS IN YOUR STAFF REPORT DETAILS THE REASONS ON WHY THESE AMENDMENTS ARE ASKED FOR, UH FIRST STARTING OFF IN THE GENERAL FUND. THERE IS A TRANSFER OUT THAT IS REQUESTED AS AN AMENDMENT. THIS HAS TO DO WITH ACTUALLY THE STORM WATER DRINK. IT'S FUN. SO THIS AMENDMENT IS REQUESTED. TO SUPPORT THAT FUNDS FUND BALANCE. ON THE THIRD BULLET POINT THE SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS SO IT'S TOWN POLICY TO MAINTAIN NO MORE THAN 25. $1000 CASH BALANCE IN THESE SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS. AND SO THERE'S AMENDMENTS JUST BRINGS THE TOWN WITHIN. COMPLIANCE WITH THIS POLICY. FOR TOURS, NUMBER ONE AND NUMBER TWO. UM THERE ARE AMENDMENTS ARE RELATED TO DEVELOPER AGREEMENTS. THE THAT RELATED TO THE TEST CAME ABOUT BECAUSE REVENUE ESTIMATES EXCEEDED WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY BUDGETED. IN THE STORM WATER DRAINAGE FUND. THERE WERE SOME SUPPORT OF SOME DRAINAGE PRODUCT PROJECTS. AND THEN ON THE IMPACT FEES. THERE ARE AMENDMENTS THAT ARE RELATED TO THE WASTEWATER IN THE WEST THOROUGHFARE IMPACT THE FUNDS THESE REALLY RELATED TO TIMING IMPACT AS THAT MONEY IS BROUGHT IN, AND IT TRIGGERS. YOU KNOW THE AGREEMENT WITH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. AH! THOSE BUDGET AMENDMENTS WOULD GO THEN TO COVER THE AMOUNT THAT WAS THE AMOUNT THAT WAS ACTUALLY EXPENDED IN THOSE IN THOSE FUNDS. AND THEN, LASTLY, FOR 22 . THERE IS A IN THE HEALTH. I'LL NEVER SIGNIFICANT CLAIMS. AND SO THE AMENDMENT IS SOLELY JUST TO BRING UP OUR BUDGETED FIGURES WITH OUR ACTUALS AND THAT. THAT IS ALL THE AMENDMENTS THAT HAVE FOR FISCAL YEAR, 22. 2021 2022, OKAY? ALL RIGHT. THOUGHTS FROM FINANCE COMMITTEE THAT ACTUALLY WENT THROUGH THIS. YEP CHARLES AND I AND MARCUS WENT THROUGH THIS WITH THEM. LOT OF THINGS TO KIND OF CLEAN UP AND MOVE ALONG. AND REALLY NOT. NOT A LOT OF

[01:20:06]

OPTIONS OTHER THAN TO MOVE FORWARD WITH. MOTION TO PRE BOTTOM 22. KIND OF MOTION BY CHRIS CURRENT SECOND BY CRAIG ANDRES ALL IN FAVOR. YOU'RE GONNA BREAK HAND. THEIR MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. THE NEXT ITEM IS GOING TO BE. I'M SORRY, DID WE? DID WE GIVE BOB HIS CREDIT FOR THIS PARTICULAR YOU GUYS WILL NOTICE ITEM. 22 IS THE 2021 2022 BUDGET ITEM. 23 IS A 23 BUDGET AND FOR THE FINANCE TEAM THAT WAS PRETTY GOOD, PRETTY HUMOROUS. SO UH, SO

[23. Consider and act upon an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2022-54 (FY 2022- 2023 Annual Budget).]

NOW WE'RE GONNA LOOK AT ADAM 23 , WHICH IS THE CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2022-54 WHICH IS FY 2022 2023 ANNUAL BUDGET. CHRIS THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. SO ON THIS AGENDA ITEM . IT IS THE AMENDMENT FOR THE 22 23 FISCAL YEAR. THIS HAS ALSO BEEN REVIEWED BY THE FINANCE SUBCOMMITTEE AND UNANIMOUS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. SOME OF THE ITEMS THAT WE HAVE POOR APPROVAL JUST REALLY COME DOWN TO BUDGET OVERSIGHT. SO WHEN THE BUDGET DOCUMENT WAS PUT TOGETHER AND PRESENTED TO YOU, THERE WERE SOME OVERSIGHTS THAT WEREN'T INCLUDED THE FIRST TWO ON THIS LIST. YOU CAN SEE THE DETECTIVE AND THE ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN.

