[Call to Order/ Roll Call.]
[00:00:08]
UM, EVERYONE, WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TOWN COUNCIL. MEETING WITH THE RECEPTION. FIRST ITEM IS CALLED ROW WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS, CHARLES COTTON. THERE'R AND MANAGE MILLER. I AM IN BARTLEY. MARCUS RAY AND CRAIG, JUST DEAL. INDICATION. DOLLAR WITH FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH AND THEN WE'LL SEE THE PLEDGES. GRACIOUS AND LOVING HEAVENLY FATHER. OR COMMUNITY. LEAVE.
LEAVIN BEING GUIDED BY ARE OPEN. COMING AND DWELLING. AND AS WE PAUSE TO ASK YOUR BLESSING ON THE MEETING TO COME THE DECISIONS TO BE MADE WE ALSO PART. VERS RETIRE. MM. WE ARE EACH OF US. ROUNDED BY A CLOUD OF WHAT. LORD, WE ASK IF YOU WOULD CONTINUE TO LEAD NOURISH.
SUPPORT THIS CAN WE MIGHT BE ALL THAT YOU'VE DONE. DREAM FOR US. PROSPER MIGHT BE KNOWN FOR AND WIDE ALL THE WAY TO WASHINGTON. EVEN THAT TOWN ON A HILL. LIKE. SHINES IN THE DARKNESS FOR THE REST OF THE WORLD. IN CHRIST JESUS NAME.
RATIONS. MINISTER OATH OF OFFICE TO NEWLY ELECTED COUNCIL MEMBERS AND PRESENT CERTIFICATES OF
[1. Administer Oaths of Office to newly elected Councilmembers and present Certificates of Election. (MLS)]
ELECTION.I COULD INVITE NEARLY ELECT CHRIS CURRAN. REELECTED, MARCUS, RIGHT. YOU PLEASE RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. I WILL READ YOU THE OATH OF OFFICE AND THEN ONCE FINISHED SAY I DO. DO YOU, CHRIS KERN AND MARCUS? RIGHT? AND WE SWEAR THAT YOUR FAITHFULLY EXECUTE THE DUTIES. OF THE OFFICE OF TOWN COUNCIL. PLACE ONE AND FOUR. OF TOWN TO PROSPER. IN THE STATE OF TEXAS AND WILL TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITIES, PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND OF THIS STATE. SO HELP YOU GOD. CONGRATULATIONS.
80 YEAR, SMITH WILL DO. YES, SIR.
[00:05:38]
AND BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. THIS IS A CERTIFIED THAT IT A GENERAL ELECTION HELD MAY 7TH 2022 CHRISTIAN KERN WAS DULY ELECTED TO TOWN COUNCIL PLACE FOR TESTIMONY WHEREOF I AM HERE AND TO SIGN MY NAME AND CALLS THE SHIELD OF THE TOWN OF PROCESS.TO BE A FIXED ON THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY, 2000 AND 22. NATIONS.
RIGHT HAND. I WILL READ THE OATH. DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR. FOR FIRM THAT YOU WILL FAITHFULLY EXECUTE THE DUTIES OF THE OFFICE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL. THE TOWN OF PROSPER THE STATE OF TEXAS AND WILL TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITY. CHECKED DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND OF THIS STATE, SO HELP YOU GOD.
NAME AND BY THE SORT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS THIS IS THE CERTIFIED THAT A GENERAL ELECTION HELD MAY 7TH 2022 DAVID F. BRISTOL WAS DULY ELECTED MAYOR AND TESTIMONY WHERE I.
HERE IN TO SIGN MY NAME AND CAUSE THE SHELL OF THE TOWN OF PROSPER TO BE A FIXED ON THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY 2022 CONGRATULATIONS, MAYOR.
[00:10:26]
YEAH. YEAH. THANKS. OKAY, SO. GONNA ROLL CAR SO WE ARE NOW ON ITEM NUMBER TWO, THE CONSENT AGENDA. AH RIGHT NOW WE ARE SORRY THAT WE, HAVEN'T WE? YEAH. I JUST WANTED TO POINT OUT THAT ANNOUNCEMENTS THAT PREVIOUS MAYOR DEFERRED THE ANNOUNCEMENTS SO THAT THE CURRENT AMERICAN HANDELMAN COUNCILMAN CUT, AND THAT SOUNDS LIKE A REALLY GOOD IDEA. SO WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO[Announcements of recent and upcoming events.]
CONTINUE TRADITIONS LIKE THAT SO COUNCILMAN CURREN. WOULD YOU MIND COVERING THE ANNOUNCEMENTS FORCE? ALRIGHT. HERE ARE THE ANNOUNCEMENTS. THANK YOU TO EVERYONE WHO ATTENDED THE TOWN COUNCIL RECEPTION PRIOR TO TONIGHT'S MEETING. TOWN COUNCIL , RESIDENTS, FRIENDS AND FAMILY ACKNOWLEDGED ALKALINE MERIT. RAY SMITH AND MAYOR PRO TEM MEG'S MILLER FOR THEIR MANY YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE TOWN. MARCUS RAY WAS ACKNOWLEDGED FOR HIS REELECTION AND DAVID BRISTOL AND CHRIS CURRAN WERE WELCOMED AS NEWLY ELECTED MEMBERS OF THE TOWN COUNCIL. ON FRIDAY, MAY 27TH HIT THE ROAD WITH THE PROSPER COMMUNITY LIBRARY STORYTIME AT THE BODY SHOP COLLISION REPAIR AT 10:30 A.M. ENJOY A FUN STORY AND FASCINATING TOUR TO FIND OUT WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A CAR GETS BUMPED AND BRUISED. ALL AGES WELCOME ALL AGES. WELCOME TO PARTICIPATE. DISCOVER BOOTS ON BROADWAY ON SATURDAY, JUNE 11TH AT SIX PM DOWNTOWN PROSPER WITH GARY KYLE, PREMIER ENTERTAINER AND SONGWRITER WITH TEXAS LEGEND GARY P. NONE TAKING THE STAGE AT 7 30. PM PARKING WILL BE AVAILABLE AT PROSPER TOWN HALL. BROADWAY STREET WILL BE CLOSED BETWEEN SOUTH CROCKETT STREET AND SOUTH COLEMAN STREET DURING THE EVENT. RESIDENTS ARE ENCOURAGED TO ENSURE THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR NATIONAL POLICE MONTH BY TURNING THEIR PORCH LIGHTS BLUE FOR THE MONTH OF MAY. BIBLES MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE POLICE STATION, A ONE SAFETY WAY OR THE INFORMATION DESK IN TOWN HALL. ALSO A REMINDER OF THE TOWN HALL OFFICES WILL BE CLOSED ON MONDAY, MAY 30TH FOR THE MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY DUE TO THE HOLIDAY RESIDENTS WHOSE TRASH SERVICE FALLS ON MONDAY WILL BE DELAYED BY ONE DAY. THE SPECIAL BULK DROP OFF LOCATIONS AT PUBLIC WORKS WILL ALSO BE CLOSED THIS SATURDAY, MAY 28 MARY OF ONE MORE THING.CONGRATULATIONS TO CORNERSTONE. THEY MOVED TO THEIR NEW LOCATION LOCATED AT 8 61 NORTH COMMON SUITE 100. IT IS NOW THEIR STORY AND THEIR DONATION CENTER, SO I'D LIKE TO CONGRATULATE THEM AND INVITE COMMUNITY TO GO AND SHOP THERE AND GIVE HER DONATIONS AND ALSO LIKE TO THANK THE L A FOR THEIR GENEROUS DONATION TO CORNERSTONE AND THEIR PAST MEETINGS THAT WE THANK YOU FOR ALL ALL OF YOUR SUPPORT. THANK YOU ANY OTHER ANNOUNCEMENT? I JUST LIKE TO ADD THAT I PERSONALLY LOOKING FORWARD TO GARY P. NONE AND ANYBODY WHO DOESN'T KNOW HIM.
