[3. CONSENT AGENDA]
[00:01:29]
CORRECT. ALL RIGHT. THAT'S IT. WELL YEAH, JUST A MINUTE. SO ADAMS THIS EVENING IS ADAM THREE, A THE MINUTES FROM THE OCTOBER 4TH MEETING. SO YEAH, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE ADAM 38. I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER THREE THAT CONSENT AGENDA TO APPROVE THE MEETING THE MEETING MINUTES FROM OCTOBER 4TH MEETING. ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION COMMISSIONER VAN WOLF HAVE A SECOND. SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER HARRIS OR CHARLES OR BOTH, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF APPROVING CONSENT AGENDA. ADAM 38, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.
MOTION CARRIES FORWARD TO ZERO. THANK YOU. CITIZEN COMMENTS BEFORE WE GET INTO OUR REGULAR AGENDA. ELSEWHERE A CITIZEN COMING IN THE CHAMBERS AT THIS TIME. THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON ANY TOPIC. HOWEVER, THE COMMISSION IS UNABLE TO DISCUSS OR TAKE ACTION ON ANY TOPIC NOT LISTED ON THIS AGENDA. I JUST WANT TO DOUBLE CHECK ANYONE ONLINE. WANT TO COMMENT. AND NO. ONE IN THE CHAMBER. SO LET'S GO ON NEXT TO
[4. Conduct a Public Hearing, to consider and act upon an amendment to the Thoroughfare Plan to realign segments of Teel Parkway, McKinley Street, Gorgeous Road, Coleman Street, and the DNT Collector, amend the cross section for First Street between Coleman Street and Craig Road, rename Fishtrap Road west of Legacy Drive to First Street, and add a collector road from the DNT Collector to Frontier Park. (CA22-0002).]
OUR REGULAR AGENDA THIS EVENING. WHICH IS REGULAR AGENDA. ITEM NUMBER FOUR. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FOUR CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AN AMENDMENT TO THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN TO RELY ON SEGMENTS OF TAIL PARKWAY MCKINLEY STREET GORGEOUS ROAD CALLED COLEMAN STREET IN THE DNT COLLECTOR. AMEND THE CROSS SECTION FOR FIRST STREET BETWEEN COLEMAN STREET AND CRAIG ROAD, RENAMED FISH TRAP ROAD WEST OF LEGACY DRIVE TO FIRST STREET AND AT A COLLECTOR ROAD FROM THE DNT COLLECTOR TO FRONTIER PART THIS IS K C A 22-E IS SHEILA WEBB. I'M THE INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES. I WANT TO THANK EVERYBODY FOR COMING OUT TONIGHT. JEEZ, UM SO BEFORE WE GET STARTED ON, I GUESS BEFORE YOU OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND I'LL JUST RUN THROUGH A QUICK PRESENTATION ON THE PROPOSED CHANGES. FIRST I WANT TO JUST LET YOU KNOW KIND OF ANSWER THE QUESTION OF WHY WHY THE ITEM DENIED. UM ABOUT THREE YEARS AGO , WE RAN INTO A ZONING CASE WHERE YOU KNOW, OUR THOROUGHFARE PLAN WE KNOW IS A GUY THAT KIND OF GUIDES OUR TRANSPORTATION DECISIONS IN TOWN. IT'S USED AS A GUIDE. IT'S NOT A ON THE GROUND SURVEY DOESN'T TIE ANYTHING DOWN. BUT YET WE LEARNED BACK IN 2019 THAT THE PUBLIC DOES KIND OF LOOK AT THAT THOROUGHFARE PLAN. THEY HAD THE TECHNOLOGY. THEY ZOOM IN, AND THEY MEASURE IT OUT, SO THEY HAVE SOMEWHAT OF AN EXPECTATION.THAT THIS THOROUGHFARE PLAN IS GOING TO BE SOMEWHAT, UH UM, REPRESENTS WHAT COULD BE ACTUAL AS FAR AS WELL. LOCATIONS OF THOROUGHFARES. SO BACK IN 2019, BASED ON SOME OF THOSE CONCERNS FROM THE PUBLIC AND DISCUSSIONS WITH THE TOWN COUNCIL, WE SAID THAT WE WOULD MAKE A COMMITMENT TO UPDATE AND AMEND THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN IS NEEDED OR AT LEAST GO BACK AND LOOK AT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS IF WE NEEDED TO MINA THOROUGHFARE PLAN