WHAT I CAN SAY IS THE FTE OR THE FULL TIME EQUIVALENT WAS AUTHORIZED. THE OVERSIGHT CAME IN WHERE THE PERSONAL COST WORD BUDGETED, SO THOSE DID NOT MAKE IT INTO THE BUDGET. AND SO WE'RE SIMPLY ASKING. YOU'VE AUTHORIZED THE FTE. WE'RE ASKING FOR AUTHORIZATION. FOR THE BUDGET AS WELL ON THIS. ANOTHER OVERSIGHT WAS IN THE WATER AND SEWER FUND SPECIFICALLY IN THE MINISTRATIONS SECTION. UM WHAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE DOCUMENT AGAIN DOES NOT REFLECT WHAT THE BUDGET WAS BUILT ON. IN THIS SYSTEM. AND THEN LASTLY, THE LAST OVERSIGHT I HAVE ON HERE IS IN THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND. AND ALL THIS DOES IS AUTHORIZED THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. TO SPEND THE DONATIONS THAT THEY RECEIVED. AND SO THIS IS $5000 IN DONATIONS THAT THEY WOULD RECEIVE. THAT NEED YOUR AUTHORIZATION TO BE ABLE TO SPEND. MOVING ON. SO SINCE THE BUDGET WAS PUT TOGETHER, THERE HAVE BEEN SOME, UM, SOME UPDATES. THE ARE BEING REQUESTED . UH SOME OF THESE REALLY TO ASSISTANCE THROUGH THE FORM OF THIRD PARTY CONTRACT LABOR SUPPORT. THE LAST FEW FOR PARKS AND FIRE. THERE IS EITHER A VACANCY CURRENTLY OR A VACANCY THAT WILL BE WITHIN THE NEXT FEW WEEKS, THE THEY'RE ASKING FOR SOME THIRD PARTY LABOR TO CONDUCT THEIR INSPECTION. MAKE SURE THAT SERVICES TO THE COMMUNITY DO NOT GO DOWN.

FINANCE IS ASKING FOR SOME CONTRACT LABOR SUPPORT. AS YOU'RE YOU MAY BE AWARE YOU MAY NOT BE AWARE. FINANCE PROFESSIONAL STAFF WAS 100% TURNOVER RECENTLY. AND SO WE'RE CURRENTLY GOING THROUGH THE YEAR AND AUDIT UM AND IF YOU APPROVE LATER ON AN AGENDA ITEM, UH, YOU KNOW, IN JANUARY WILL BE GOING THROUGH AN E R P IMPLEMENTATION. AND SO WITH THAT IN MIND ALL THOSE FACTORS IN MIND OR ASKING FOR A AN APPROVAL FOR CONTRACT LABOR SUPPORT ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS. GOING DOWN TO THE DECKS. THE FLOOD SAFETY SYSTEM. THIS IS THE LICENSE PLATE READER PROGRAM , BELIEVE COUNCIL IS AWARE OF THE NEXT ITEM. RATHER THAN JUST THE DASH AND BODY CAM EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE. UM SO STAFF DURING THE BUDGET PROCESS DID ASK FOR CALLS. AND. YOU DID ASK FOR INSURANCE FROM THE VENDOR THAT THAT AMOUNT WOULD BE ADHERED TO. COME TO CURRENT TIMES, AND, UM THERE IS A COST INCREASE WITH THE ORIGINAL SCOPE OF THE PROJECT. THERE IS ALSO ADDITIONAL SOFTWARE THAT WILL BE NEEDED TO MAKE THIS SOFTWARE OR THIS HARDWARE FUNCTIONAL. UH AND SO THERE'S SOME ADDITIONAL LICENSES THAT WILL NEED TO BE PURCHASED. FOR THIS PROJECT TO MOVE FORWARD. UM. NEXT ON THE LIST. WE HAVE A ONE TIME $800 LUMP SUM PAYMENT TO EMPLOYEES.

I'VE APPROVED. THIS WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED TO EMPLOYEES ON THE DECEMBER 30TH. PAYCHECK AND I BELIEVE IT IS EMPLOYEES THAT WERE EMPLOYED WITH THE TOWN OF FROSTBURG THROUGH THE END OF

[01:25:05]