IT'S SAD. OKAY SO IF YOU GET A CHANCE, COME OUT AND LISTEN TO GARY PEANUT. THINK AH! THE NEXT
[CONSENT AGENDA:]
ITEM IS OUR CONSENT AGENDA. ITEMS PLACED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE IN NATURE AND NON CONTROVERSIAL THE CONSENT AGENDA CAN BE ACTED UPON IN ONE MOTION AND ITEMS MAY BE REMOVED FROM THE CONCENTRIC AGENDA BY THE REQUEST OF COUNCIL MEMBERS OR STAFF. COMMENTS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. APPROVE ITEMS 234 2ND MOTION BY COUNCILMAN HODGES SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CARTON ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION PASSES. FOR THE RECORD. THERE WERE NONE IN OPPOSITION.I'LL TAKE A LITTLE WHILE AND I'LL LEARN ALL THE PROPER PROCEDURES. OKAY. THE NEXT ITEM
[CITIZEN COMMENTS]
IS CITIZENS COMMENTS AND THAT THESE, THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ANY TOPIC. HOWEVER, THE COUNCIL IS UNABLE TO DISCUSS OR TAKE ACTION ON ANY TOPIC NOT LISTED ON THIS AGENDA. PLEASE COMPLETE A PUBLIC COMMENT REQUEST FORM AND PRESENTED TO THE TOWN SECRETARY PRIOR TO THE MEETING. AS OF THIS TIME I HAVE TWO. PUBLIC COMMENT. REQUEST FORMS. AND IT'S FROM MARIA MILLING MYLAN. REALLY? AND I DON'T THINK THAT'S OKAY. HERE WE GO. CONGRATULATIONS NEAR BRISTOL. I'M MARIA MYLAN, AND I'M, THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF NEIGHBORS NOURISHING NEIGHBORS[00:15:08]
WERE FORMERLY BETHLEHEM. PLACE THE FOOD PANTRY HERE AND PROSPER. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME THIS OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK THIS EVENING. NEIGHBORS NERVE SHE NEIGHBORS AFFECTIONATELY CALLED IN THREE IS THE FOOD PANTRY THAT HAS BEEN IN EXISTENCE AND PROSPEROUS SINCE 1980. WE WERE STARTED BY THE PROSPERING UNITED METHODIST CHURCH AND STAYED ON THEIR PROPERTY ON CHURCH STREET UNTIL MOVING TO OUR CURRENT LOCATION ON MCKINLEY. WHEN WE MOVED IN FEBRUARY OF 2020, WE CHANGED OUR NAME TO NEIGHBORS, NURSING NEIGHBORS, RECOGNIZING THE GENEROSITY AND SUPPORT THE COMMUNITY. THE FIRST DAY WE WOULD SERVE OUR FAMILIES FROM OUR NEW LOCATION. WE WERE TOLD BY NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK THAT WE WERE NOT ABLE TO SERVE DUE TO COVID AND THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO CANCEL OUR IN PANTRY SHOPPING. AND THREE, LIKE ALL OTHER BUSINESSES HAD TO CREATE BE CREATED AND FIGURE OUT A WAY TO CONTINUE SERVING OUR CLIENTS. WE PIVOTED. WE FILLED BOXES AND SERVED OUR CLIENTS AND THEIR CAR WHILE PLAYING THROUGH A CAR LINE. WE WENT BACK TO CHOICE PANTRY IN OCTOBER 21, WHERE SHOPPERS ARE NOW WELCOMED IN THE PANTRY TO SHOP. I'VE BEEN LOOKING FOR OUR NEXT LOCATION FOR OVER A YEAR, WE FOUND DIFFERENT LOCATIONS, HOWEVER, ONE SPACE REQUIRED A $250,000 FINISH OUT. ANOTHER SPACES HAVE MONTHLY RENTS WHICH EXCEED OUR MEAGER BUDGET. OUR LEASE WAS UP AND FEBRUARY WHERE IN OUR CURRENT LOCATION MONTH TO MONTH BY THE GOOD GRACES OF OUR SENSE, SUB LANDLORD BUSINESS HAS GROWN TREMENDOUSLY, AND HE'S EAGER TO EXPAND INTO THE BUSINESS IN WHICH WE'RE SUBLETTING. THERE'S A WAREHOUSE SPACE AT 4 74 NORTH HAYES ROAD. IT'S A SMALL INDUSTRIAL PARK WITH THREE STANDALONE BUSINESSES BUILDINGS . THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND PROSPER TRAIL RUNNING PARALLEL TO PRESS. ALTHOUGH THE PROPERTY IS MARKETED AS INDUSTRIAL AND EVERY REAL ESTATE LISTING FROM LUEPNITZ TO REMAX I'VE BEEN TOLD BY 10. REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PROPERTY IS OWNED EGG AND THAT THE TOWN ATTORNEY'S RESPONSE TO ARE GETTING A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS THERE IS 100% NO WAY CHANCE FOR N. THREE TO OCCUPY THE PROPERTY. IT WAS DURING THE MORE RECENT CONVERSATIONS THAT I LEARNED THAT PROSPER DOES NOT HAVE A CLASSIFICATION FOR FOOD PANTRIES , SO IT WAS DECIDED TO PUT US INTO THE BOX WITH THE DISTRIBUTION CENTER. WHEN I ASKED FOR DISTRIBUTION CENTERS WERE ALLOWED. I WAS TOLD INDUSTRIAL ZONE WHEN I THINK OF IT AS A DISTRIBUTION CENTER, I THINK OF NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK OR ANY OTHER BUSINESS, WHICH HAS SEVERAL LOADING DOCKS AND BAYS AND THOUSANDS OF SQUARE FEET IN THEIR WAREHOUSE. AND THREE IS A FOOD PANTRY. WE DO NOT HAVE TRACTOR TRAILERS, MAKING DELIVERIES TO OUR LOCATION. WE SERVE FAMILIES AND PROSPERING SURROUNDING AREAS SEPARATE FROM FOOD AND SECURITIES. THEY'RE MORE OF A MINISTRY THAN A DISTRIBUTION CENTER. AS I SAID EARLIER, THE FOOD PANTRY HAS BEEN A PART OF THE PROSPER COMMUNITY SINCE 1980 SO I WAS SURPRISED TO HEAR THAT THERE WASN'T A CLASSIFICATION FOR FOOD PANTRY PRIOR WHATEVER PROCESS WAS FOLLOWED TO CLASSIFY IN THREE AS A DISTRIBUTION CENTER, I WOULD THINK AND JUST AS EASILY DECIDE THAT A FOOD PANTRY CAN FALL UNDER AN AG CLASSIFICATION. WHICH I WAS TOLD THAT PROPERTY ON HAYES FALLS UNDER AN AD CLASSIFICATION. I'M ASKING YOU TO CATEGORIZE US AS A BUSINESS WAS FALLS UNDER THE CATEGORY INSTEAD OF DISTRIBUTION CENTER SO WE CAN GET OUR CEO.IRONICALLY THE TYPES OF BUSINESSES THAT WOULD BE ALLOWED IN THE PROPERTIES OWNED AG OUR BED AND BREAKFAST, A CAMPGROUND. UM RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK, A CHILDCARE CENTER OR EVEN A GOLF COURSE. IT SEEMS TO ME THAT YOU CAN FIND A COZY PLACE FOR FOOD PANTRY PERCENT BETWEEN THE RV PARKS AND THE DAYCARE CENTERS. WE SIGNED A LEASE TO MOVE IN. MAY 1ST WE HAVE LOST OUR DEPOSIT OF 3700 AND $50 ALREADY? IF WE DON'T GET OUR CEO BY 31ST. WE WILL LOSE THE SPACE AND COULD POSSIBLY TOLD WE WILL NEED TO VACATE OUR CURRENT SPACE WITH NOWHERE TO GO. MY FAMILY AND I MOVED TO PROSPER IN 2000 WHEN THEY WERE 1400 PEOPLE LIVING HERE. I'VE SEEN MANY CHANGES IN OUR LITTLE TOWN. BUT THE PANTRY HAS SEEN SUBSTANTIALLY MORE CHANGES, AND IT'S 42 YEARS OF EXISTENCE. I IN THEIR FAMILIES THAT WE SERVE, RESPECTFULLY ASK THAT YOU HELP US GET INTO OUR NEW LOCATION ASAP. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE. I WOULD HATE FOR NEIGHBORS NURSING NEIGHBORS TO HAVE TO SHUT THEIR DOORS UNDER MY WATCH. AND I SURE HOPE YOU FEEL THE SAME WAY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. AND THE ITEM, SO WE'LL GO AHEAD AND WAIT TILL THAT AGENDA ITEM TO RECOGNIZE THAT SPEAKER. THE NEXT NEXT ITEMS. ITEM NUMBER FIVE CONDUCTED PUBLIC HEARINGS