TO SHOW CHANGES IN EXISTING ROADWAYS THAT HAVE BEEN BUILT THAT ARE DIFFERENT FROM WHAT'S SHOWN ON THE THIRD FLOOR PLAN. CHANGES TO ALIGNMENTS OF THOROUGHFARE PLANS BASED ON UM EASEMENTS OR RIGHT AWAY THAT WE'VE WE'VE ACQUIRED WHERE WE KNOW THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE A CHANGE THAT'S COMING. OR OTHER OTHER THINGS THAT WE KNOW THAT ARE COMING ON THERAPY PLAN THAT ARE NOT YET REFLECTED ON THE PLAN. LET'S GET AHEAD OF THAT AND SHOW THAT SO THAT'S WHERE WE ARE TONIGHT WITH THIS ITEM. UM THE FIRST FEW ITEMS
[00:05:03]
REPRESENT SOME SOME EXISTING CHANGES. THE FIRST BEING THE TEAL PARKWAY. YOU SEE THE CURRENT ALIGNMENT UNTIL PARKWAY JUST SOUTH OF PARVIN ROAD, WHICH IS THE ROAD THE ROAD ON THE NORTH SIDE AND RED. YOU CAN SEE CONCEPTUALLY JUST SHOWED KIND OF JUST A STRAIGHT KIND OF CURVED LINEAR LINE DOWN TO PROSPER TRAIL. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT REFLECTS WHAT WAS ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTED MORE LINE WITH WHAT'S ON WHAT'S ON THE GROUND, BASED ON UM, THE DEVELOPMENTS OUT THERE AND AGAIN THE ACTUAL LINE ON THE ROAD CONSTRUCTED. WE GET DOWN IN THERE DOWNTOWN AREA YOU CAN SEE ON THE LEFT. WE HAVE MCKINLEY STREET. THIS IS JUST NORTH OF FIRST STREET RIGHT BEHIND US. WHERE AT ONE POINT MCKINLEY. THERE'S THE ROAD SHOWN IN BLUE CLOSEST TO THE RAILROAD WAS ACTUALLY GONNA CURVE AND CONNECT INTO COLEMAN STREET, WHICH IS THE LARGER STREET THAT YOU SHOW THERE IN BLUE WITH THE LIVE DEVELOPMENT. THAT'S THE APARTMENTS IN TOWN HOMES HERE.DOWNTOWN MCKINLEY CAME BASED ON THEIR DESIGN. MORE OF A KIND OF A INTERSECTION WITH GORGEOUS GORGEOUS BEING THE STREET THAT YOU CAN SEE IS THE KIND OF AN EAST WEST STREET THAT WILL CONNECT INTO CALM AND CREATE AN INTERSECTION WITH MCKINLEY. SO THAT PROPOSED AMENDMENT REFLECTS WHAT IS BEING BUILT TODAY. WITH THE LIVE DEVELOPMENT. THAT WE COME DOWN TO OUR GATES OF PROSPER DEVELOPMENT. WE HAVE THE CURRENT ALIGNMENT OF COLEMAN STREET WHERE INTERSECTS LOVER'S LANE. PROBABLY MANY OF YOU HAVE DRIVEN THIS WEIRD KIND OF TEASE, AND IT'S OFFSET WITH LOVE.
COLEMAN STREET IS A GO SOUTH OF LOVERS LAYING OVER TO RICHLAND. AND SO THE INTENT HAS ALWAYS BEEN TO REALIGN COLEMAN STREET RECONSTRUCT THAT OVER TO THE EXISTING INTERSECTION OR THE ROUNDABOUT THEIR LOVER'S LANE AND GET COLEMAN AND THAT'S REFLECTED HERE IN THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT. ONE UNTIL PROBABLY A LITTLE BIT MORE. MAYBE MAYBE CONTROVERSIAL IS BACK IN 2006, OR THOROUGHFARE PLAN SHOWED A WHAT WE CALL OUR DNT COLLECTOR OR DNT BACKER ROAD. UM IT'S THE LINE SHOWN IN BLACK EAST CIRCLED EAST OF THE DNT. UH THIS WAS JUST RIGHT OFF THE TOLLWAY.
GOING FROM FRONTIER PARKWAY SOUTH DOWN TO FIRST STREET, AND THIS IS A TWO LANE ROADWAY THAT IS ESSENTIALLY MEANT TO PROVIDE TWO WAY TRAFFIC. YOU KNOW WHAT'S THE TOLLWAY DEVELOPED? WE NEED THE SERVICE ROAD WOULD BE JUST ONE WAY AND THIS WAS A TWO WAY BACK FEED THAT WAS ADJACENT TO AND BEHIND THE LEGS OF PROSPER DEVELOPMENT. AND THIS WAS BACK IN 2006. AND IN NOVEMBER OF 2006 . WE HAD A ZONING CASE THAT CAME IN. HOPEFULLY YOU CAN SEE THAT. OKAY. THIS IS NORTH OF PROSPER TRAIL IN BETWEEN THE LAKES OF PROSPER DEVELOPMENT AND THE TOLLWAY. THEY CAME IN THESE OWNED THE NORTHERN PIECE OF THAT TRACK IS MULTI FAMILY AND THE SOUTHERN PIECES OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR AND YOU CAN SEE THEY HONORED THAT 60 FT OF RIGHT AWAY THERE WAS ANTICIPATED. IN THEIR ZONING EXHIBIT FOR THAT DNT COLLECTOR. AND THEN, FURTHERMORE , AND THERE'S