NOVEMBER. UM WE WENT THROUGH AFTER WE PUT ALL THESE AMENDMENTS TOGETHER AND ANALYZED THE GENERAL FUND. BECAUSE WE ARE AWARE THAT CAPITAL NEEDS ARE VERY IMPERATIVE. SO WE ANALYZED THE FUND BALANCE. AND. WE FOUND THAT THERE'S AN ANOTHER MILLION DOLLARS. THAT COULD BE CONTRIBUTED TO THE CAPITAL DEDICATED NOW THIS WOULD NEED TO GO AGAIN THROUGH THE SIPPY. SOME COMMITTEE TO BE PROGRAMMED. BUT THERE IS A MILLION DOLLARS THAT WE FEEL COULD BE CONTRIBUTED TO THE TO BE CAPITAL DEDICATED FUND. SO IN YOUR PACKET TONIGHT , YOU SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED A PAGE THAT IS TITLED FISCAL YEAR 23 CAPITAL DEDICATED FUND. AND WHAT THAT IS. THAT'S THE RESULTS OF THE LAST CMP SUBCOMMITTEE THAT MET SO ON THIS PAGE. THE $7.4 MILLION INCAPABLE DEDICATED THAT WAS APPROVED THROUGH THE BUDGET PROCESS. UM THERE WAS A PORTION OF THAT THAT WAS APPROVED THROUGH THE BUDGET PROCESS AS WELL. AND THAT'S THE TOP SECTION THAT YOU CAN SEE UNDER THE HEADING ALLOCATION, INCLUDING IN THE 2020 22 OH 9 13 ADOPTED SOON. THAT'S ROUGHLY TWO AND A QUARTER MILLION THAT THAT WAS GIVEN THE NAME OF THAT 7.4. CAPITAL DEDICATED. BELOW IS THE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SUBCOMMITTEE AND THE PROJECTS THAT THAT THAT IMPRESSED OF THAT 7.4 MILLION WOULD GIVE IT TO YOU. SAW YOU ASKING FOR THIS TO BE APPROVED AS PART OF THE ORDINANCE, RIGHT? SO THIS WILL BE AS PART OF THE BUDGET APPROVAL CANCEL WOULD APPROVE. GIVING THESE DOLLAR AMOUNTS NAME ON THESE PROJECTS. IT DIDN'T LOOK LIKE, UM IT WAS IN THE MOTION, BUT IT'S PART OF THE BUT WE'RE APPROVING THE SPECIFIC AMOUNTS. RIGHT, TERRY, TOO. THIS WASN'T PART OF THE PACKAGE. SO WE CAN WE CAN, BUT BEFORE I DO THAT I LIKE I WANT TO HEAR FROM THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. COMMITTEE ON SO I CAN'T SPEAK FOR US SO I CAN LOOK AT IT. HOW DID YOU BECOME CHAIRS? I WASN'T SUPPOSED TO BE HERE TONIGHT. OKAY WELL, THAT LOOKS BIG. YES I DID IT JUST FOR THE RECORD FOR THE MEMBERS, NOT ON THAT COMMITTEE. THIS IS THEIR FIRST TIME LOOKING AT THIS. YEAH. SO THEY ARE APPRECIATE HIM. YES. ARE YOU CELEBRATING ANY OF THESE PROJECTS? I JUST WANNA MAKE ACCELERATED, OKAY? UH HUH. SEE BAD STAFF WORK THE STAFF WE CAME WITH THESE. HER STATION. WE'RE GOING TO START WITH THIS FIRST GROUP. THREE, WHICH WERE ALREADY GREAT PEOPLE, 2000. BUT GOOD. SO BUT IN THAT MILLIONS FINE. GOT US TO A TOTAL BUST. $2 MILLION IN THAT MEETING WE HAD WITH HIM. AND SO 10. MILLION IS WHERE WE ARE.

CAPITAL. 12 MILLION THE COMMITTEE AGREED THAT. IF THIS DOESN'T COME INTO BUDGET DOESN'T COME IN THE CONTRACTING COMMITTED 12 $10 MILLION. OR USE A BEER AND A HALF THIS YEAR AND PULL UP THE REST OF IT, WHATEVER IT COSTS. RECOMMENDATION THAT COMMITTEE. SAFETY WAY IS. POWERS THAT REALLY NO CHOICE. SUSTAINABLE GORGEOUS MCKINLEY THAT LIVED ABOUT IS IN PLACE.

WHAT WE HAVE TO DO. 3 80. FEEL CREATING INTERSECTIONS. OVERRUN, BUT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO SPIN, SO THOSE WERE NOT REALLY GOT A LOT OF DISCUSSION. WE'RE HOPING THE TOLL ROAD GETS THIS GETS ACCESS OFF. SO THIS IS KIND OF A BIG PROBLEM. SAME THING WITH LEGACY. FOUR LANES. THAT WAS A

[01:30:04]

PRIORITY. IT'S THE OTHER WAY ACQUISITION THERE SO THAT WE CAN GET GET THAT MOVIE. THE MORE LEFT TURN OF THE FOURTH. IS IN HERE AT 375. THAT'S THE COURT. AT FIRST WE TALKED ABOUT EARLIER THAT IS A SOUTH PBOND. TO TURN LANE. HOPES IT WILL COME IN LESS THAN THAT. WE DON'T HAVE A GOOD ESTIMATE ON THAT THIS POINT BUT THIS 375 WHEN WE GET A NUMBER, A REAL NUMBER ON THAT SOME OF THAT MADE THAT ROLLED BACK INTO THE CAPITAL DEDICATED ALONG WITH THEY IF THERE'S EXCESS LEFTOVER , ALONG WITH ONE MILLION, WE JUST ADDED TODAY TO THE ACCOUNT. AND THEN FIRST STREET DESIGN.

GOLDEN, CRAIG. INTO THAT. AS YOU CAN SEE, A BIT OF A HALF OF THAT IS THE SO MAYBE. I DON'T KNOW.

WHY IS THE $11.5 MILLION MEMBER FOR A TOTAL CAPITAL. SINCE WE HAD TO PLAY WITH, WELL, WE HAD EIGHT MILLION IN THE CRP. I BELIEVE FOR THE FIRE STATION. OKAY MILLION PLUS SOMETHING LIKE THAT. AND THEN THIS 1.5 MILLION CAME ABOUT BECAUSE IN OUR MEETING WITH THE FIRE CHIEF, WHERE THEY PRESENTED THERE. ESTIMATE AT 12 MILLION. THEY ALSO CAME IN AND PRESENTED AN ALTERNATIVE TO REDUCE THE COST. DOWN TO 10 9 HAVE $10 MILLION. I'M NOT SURE THE RIGHT NUMBERS IN HERE BUT NINE F 10 MILLION AND THIS COUNCIL SAID WE WERE COMFORTABLE SPENDING THAT MUCH.