[5. Conduct a public hearing and consider and act upon a request to rezone a portion of Planned Development-36, and a portion of Planned Development-63, to Planned Development (PD) for Legacy Gardens, on 121.4± acres, in order to modify the residential development standards, including but not limited to reducing permitted lot sizes, located on the south side of Frontier Parkway, west of Dallas Parkway. (Z20-0019). (DS)]
CONSIDERING ACT UPON A REQUEST TO REZONE A PORTION OF PLAN DEVELOPMENT 36 A PORTION PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 63 TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT. FOR LEGACY GARDENS AT 121.4 ACRES ORDERED MODIFY THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPING STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO REDUCING PERMITTED LOT SIZES. LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FRONTIER PARKWAY WEST OF DALLAS PARK. THAT EVENING. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTED TO REZONE A PORTION OF A PLANNED[00:20:06]
DEVELOPMENT AND 36 A PORTION OF THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT 63. TO ESTABLISH A NEW PLAN DEVELOPMENT REALLY, TO FACILITATE A DEVELOPMENT OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION.PROBABLY BEST TO KIND OF FOLLOW ALONG. I'M GOING TO TRY TO KIND OF GIVE A BRIEF PRESENTATION, BUT THERE IS A TABLE. HARRISON CHARTS. I'M GONNA KIND OF GO THROUGH THAT. SO FIRST THINGS FIRST IN PLAN DEVELOPMENT 36. THERE WERE THREE TYPES OF SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL ARTS 10,000 SQUARE FOOT 11,000 SQUARE FOOT. AND 12,500 SQUARE FOOT. THERE WAS A PROPOSED DENSITY OF 2.39 UNITS PER ACRE, AND THERE WAS NO MORE THAN 482 MINUTES ALLOWED. AND PERIOD 36 IS ON THE LEFT SIDE. THERE ARE ALSO TWO PLOTTED, UM, SUBDIVISION THAT ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS REZONING, BUT IT IS ALSO PART OF THE SUBDIVISION. UM I WILL MENTION THAT IT'S JUST TO THE SOUTHWEST SIDE. AND THEN THERE'S UM JUST ANOTHER PLAN DEVELOPMENT JUST HAVE THE CONNECTION OF HER LEGACY CROSSING. UM WITHIN THOSE TWO PLOTTED SUBDIVISIONS, PD 74 ALLOWED 17 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITH A MINIMUM OF 15,000 SQUARE FEET. AND PD 16. WHICH IS THAT CONNECTION, UM, ALLOWED 17 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS WITH THE MINIMUM OF 11,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT. NOW ON THE RIGHT SIDE PD 63 NOT PD. THERE WAS ONLY ONE TYPE OF LOCK A MAXIMUM OF 10. SINGLE FAMILY LOTS BETWEEN 13,500. AND 14,999. ALL OTHER SINGLE FAMILY LOTS SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 15,000 SQUARE FEET. AND THE PROPOSED DENSITY FOR PD 63 WAS 1.6 DARLING UNITS. OR NORMAL THAN 121 UNITS. AS FAR AS FOR THIS P D. THE APPLICANTS, PROPOSING TO MODIFY THE STANDARDS AND INTRODUCED THREE NEW LAW TYPES. 8000 SQUARE FOOT 9000 SQUARE FOOT AND 10,000 SQUARE FOOT WITH THE PROPOSED DENSITY OF 2.47 UNITS, UM, PER ACRE OR NOR MORE THAN 300 UNITS. MM. SO KIND OF LOOKING AT, INCLUDING ALL OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS. THE TOTAL WAS NO MORE THAN 637 UNITS FOR THE ENTIRE SUBDIVISION. GIVEN THAT THERE HAS BEEN, UM EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS HAVE BEEN PLANTED EARLY, WHICH IS 234 THAT LEFT A REMAINING 403 UNITS THAT COULD POTENTIALLY DEVELOP, HOWEVER, WITH THIS PD MODIFICATION UM, THE APPLICANT HAS STAYED AT THAT , UM, NEW PDS LIMITING 300 UNITS. STAFF DOES HAVE CONCERNS WITH THE SIZE OF THE LOTS BEING PROPOSED, UM AS A MODIFICATION, IS REMOVING SOME OF THE LARGER LOTS THAT WERE INTENDED IN THE PREVIOUS APPROVED P 36 63. UM STAFF DID RECEIVE ONE RESPONSE LETTER IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED ZONING REQUESTS AND THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONER MEDIA THEY DID RECOMMEND THAT TOWN COUNCIL APPROVED THE REQUEST. SUBJECT TO FOLLOWING OF LIMITING, UM EIGHT F NINE F ANTENNAS TO MAXIMUM, WHAT WAS SHOWN ON THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN. AS WELL AS TO INCREASE THE MINIMUM DWELLING SIZE UNITS ON ALL LOTS TO 1800 SQUARE. YEAH, WE CAN'T HAS AGREED TO THIS RECOMMENDATION. AND I, AND THAT'S REALLY HIM. I WILL SEND FOR ANY QUESTIONS. PART OF A LOT OF NUMBERS THROWN AT YOU. ONE QUESTION AND SEE APPROVED THIS WHAT WAS THE IT WAS IT WAS YOU REMEMBER? 6060. AND I DIDN'T. I DIDN'T HEAR THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AGAIN. THERE WAS THIS MORE OF CONCERNS OF THE LOCK SIZES. YOU SAID THEY ADDRESSED YOUR YOUR LOT SIZE QUESTION AND YOUR UNIT SIZE MINIMUM UNIT SIZES. WELL, THEY DRESS BOTH OF THOSE CHANGE THOSE FROM THE TIME THEY WENT TO P AND Z TWO NOW QUESTION FOR YOU ON THE FOUR. WHAT WAS THE AMOUNT THAT WAS REMAINING 400 MONTHS? 400 YEARS IN THE PD. THERE'S GOING TO BE A 403 UNITS ALLOWED . AND THEN THE NEW PDS LIMITING THAT TO 300. OF THAT 403 IS ALL THE LANDMASS THAT THOSE 403 ARE CONSIDERED STILL INTACT. OR WAS THAT ANY OF THAT CARPET? SO ARE YOU ASKING WHAT TYPE OF LOCKS THERE WERE? NO, I'M SAYING FOR THE LAND MASS THAT WAS WITHIN THE 36 63. WAS THIS BEFORE OR AFTER THE MIDDLE SCHOOL AND ELEMENTARY BEFORE? SO MIDDLE
[00:25:01]
SCHOOL AND ELEMENTARY CARVED OUE FOR 403. THAT'S CORRECT. SORT OF ON PD 36 THAT THERE IS NO YOU KNOW AREAS FOR THE SCHOOL AND THEN YOU CAN SEE. OKAY, I'LL PROBABLY DESERVE MY QUESTIONS FOR AFTER THE APPLICANT IS HERE. RECORDED DENSITY ON THE ONE PD. DO YOU HAVE THE SIZE DENSITY FOT WAS THE PRIOR. FIRE. IT WAS 2.39. 2.3922 POINT 47. 1.6 WAS ONLY IMPEDE E 63. THAT'S CORRECT, AND THAT WAS THE SMALLER PDS. BUT HAD THE LARGER LOTS. YOU HAVE A FEEL FOR WHAT THE AVERAGE LOT SIZE WAS. CHOIR TO THIS AND WHAT IT WILL BE NOW. UM, YEAH. SO CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE. FOUR. A LOT OF TYPES. SUMMARIES. RIGHT? REALLY IT WAS GOING TO BE $10. 11,000 AND 12.NO AVERAGE. THE AVERAGE OF THE REMAINING OF THE OF THIS WHAT WAS LEFT IN 36, I GUESS. WHAT WAS THE AVERAGE. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THOSE LOTS AND NOW THEY'RE ASKING FOR BASICALLY WHAT WAS THE 2.39? FIRST OF THE 2.47. SO I LOOKED LIKE THERE WAS GOING TO BE STILL. AND I MIGHT NEED TO REFER TO THE APPLICANT BUT IT LOOKS LIKE THERE WAS MORE OF A TYPE TWO LEFT OVER TO THE NORTH.
AND THEN TYPE THREE TOWARDS THE WEST. SO IF I LOOKED AT IT RIGHT EARLIER. THEY HAD ORIGINALLY APPROVED FOR 281 LIKE THE TYPE TO WHICH IS 11,000. AND 67. LIKE 114 SHORT AND THEN ANOTHER 89 SHORT OF THE 10,000. RIGHT? THINK JUST A BRIEF COMMENT TO YOUR POINT. COUNCILMAN CURREN.