OWNING EXHIBIT AND PRESENTATION. THEY SHOWED THE COLLECTOR ROAD FOR THAT THOROUGHFARE PLAN. AND HOW? HOW IT WAS LOCATED THERE BEHIND THE HOMES. AT THE LIKES OF PROSPER DEVELOPMENT. HOWEVER OVER THE YEARS OUR CURRENT ALIGNMENT YOU CAN SEE HERE OF THAT DNT COLLECTOR GOT A LITTLE SQUIGGLY AND GOT FURTHER WEST OF THE SUBDIVISION OF LAKES AND PROSPER. AND HOW THAT REALLY CAME ABOUT. IF YOU REMEMBER BACK IN 2006 THAT THAT CONTINUOUS ROADWAY GOING FROM FRONTIER PARKWAY DOWN TO FIRST STREET. AH! I HAD A LITTLE HICCUP THERE WHEN PRESTON WOULD BAPTIST CHURCH WAS DEVELOPED, IT ACTUALLY EXTENDED FURTHER WEST OF WHERE THAT ROAD WAS ANTICIPATED, AND SO THAT CREATED A KIND OF AN OFFSET OF WHERE THAT ROAD COULD GO FURTHER SOUTH OF PROSPER TRAIL. SO THIS COLONEL LINEMAN OF THE DNT COLLECTOR MOVING IT WEST WAS IN AN ATTEMPT TO TRY TO RUN THAT CONTINUOUS ROAD FURTHER SOUTH OF PROSPER TRAIL. IT WAS APPROXIMATELY THE PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN PRESTON WOULD BAPTIST AND BLUE STAR DEVELOPMENT WHO OWNS LAND THERE ADJACENT TO THE HALLWAY. SO THAT WAS AN ATTEMPT AT THAT POINT WHEN WE ADMITTED THE THIRD PER PLANE TO TRY TO SEE IF WE CAN WORK OUT A WAY TO HAVE THIS DNT COLLECTOR NOT STOP IT. PROSPER TRAIL EXTEND FURTHER SOUTH FIRST STREET AND THEN OVER TIME, WE DID DO AN EVALUATION TO SHOW THAT THAT WE DIDN'T NEED THIS CONTINUOUS COLLECTOR OF SOUTH OF PROSPER TRAIL COOK LANE , WHICH IS A LITTLE FURTHER THE EAST SERVE THAT SAME PURPOSE. AND SO, UH, IT'S REALLY AT THIS POINT. WE'RE TRYING TO CLEAN THE THOROUGHFARE PLANE BACK UP TO MATCH THE ZONING BACK IN 2006, NOT JUST BECAUSE IT'S NOT NEEDED TO GO FURTHER SOUTH, BUT MAINLY BECAUSE WE'VE GOT A LOT OF INTEREST. FROM THE OWNER THAT HAS THE PROPERTY THAT THE MULTI FAMILY TRACK LIKE I MENTIONED BACK IN 2006, AND THAT COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR, AND THEY'RE NO LONGER INTERESTED IN
[00:10:03]
ENTERTAINING A THOROUGHFARE THAT RUNS TO THE MIDDLE OF THE PROPERTY. THEY MADE IT VERY CLEAR THAT THEY WANT TO HONOR WHAT THERE WAS APPROVED AS PART OF THEIR ZONING IN 2006, SO IT'S REALLY US TRYING TO GO BACK AND CLEAN UP. ABOUT WHAT WAS APPROVED BACK IN 2006. AND THE OTHER PIECE OF WHAT'S SHOWN IN THE PROPOSAL ALIGNMENT. IS A YOU SEE ANOTHER COLLECTOR ROAD.RUNNING PARALLEL TO FRONTIER PARKWAY THAT'S CONNECTING FRONTIER PARK OVER TO THAT DNT COLLECTOR ROAD. THIS HAS BEEN SOME RECENT DISCUSSIONS WITH THE TOWN COUNCIL DESIRE TO HAVE MORE ACCESS TO AND FROM FRONTIER PARK WHEN WE HAVE, YOU KNOW A LARGE EVENTS THERE, AND SO THEY'VE THEY'VE REQUESTED THAT THROUGH THIS PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS THAT WE GO AHEAD AND PUT THIS ROAD ON THERE FOR CONSIDERATION AND THAT AND THAT WILL BE VETTED OUT THROUGH THE PUBLICATION PROCESS.
SO WE CAN SEE THAT THAT IS SHOWN AS BEING A PROPOSED COLLECTOR ROAD ON THIS EXHIBIT. THIS. AH HERE IS A, UM ON FIRST STREET. I KNOW SOMEBODY MENTIONED FIRST STREET EARLIER TREND ACTUALLY RESTART TOWN, BUT WE ARE WORKING ON FIRST STREET OVER HERE, BELIEVE IT OR NOT IN FRONT OF TOWN HALL. WE ARE UNDER DESIGNED FROM THE TOLLWAY TO COLEMAN IS FOUR LANES. WE ALSO AS YOU KNOW , FROM CRAIG STREET TO PRESTON AND BEYOND ITS FOUR LANES. WELL, THERE WAS A CONCERN FROM THE COUNCIL. WHEN WE LOOKED AT THE SECTION OF FIRST STREET BETWEEN COLEMAN AND CRAIG, YOU LOOK AT THE OLD TOWN INSERT. IT WAS A TWO LANE ROAD WITH PARALLEL PARKING. SO THE CONCERNS EARLIER THIS YEAR WERE. HEY YOU'VE GOT A TWO LANE ROAD WITH FOUR LANE ROADS COMING IN ON BOTH SIDES.