BUT WE WANTED THE FULL PROJECT FOR THAT MUCH. FOR WHAT? FOR WHAT? WE'RE COMFORTABLE SPENDING. I THINK THAT'S THE WAY THE 10,000,010 MILLION. SO WE'RE COMFORTABLE DOING 10 MILLION. IF THEY COULD GET THE PROJECT. WE SAID WE DON'T WANT YOU TO CUT THE SCOPE. THE DRAMATIC DRAMATICALLY. BUT IF YOU CAN GET THE WHOLE PROJECT FOR 10 MILLION, WE'RE GONNA PUSH IT FORWARD. THIS IS THAT THAT MONEY THERE? IF YOU KNOW, CAPITAL, UH, DEDICATED COMMITTEE. SAID. IF YOU DON'T GET IT FOR THAT 10 MILLION NUMBER THEN WE'RE GOING TO PROPOSE TO DEFER THAT. THE FIRE STATION TO NEXT YEAR. AND USE SOME CAPITAL DEDICATED FROM NEXT YEAR'S A CAMP TO COMPLETE THE BUT WHATEVER THE EXACT CALL, SO WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT NUMBER IS UNTIL MID JANUARY, PROBABLY AND YOU KNOW, SO AT THAT TIME, WE'LL HAVE TO READDRESS THAT. BUT IN THE MEANTIME, WE WANT TO GET STARTED ON ALL THESE OTHER PROJECTS. DIDN'T WE? AT SOME POINT, SO WE HAVE $7.4 MILLION WORTH OF CAPITAL DEDICATED FUNDS COMMITTED THOUGHT AT SOME POINT . MAYBE I MADE THIS IS ANOTHER NUMBER THAT IS IN OUR MY BRAND THAT WE HAD 11.5. HAD TO WORK WITH WE DO WE DO IN TOTAL 74. IT'S ALWAYS BEEN HAS ALWAYS BEEN THAT OKAY, MAYBE I JUST BECOMES 84. YEAH IT'S 84. OKAY SO IT WAS NEVER, EVER NEVER HAD THAT HAPPEN. I DON'T KNOW WHY, BUT JUST FORGET. I SAID THAT I JUST BOB BOB'S GONNA GOTTA COMMENTARY. REMEMBER ANDREW. SHE MAY BE THINKING ABOUT THE 11.2 CENTS. THE 11.2. SENSE OF THE TAX WHERE THAT'S GENERATES THE 7.4. THAT'S IT. THAT'S IT. SORRY. YOU KNOW, THANK YOU. YOU ALWAYS READ MY MIND? SORRY GO AHEAD, CHRIS. I'M JUST WANT TO UNDERSTAND WHAT WHAT PIECES OF THOSE FIRST THREE PIECE OF THE MILLION DOLLARS FOR THE CIRCLE, AND THAT'S A DESIGN COSTS FOR THAT CHANGE. I'M JUST TRYING TO FIND OUT HOW FAR HOW FAR ALONG ARE WE IN THIS PROJECT? WILL IT BE SHOVEL READY AFTER WE YEAH, THAT'S THE ADDITIONAL OVERRUNS FOR THE FIRST THREE D D. COLEMAN PLUS THE TRAFFIC CIRCLE, OKAY, DESIGNED WERE ACTING THE RIGHT AWAY ACQUISITION PROCESS. THE MAIN LANES. FROM D AND T TO THE INTERSECTION AND IT WILL PROBABLY COME INTO YOUR FIRST PART OF THE YEAR TO GET AUTHORIZATION IN CASE WE NEED EMINENT DOMAIN FOR THE AREA THAT NEEDED FOR THE TRAFFIC CIRCLE, AND THEN THE CALLING TO CRAIG PIECE WE'VE DONE NO RIGHT AWAY. NOTHING ON THAT SO THAT THEY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE MEANT TO TRY TO GO IN AND START THE DESIGN FOR THAT, AND THAT WILL REALLY IDENTIFY. THE FOOTPRINT NEEDED FOR THE RIGHT AWAY. DO WE ANTICIPATE DOING THE FIRST SECTION FROM DNT TO COMMENT ON THE CIRCLE BEFORE? YES SIR. THAT'S THAT'S IN THE BUDGET THIS YEAR FOR CONSTRUCTION, IT'LL PROBABLY LATE IN THE PHYSICAL YEAR, SO HOPEFULLY BY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OKAY. THANK YOU. BY THE WAY, I JUST WANTED TO POINT OUT THAT YOUR WIFE LEFT. AH! YEAH MHM. YEAH SHE'S LIKE, GOT BORED. YAHOO! YEAH. SO QUESTION FOR THE CAPITAL. DEDICATED COMMITTEE. SO THE ACTUAL NUMBER WE'RE GOING TO GIVE IT GOING TO GET THROUGH ANOTHER MILLION IN THERE. WHAT WERE YOUR NEXT COUPLE OF PROJECTS? WE DIDN'T WE DIDN'T GO