THERE'S 114 LEFT OF THE 11,089 LEFT OF THE 10,000 OR 61 LEFT OF THE 12,500. THEY HAD 10 BY RIGHT FOR THOSE THAT CAN BE ACTIVATING 1000. SO RESIDUAL THAT ARE LEFT OF WHAT WAS THE INITIAL ALLOCATIONS 264. WHAT'S BEING ASKED OF US TONIGHT IS 280. SO MORE THAN BY RIGHT FROM WHAT'S LEFT. I GUESS THE CONCERN I WOULD HAVE IS OF WHAT'S'S BEING ASKED WHERE THE MAJORITY OF THEM ARE. 11,000 SQUARE FOOT. AND GREATER. THAT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE GETTING EXCHANGE. YOU'RE GOING TO INCREASE 59 UNITS. TO THE 10,000 MODEL. AND OF THAT THERE'S A REQUEST FOR MUCH, MUCH SMALLER. AND SO FOR THAT I JUST HAVE CONCERNS WITH THE INCREASE OF UNIT COUNT FOR DENSITY PER CAPITA, THE CAR MOUNTS AND THE FACT THAT FOR WHAT'S REMAINING WE'RE ADDING INTO MUCH SMALLER.
SIZE. THE SQUARE FOOTAGE. I GUESS THAT'S THE ONLY THING I DO APPRECIATE THE DEVELOPER BEING AN AGREEMENT TO 1800 SQUARE FEET. GOOD CONCESSION. CONCERNED ABOUT THE QUANTITY OF UNITS END NOT EIGHT. SO QUESTION IS HOW MUCH WHAT'S THE ACREAGE ON THE MIDDLE SCHOOL? THAT'S IN THAT, OR IS IT? IT'S A MIDDLE SCHOOL AND ELEMENTARY. I'LL REFER TO PLEASE. THANK YOU.
IT JUST COMES, WOULD YOU WOULD YOU MIND JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THANK YOU. AND CONGRATULATIONS. THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN. ON THIS PLAN THAT YOU SEE BEFORE YOU HERE. THERE'S YOU KNOW A LOT OF DIFFERENCES. MORE SIMILAR. FIRE HAS LAND. SEE THE ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE
[00:30:03]
SCHOOL. COLLECTIVELY MADE IT OUT ABOUT 50 ACRES FROM OUR ORIGINAL PLAN. AND WHILE WE'RE MORE THAN HAPPY TO WORK, HONESTY AND BE GOOD NEIGHBORS AND PARTNERS AND HAVE RIGHT? IT WASN'T REALLY ANTICIPATED WHEN WE STARTED THE PROJECT AND PLANNED THE AMENITY SPACE AND SO FORTH. WE HAD 632 HOUSES PLAN. BEGINNING OF. $5.5 MILLION AMENITY CENTER IN POUND FOR POUND. IT'S ABOUT FOUR TIMES. SQUARE FOOTAGE PER HOUSEHOLD. SOME OF OUR NEIGHBORING. THE. FOR UM, THE REDUCTION IN TOTAL NUMBER. THE ADDITION OF THE SCHOOL SITES. ON ONE HAND MEANS THAT POTENTIALLY WILL NEED TO RAISE OUR DUES AND WILL UNDULY BURDEN. BACK OF THE BUILDING. 230 WHEN. AND SO THIS PROPOSAL. DOWN FROM 632 405 114. HAVE. 83% OF THE LOTS BEING 76. FEET OR LARGER, LARGE LOTS, ONLY A SMALL PERCENTAGE 14 OR THIS 66 FT PRODUCT. WHICH WE'RE GONNA PUT A 50 FT HOUSE ON WHICH WERE ALREADY BUILDING TODAY IN LIKE PRINCE IN TERMS PRODUCT HOUSE ITSELF PRODUCT. THERE'S FIVE FT ON EACH SIDE SIDE YARD. 75 OF THESE LOTS TOTAL, WHICH PUSH UP AGAINST THE MIDDLE SCHOOL AND TO THE NORTH ON FRONTIER. AND SO. IN ADDITION TO THAT, WE ADDED IN ABOUT 45 ACRES, TOTAL GREEN SPACE 20% CONNECTIVITY BY TRAIL NETWORK THROUGHOUT THE SIDE SO YOU CAN WALK TO THE ELEMENTARY THEORETICALLY. HOWEVER, THAT SAID WITH. LARGER LOTS. I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY FAMILIES THAT HAVE KIDS THAT ARE ELEMENTARY. THIS COMMUNITY AND WHAT SERVICES WILL ACTUALLY SERVE A PURPOSE THAT WILL ACTUALLY SERVE. MY WHOLE IDEA. PORTS. BUT THE TRAIL SYSTEM NONETHELESS CONNECTS ALL THOSE THINGS THROUGH. OVERALL I THINK, LAYS IT OUT BETTER WITH YOUR POCKET PARKS THAT ARE PRETTY SIZABLE. TWO OR SO MINUTE WALK THROUGH. IN MY MIND, YOU KNOW IF I WAS THIRD PARTY LOOKING ON. SO THAT WAS A MUCH LONGER ANSWER TO THE QUESTION OF HOW MUCH HOW MANY ACRES WERE TAKEN OUT FOR THE SCHOOL SITES. THANK YOU. THAT THAT'S IT. THANK YOU. RIGHT NOW. I THINK WE CAN NOTHING. JUST HELP ME WITH THE PROCEDURE IN TERMS OF KEEPING THE PUBLIC. OKAY, SO WE'LL CONTINUE. PLEASE CONTINUE. AS FAR AS THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE HOUSE IS GOING UNDER. THAT WAS NEVER SOMETHING I EVER BUILD A HOUSE THAT SMALL WE. SMALLEST TOWN. FORTY NINE HUNDRED THREE.UM AND SO THAT'S MORE OF A TOWN MINIMUM STANDARDS AND SOME THAT'S. YOU MENTIONED THAT AMENITIES CENTER. MILLION PLUS. SO. WITHOUT THE CHANGES TO THE PD. WHAT'S WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE IN FEES? DO YOU THINK BALLPARK, BUT IT WOULD BE HONESTLY, I DON'T KNOW AT THE END OF THE DAY ONCE WE'RE STABLE. MARK. HAVE YOU KNOW? CENTRAL WELL SYSTEM. CHARGES ARE. POND WHICH IRRIGATES WHICH IS MEANT TO BE A SAVINGS FOR RESIDENTS. WATER. WATER, BUT YOU KNOW? SALES APPARENTLY BREAK ALONG. SO THE COST TO MAINTAIN THIS. I DON'T KNOW. BUT AS A PERCENTAGE, IT'S THE NUMBER OF WATTS THAT WERE IN PLACE BEFORE DIVIDED BY THE NUMBER OF LOTS NOW. SO WHAT IS THAT? CAN YOU TELL ME HAND ME THE LIGHTS WOULD HAVE BEEN IN PLACE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. 600 THE OLD PLAN 132. THERE WERE 632 AT TWO POINT. UNDER THE OLD PLAN, RIGHT? YES. AND
[00:35:02]
ENTITLEMENT TODAY IS ABOUT 404. AND THE AND THE EXISTING APPROVED PLAN ON THE REST. TOTAL 404. YES, SIR. AND THEN FOR 5 14 TOTAL. ADDITION OF 110 LOTS. WHICH WOULD GO.I'M SORRY. I DON'T HAVE THE NUMBERS IN FRONT OF ME. BUT I HAVE A SO YOU'RE ASKING FOR APPROVAL FOR 100 ADDITIONAL LOTS ON YEAH. FOR A TOTAL OF 45 14, WHICH IS A REDUCTION FROM THE ORIGINAL 6 32. REGARDS TO THE SCHOOL SITES. THE TIMING ON THAT . AND CAN YOU EXPLAIN? I UNDERSTAND YOUR ARGUMENT AND THAT IN REGARDS TO THE MIDDLE EAST CENTER, BUT WAS THE PLAN AT THE POINT OF SELLING THAT PROPERTY. AND ABOUT WASN'T SOMETHING WE SOUGHT OUT IT WAS WE WERE KIND OF TOLD IT WAS I DON'T WANT TO SELL IT. NATION TYPE SITUATION. AND SO WE WORKED WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND ADMITTED DEAL ON THAT DONATED THE ELEMENTARY BUT THE PLAN WAS INITIALLY TWO YEARS AGO. WE STARTED TALKING WITH ALEX. AUGUST 2020. HAD A CONFERENCE CALL WITH FORMER MAYOR RAY SMITH. KICKING OFF AND WE HAD A PLAN THAT WAS PROPOSED THEN AND WE'VE WORKED ON THIS FOR TWO YEARS. NOW IN MY TOWN, UM AND THAT HAD. ABOUT 180 TO 30% 55 FT LOTS. 110 ANOTHER 20% 65 FT LOTS. AND SO WE'VE DRAWN BACK SEVERAL 100 LOTS AND THAT WAS FOR A TOTAL OF FILE. 80 THERE WAS ORIGINALLY PROPOSED. OR, YOU KNOW, STICK. CLUED ANY 55. THOSE WERE ALLEY LOADED. PULLS BACK. SMALLER LOCTITE. LARGER SIDE SET.