AND WE KNOW THIS IS A PRETTY PRETTY HEAVILY TRAVELED ROAD, SO THE COUNSELOR ASKED US TO LOOK AT SOME ALTERNATIVES ON HOW CAN WE MOVE TRAFFIC THROUGH THAT SECTION OF THE DOWNTOWN AREA AND WHAT WE SHOW HERE IS A PROPOSAL TO ACTUALLY GET A FOUR LANE SECTION THROUGH HERE, BUT IT WON'T BE A FOUR LANE DIVIDED SECTION. IT WOULD BE A SOMEWHAT UNIQUE FOUR LANE UNDIVIDED SECTION WITH SOME NARROW LANES. NARROW PARKWAY WITH WITH ONLY A SIDEWALK ON THE SOUTH SIDE AND ACTUALLY REDUCING THE RIGHT AWAY . THAT WAS ANTICIPATED WITH THAT TWO LANE ROAD WITH PARALLEL PARKING. THAT WAS IN A 60 FT. SECTION THIS WE'RE PROPOSING TO REDUCE IT DOWN TO 56 FT SECTION, BUT INCREASE THE LEVEL OF TRAFFIC TO GET A FOUR LANE UNDIVIDED ROADWAY THROUGH THERE.
WE BROUGHT THAT BACK TO COUNCIL WORK SESSION THIS YEAR AND GAIN APPROVAL TO USE THAT SECTION AS THE BUT NEWS PROPOSED SECTION OF FIRST STREET BETWEEN COLEMAN AND CRAIG AND THEN LASTLY, THIS IS AN OVERALL OF THE THIRD. WE'RE PLAYING WITH ALL THE CHANGES THAT I MENTIONED, UM THE LAST CHANGE BEING THEIR LAST COUNCIL MEETING, THE COUNCIL DID PASS AN ORDINANCE TO FORMALLY CHANGED THE NAME OF FISH TRAP ROAD BETWEEN LEGACY AND THE ROAD TO FIRST STREET SO YOU CAN SEE FIRST STREET IN THE NAME OF THAT STREET. UH IT'S NOT SHOWN ON THE WEST SIDE WHERE WE DID REMOVE FISH TRAPS. SO CURRENTLY THE FISH TRAP IS NO LONGER HER NAME FOR THE ROADWAY FROM G TWO LEGACIES. SO WITH THAT I'D BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE ON ANY OF THAT BEFORE YOU OPEN. THE PUBLIC ROOM DID HAVE QUESTIONS JUST TO THE ELECTION LINE. YES, SIR. IS THAT THE ONLY ONE? I LOST EVERYTHING THAT WE DO. THAT BETTER? NO I JUST DIDN'T HIT THE MUTE BUTTON.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MY FRIEND. OKAY SO WE'LL TRY THAT AGAIN FOR THE PEOPLE MIGHT NOT BE ABLE HEAR ME. MOST OF EVERYTHING WE'VE SEEN IS JUST REALIGNING WHAT'S ALREADY BEEN BUILT TODAY OR IN THE PROGRESS OF BEING BUILT TODAY. THERE ARE A COUPLE OF PIECES LIKE THE LITTLE FINGER TOO. THE PARK THE FRONT AIRPARK. THAT'S NEW, RIGHT? IT'S GOING TO BE PROPOSED. IT'S NOT ON THERE.
WHAT ELSE IS LIKE THAT. THAT'S NEW, AND BECAUSE MY FOLLOW UP MY REAL QUESTION IS AND MAYBE IT'S REALLY FOR COUNCIL. HAVE WE ALREADY SET ASIDE THE FUNDS OR DO WE THINK WE HAVE THE FUNDS TO DO THIS OTHER STUFF AS WELL? BECAUSE I LIKE THE PERSONALLY LIKE THE CONNECTION TO FRONTIER PARK. IT'S NEEDED, ESPECIALLY ON FOOTBALL DAYS AND HEAVY PARK DAYS, BUT I AM CURIOUS AS TO WHAT'S ALREADY FUNDED OR WHAT CAN CONTEMPLATED INSIDE THE BUDGET. OKAY SO THIS IS YOUR FIRST QUESTION. SO YOU'RE AT THE THERE'S QUITE LIKE THE FIRST THREE OR FOUR CHANGES ARE BASED ON EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS OR IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE HEADED THIS WAY. UH THIS ONE HERE IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT WITH THE NORTH SOUTH COLLECTOR ROAD. IS MORE OF A JUST A CLEANUP OF PUTTING IT BACK TO WHERE IT WAS BACK IN 2006, BASED ON THE ZONING, THERE ISN'T A TIMELINE FOR THE DEVELOPER TO BUILD THAT, BUT LIKE I SAID, THEY'RE COMING IN AND WANTING TO DEVELOP IN WANTING US TO MAKE SURE WE CLEAN UP THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN. FOR THAT, UH, THE ENHANCEMENT LIKE
[00:15:01]