[01:35:01]

TO THE NEXT MILLION NO, WE'VE WE DO HAVE A LIST OF PROJECTS. I KNOW THAT STAFF HAD SOME PROJECTS THAT WE WERE INTERESTED IN. BUT WE DID NOT FOCUS ON THAT. AND THERE'S THAT LIST THAT WORTH PULLED OUT OF PUT ON THIS LIST. WE NEED TO RE PRIORITIZE THOSE AGAIN. NOW THAT WE'VE KIND OF PICKED SOME OUT, WE NEED TO RE PRIORITIZE. WHAT'S LEFT WILL BRING THAT BACK. I THINK I THOUGHT WAS ONCE WE GET THE COURT NUMBERS, THE COURT EXPANSION NUMBERS IN WE COULD ADD THAT WITH THIS NUMBER, AND THAT WOULD BE, YOU KNOW. WE MAY HAVE SOME OVERRUNS. WE MAY NEED 2,000,004, RIGHT? THAT'S KIND OF WHAT, OKAY PROJECTS SO I WILL TELL YOU THE TWO OTHER BIG PRIORITIES, WHICH A MILLION DOLLARS WON'T TOUCH. IT IS LEGACY CONSTRUCTION. THAT'S WHY WE'RE GOING TO HEAD TO THE RIGHT OF WAY. WE COULD HAVE THAT DONE SHOVEL READY AND THEN HE'LL THAT WAS THE OTHER ONE. IT'S QUITE QUESTION AND WE WERE SEVE EVERYTHING. THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO ANALYZE THE PRIOR YOUR BUDGET OVER. I MEAN, IT'S JUST ARE WE DONE NOW? IS THERE MORE SALES TAX DOLLARS? THEY CAN CREATE MORE MONEY OR NO. SO WE'VE RECEIVED EVERYTHING.

UNLESS SOMETHING IN AN AUDIT CORRECT AND OR, YOU KNOW, WE'VE GOT A MILLION EIGHT AND ENCUMBRANCES THAT WILL NEVER RESULT IN A IN A REVISION, BUT MAY END UP IN SOME EXCESS FUNDS LEFT OVER RIGHT SO AS PART OF THE MOTION TO APPROVE THIS, THERE'S EMOTION, TOO. ROLL THE PURCHASE ORDERS RIGHT? AND SO THAT HAS BEEN SOMETHING THAT HAS JUST BEEN TOWN PRACTICE AT THE END OF THE YEAR IN THE UNSPENT, OPEN PURCHASE ORDERS OR THEY WERE. THEY WERE GONE THROUGH AND ANALYZE TO THE NEED. THEY WERE JUST VERY EASILY ROLLED OVER INTO THE NEXT YEAR. THAT'S A PROCESS THAT WE'RE CHANGING. IT'S GOING TO MOVE TO MORE OF A USE IT OR LOSE IT KIND OF SYSTEM. YOU MAY BE USED TO IT BEING CALLED THAT SO THAT STAFF AND THEY'VE ALREADY BEEN COMMUNICATED TO THAT. THIS WILL BE THE EXPECTATION GOING FORWARD , SO THIS WOULD BE THE LAST TIME THAT WE COME TO ASK YOU JUST TO BLINK WITH LIBERAL ALL THE OPEN POS THAT WE HAVE. IS THERE A WAY TO TRACK THAT THOSE. POS THAT ARE OUTSTANDING TO MAKE SURE THEY WERE FUNDED PROPERLY, OR IF THEY WEREN'T THAT WE PUT THAT MONEY BACK INTO CAPITAL DEDICATED OR THEY WERE FUNDED PROPERLY. IT'S THAT THEY HAVEN'T GONE OUT AND PURCHASED WHATEVER THEY WERE FUNDED FOR. OKAY, SO WHAT IF THEY DON'T? AND SO THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY THAT IT COULD BE CLOSED IN THAT MONEY WOULD ROLL INTO BUDGET. BUT WE DO HAVE THE LIST OF ALL THE VIEWS AND WE CAN TRACK TO SEE IF THEY ACTUALLY WERE. YES AND THE LIST OF INCLUDED IN THE IN ONE OF THE EXHIBITS THAT THAT IS IN YOUR PACKAGE. OKAY, I'M GONNA STOP OKAY? SO A COUPLE OF THINGS ON THE EARTH THIS THIS IS GREAT. I CAN'T WAIT TO GET SOME OF THESE ITEMS DEPLOYED OUT THERE. THE DASH CAMS. THE $800 LUMP SUM PAYMENT TO EMPLOYEES. I THINK, UH, IS A VERY BIG DEAL FROM THE COUNCIL AND TO THE STAFF AND TO NOTE THAT WE THAT IS TO CONVEY THE APPRECIATION. FOR THE WORK THAT'S BEEN DONE HERE IN THE PAST YEAR AND UNDER FAIRLY DIFFICULT CIRCUMSTANCES. I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DO NOT JUST GLOSS OVER THAT AND THROW ANOTHER 800 BUCKS AND SOMEBODY'S PAYCHECK, BUT THAT IS A SIGNIFICANT IT'S A 250,000 THAT CHARLES WAS LOOKING FOR. SO FOR COMMUNICATE THAT CORRECT YES, MA'AM. WE ARE IF APPROVED TONIGHT. BOB. HAS BEEN WORKING WITH THE COMMUNICATIONS TEAM.