A MERE CRYSTAL. WE PREFER TO HAVE THE AFRICAN MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION BEFORE YOU OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND SINCE THIS STARTED WITH QUESTIONS, I'M NOT SURE IF YOU ACTUALLY HAD A FORM OF PRESENTATION. OKAY? THE PRESENTATION. TERMS OF TRAIL CONNECTED. TECHNICALLY CORRECT, WE SHOULD OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THIS POINT. THAT A VOTE. CLEARLY IT IS NOW PUBLIC HEARINGS AT ALL RIGHT NOW. NOW WE'RE INTO THAT WE'LL WORK THAT OUT IN THE NEXT ONE. SO, UH, SO DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO ADD? WHILE THE HEARING. WE ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION OR WORKING THROUGH SOME FINAL COMMENTS ON OUR FACE TO WHICH IS JUST LOCATED TO THE NORTH. NEXT COUPLE. KICK OFF THIS THIRD PHASE IN PRETTY SHORT ORDER. SO I'LL ASK YOU A QUESTION. THEN OF THIS IS THERE A YOU HAVE A DOCUMENT IN WRITING WITH SCHOOL DISTRICT THREATENED TO CONDEMN HIM. AGREE. THANK YOU. QUESTION FOR YOU.
WHAT? WHAT'S THE SMALLEST LOT SIZES JUST NORTH AND YOU TALKED ABOUT THAT? UM, IN. MURDOCK'S DEAL THERE. YOU KNOW, I'M NOT EXACTLY SURE ABOUT THINKING THE FIFTIES. NOT SURE. TIGHT. YOU'RE
[00:40:07]
TALKING ABOUT NORTHERN FRONTIER . YES, SIR. RIGHT I'M TALKING ABOUT NORTH OF YOUR WITHIN YOUR DEVELOP. 66 66 FT. CURRENT STATE 10,000. SORRY YEAH, NOT TALKING ABOUT SELENA, JUSTIN PROSPER.UNDERDEVELOPMENT AND CURRENT STATE. YOU'VE GOT EXISTING PLANET LOTS. 17 76 FT TYPE ONE? YES. YEAH AND SO THERE'S 66 IS A 10 FT REDUCTIONIST. LOT. 14% OF THE TOTAL. MY COMMENTS FOR COMMENTS. WE DO HAVE A PUBLIC SPEAKER FOR THIS ITEM. MR. DIXON, WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK? TO THEM. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MAYOR. THANK YOU. COUNCIL STAFF . JASON DICKSON 10 15 BELOW PROSPER, TEXAS, 75 OR SO. REALLY WASN'T COMING HERE TO TALK ABOUT THIS TONIGHT. CHRIS CURRAN MARKETS RIGHT? UM BUT WHEN I SAW THIS, I STARTED BROUGHT UP CITIZENS. UH, BUT OF PREVIOUS COUNSEL. RIGHT? WE SAT IN YOUR SEAT. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE WAS AN ABILITY ATION. WE NEED A STRONG COMMITMENT TO KEEP LOT SIZES. I HAVE LIVED HERE A LONG TIME. YOU'VE SEEN IT GO FROM MINIMUM OF FIVE ACRE LODGE DOWN THE TUBE. IN EIGHT THEIR LIVES AND THEN WE'VE SEEN EVERY VARIATION THERE. ESPECIALLY WITH SOME OF THE MUD DISTRICTS THAT CAME INTO OUR COMMUNITY. GREAT COMMUNITY, AS EVERYBODY SAID TONIGHT DURING THE PRESENTATION BUT ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE HELD TO IS TRYING TO MAINTAIN LARGER SQUARE FOOTAGE. DO THAT. IT DOESN'T SQUARE FOOTAGE OF A LOT DOES NOT EQUATE TO VALUE OR BUT IT DOES. ALSO CREATE A SENSE OF DIFFERENT TYPE OF COMMUNITY WHEN YOU START 25 AND SETBACKS VERSUS. SETBACK SO SOME OF THE THINGS THAT I WOULD CONSIDER AS IT WAS BROUGHT UP IN THE EARLIER PRESENTATIONS. I DO SLEEP WITH A SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER. AND THERE WAS NO CONDEMNATION ON THIS PROPERTY. IT WAS SO AT A VERY LOW RATE. WHICH REALLY HAS NO EFFECT. ON THE TOWN OF PROSPER. WHAT THE I S D DOES WITH THEIR LAND AND DEVELOP IT IS NOT OUR CONCERN. THERE SHOULD ALSO NOT BE OUR CONCERN THAT BECAUSE SOMEONE TO SERVE THE SCIENCE AND 58 CREATE AN EMERGENCY ON THIS COUNCIL. SO IF YOU DECIDE TO DO, IT SHOULD BE YEAR REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THEY DID OR DID NOT SELL. NOW. THERE WAS A LOT OF NUMBERS STONE AROUND DURING THIS PRESENTATION. LOST. BUT THE SIMPLE NUMBERS OF THE FOUR OH, THREE DOWN TO 300. THAT'S A MINUS 103 HOMES. AT A VERY LOW CONSERVATIVE AVERAGE HOME PRICE OF $550,000, WHICH I WILL BUY ANY OF THOSE HOMES THAT PROSPER TODAY. IF YOU CAN FIND ME ONE THAT'S A REDUCTION OF $56 MILLION YOUR TAX ROLL. IF YOU DO ANOTHER NUMBER THAT I HEARD 632 DOWN TO 404. THAT'S 248 SORRY 248 HOMES, WHICH IS 125. AT A $550,000. I DON'T THINK YOU'RE GONNA BE ABLE TO FIND SO WHAT I WOULD ASK IS I DO KNOW THAT THIS CONVERSATION HAS BEEN UNDERWAY FROM MULTIPLE YEARS. THE PREVIOUS COUNCIL. REJECTED WHEN IT WAS BROUGHT FOR US AS AN IDEA POTENTIAL BECAUSE WE WANT TO REMAIN TRUE TO WHAT OUR BELIEFS WERE IN THE BEGINNING OF LARGER LOTS. WE GAVE THEM A FAIR VALUE.