YOU MENTIONED THAT CONNECTION OVER THE FRONTIER PARKWAY. UH THERE'S NO FUNDS SET ASIDE TO CONSTRUCT THAT. OR A TIMELINE THAT WE ANTICIPATE TO DO THAT IT'S MORE OF TRYING TO PUT IT IN IT. PASSES THROUGH HIS HOPEFULLY MORE PUTTING IN THE PLANNING PHASE OR WHEN THAT PROBABLY DOES DEVELOP. THE INTENT WOULD BE IF IT'S ON OUR THOROUGHFARE PLAN, IT BECOMES AN IMPACT THE ELIGIBLE PROJECT SO ALL AS YOU KNOW ALL THESE PROJECTS WHEN THEY COME, AND THEY PAY A ROADWAY IMPACT V SO THEY CAN USE THAT ROADWAY IMPACT THEY PAY. TO REIMBURSE FOR THAT INFRASTRUCTURE THAT ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE. WE HOPE WE WOULDN'T GO OUT THERE AND ARBITRARILY PUT THE ROAD WHERE WE WANT IT. WE WOULD WORK WITH THAT DEVELOPMENT TO TRY TO PUT THAT ROAD WHERE IT BENEFITS THEM AS WELL AND THEN USE THEIR FUNDS THAT THEY PAY TO ACTUALLY FUND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROAD SO WE WOULDN'T ACTUALLY HAVE TO COME OUT OF ANY MONEY. RIGHT AWESOME. THANK YOU ON THAT, AND THE OTHER PIECE OF THE OTHER ENHANCEMENT PIECE IS THIS ON FIRST STREET. BEING ABLE TO JUST CHANGE THAT FROM A TWO LANE WITH PARALLEL PARKING BETWEEN COLEMAN AND CRAIG AND TAKING IT TO A FOUR LANE UNDIVIDED SECTION. REMEMBER WHEN I STARTED BACK IN 2006 BELIEVE IT OR NOT, AT ONE POINT BEFORE WE WENT TO A TWO LANE SECTION IN A 60 FT RIGHT AWAY THAT WAS PLANNED TO BE A FOUR LANE DIVIDED YOU KNOW, 90 FT RIGHT AWAY SECTION, SO WE REDUCED IT DOWN. AND BUT NOW WE'RE BACK WITH THE NEED TO MAKE IT A FOUR LANE. BUT I THINK THIS IS A GREAT KIND OF COMPROMISE TO GET IT AS AN UNDIVIDED, NARROW SECTION. THAT'S THE OTHER ENHANCEMENT. AND THAT TOO IS MORE. THAT'S NOT ON OUR C I P OR ANYTHING RIGHT NOW FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION. IT'S MAINLY FOR THE PLANNING PURPOSE, SO PEOPLE COME AND START REDEVELOPING.LET'S MAKE SURE WE GET THE RIGHT AWAY. THEY KNOW WHAT'S COMING. AND SOONER OR LATER TRAFFIC WARRANTS. WE COULD SEE THAT ELEVATE HOPEFULLY, ANSWER QUESTIONS, MR. NO, I DID AND THEN OUT. ON THE G ROAD WHERE IT ENDED. I'M GLAD THAT STOP THERE BECAUSE IT WAS THERE STILL DISCUSSION TO TAKE IT ALL AWAY TO 13 85, AND I THOUGHT WHERE YOU'RE ENDING FISH TRAP. I THOUGHT THAT WAS A GOOD ONE AT G ROAD SORT SORT OF ENDS THERE. YES. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.
ALRIGHT ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR WEBB BEFORE WE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. IF NOT, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING HAD HIM THIS EVENING. I DON'T NUMBER FOUR, SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND AT THIS TIME IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? TO ITEM NUMBER FOUR. WITH THAT. LET ME GO TO ONLINE. DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER FOR THIS EVENING? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. WE'LL GIVE IT 15 TO 20 SECONDS, WHICH SEEMS LIKE FOREVER WHEN IT'S QUIET. DAVID ONE THING THAT WE HAVE ANY PUBLIC COMMENT.
REQUEST FORMS EITHER WAY ON THIS ITEM THIS EVENING. AND I EVEN PUSHED OUT OVER THE WEEKEND THAT WE NAME IT. HIS TRAVEL JUST GOT A FEW NEGATIVE COMMENTS BUT MOSTLY OVERWHELMING FROM THE POSITIVE FROM THE LAST TIME. YEAH. BECAUSE WHEN YOU'RE DONE PEOPLE JUST WANTED. IT'S GOT SOME HISTORY FROM GETTING COUNTY KNOW THE ACTUAL HISTORY, PEOPLE RESEARCH, THE HISTORY AND, LIKE , YOU KNOW, ITS HISTORY, AND I WAS LIKE, WELL, WHERE ARE YOU FROM? LISTEN THAT'S CALIFORNIA.