AND WE'RE GOING TO PUT SOME LANGUAGE TOGETHER. ROBIN'S BEEN VERY HELPFUL. AND WOLF PROPERLY . PUT THAT TOGETHER AND GET THAT WORD OUT, PROBABLY THIS WEEK. THE PLAN IS TO GET THAT ON THE LAST PAYMENT AND BLESSED CHECK PAYCHECK. OKAY THANK YOU FOR GETTING THAT OUT. THE NEXT THING IS THE FLOCK SAFETY SYSTEM. THAT IS QUICKLY AS WE CAN DEPLOY THAT I'D LOVE TO SEE THAT HAPPEN. AND THEN, UH, WHY? YES, SIR. THANK SCOTT SAID HE HAD A LADDER ON THIS TRUCK. HE'S GOING TO START INSTALLING SO GOOD. UM AND THEN THE LAST THING IS A COMMENTARY ON PROCEDURE. AH! GOING FORWARD FOR THE CAPITAL. DEDICATED ITEMS. I WOULD REALLY LIKE TO SEE THAT IN THE PACKAGE SO THAT I CAN THINK MY WAY THROUGH THIS BEFORE WE COME TO A COUNCIL MEETING AND THEN SPRING IT ON FORMER COUNCIL MEMBERS. GOING FORWARD IF WE COULD CHANGE THAT. WE HAVE A MOTION? YEAH, I MOVE TO APPROVE. ORDINANCE NUMBER 2022 50 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020 23 ANNUAL BUDGET PROVIDE FUNDING

[01:40:02]

INCREASED EXPENDITURES IN THE GENERAL FUND. WATER, SEWER UTILITY BUG AND SPECIAL WORK.

MOTION TO ADD CAPITAL. HOW ARE YOU? AT ONE POINT WELL, IT'S ALLOCATION. CAN WE CALL THIS? AN EXHIBIT? TO THE ORDINANCE. AND TO APPROVE EXHIBIT A AND TO APPROVE EXHIBIT A AS A PART OF THE ORDINANCE. SET ALL NEED TO SAY. DOES THAT WORK? SECOND. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION. GREG SECOND BY CHARLES COTTON ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. NEXT

[24. Consider and act upon awarding CSP 2022-53-A to Tyler Technologies, Inc. for an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Solution for the Town of Prosper; and authorize the Interim Town Manager to execute documents for same.]

AGENDA. ITEM NUMBER 24 CONSIDERING ACT UPON BOARDING CSP 2022 53-8 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES FOR AN ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SOLUTION SYSTEM FOR THE TOWN OF PROSPER, AUTHORIZED THE INTERIM TOWN MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE DOCUMENTS FOR THE SAME. THE GOOD EVENING MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

UH, THIS IS AN ITEM THAT'S BEEN AROUND FOR A WHILE, BUT HE HAS SPOKEN TO YOU SEVERAL TIMES ABOUT IT. UM BASICALLY, I DON'T HAVE SLIDES ON THIS BECAUSE IT'S BEEN A LONG TIME COMING. I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT WITH THE HELP OF SCHEMES AND A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF WORK FROM LEN, WHO'S OUR NEW TECHNICAL PROJECT MANAGER WHO DID A LOT OF HORSE TRADING HE HE GOT THE COST OF THIS DOWN A LOT LOWER THAN THEN WE WERE ANTICIPATING. SO I'M PLEASED ABOUT THAT. AND HE CAN ANSWER ALL OF THE QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE REGARDING FEATURE SET COST. UM ANY OF THOSE THINGS. IF YOU'VE GOT ANY ANY QUESTIONS FOR LEE YEP, FOR A LONG TIME. I HAVE A MOTION. I MOVED TO APPROVE AWARDING CSP 2022-53, A TWO TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED FOR AN ENTERPRISE RESOURCES PLANNING DRP. SYSTEM SOLUTION FOR THE TOWN OF PROSPER AND AUTHORIZED THE INTERIM TOWN MANAGER TO EXECUTE DOCUMENTS FOR SAM. MOTION. I'LL SECOND CRAIG ANDERSON ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION

[25. Consider and act upon authorizing the Interim Town Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) between Sciens, LLC and the Town of Prosper, Texas, related to the implementation and deployment of the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Solution.]

PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. NEXT AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 25 TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM TOWN MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN SIGNED SCHEMES SCHEMES. LLC IN THE TOWN OF PROSPER RELATED TO THE IMPLEMENTATION DEPLOYMENT OF THE ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SYSTEM SOLUTION. I BELIEVE THIS IS A SISTER ITEM TO THE PREVIOUS ONE. THAT IS CORRECT SCHEMES, OF COURSE, HAS HELPED US OUT A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT ON THE INTER GOV SELECTION AND IMPLEMENTATION THAT WE'VE DONE. IN FACT, WE WENT LIVE WITH THAT THIS WEEK. UM AND EVERYBODY DOWN ON THE SECOND FLOOR IS BOWLED OVER BY THAT, UM AGAIN. BETTY HAD HAD SPOKEN TO YOU ABOUT THIS AS WELL . THEY'VE BEEN A TREMENDOUS HELP IN GETTING THE RFP. UH WRITTEN, SCORED, EVALUATED AND PARTICIPATED, OBVIOUSLY AND ALL OF THAT. CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS. THIS AGREEMENT IS FOR DEPLOYMENT. OF THE TRP OVER THE NEXT. 44 YEARS. OKAY WELL, THREE YEAH, 34, DEPENDING ON HOW WE LOOK AT DIFFERENT THINGS, BUT AGAIN. THEY'VE BEEN A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF HELP. AND YOU WANT TO SEE HIM HELP US ON THIS PROJECT.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR LEON? THIS ITEM FROM SCHEMES IS HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ERNEST WE HAVE A MOTION. MOVE TO AUTHORIZE THE INTERIM. MANAGER, JACK SUCCEEDED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. YES, A BETWEEN THE SCENES LOC. AND THE TOWN OF PROSPER, TEXAS RELATED TO THE IMPLEMENTATION AND DEPLOYMENT. ABOUT THE RESOURCE PLANNING. EUROPEAN SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS.

MOTION AND A SECOND MIAMI BARLEY ALL IN FAVOR. THE PASSAGE UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. NEXT ITEM. THANK YOU, LEE. AND I THINK YOU CAN STAY THERE. I CONSIDER AND ACT UPON I APPROVAL

[26. Consider an act upon approval of a contract with Motorola Solutions, Inc. for an in-car and body-worn camera and evidence management platform.]

OF CONTRACT WITH MOTOROLA SOLUTION FOR AN IN CAR, BODY WORN CAMERA EVIDENCE AND EVIDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTION PLATFORM. AGAIN THIS IS SOMETHING THAT'S BEEN A LONG TIME COMING. WE ISSUED A CSP CSP 2020 TO 62. A UH WE HAD TWO RESPONSES. I DO WANNA ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THERE WERE SEVERAL DEPARTMENTS IN TOWN THAT PARTICIPATED IN SCORING USER FPS. SO WE HAD COME ENFORCEMENT. WE HAD FIRE. UM WE HAD INSPECTIONS ALL PART OF THAT TEAM. THE IDEA BEING WHATEVER CAMERA SYSTEM WE DECIDE ON CAN BE DEPLOYED TO THE TOWN AT LARGE EVENTUALLY TO THOSE DEPARTMENTS THAT ARE CURRENTLY USING CAMERAS . UM AS WE KNOW, YOU KNOW, AS AS INCIDENTS WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT FIRE INSPECTIONS INCREASE, WE MIGHT WANT SOME PROTECTION FOR THEM AS WELL. SO THIS PLATFORM. I WANTED TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE HAD VISIBILITY IN THIS. SO I WAS PLEASED THAT EVERYBODY PARTICIPATING AND HELPING SCORE. WE CHOSE MOTOROLA. IN THE PACKET . THERE'S A 10 YEAR BREAKDOWN SHOWS ROUGHLY $200,000 IN SAVINGS THAT INCLUDES THE

[01:45:05]

ADDITIONAL CAMERAS FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT AND THE ADDITIONAL SOFTWARE. IT WAS IN THE BUDGET AMENDMENT THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE REQUIRED TO BUY IN THAT SAVINGS. IT TAKES INTO ACCOUNT ALL OF THAT. UM IT'S A GREAT SOLUTION. WE LIKE A LOT AND I'VE GOT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT HERE FOR MORAL SUPPORT OR QUESTIONS. YEAH. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR LEE? OR CHIEF KOWALSKI, CHIEF. HE DID HAVE A QUESTION. OKAY? PROCESSES NOW AT EXCEPT EMOTION. I MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONTRACTOR, MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INCORPORATED FOR AN IN CAR AND BODY WORN CAMERA AND EVIDENCE MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MOTION BY THE MAYOR PRO TEM SECOND CHARLES. YOU HAVEN'T SAID ANYTHING IN A WHILE. THE SECOND . THANK YOU, CHARLES ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. OUR NEXT AGENDA ITEM IS TO POSSIBLY DIRECT TOWN STAFF TO SCHEDULE TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION IN THE FUTURE MEETING. I THINK ONE OF THE ITEMS WOULD BE THE RECYCLING. I'M SORRY ON THIS ONE. I'M SORRY. GOSH HERE I WAS

[27. Consider and act upon authorizing the Interim Town Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement between and Halff Associates and the Town of Prosper, Texas, related to 3rd party landscape review services.]