WE EVEN LOOKED AT DIFFERENT ALTERNATIVES OF RECLAIMING LAND ON THE SOUTHERN BORDER THAT THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO CONTINUE TO MAINTAIN THE LARGER LOT. SO WHEN DEVELOPERS HAVE COME BEFORE THIS COUNCIL BEFORE TO ASK FOR SMALLER LOTS. IT'S USUALLY I GIVE OR TAKE. WHETHER IT WAS IN A MUD DISTRICT. ONLY OR SOMETHING OF THAT NATURE. AND THE COUNCIL OF USE THAT AS A BARTERING CHIP. UH I'VE ALWAYS STOOD BEHIND THE CONTRACT IS A CONTRACT AND THEY'RE OPENING UP THE CONTRACT. YOU SHOULD ASK YOURSELF. WHAT IS THE TOWN GETTING OUT OF THIS? UM AND OBVIOUSLY TO SCHOOL SITES ARE GREAT ELEMENTARY'S LOVETT IN NEIGHBORHOOD. BUT WHEN YOU TAKE ALMOST 50 ACRES OF THE TAX ROLL , AND NOW YOU'RE REDUCING IT. LIKE I SAID, DEPENDING ON WHICH NUMBER YOU USED ON THE PRICE OF THE HOME, SO UM, THE OTHER THING THAT DOESN'T GO INTO THE
[00:45:05]
COUNCIL'S DECISION IS BUDGETING ON AMENITY CENTERS AND SHOES AND THINGS LIKE THAT. THAT'S THAT'S ON THE DEVELOPER, AND YOU SHOULD REDUCE THE QUALITY STANDARDS THAT PROSPEROUS SET FOR. SO I LEAVE YOU WITH. I APPRECIATE IT. I KNOW SEVERAL OF YOU. YOUR FIRST VOTE. HOPEFULLY YOU ARE ABLE TO KEEP PROSPER STRONG AND YOU CONTINUE TO EXCELLENCE THAT WAS SET BEFORE YOU. THANK YOU ANY QUESTION I GOT ONE. YES SIR. YOU JUST SAID THAT WE SHOULDN'T TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THAT SCHOOL SITES WERE SOLD OR DEDICATED. BUT THEN YOU USE THE LAND THAT THOSE SCHOOL SITES WERE USED FOR, DOESN'T AS A JUSTIFICATION. FOR NOT DOING THIS AND WHAT WE WHAT WE'RE DEALING WITH THE DAY IT SOUNDS LIKE TO ME IS WE'RE DEALING WITH WHETHER WE ADD HOMES AND THEREFORE ADD ASSESSED VALUE. WE'RE NOT DISCUSSING REDUCING ANY HOMES AT THIS POINT. THAT IS NOT WHAT I SAID. MR COTTON. WHAT I SAID WAS YOU SHOULD NOT TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE REDUCTION OF 50 50 ACRES. FOR SCHOOL SITES . NOT WHAT MY QUESTION WAS. ARE WE ADDING HOMES NOW OR NOT AT A SMALLER LOT SIZE? YES, YOU ARE. YOU'RE REDUCING YOUR LOT SIZE TO CREATE MORE HOMES AND IF THAT'S THE FUTURE OF THE COUNCIL, I WOULD EVEN CONSIDER MULTI FAMILY. GREAT PLACE FOR IT. SO IF THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE YOUR INTENT IS TO GET ANOTHER ONE OF THESE HEAD TO HEADS. HEADBUTT CONTESTS. I UNDERSTAND YOUR QUESTION. I'M LEARNING FROM JOHNNY DEPP. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. NO, THANK YOU. THANK YOU. PLEASE STEP AWAY. YEAH. OKAY THEN I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THIS TIME, AND WE'LL OPEN UP OUR COMMENTS HERE FOR THE FINISHED WITH THE LAST QUESTION. I'D LIKE TO START WITH YOU SURE, YOU KNOW. LOOK AT THIS. AT THE END OF THE DAY, 66 FT LOTS IN THIS COMMUNITY. ARE GOOD LUCK. AND WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT OUR SMALLEST. YOU KNOW, WE TRIED TO STAY AT 55 WITH WE'VE DONE THAT. AND THIS IS A 66 FT. LIKE WE'RE NOT REPLACING LOTS IN MY OPINION BECAUSE OF SCHOOLS. I DON'T HAVE ANY MM HMM. IDEA THAT WE WOULD CONSIDER THE FACT THAT THEY USE THIS FOR SCHOOL SITES AS A REASON FOR APPROVING THIS TO ME. IT'S A APPROPRIATE LAND USE. WORKS AND ON TOP OF THAT. PROVED BY PNC 60. SO I'M. YOU'RE LOOKING AT IT, AND I'VE ALWAYS BEEN, UM AGAINST THE SMALLER LOT SIZES BUT TO ME YOU APPRECIATE. COMMENT. 66 IS NOT TO ME. SMALL.COUNCILMAN COTTON SAID THE YES, HE DID APPROVE IT. UM, STAFF EVEN PROVED IT WITH A COUPLE LITTLE SIDE NOTE. I APPRECIATE THE. NORMAL FENCING THAT WAS PUT IN THERE AND NOT ASKING FOR THE VARIANCE ON THAT. RECENTLY. UM SO, UM, YEAH. I DON'T SEE ANY PROBLEM WITH WITH GRANTING THIS OKAY? I WAS IN THE RARE INSTANCE OF NOT FAILING AND ZONING WHEN THIS ONE CAME THROUGH. UM AND I CERTAINLY APPRECIATE RECOMMENDATION. MISSION, SO IT DOES. AH! I AGREE WITH. MR COTTON AND THAT REGARDS AS WELL. SOMETIMES JUST HAVING BEEN IN THAT ROLE. WE DON'T HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION SO I'VE CONTINUED TO TRY TO EXAMINE. UM THE ASPECTS OF THIS AND DIFFERENT OPPONENTS OF IT OVERALL. I THINK IF I'M DOING THE MATH, RIGHT, UM AGAIN, CHARLES QUESTION IN REGARDS TO THE AVERAGE SQUARE FOOT OF THE NEW LOTS OF ROUGHLY, IT'S 93. I'M ON THE THREE LOT SIZE. IT'S NOT BEGAN AND IT'S NOT THOSE LOWER END LOTS. I MEAN, I CAN APPRECIATE WE PROBABLY WOULDN'T HAVE A PERIOD OF TIME I SAID THIS IN PLAIN IAN'S OWNING THE 45. OR SOMETHING. I DO STRUGGLE WITH TRYING TO KEEP THAT NATURE . UM, OF THE LOT SIZE IS, UM AND THE PROSPER VALUES THAT WE BUILT ON AND AGAIN. WE THE PEOPLE THAT WERE BEFORE US, BUT I ALSO KNOW STAR TRAILS IS RIGHT THERE. WIDE VARIETY OF LOTS AS WELL. UM AND WE DIDN'T REALLY GET MUCH PUBLIC FEEDBACK, AT LEAST IN THE
[00:50:04]
PLANNING ZONING LEVEL. I'M OPEN TO, UM ANYONE'S RECOMMENDATIONS IN REGARDS TO ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. I DEFINITELY THINK WE SHOULD GO. THE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT CAME THROUGH PNC AND POSSIBLY INCREASE THAT IF THAT MAKES ANY OF THE OTHER COUNCILMAN, MORE.THANK YOU. SO I DO APPRECIATE ALL THE COMMENTS AND MICHAEL APPRECIATE YOU'RE PRESENTING TO.
IT'S HELPFUL TO HAVE INFORMATION FROM YOUR PERSPECTIVE AND LOOKING AT THE NUMBER OF REMAINING UNITS FROM THOSE THAT HAVE NOT BEEN PLANTED IN WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED. UM THERE'S A THERE'S A CONSIDERABLE NUMBER OF UNITS THAT SMALLER UNITS AND I THINK THERE WAS COMMENT YOU MADE ABOUT. COMMUNITIES AROUND US JUST HAVING YOU KNOW, A BUNCH OF SMALLER HOUSES. THAT SEEMS TO BE OKAY. UM I'M KIND OF ALL THOUGHT AND HAVING LIVED THERE FOR A LONG TIME, BUT WE WANT TO BE DISTINCT AND DIFFERENT. AND SO I'M OPEN TO THAT, YOU KNOW, INCREASING THE 10. FT. UM I'M SORRY THAT 10,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT COUNT. I THINK YOU'VE ALREADY GOT THAT BY RIGHTS IN THERE AND YOU HAVE 89 LEFT. AND SO WHAT'S BEING ASKED AS ADDITIONAL 59 OF THAT UNIT COUNT? CONCERNS WITH THAT. IF THERE WAS A WAY TO, UM MAYBE TAKE THE 66 OFF THE TABLE AND BLEND IT INTO THE OTHER ONES. AND THEN YOUR COMMENT ABOUT HAVING SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT WAS GREATER THAN 1800. I'M LOOKING AT SOMETHING IN MY PACKET THAT SAYS MINIMAL DWELLING AREA LIVING SQUARE FEET. ON THE EIGHT F R 1200 ON THE NINE F R 1400 ON THE 10. HALF IS 15. THAT'S NOT THAT CASE. HE DIDN'T. YEAH SO THEY SUBMITTED A REVISED PD TODAY. UM AND SO THAT WOULD BE PART OF THE RECOMMENDATION IS TO UPDATE THE MINIMUM DWELLING TO 18. SO ARE WE. ARE WE HAVING A HEARING ON THE ITEM IN THE PACKAGE OR THE REVISED PD. THE ITEM AND BACK IN. OKAY SO FOLLOWING HAVE THOUGHT THROUGH. THANK YOU FOR THE CLARIFICATION BECAUSE FORMACION. WHAT WAS THE SQUARE FOOTAGE? YOU SAID IT WAS AVERAGE. OF YOUR HOMES. YOU GUYS BUILD.
OKAY SO IF WE ARE AWAY, I'M GUESS I'M TRYING TO MAKE A COMMENT HERE. FREAKING INCORPORATE THE LARGER SQUARE FOOTAGE. LOVE IT. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT'S MORE INTO YOU GUYS. I'D LOVE TO INCORPORATE THAT AS A AN ADJUSTMENT. OKAY WITH THE 10 FS, BUT I'D LIKE TO FIND A WAY FOR THE ADF S. I WOULD SAY IF AND WE'VE DONE THIS FOR OTHER, SO I'M HOLDING THE LINE ON WHAT WE'VE DONE FURTHER. SHOPPERS. IS MAKE A CONCESSION ON TO ALLOW FOR THE NINTH HOUSE.