SO REALLY GOOD NEWS IS THAT WHEN THEY CONTEMPLATED COUNCIL CONTEMPLATED NO. WHEN CANCEL, CONTEMPLATED IT. I DID A SURVEY AND WHEN SOME RANCH AND STAR TRAIL AND IT WAS OVERWHELMING AND LIKE 10 TO 1 FAVORABLE, GOOD LOT OF PEOPLE UNDERSTOOD THE COMING OFF OF THE TOLLWAY. YOU WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO SAY GO OFF OF FISH TRAP, AND THEN IT TURNS INTO SO IT'S A REAL CLEAN COMMUNICATION, SO IT WAS REALLY GOOD TO SEE. THAT'S WHY I'M GLAD IT ENDED. THAT AT G ROAD BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE T BONES RIGHT INTO INSTEAD OF GOING ALL THE WAY AROUND IS MAYBE WE'RE SOME DESIGN THOUGHTS AROUND THAT SO ALL RIGHT WITHOUT ANY FURTHER PUBLIC COMMENTS THIS EVENING, I'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ISLAND NUMBER FOUR AND TAKE IT BACK TO THE COMMISSIONERS FOR DISCUSSION AND OR EMOTIONAL ITEM NUMBER FOUR GETS FIRST TOWN STAFF MR WEBB.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATION THIS EVENING AND ALL THE WORK THAT'S BEEN DONE. I KNOW IT'S BEEN A LOT TO GET TO THIS POINT. SO ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS OR ADAM NUMBER FOUR. WE COULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON ATOM FOURTH. COMMENT. I'VE ALREADY SHARED ABOUT THE NAMING. I THINK IT'S GREAT TO CLEAN IT UP. I THINK IT'S AN OPPORTUNITY AS WE GO FORWARD NOT TO LET IT GET THIS STALE. I MEAN, SOME OF THIS IS PRETTY STALE. SO WHEN WE THINK ABOUT OUR DEVELOPERS AND PEOPLE WHO ARE CONTEMPLATING DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENTS IN OUR TOWN. USE THIS AS SORT OF AN INDICATOR, SO I THINK WE SHOULD TRY TO MAKE IT. CURRENT KEEP IT FRESH, MORE MORE ACTIVELY, SO THAT WOULD BE MY ONLY CHALLENGE, BUT I THINK IT'S GOOD TO CLEAN IT UP LIKE THE CHANGES.
COMMISSIONER HERE. THE INFLUX. PEOPLE. INFLUX OF CUSTOMERS TO SOME OF OUR BUSINESSES.
TRAINING. YOU'RE ON MUTE. UM YEAH. UM YEAH, AND I THINK THAT THESE CHANGES ARE ABSOLUTELY
[00:20:16]
NECESSARY AND, IN SOME CASES POTENTIALLY EVEN OVERDUE, SO I'M GLAD THEY'RE BEING MADE NOW AND WE'RE THINKING FORWARD AND, YEAH , I THINK IT'S ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY. AND I'M GLAD TO SEE THEM HAPPENING. YEAH. THANKS, COMMISSIONER HARRIS COMMISSIONER VAN WOLF. I APPRECIATE THE PRESENTATION IN DETAIL, AND IT WAS A LOT OF WORK THAT GOES INTO IT. I AM FULLY SUPPORT OF THE TOWN'S RECOMMENDATION. I REALLY DO LIKE ALSO TO COMMISSION CHARLES POINT AS WELL, ADDING THAT ADDITION INTO FRONTIER PARK BECAUSE THERE'S AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC. IT'S LOADED IMMEDIATELY ONTO FRONTIERS. I THINK IT'S GOING TO HELP ALLEVIATE AND ALSO ACCESS FROM FOLKS COMING TO TOWN FOR EVENTS SO IN FULL SUPPORT ON MY SIDE. AND ECHO. ALL THE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN SAID THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION, SUPPORTIVE OF OUT OF NUMBER FOUR AND ALL THE WORK THAT'S BEEN DONE TO GET HERE. SO WITH THAT, I'LL TAKE IT BACK TO THE COMMISSION FOR EMOTIONAL, NOT A MEMBER, FOUR. GO AHEAD. BOARD. I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM FOUR, SUBJECT TO STAFF, TOWN STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS. UM THAT'S PRESENTED THANK YOU. WE HAVE EMOTIONAL FOUR FROM COMMISSIONER HARRIS. DO WE HAVE A 2ND 2ND? THERE WE GO. WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER VAN WILL. FIRST ON ITEM NUMBER FOUR. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF APPROVING ALBUM NUMBER FOUR. PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. THE MOTION CARRIES 4 TO 0 WITH ALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT AND SUPPORT. THANK YOU. THANKS EVERYBODY. AND THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS. THAT'S A GOOD[5. Review actions taken by the Town Council and possibly direct Town Staff to schedule topic(s) for discussion at a future meeting.]