SO EXCITED. YEAH. YEAH, LET'S DO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AUTHORIZING THAT INTERIM TOWN MANAGER EXECUTED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN HALF ASSOCIATES IN THE TOWN OF PROSPER RELATED THIRD PARTY LANDSCAPE REVIEW SERVICES. DAN BAKER. THANK YOU. YES, SIR.

MAYOR. COUNCIL THANK YOU FOR LET ME SPEAK TO YOU ON THIS. UM BASICALLY WE WANT TO DO IS CONTRACT WITH HALF MY ASSOCIATES TO PROVIDE A CONTRACT. HELP US WITH SOME OF OUR NEEDS. WE ARE GOING TO LOSE PAUL NORTON INTO THIS WEEK. FRIDAYS HIS LAST DAY. WE'RE EXPEDITE. FUND HIS REPLACEMENT AS QUICKLY AS DO THAT AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. UM, BUT EVEN WITH THOSE STAFF, WE ARE STILL STUFF. I WANT TO USE THE WORD STRUGGLING, BUT IT'S UM WE'LL PROBABLY WORKING MORE HOURS THAN WE SHOULD JUST TO KEEP UP. SO THIS WOULD ALLOW US TO USE THIS CONTRACT AS NEEDED.

WE CAN USE ALL OR NONE OF IT. IT'S THERE'S NO MINIMUM WOULD BE CHARGED ON A OR BUILD AN HOURLY BASIS AS WE HAD THE NEEDED ITEMS. THOSE TASKS WOULD INCLUDE POTENTIALLY ATTENDING DRC MEETINGS, REVIEWING LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE PLANS, CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS AND EVEN GOING OUT ON SITE AND INSPECTING LANDSCAPE TO MAKE SURE THEY MEET ALL OF OUR NEEDS. UM SO WITH THAT WE WILL CONTINUE TO EVALUATE THE DEMAND AND DETERMINE APPROPRIATE STAFF LEVELS AND OPTIONS. BUT WHAT THIS DOES ALLOW US TO DO. IS TO MEET A STAFF SHORTAGE WITHOUT HAVING TO GO OUTSIDE AND HIRE SOMEONE. SO WE HAVE THINGS SLOW DOWN. WE'RE NOT STUCK WITH SOMEONE WHO'S NOT DOING WORK. IF THINGS WRAP UP, WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO RAMP THIS UP AS WELL WITH THAT. GIVE ANY QUESTIONS ON HAPPIER IN FOR THIS ONE QUICK QUESTION. UM SO.

SOMEBODY WOULD GO IN AND ATTEND A MEETING OBVIOUSLY IN ON BEHALF OF THE TOWN. AND THEN ANOTHER MEETING COMES UP SOMEBODY GOES. IS THAT THE SAME PERSON I WOULD ASSUME SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE ONE PERSON IS KIND OF YOUR POINT, RIGHT? YOU DON'T HAVE MULTIPLE PEOPLE. DIFFERENT TIMES. IT'S GOING TO MOST LIKELY ONE PERSON, BUT IT'S GOING TO DEPEND ON WHAT TOPIC OR UTILIZING. OKAY SO IT COULD BE DIFFERENT PEOPLE WITHIN HALF, DEPENDING ON THIS SPECIALIZATION. SO THE CIVIL ENGINEERING PERSON PROBABLY GOING TO BE DIFFERENT THAN THE LANDSCAPE PERSON THAT MAKES SENSE YOURSELF. YOU KNOW IF IT WAS SOMETHING THAT PERTAIN TO THE SAME ITEM OR ISSUE, I WOULD JUST HOPE THAT IT WOULD BE THE SAME PERSON SO THAT THEY HEARD ALL THE INFORMATION AND ONE BY ONE THING AND ANOTHER, SO WE WILL KEEP THAT CONTINUITY ALL THE WAY FROM FROM BEGINNING TO END. IT'S ALL YOU ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION. COST THINKS ABOUT YOU LOOKED LIKE HE WAS PASTOR. YOU GOT IT CORRECT. AND MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE INTERIM TIME MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN HALF ASSOCIATES IN PROSPER, TEXAS, RELATED TO THIRD PARTY LANDSCAPE. THANK YOU, JEFF HODGES ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU APPRECIATE IT. NOW OUR NEXT AGENDA ITEM, MR. POSSIBLY

[Possibly direct Town staff to schedule topic(s) for discussion at a future meeting.]

DIRECT TOWN STAFF TO SCHEDULE TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION AT FUTURE MEETINGS. I THINK ONE OF THE THINGS IS TO INVESTIGATE THE RECYCLING PLAN HAS NOTED BY THE STUDENTS TODAY. THEN I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING OTHER THAN THEY OUGHT TO BE ABLE TO. DO RECYCLING THE CITIZENS CAN.

YEAH, I THINK IT WOULD. IT WOULD FIT INTO THAT BOB SHAKING HIS HEAD. YEAH, THAT WE COULD LOOK

[01:50:01]