BUT MY PREFERENCE WOULD BE TO TAKE THE 75 THAT'S BEING REQUESTED AND DISPERSE IT TO THE LARGER LOT SIZES WHETHER IT BE ATTENDING OR TYPE TWO, WHICH IS A LOT OF 1000. TO THE AMOUNT THAT'S ALLOWABLE BY THE DENSITY. AND THEY MEAN THAT YOU KNOW YOU MIGHT NOT GET ALL 75. BUT IT GETS YOU CLOSE. AND I THINK THAT WITH THAT AND THE 2500 SQUARE FEET THAT'S A GOOD COMPROMISE SO MUCH. CAN I ASK YOU IF THERE'S A IF THERE WAS A SUBMITTED CHANGE TO THE PD. THAT THE DEVELOPER OF THE APPLICANT WAS OKAY WITH THAT. CAN WE NOT KNOW WHAT THAT IS AND OR GET A ACTUALLY LIKE TO ASK THE TOWN ATTORNEY WE CAN. WE CAN CHANGE WHAT WAS ASKED FOR IF THEY OFFERED SOMETHING ELSE.
CORRECT. NOTICE ALLOWS SURE WHAT'S BEEN OFFERED BY THE NOTICE. HEARING. PRESUMABLY MEETS THE CRITERIA FOR WELL HAS HAS A STAFF HAD TIME TO REVIEW THIS NEWLY SUBMITTED PD AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION. SO ALL I WAS PRESENTED THE REVISION THAT I RECEIVED TODAY WAS FROM THE RECOMMENDATION FROM PLANNING AND ZONING. AND SO THEY DIDN'T CHANGE ANYTHING ELSE. IT WAS JUST A MINIMUM SWELLING UNITS THAT THEY AGREE TO AND THE TIME DOWN THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF LOTS.
WHAT MEANS YOU RECOMMENDED? SO THAT WAS ALL. REALLY WHAT WAS CHANGED? OKAY SO THEY AGREED TO CHANGE. THEY AGREED TO THE CHANGES THAT P AND Z THAT'S CORRECT NOW. OKAY YEAH, THERE
[00:55:02]
WASN'T LIKE A COMPLETELY DISCUSSING ALL THIS TIME WHAT PNC APPROVED AND WHAT THEY HAVE PROPOSED, RIGHT? OKAY SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE COMPARING TWO. SO ALL RIGHT. WE GOT APPLES AND SO. AS I THINK THROUGH THIS ONE AS THE NEW GUY ON THIS COUNCIL, I'LL RESPECT WHAT CHRIS, MYSELF.FORMER COUNSELOR DIXON MENTIONED ABOUT LOT SIZES AND HOW WILL RECOGNIZE IT? WHEN I WAS ON COUNCIL? THERE WAS A BATTLE OVER 22 ACRE LOTS SO WE'VE GONE A LITTLE BIT BELOW THAT REASON. SO THE COMMUNITY IS CHANGING. AND I'M NOT UNWILLING TO CHANGE WITH THAT. HOWEVER I'M I'M VERY CONFUSED BY HOW A DEVELOPER SELLING OFF PROPERTY. WHETHER IT'S A SCHOOL SITE OR NOT, A SCHOOL SITE SAYS THAT I SHOULD NOW COME BACK AND GIVE THEM MORE LOTS TO MAKE THEIR WAY WORSE.
THEY WENT THROUGH A CONTINUED DECISION MAKING PROCESS AND I WOULD. AS I THINK THROUGH THIS USING WORDS LIKE CONDEMNATION AND THINGS LIKE THAT I WOULD CAUTION ANYBODY FROM SAYING THAT'S THEIR JUSTIFICATION, ESPECIALLY IF THEY DON'T HAVE IT IN RIGHT. SO I STRUGGLE WITH THIS ENTIRE CHANGE. AND AS THE NEW GUY COMING FROM THAT OLD ERA THAT MY VERY FIRST VOTE IS TO GO FOR SMALL LOTS SO I STRUGGLE. DO WE HAVE ANY FOLLOW ON COMMENTS? IF I COULD UNDERSTAND WHAT MARCUS WAS PROPOSING AND WHETHER OR NOT THAT'S SOMETHING TO APPLICANT WOULD BE AGREEABLE TO THEN. YOU KNOW, THEN I MEAN, BECAUSE I'M AGREEABLE TO WHERE WE ARE. BUT IF WHAT YOU'RE PROPOSING IS SOMETHING THAT MAKES SENSE AND WHAT THE OUTLETS AGREEABLE TO SURE BE INTERESTED IN HEARING THAT YEAH, I'M HAPPY TO RESTATE. BRING IT DOWN TO MY LEVEL FOR ME. THANK YOU. I'LL OUT OF CRAYONS OVER HERE. LIKE. SO WHAT I WAS PROPOSING AND FOR CONSIDERATION. I LIKE THE FACT THAT YOU DON'T BUILD HOMES, TYPICALLY BELOW A CERTAIN SQUARE FOOTAGE. I WOULD LIKE TO INCORPORATE THE 2500 OR 2300. YEAH, WELL, YOU SOMEWHERE BETWEEN THERE GIVE ME YOU KNOW.
I LIKE 2500. HE SAID 2500, OKAY, SO AND IF THERE'S A WAY TO FOLD IN THE SMALLEST LOT SIZES, 75 UNITS. INTO SOMETHING THAT ABOVE OBVIOUSLY 10 F AND ABOVE. ANOTHER THAT MEANS YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO PROBABLY WORK FROM YOUR NUMBERS. I DON'T WANT TO SEE AN INCREASE TO THE NON HALFS, BUT I WOULD BE WILLING TO ALLOW THE NINE OF US. KNOWING THAT YOU WERE GIVEN A CONCESSION HERE.
GIVE ME THE SQUARE FEET NINE AND TENS. 10 AFTER NINE F 10,000 SQUARE FEET. OKAY. I'M SORRY.
OKAY. GOT YOU NEVER MIND. I TOLD YOU NEED REALLY BRING IT DOWN. SO 57 WAS BREAK MY BREAK. THE 57 PROPOSED FOR NON F. I'LL BE OKAY WITH I'LL PROPOSE. I WOULD EVEN SAY THAT 15 ADDITIONAL 59 UNITS AT 10. THAT'S BEEN REQUESTED. BE OKAY WITH. THE REMAINING 75 UNITS OF THE EIGHT F I WOULD LIKE TO SEE FOLDED INTO IDEALLY , A PRODUCT, UM, LARGER. THEN UM , THAT'S ENOUGH, AND REASON BEING IS BY INITIAL PD. YOU HAVE 100 AND 14 REMAINING UNITS OF THAT P. D. THAT YOU COULD DO IT NOW. DISNEY WISE WITH PROPERTY, YOU WOULD HAVE TO PROBABLY JUST THAT, BUT LIKE THE FOLD THEM INTO THE LARGER UNIT SIZES. IN THE 2500 SQUARE FEET. SO YOU'RE YOU'RE SAYING THE 75 UNITS THAT ARE IN THE ADF? YOU'D LIKE THEM TO CHANGE THAT. ROLL BACK INTO THE. TENS NINES OR TENS, IDEALLY, 10 F AND ABOVE BUT THEY'RE ALREADY ADDED 59 UNITS TO THE TENTS. AND I DO THINK THAT WE SET OURSELVES APART. NOTHING THAT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO FIND. PATRON NOT WILLING TO BUY A HOUSE THAT SIZE IF YOU WANT TO PAY THE H WAYS, AND THEY'RE STILL WALK THE KIDS TO SCHOOL.
BECAUSE PROBABLY KIND OF PROSPER IS CAN I ASK THE AFRICAN IF THAT'S SOMETHING HE'S AGREEABLE TO GET PLACE TO POSSIBLY GET A UNANIMOUS VOTE ON SOMETHING HERE. WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO ENTERTAIN THAT QUESTION? EXCUSE ME. THEM UP TO THE MIC. WHILE NOT ADVERSE, I MEAN SPENT. YEARS
[01:00:06]
KIND OF WORK. THANKS. AND WHAT'I REALLY DO. SIDE VIEW. THAT MEANS IT'S JUST SOMETHING BORING.WORK. HAS WRITTEN FOR THE ATEF'S. I COULDN'T SUPPORT I CAN'T SPEAK FOR EVERYBODY. I JUST I FEEL THAT THE CONCESSIONS THAT YOU KNOW WILLINGNESS TO FOLD IN THE NUMBER OF UNITS TO THE DENSITIES, MAX. THAT'S BY RIGHT. THAT'S FAIR. SO YOU'RE PROBABLY TALKING ABOUT DELTA. 20 HOUSES.