CHANGE. SO ITEM NUMBER FIVE REVIEW ACTIONS TAKEN BY TOWN COUNCIL AND POSSIBLY DIRECT TOWN STAFF TO SCHEDULE TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION AT FUTURE MEETINGS. GOOD EVENING. I DON'T HAVE REALLY TOO MUCH, UM I JUST KIND OF LISTED SOME OF THE KIND OF HIGHLIGHTS SO THE MQ PROSPER NORTH ZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT THAT WAS DENIED WAS TABLED. TO THE JANUARY 10TH JUST TO KIND OF ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO SORT OF CONTINUE TO HAVE THOSE DISCUSSIONS WITH THE CITIZENS AND SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS. UM OBVIOUSLY, WE JUST TALKED ABOUT THE STREET RENAMING. THAT WAS AN ORDINANCE THAT WAS APPROVED AND YOU CAN SET AGENDA AS WELL. AND THEN, UM , I DID PASS OUT THE SERVICE AGREEMENT. UM THAT IS SORT OF KIND OF OUTLINING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE. DEFINITELY REALLY EXCITED FOR THIS. UM THIS IS DEFINITELY AS YOU ALL KNOW, GUIDANCE FOR FIRST STAFF, AND FOR EVERYONE, REALLY? UM AND SO I JUST WANTED TO PROVIDE THAT TO Y'ALL. ONE OF THE FIRST TASK OF THE COM PLAN AMENDMENT WAS TO COME UP WITH THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE AS LISTED IN FRONT OF YOU. AND AGAIN, WE'LL HAVE MORE OF A TIMELINE.BUT I JUST WANT TO KEEP YOU ALL IN THE LOOP. AND UM I THINK ONE OF THE TASK IS TO COME TO TMZ AND PRESENT THE PLAN SO Y'ALL WILL PROVIDE AND FEEDBACK BUT AGAIN, I DEFINITELY WANT TO KEEP YOU ALL UM, THAT'S KIND OF A PROGRESS AND KEEP YOU ON THE LOOP. BUT OTHER THAN THAT, THAT'S ALL I HAD. UM, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME. I THERE MAKING SURE I WAS ON I DO . CAN YOU TELL ME A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THE MQ TABLING. I'M GLAD FOR THAT TABLING, BUT WAS THERE SOME ON THE EDGE OR EMERGING? AGREEMENT THAT WAS SORT OF BRINGING THIS THING CLOSER TO BEING RESOLVED. YOU KNOW? YES. SO WHAT I'VE HEARD THAT WAS JUST THE APPLICANT REQUESTED TO THE TABLE. THE ITEM . UM THERE WAS AGAIN NUMEROUS CONCERNS FROM THE NEIGHBORS. SO I THINK, UM AND YOU KNOW, THIS HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR SINCE. I THINK JANUARY OF LAST YEAR. UM AND SO THAT WAS REALLY I THINK THAT THE POINT OF IT FEELING HAS SOMETHING ELSE. YOU CAN CORRECT ME, BUT IT WAS JUST AGAIN TO GIVE OKAY, UM, TO ADDRESS ANY OF THE CONCERNS THAT THE CITIZENS OR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS HAD THAT'S GOOD. I'M HOPING THEIR CLOTHES ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.
QUESTIONS FOR DAVID OR THEY HAD THE STAFF THIS EVENING. I'M JUST ONE OTHER QUESTION IS NOT ON THIS UPDATE. BUT I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT TRAINING AS YOU LOOK FORWARD BETWEEN NOW AND THANKSGIVING. YES THAT YOU THINK. MAYBE BECAUSE TODAY WAS UNEXPECTEDLY LIGHT. I THOUGHT TONIGHT WE HAVE A FEW MORE CASES. SO DO YOU KNOW WHEN WE'RE MAYBE THINKING ABOUT THE TRAINING? SO SO I'M ACTUALLY GETTING WITH OUR TIME ATTORNEY. WE'RE LOOKING AT A COUPLE OF DATES BEFORE THANKSGIVING. EVEN THE NEXT ONE, BECAUSE I THINK SINCE IT'S A LITTLE BIT SLOW WITH THE I MEAN, WE HAVE A LOT OF SOME METALS WE'VE GOT INTEND TODAY YESTERDAY AND WE GOT LIKE 12 THE OTHER DAY. UM SO WE'RE TRYING TO KIND OF IF IT'S A LITTLE BIT SLOWER. THE YOU KNOW THIS IS THE PERFECT TIME. UM SO WE ARE LOOKING FOR 11 1 NOVEMBER FIRST OR NOVEMBER. 15TH OF YOU HAVE ANY UM, HOLIDAYS OR JUST FOR TRYING TO GET THE MOST PEOPLE. MOST COMMISSIONERS AT THE MEETING. UM BUT THAT THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE DIDN'T THINK I SENT AN EMAIL OUT JUST TO BRING
[00:25:07]