I THINK I'D BE DOING. HAD MOVED THE TABLE IT WHILE THEY CONSIDER INCREASING THE REDUCING THE NUMBER OF EIGHT F LIES. AND ROLLING THOSE INTO THE NINE AND 10. MAKE THAT MOTION. I'M MAKING A MOTION TO TABLE THIS. BE GIVEN TIME FOR YOU OTHERWISE, YEAH, I'M SORRY TO OUR NEXT MEETING.
IF WE COULD DO THAT, IS THAT ENOUGH? 14TH IS THAT AN ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF TIME? HORN SAYS YES.
SO WE HAVE A MOTION 2ND 2ND FROM MARCUS GRAY ALL IN FAVOR. HI ANY OPPOSED? NONE THANK YOU, SIR.
THANK YOU. CONGRATULATIONS. OKAY? UNDER THE NEXT ITEM, POSSIBLY DIRECT TOWN STAFF TO
[6. Discuss and consider making appointments to the Council subcommittees. (RB)]
SCHEDULE TOPICS FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION OF FUTURE MEETING. OWING TO ITEM NUMBER SIX, DISCUSS AND CONSIDER MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE. ROBIN. THANK YOU, MAYOR, BRISTOL AND COUNT. EACH YEAR AFTER THE ELECTION. WE GIVE THE COUNCIL AND OPERATE VIEW AND REVISE APPOINTMENTS TO THE FIRE. QUICKLY. COUNCIL TECHNOLOGY AND BIRTH, WHICH IS VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUN. SUBCOMMITTEE WHICH PERIODICALLY REVIEWS THE TOWN'S EXISTING TECHNOLOGY, TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITIES AND MAKES RECOMMENDATIONS ON THOSE. THEY ALSO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE TOWN'S VER FUND AND ANY OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS TO PROMOTE THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY TO INCREASE EFFICIENCY OF OPERATIONS WITHIN THE TOWN. CURRENT MEMBERS ON THAT SUBCOMMITTEE, OR MEG'S MILLER AND CRAIG ANDREW. THE FINANCE SUBCOMMITTEE REVIEWS THE TOWN'S ANNUAL AUDIT. UH, COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT. AND PERIODICALLY REVIEWS AND MAKES RECOMMENDATIONS TO ANOTHER FINANCIAL MATTERS. CURRENT MEMBERS ARE MAYOR SMITH, MARCUS RAN CHARLES COTTON. THE BENEFITS SUBCOMMITTEE REVIEWS SIGNIFICANT CHANGES TO EMPLOYEE BENEFIT. PERIODICALLY REVIEWS AND MAKES INPUT ON THE WELLNESS PROGRAM AND OTHER ADVICE AND DIRECTION TO ENSURE THE TOWN BENEFITS ARE COST EFFECTIVE. CURRENT MEMBERS ON THE BENEFITS COMMITTING OR JEFF HODGES AND YOU, BARTLEY AND CHARLES COTTON. THE COUNCIL BROADBAND COMMITTEE WAS ESTABLISHED FOR THE PURPOSE OF RESEARCHING INTERNET SERVICE OPTIONS WITHIN THE TOWN, AND THE COMMITTEE MEETS WITH SERVICE PROVIDERS AND OR EXTERNAL ORGANIZATIONS TO STUDY CURRENT SERVICE AND DEVELOPMENT. FRANCE A PLAN LISTEN, THE TOWN. CURRENT MEMBERS ARE CRAIG ANDREWS MIX MILLER AND MARCUS RAY. AND FINALLY THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT COMMITTEE WAS ESTABLISHED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING RESIDENTS AN OPPORTUNITY TO ENHANCE THE TOWN'S INTERACTION WITH THE PUBLIC. CURRENT MEMBERS ARE MARCUS RAY, PARTLY, AND JEFF HODGES THIS EVENING. I'D LIKE TO THE COUNCIL TO ASK THE COUNCIL TO CONSIDER AND DISCUSS ANY CHANGES YOU MIGHT LIKE TO MAKE.ON, THE COUNCIL SAID. AND SAY THAT I WOULD LIKE TO NOMINATE IN EVERY CASE WITH THESE COMMITTEES , UH, CHRIS KAHN IN THE PLACE OF MEG'S MILLER. THAT WOULD BE ON THE TECHNOLOGY AND BIRTH. IT ON THE BROADBAND COMMITTEE. IN THE PLACE OF MAYOR SMITH. I'D LIKE TO REPLACE HIM ON THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. AND THEN IF THE COUNCIL WOULD AGREE, I'D ASK YOU TO KEEP EVERYONE ELSE IN THEIR SAME POSITION. ALRIGHT SO MOTION NEEDED FOR THAT. THAT'S OKAY. CONSENSUS FROM COUNCIL. IT'S
[01:05:03]
VIBRANT. SO THANK YOU FOR AGREEING TO SERVE. EVERYONE SOUNDS GOOD. THANK YOU. RIGHT?[EXECUTIVE SESSION:]
UH, AT THIS TIME MORNING RECESSED INTO CLOSED SESSION TO COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 551.1 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODED AS AUTHORIZED THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS AT THANK YOU VERY MUCH.READ THE. EACH ONE. OKAY, ALRIGHT. THAT ITEM. SECTION 551 TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF SECTION 551072 TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER THE PURCHASE EXCHANGE LISA OR VALUE OF REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES AND ALL MATTERS, INCIDENT AND RELATED HERE, TOO. SECTION 551.74 HAD DISCUSS AND CONSIDER PERSONAL MATTERS. PERSONNEL MATTERS IN ALL MATTERS RELATED AND INCIDENT, TOO. SECTION 551071 TO CONSULT WITH THE TOWN ATTORNEY REGARDING LEGAL ISSUES TO RELATIVE PERMITTED USES CONDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND ZONING DISTRICTS AS REFERENCED IN THE TOWN ZONING ORDER. IN ALL MATTERS, INCIDENT AND RELATED THERE, TOO. SECTION 551.74 TO DELIBERATE THE APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR PRO TEM AND DEPUTY MAYOR PRO TEM SECTION FIVE BY 1074 TO DISCUSS APPOINTMENTS TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS. CORRECT CONSTRUCTION FOR THE APPEALS PARKS AND REC BOARD LIBRARY BOARD PROSPER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION TURNS ONE AND TURNS TO BOARD. ALRIGHT WE'LL RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION AT 9 45. SO. WE HAVE
[Reconvene in Regular Session and take any action necessary as a result of the Closed Session.]
SOME ACTION TO TAKE AS A RESULT OF THE CLOSED SESSION. YES, MAYOR, I'LL I'M GOING TO MAKE A MOTION TO, UM, APPROVED JEFF HODGES AS MAYOR PRO TEM AND CRAIG ANDREWS AS DEPUTY MAYOR FOR TIM. ONE SECOND OKAY, WE'VE GOT A MOTION A SECOND ALL IN FAVOR. HI MOTIONS UNANIMOUS. UM MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE TOMMY VAN WOLF APPOINTMENT TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. IN RACE MINTS APPOINTMENT TO THE TOURIST BOARD. ANY ANY. OH AND CHRISTIAN MEYER TO COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT.DO THOSE HAVE TO BE SEPARATE MOTIONS? TERROR CAN ALL BE IN ONE. AND EIGHTIES. YOU GOT DDC, NOT JUST THE THAT'S RIGHT. SORRY AND RAY SMITH TO E. D. C. ONE IN YES, OKAY. SO KRISTEN MEYER, SORRY FOR THE SAKE OF TAKING NOTES FROM MICHELLE KRISTEN MEYER FOR C E. C. TOMMY VAN WOLF FOR PNC RAY SMITH FOR TOURIST BOARDS ONE AND TWO AND ABC. THANK YOU. THAT'S THE MOTION.
CHARLES SECOND, ALL I'M SAYING HI MOTIONS UNANIMOUS. WE HAVE NO OTHER MOTIONS THAT NEED TO TAKE OR ANYTHING ELSE TAKE ACTION, SO I'LL MOVE ADJOURNMENT. UM, I THINK THANK
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.