THAT BACK AND SEE WHAT WE CAN GO FROM THERE. AND ALSO ANYTHING THAT YOU ALL HAVE. UM THAT YOU WOULD MAYBE WANT TO GET MORE KNOWLEDGE ON? YOU KNOW, UM MAYBE , LIKE THE COMMON PLAN, OR LIKE WHAT WE CAN DO OR OR JUST CERTAIN THINGS THAT BECAUSE AGAIN, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE SORT OF AN AGENDA OF DIFFERENT ITEMS LEGAL AND KIND OF WALK YOU THROUGH THE COMPLAINT AND JUST KIND OF DO OVERVIEW OF EVERYTHING SO ANYTHING THAT YOU MAY HAVE QUESTIONS ON OR WANT TO FOCUS ON PLEASE FEEL FREE TO SEND THAT OVER THE ONLY ONE THAT I KNOW THAT I THINK WOULD BE IN GOOD WOULD BE THE DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE TOLLWAY THROUGH SOME CHANGES HERE AND THEN COUNSEL DID SOME CHANGES. AND, YEAH, I'M SURE NEXT YEAR WILL BEGIN TO HAVE SOME YEAH.NO, WE HAVE HALLWAY, SO IT WOULD BE GOOD FOR US TO BE REFRESHED ON WHAT THE FINALS REGARD LINES ARE AND THEN FOR ME. WHAT CAN THEY NEGOTIATED? NOT NEGOTIATE, LIKE MORE. RIGID ON IN TERMS OF LIKE THESE ARE SORT OF OUR NON NEGOTIABLES WHEN WE'RE IN THERE, BECAUSE RIGHT NOW IT'S SO NOT THAT THAT'S NOT AS CLEAR, ESPECIALLY IF THEY OPENED UP THE P D. AND WE HAVE ABOUT EIGHT ITEMS, EIGHT ORDINANCES OR EIGHT DESIGN THAT ARE THAT ARE CURRENTLY BEING REVIEWED SO WE CAN PROVIDE AN UPDATE AS WELL AND I'LL WRITE THAT DOWN. I THINK THE ONLY THING TO UM REMEMBER LAST TIME WE TALKED AND WE TALKED ABOUT HOW THIN IT WAS GONNA BE OVER THE NEXT FEW MEETINGS, SO YOU'RE EXPECTING THAT TO PICK UP SOMETIME AROUND MID TO LATE NOVEMBER? YOU'RE THINKING THAT IT'S GOING TO PROBABLY PICK UP A BIT IN TERMS OF THE CASES. YEAH SO, SO AGAIN.
IT'S THE SORT OF THEM ARE I MEAN, I THINK WE EVEN TYPICALLY BEFORE THE HOLIDAYS, EVERYONE TRIES TO GET STUFF IN BEFORE THE END OF THE YEAR. SO UM, I THINK IT'S GOING TO KIND OF PICK UP AGAIN. LIKE I SAID, WE'VE HAD 10 TODAY. SEVEN RECENT MIDDLES TODAY AND THEN IT WAS LIKE 12 MEDALS ON THE LAST TIME, SO WE DEFINITELY ARE BUSY WITH BUT IT'S JUST, UM WE'RE STILL REVIEWING THE ITEMS AND STILL AND IT'S NOT READY YET FOR PNC, SO I BELIEVE RIGHT NOW WE HAVE ONE PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR THE NOVEMBER 1ST FOR STRAIGHT ZONING. UM AND THEN, HOPEFULLY THE OPINIONS EACH TRAINING FOR THAT THAT TIME OR THE 15TH. SO WE'RE THINKING WE PROBABLY WON'T REALLY EVEN SEE THAT INFLUX. SOMETIMES MAYBE EVEN MAYBE, NOT EVEN TILL DECEMBER, AND A LOT OF IT GETS KIND OF COMPLICATED WITH THE HOLIDAYS, SO WE KNOW YOU KNOW THERE'S VACATION AND STUFF LIKE THAT. SO UM, BUT LIKE I SAID, I THINK IT NORMALLY WILL START PICKING UP AROUND NOVEMBER OR NOVEMBER 15TH THAT THAT SECOND ONE UM, WE'RE THE FIRST ONES BECAUSE WE JUST HAVE TO BELIEVE ONE PNC MEETING ON IN DECEMBER. THANK YOU. DAVID IS THAT POINT? IF IT WORKS FOR THE OTHER COMMISSIONERS THAT NOVEMBER 1ST JUST FROM MY JUST OPINION WOULD BE PROBABLY BETTER TO GET TRAINING ON THE FRONT BECAUSE AS YOU GET LATER NOVEMBER GETS VERY BUSY WITH LIFE AND PEOPLE WORK TRYING TO SQUEEZE THAT IN, SO I KNOW AT LEAST I CAN'T SPEAK FOR ALL OF US. BUT, UM, THE FIRST WOULD BE MY PREFERENCE OPEN. YOU GUYS JUST CAUSE WE'RE GETTING CLOSE TO THAT TIME FOR NOTED I THINK I DON'T AGAIN. JUST BE THAT PROBABLY AFTER RATHER THAN BEFORE, BECAUSE TO GET HERE BEFORE SIX AND PROBABLY HARD. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR FEEDBACK? ONE THING I'D LIKE TO SAY IS A THANK YOU TO COMMISSIONER CHARLES COMMISSIONER VAN WOLF FOR BEING ON THIS. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE. SO GOOD JOB THANKS FOR STEPPING UP, ADDITIONALLY THAN WHAT YOU ARE ALREADY. SO THANKS FOR THAT. WITH THAT WE'LL GO TO ITEM NUMBER SIX, A MOTION TO ADJOURN. YOUR MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MOTION TO ADJOURN. COMMISSIONER CHARLES DO HAVE A SECOND. 2ND 2ND FROM COMMISSIONER HARRIS TO ADJOURN ALL THOSE IN FAVOR TO ADJOURN. RAISE YOUR HAND MOTION CARRIES 4 TO 0. WE
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.